The Truth About How Governments Will Use Inflation To Redistribute Wealth

Via International Man

Inflation To Redistribute Wealth

Inflation is the single biggest threat to your financial well-being.

That’s not exactly a revelation for most people. However, propaganda muddles the issue, so there is a lot of confusion.

Though he was wrong on just about everything, John Maynard Keynes was on target when he said:

“Lenin was certainly right, there is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the basis of existing society than to debauch the currency. This process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

What is inflation? How is it measured? What is coming next, and what can the average person do about it?

I’ll break it all down and give clarity to these fundamental and crucial questions.

Inflation is one of the most misused words in the English language. The original and correct meaning of inflation is an increase in the money supply.

Over the years, the government and their court economists in academia and media have attempted to redefine inflation to mean an increase in prices.

Since its founding in 1828, Webster’s Dictionary had always defined inflation as an increase in the money supply. Then in 2003, it changed the definition to mean a rise in the general price level.

The difference might seem subtle, but it’s not. It’s a deliberate deception.

Redefining inflation confuses cause and effect, and that is exactly the point. Price increases do not cause inflation. Instead, an increase in the money supply—inflation—causes prices to increase.

Defining inflation as a rise in prices gives people the impression that inflation is a natural market phenomenon when it is not. It also conceals who is causing this unnatural occurrence to happen. The direct victims of this swindle are, therefore, confused about what is happening.

It would be like redefining robbery to mean “a mysterious property loss,” as if there was no robber.

The reality is that inflation is 100% a political phenomenon.

Neither the local grocery store, the pharmacy, the restaurant owner, nor foreign scapegoats are responsible for inflation. The government—with its monopoly control over the currency—is.

That’s why there’s never been a gold hyperinflation.

Governments inflate the currency to generate more money than they otherwise could through direct taxation and issuing debt. Inflation is an indirect, hidden, and insidious tax that the government takes from the populous without its consent.

Doug Casey puts it best: “If taxation is the expropriation of wealth by force, then inflation is its expropriation by fraud.”

Inflation is also nothing new. Even in ancient times, governments would resort to debasing their money by clipping their gold and silver coins to raise revenue surreptitiously. Modern central banks are performing the same scam but on a scale orders of magnitude larger.

Here’s the ugly truth. Central banks only exist to steal money from you through inflation and redirect it to the politically connected.

Money represents life. So they are, in fact stealing your life via the printing presses.

Any sober assessment of the situation reveals that it’s a swindle of historic proportions.

Measuring Inflation

There are two main ways to measure inflation:

  1. based on the government’s definition of inflation (increase in the general price level)
  2. based on the correct definition of inflation (increase in the money supply)

One is faulty, prone to political manipulation, consistently understates reality, and is meaningless. The other more or less gives an accurate picture.

When you hear about inflation in the mainstream media, academia, or from some government official, they are talking about the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or some variation of it.

The CPI measures changes in the price level of a weighted average basket of consumer goods and services.

There are several fatal flaws with the CPI.

First, it assumes the government’s definition of inflation can be distilled down to a single number.

But prices don’t rise in uniform. For example, the costs of big-ticket items—like medical care, college tuition, and housing—tend to increase much faster than other things, as shown in the chart below.

It should be clear from the chart above that price increases aren’t distributed equally and can’t be distilled into a single number. Instead, price increases are a vector distributed unequally. Scarce and desirable assets and services are more prone to increasing prices.

Further, every individual has their own preferences, which means nobody will have the same basket of goods and services they desire. Someone living in Miami will have a completely different basket than someone living in rural Minnesota.

That’s why trying to measure a general rise in prices as a single number for 334 million individuals across the whole country—as the CPI attempts to do—is an impossible task. It’s even more absurd than taking the national average weather temperature as some meaningful data point on what clothes you should wear for the day.

But it gets worse with the CPI’s other fatal flaw.

Who gets to decide what items are included in the CPI and their weightings in the index? The government, of course!

Is it any surprise that they cherry-pick the items and their weightings in the CPI to show there is little to no inflation? In effect, the government gets to measure its own inflation. It’s like letting students grade their own papers.

Are rising beef prices causing the CPI to rise too quickly? Well, we can substitute soy burgers—or some other cheap industrial sludge—for beef in the index.

Or we can increase the weighting of things like Netflix and cell phones, which are decreasing in price, and reduce the weight of housing, which is rising, to show a lower overall CPI number.

Are gas and energy prices going up to quickly? Simple. We’ll remove them from the index.

These are the shenanigans that go on as the government manipulates the data to get the outcome politicians want.

But why would the government want to understate inflation?

Because recognizing the actual effects of inflation would help limit how much wealth they can extract from the populace through modern coin clipping. That would force some difficult budget decisions that would be politically unpopular.

The CPI is an utterly worthless statistic. In actuality, it’s nothing more than dressed-up government propaganda to conceal the fact that they are stealing massive amounts of wealth from the populace without their consent through the hidden inflation tax.

Yet, most people incorrectly equate inflation to the CPI. It’s a trope that authority figures repeat regularly, and most people accept it as truth without a second thought.

The Honest Way To Measure Inflation

The real way to calculate inflation is intuitive and straightforward.

It doesn’t require you to understand convoluted math formulas and complicated theories—as the gatekeepers in academia, media, and government mislead many folks into believing.

Simply looking at the change in the money supply gives you a much more accurate measure than the CPI. It strips out a lot of the noise, political manipulation, and propaganda to provide a straightforward number to describe what is happening.

And when you look at the change in the US money supply, it’s no surprise that the government would rather have you look at the CPI. That’s because the amount of money printing and currency debasement they are engaging in is shocking.

From the start of the Covid hysteria in March 2020 until today, the Federal Reserve has printed more money than it has for the entire existence of the US. It’s the biggest monetary explosion that has ever occurred in the US.

During that period, the US money supply increased by a whopping 41%.

In other words, if your after-tax wealth did not grow more than the 41% hurdle rate since March 2020, then you are losing ground. You’re on the road to serfdom.

As bad as the situation with inflation is right now, it’s nothing compared to what is ahead of us.

The coming money printing could be unlike anything we’ve ever seen before.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Llpoh
Llpoh
July 12, 2022 7:01 pm

Rich folks hold hard assets. Relative prices of hard assets don’t change do to inflation. The value of cash changes. So assets don’t suffer due to inflation. Folks relying on cash – ie wages – get screwed by inflation. The rich, not so much.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
July 12, 2022 7:47 pm

Llpoh- I know quit a few extremely wealthy people who do not hold hard assets as most of their wealth in cash and the stock market. That is stupid on every level in times such as these. You don’t have to be rich in order to have the good sense to keep your wealth in hard assets. You just need to be smart.

WillyB
WillyB
  Llpoh
July 12, 2022 8:09 pm

Back in the 70’s most working people were less affected by inflation, because they got raises every year. People bought houses they couldn’t afford, because next year they’d get a raise and the payments would be affordable. I knew people who moved up in bigger houses about every three years. A lot of people did, until the music stopped around ’82 and people lost jobs and houses and thousands were suddenly upside down in their mortgages.

The people who were really hurt in the last inflationary time, as in this one, were retired people living on savings and investments. Dow dropped from 1000 to 577 from ’72 to ’74. Interest rates took off, so people holding bonds had low yielding “safe” investments that were worth less too. Same now. Our IRAs have dropped in value 20% since Dec 2021. We don’t need the money, but RMD (Required Minimum Distribution) is calculated based on last year end, so we lose double. We have to turn paper loss into a real one in order to meet the legal requirement to pay taxes, so we lost on investments, and what’s left is reduced thanks to inflation.

BTW one of the lines on the price chart is also influenced by government: phones. Anyone who has bought phones since 2001 knows they keep going up. However the AVERAGE price is down 40% thanks to the bill signed by “W” Bush to provide FREE cell phones to anyone on food stamps. Average what we pay with what 40 million others pay (-0-) and the average is a 40% drop. Lies, more lies.

BL
BL
  WillyB
July 12, 2022 8:26 pm

Willy- Why did you play the IRA game? Smart people paid off their houses and stayed put, those who traded houses and refied were suckers in a con. Retirement accounts are low fruit for the usual suspects.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  WillyB
July 13, 2022 6:20 pm

Does everyone believe that the price of a car remained the same for twenty years from 2000 to 2020? Anyone know what, for example, a new honda accord sold for in 2000 vs 2020?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
August 22, 2022 1:28 pm

Posted without analysis for correctness,

https://www.thepeoplehistory.com/70yearsofpricechange.html

Steve Z.
Steve Z.
July 12, 2022 8:23 pm

The money printing will increase and exponentially until the entire edifice collapses. That why we’ll have a never ending stream of crises until as Zappa said ” they pull back the curtain and see a brick wall”.
( I shortened the quote)

ursel doran
ursel doran
July 13, 2022 12:06 am

Hussman new market comment.
It really is different this time.
A bubble’s last words are “It always comes back”

Are We There Yet?

m
m
July 13, 2022 2:37 am

Whaddaya mean, “will”?

Real inflation (calculated along 1980s methods) has been
7% annually since 1971, then
9% since 2009, and now [first estimate] around
17% per year since 2020.

Compare that to your wage increases, and the interest on your savings.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  m
July 13, 2022 4:45 am

You are without doubt the stupidest person to post on this site. I ran those figures. If what you say is true, and it sure as hell isn’t, what used to cost a dollar would now cost $46 dollars. Here is what a few items cost in 1971:

– Gas $0.40 at 46 times = $18.40. Nope.
– Fresh eggs (1 dozen): $0.53 = $24.38. Nope.
– White bread (1 pound): $0.25 = $11.50. Nope.
– Sliced bacon (1 pound): $0.80 = $36.80. Nope.
– Round steak (1 pound): $1.36 = $62.56. Nope.
– Potatoes (10 pounds): $0.68 = $31.28. Nope.
– Fresh delivered milk (1/2 gallon): $0.66 = $30.36. Nope.
– house around $30 k = $1380k. Nope.

Seriously, how fucking stupid are you? Do you believe any pile of shit you are fed?

m
m
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 7:23 am

Hey buffoon,
how come you didn’t run the same with the official inflation numbers since 1971, for laughs and giggles?

Then for effect, add 1 oz. of Gold, health insurance for a family of 4, some standard medical procedure (e.g. an unproblematic childbirth in a hospital), as well as a college education to your list.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  m
July 13, 2022 7:32 am

I am not the one posting those fucking fake ass numbers, you are. You are a total dimwit. You claim that items costing $1 dollar in 1971 are now costing $46. That is what YOU posted. Not me. Can you post a basket of every day good that have gone up 46 times since 1971? Can you, punk? Go ahead, make my day.

Nope, when I kick you in the nuts, you come back with nothing whatsoever. You claim that things have gone up by 46 times, but cannot substantiate not a single tucking thing.

You see, unlike you, I am not a math ignoramus. I actually know how compounding works. I know how to compound at 7 percent, etc, for the years between 1971 and today. I smell bullshit a mile away, and I do not post fake numbers, then quickly try to switch the subject, as you do.

You are full of shit. As I said, you are the biggest imbecile on the site. Why don’t you actually think before you post? Why don’t you try to see if such inflation figures make any sense whatsoever before you spit them out as fact?

Sick and tired of morons posting shit I am.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  m
July 13, 2022 8:05 am

Ok, shit dick. State colleges cost around 400 a year in 1971. Today that is around 11,000. What is 400 times 46? Hint: a lot fucking more than 11,000. I win again.

A baby delivery was around 300. Today it is around 7500. Guess what, I win again (300 times 46 > 7500).

Health care costs were about $350 a person in 1970, and around $14,000 a person today.
Guess what, I win fucking again, as 350*46 > 14,000. And when you factor in the way the population has aged, I win again by miles. Because, you know, I actually can calculate and look numbers up. In 1970, 10% of the population was over 65, and today it is around 17%. That has had a massive – massive – impact on insurance costs and the cost of healthcare. Healthcare costs are out of control, but inflation is only one part of that story. But still it has not gone up 46 times since 1971. That is just stupid.

Unsurprisingly, the moron m cannot show a single item that has gone up by 46 times, try as he might.

m
m
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 10:29 am

You are really a complete dumbshit.
1. Yeah, let’s look only at in-state college tuition – and fer sure ignore that room and board went up way more.
2. I’d put a delivery more at $10,000 nowadays.
But even taking your $7500, that would still be a factor of 25 price increase since 1971. As you pretend to understand math, then you’d also get that you don’t compare 25 with 46, but as we are talking about factors, you compare 25 with 46/25=1.84 [=factor you believe I’m off] –
and 1.84 compared to 25 ain’t so bad.
3. Inflation a/k/a price increases doesn’t fucking care what it’s caused by, the consumer still has to pay it. So to downplay $14000/$350=40-fold increase by pulling something out of your ass is unadulterated bullshittery by you.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  m
July 13, 2022 10:50 am

You haven’t been right on a single point. You haven’t pointed to a single thing that went up 46 times. Re insurance, the biggest factor is the fact that the aged have gone from 10% of the population to 18%. If you are too dense to understand that that has increased costs, then you are an even bigger moron than it generally appears, and that is a damn high bar to leap. Almost all of a persons lifetime medical expenses happen in the last few months of life, and we have almost twice the percentage of those than were in 1970. And that extra medical burden flows into insurance costs.

And re the state vs private bullshit, I notice you didn’t post a damn thing. As you are incapable of any real thought or research. Every single thing you have posted has been wrong. Every single thing. No exceptions. You still haven’t come up with any – not one thing – that matches your original claim. Not a single damn item. Amazing isn’t it.

Why don’t you just own it and say you fucked the goat. Because I am handing you your ass every time.

What a fucktard. What say you come up with ONE item that went up 46 times it’s 1971 price. Just one. Just to see if you can do it. That was some world class stupid you posted. Someone plated up a pound of dog shit, and you dove right in with your spoon, never bothering to even have a sniff.

Sound of crickets will ensue.

m
m
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 12:26 pm

Crickets?
You mean like your “answer” on what the official inflation (CPI) has been since 1971? And how that factor relates to your glorious examples?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Llpoh
August 22, 2022 1:25 pm

I can only think of one thing that has gone up more than 50x, the parents house in Victoria. 1968 they bought it for $7000. It sold in 2018 for $1.2million. (plenty of maintenance and upgrade costs over 50 years)

But that is in Victoria BC. Home prices are insane in BC but even more so in Van/Vic.

But everything else I can think of is still well under ~50x in ~50 years.

Stucky
Stucky
  m
July 13, 2022 10:51 am

Funky maff!

I have just one serious question for you. Not that you care, but your answer will determine whether or not I ever read your posts again.

Is the following true, or false?

comment image

Llpoh
Llpoh
  m
July 13, 2022 10:56 am

Oh, so your answers are 1) room and board went up more. Really. What were the figures? No figures, right.

2) you would put a delivery at $10,000. No one gives a warm shit what YOU would put it at. What it is is $7500.

3) inflation does care what it is caused by if it is fact an apportionment of additional expenditure. If you use twice as much as something, the cost of said something doesn’t fucking double, you simply use twice as much of it. And we are using twice as much healthcare, you fuckwit. Insurance is the apportionment of that total bill. That reality has to be allowed for. We are paying for twice as many elderly as we were.

How on earth are you so stupid?

Stucky
Stucky
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 11:28 am

“How on earth are you so stupid?”

Practice. Lots of practice.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Stucky
August 22, 2022 1:25 pm

LOL.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 7:38 am

So, there are more morons than the retarded m around, who also cannot do a simple compounding exercise. These cretins must use spoons to feed themselves as they would be blind by now if they tried to use forks.

M, Einstein that he is, says prices on average for a $1 item in 1971 would be $46 today. That is insane, it is a damn lie, and anyone with an IQ stretching into double digits could figure it out for themselves. What the fuck is wrong with you idiots? Facts are fucking facts. They are not opinions. Downvoting a fucking fact is retarded. Bury your head in shit and hope for the best must be your way of navigating the world.

Stucky
Stucky
  Llpoh
July 13, 2022 8:13 am

“Downvoting a fucking fact is retarded.”

Yes, it is.

As such, I clicked on this thread specifically to upvote all your posts, and downvote those of your fuktard.

YW

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Stucky
July 13, 2022 8:21 am

Stuck, you are the constant spoon that stirs TBP drink. Thanks for all you have done for this place.

I just cannot understand how some of these people are so entrenched that they object to easily verifiable facts that contradict whatever narrative they want to push. It really is …. retarded.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 13, 2022 6:48 am

Populace is a noun.
Populous is an adjective.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Anonymous
July 13, 2022 7:20 am

Blow me is a verb and a noun.