A Tale of Two Geniuses

Via Eric Peters Autos

Elon Musk is hailed as a “genius” by some.

And he is – but not in the way they mean it.

Like Henry Ford, Musk took something he didn’t invent that was essentially a curiosity and recast it in a different way. The difference being that when Henry Ford simplified the car by standardizing parts and mass producing them on an assembly line – as opposed to hand-building them, one at a time, as had been prior practice – the result was a much less expensive and far more practical car that almost anyone could afford to buy.

Musk did the opposite.

The early electric cars were simpler as well as more practical than non-electric cars; this was a big part of their initial appeal, 100 years ago, when they were (briefly) competitive with early non-electric cars. You didn’t have to hand-crank the engine and risk breaking your wrist – because of course there was no engine. Instead, an electric motor connected to the drive wheels and an array of lead-acid batteries. The car turned off – and on – and off you went.

You didn’t go very far, of course – and you had to wait (as now) for the thing to recover its charge. As the non-electric car became less fussy – and especially once the electric starter motor  was invented and eliminated having to hand-crank the engine – it became the car of choice for most people because it made the most sense for most people. It cost less and went farther. It was not tethered to anything. It could be owned by a farmer whose house lacked electricity, for instance.

It gave its owner more freedom of movement – which is just the same as saying it gave him more freedom in that now he could afford to go wherever he liked whenever he wanted.

The electric car reverted to being what the non-electric car had been, at the beginning: A curiosity rather than a conveyance. It remained that for the next roughly 80 years because the electric cars that were made after Henry Ford made his Model T were fundamentally the same as all the electric cars that had been made before. Some of them even looked like modern takes on the Model T, in that they were very basic vehicles – a flimsy box on top of a chassis and the main amenity being an On-Off switch. Most lacked even the “luxury” of a heater (which in an electric car saps power from the batteries, further reducing the already limited range of the vehicle).

Forget AC and other powered options.

Why buy such a car when you could buy a non-electric car that not only came standard with a heater but much else besides – including the freedom that came with being able to drive it for hundreds of miles without having to stop, which made it easy to go wherever you wanted whenever you liked?

Musk’s “genius” was to recast the electric car as a high-performance, luxurious car – with all the amenities people expect in any car and the acceleration capability that very few non-electric cars could match. This made the electric car appealing – but not because it was affordable, practical or efficient. In fact, the recast electric car was the antitheses of all of those things. In order to be quick it needed a massive battery pack, which made it both extremely expensive and extremely heavy – which made it inefficient.

But it was attractive – in the same way a very attractive woman is to most men – including those who cannot afford her.

In the same way that cars hand-built on custom bodies prior to the Model T were also attractive – but only a few people could afford them.

What Musk did was to rebrand the electric car as something sexy and “new” – even though the electric car concept is older than any Model T.  But he made it seem new – and very sexy – by making it very quick and very sleek, with all the very latest in the way of gadgetry. All of which served to distract from its unaffordability,  impracticality and inefficiency.  

Musk grasped that people love to look at what they can’t afford and which makes little sense. A good example of this being the old TeeVee show, Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous. Also the general obsession with rich and (sometimes) attractive celebrities – few of which most of those gawking at and reading about will ever date.

But the problem remained. How to sell what most people couldn’t afford?

Enter Elon’s real genius.

Unlike Henry Ford, who appealed to the marketplace, Elon Musk appealed to the government. Not merely to subsidize what he was otherwise unable to sell but – far more fundamental – to promote the sell. That is wasn’t merely an indulgence to purchase (or subsidize) an electric car.

It was a kind of moral necessity.

In order to forestall what is now styled – oilily – “climate change.” Oilily because it is obviously all-encompassing and so cannot be “denied.” It gets warmer – then it gets colder. The “climate” has “changed.” Much harder to explain the con to the average scientifically illiterate and fear-addled peasant than the “global warming” which preceded “climate change.” If it didn’t get as “warm” as the computer modeled hysterics claimed it would, it was easy to “deny” what they claimed – by observing that it hadn’t.

But when every “change” is taken – is touted – as a pathological event?

Then you suddenly have a “market” for electric cars. A justification for the subsidies and the mandates. For the outlawing – via ever-stricter regulations – of the affordable, practical efficient alternatives to electric cars.

This is the nature of Elon’s “genius” – as contrasted with that of Henry Ford.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
clbrto
clbrto
March 23, 2022 4:54 pm

I have zero interest in an electric vehicle

but I sure do wish some enterprising genius would create a “modern day – model T”

cheap, no bells & whistles, able to fix at home

but that wouldn’t be allowed – the goal is to restrict/end car travel

Anonymous prime
Anonymous prime
  clbrto
March 23, 2022 5:00 pm

clbrto, you hit the nail on the head.

the goal is to restrict/end car travel

TPTB simply want more boot on everyone’s neck.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  clbrto
March 23, 2022 5:35 pm

Government regulations will not allow such a vehicle to be produced.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  TN Patriot
March 23, 2022 6:26 pm

And all of those “regulations ” were promoted by the auto makers to ensure that they would make even more money for items nobody actually wants.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  MrLiberty
March 23, 2022 7:24 pm

Only some of them were. The greenies had their own input, as did the saaaaftey folks.

VOWG
VOWG
  clbrto
March 24, 2022 6:51 am

Rebuild a 50’s era chevy or ford.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
March 23, 2022 4:56 pm

He did even better than that. He was part of the carbon credit con that forced ICE engine car makers to pay that clown billions to “offset” the horrible cars the public actually wanted and that likely are LESS environmentally destructive than Musk’s overpriced toys. Henry Ford was a great man. Elon is just a con man.

Colorado Artist
Colorado Artist
  MrLiberty
March 23, 2022 6:43 pm

He jacks with everything.
comment image

Steve
Steve
March 23, 2022 4:58 pm

The aim of EVs is not to replace the 1.5bn ICU cars on the planet, but to destroy mobility and freedom for the peasants. The people pushing EVs know that even if they overcome the technical difficulties of electric vehicles, there will never be enough electricity production to fuel the demand. They all want us stuck in our rabbit boxes, using smelly inefficient mass transit while they sashay around the world in their private jets and mega yachts.

Balbinus
Balbinus
  Steve
March 24, 2022 7:38 pm

That is the plan. We shall see how it works out.

Walt
Walt
March 23, 2022 5:28 pm

The only thing genius about Elon Musk is the man who was Tesla.
Musk is little more than a grifter.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Walt
March 23, 2022 5:42 pm

He is an actor, playing a role. Take a look at his background.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
March 23, 2022 5:35 pm

I have long said that Elon is the modern day P. T. Barnum.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  TN Patriot
March 23, 2022 6:27 pm

Barnum at least put on something entertaining.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  MrLiberty
March 23, 2022 7:25 pm

Elon is entertaining at times, but mostly just a carnival barker.

flash
flash
March 23, 2022 6:00 pm

Elon Musk is a corporate welfare whore and the face of build back better for the Deep State demons.

Discover Where Corporations are Getting Taxpayer Assistance Across the United States
https://www.goodjobsfirst.org/subsidy-tracker

Subsidy Tracker Parent Company Summary
Parent Company Name: Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX)

Subsidy Summary

TOTAL $5,630,574
Loan / Bailout Summary

TOTAL $106,055,302

Subsidy Tracker Parent Company Summary
Parent Company Name: Tesla Inc.

Subsidy Summary

TOTAL $2,506,116,253 110

Loan / Bailout Summary
TOTAL $466,500,000 2

Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies
05/29/2015

Tesla and SolarCity continue to report net losses after a decade in business, but the stocks of both companies have soared on their potential; Musk’s stake in the firms alone is worth about $10 billion. (SpaceX, a private company, does not publicly report financial performance.)

Musk and his companies’ investors enjoy most of the financial upside of the government support, while taxpayers shoulder the cost.

https://www.goodjobsfirst.org/news/elon-musks-growing-empire-fueled-49-billion-government-subsidies

starfcker
starfcker
  flash
March 23, 2022 8:48 pm

For crying out loud, Flash, that’s the best you got, 2015? A few things have happened since then with both Tesla and SpaceX. They continue to be The cutting edge of engineering to get things done and reducing the price constantly in the core businesses that they both perform. If nitwit Peters would just open his eyes, he could do some real journalism and tell us about NASA and General Motors. Both are reduced to hyper expensive collections of female and minority Engineers unable to cut it on the core competencies of the respective company’s supposed mission. Putting men and satellites into space in the case of NASA, and building cars that people want at General Motors. General Motors delivered 26 electric vehicles last quarter. Not a typo. 26. Both NASA and GM have pushed their timelines forward so that we can expect results from them in 2030. Both rely completely on federal money to survive. While they get nothing done. Peters, wake up. You’ve been wrong about this for a long, long time. You’re making a fool of yourself.

UTURNKING
UTURNKING
  starfcker
March 23, 2022 10:39 pm

You dumb f**k. Haven’t you figured out NASA is just a grift just like every thing else the small hats do.

Fedup
Fedup
March 23, 2022 6:06 pm

The Tesla cars weigh more than ICE cars and will go through tires faster.

jo
jo
March 23, 2022 6:29 pm

Musk’s real genius was in figuring out that human psychology needed, nay, craved a manner in which to differentiate themselves from the plebes, and what better way to do that than to distill Virtue Signaling into a highly marketable tool. He helped make the ICE machines appear oh so dirty and polluting, and correctly discerned that most people could not divine that “clean” power from the wall, via, say, coal/oil/gas, was any different from gasoline derived from oil.

B_MC
B_MC
March 23, 2022 6:51 pm

Musk is an amateur. Here are the pros….

And there’s this scam underlying, I think it is the defining scam of our time — where you have actually the three largest asset managers in this country, State Street, Vanguard and the king of them all BlackRock, who together manage today over $20 trillion…

You have a coordinated effort between the most powerful financial institutions and money managers to decide to lend or invest in certain projects but not others. In ways that are raising prices for consumer goods of Americans. That is not the free market in action. It’s even worse than a monopoly or an ideological cartel. They’re working hand in glove with the party in power to be able to do their bidding through the private sector. *1.

Wouldn’t the SEC have something to say about that? You bet….

The latest strike came Monday when the Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-1 to advance a proposed rule requiring public companies to disclose climate risks. The proposal, which was issued with only Democratic votes, is contrary to SEC history, securities law, and sound regulatory practice…

Mr. Gensler’s solution is to regulate private companies by the back door…

We’ll take up the rule’s financial benefits to the ESG (environmental, social and governance) crowd another day. The main intent of the rule is to make it easier for left-leaning asset managers like BlackRock, public pension funds and trial lawyers to bully companies. Public companies will be liable for climate disclosures the SEC deems inaccurate or incomplete. *2

*1.

Listen: Vivek Ramaswamy gives best explanation of ESG: ‘The defining scam of our time’ – ‘Agendas that would make the blood of those retirees boil if they knew’

*2. https://archive.ph/6s8zn

kfg
kfg
March 23, 2022 8:33 pm

Ford’s genius was designing, hand building and driving a car to a Land Speed Record. This helped make the reputation that allowed him to attract investors to start a production company – twice (He founded the Henry Ford Motor Company, which was renamed Cadillac when he left, before he founded the Ford Motor Company).

Musk’s genius was being a wealthy investor who bought into a car company others had designed, built and started, then slapping his personal brand all over it, edging out the original founders.

fujigm
fujigm
March 24, 2022 12:57 am

I hear the battery pack is some 2000 lbs.
Seems a simpler solution would be to ditch the battery pack, install a small diesel genset and tank, and have a diesel-electric.
Like a locomotive.
Electric power and torque on demand.
With a diesel sipper providing the power.
What am I missing?

kfg
kfg
  fujigm
March 24, 2022 7:43 am

“What am I missing?”

Nothing that Dr. Porsche missed when he designed such a car more than 120 years ago.
During Oil Crisis 1.0 I was a physics student with an interest in automotive engineering, and my first gig was to design an electric car (for a hippie startup that went bust before the prototype was finished).

The experience taught me the wisdom of Porsche’s idea and I have been telling people for decades that that’s the correct way to build a “hybrid.” Only now we have microprocessors to do it right with an independent motor for each wheel, eliminating the mechanical drive train and inherently providing AWD with independent torque control at each wheel and ABS regenerative braking.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
March 24, 2022 7:33 am

Elon is a genius in the same way that Charles Ponzi and Elizabeth Holmes are geniuses.

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka
March 24, 2022 8:05 am

Two genius thoughts:
Nikola Tesla was the real genius, and they stole his most original and world changing inventions after he died in that hotel.

I would consider Joel Salatin more of a genius than the persona of “Elon Musk”.