Arctic Summer Sea Ice Stopped Declining a Decade Ago – But Scientists Have Hidden It

Via The Daily Sceptic

Arctic summer sea ice stopped declining a decade ago, but green activists have spared no effort to continue promoting the poster scare that humans will cause it all to disappear within a few years. In his recent BBC Frozen Planet II agitprop, Sir David Attenborough claimed it might all be gone by 2035. In an excellent piece of investigative reporting titled Lies, Damned Lies and Arctic Graphs, the climate writer Tony Heller recently lifted the lid on many of the tactics used to keep the scare in the headlines. “They bury all the older data and pretend they don’t notice sea ice is increasing again. What they are doing is not science but propaganda,” he charges.

The Daily Sceptic has written a number of articles of late noting that summer sea ice extent in the Arctic is recovering. In Greenland, I recently reported, the ice sheet may have increased in the year to August 2022. Invariably, social media commentators reply by publishing the sea ice graph below, compiled by the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).

This is reproduced from Heller’s YouTube work and shows a linear decrease in September (the lowest point of annual sea ice) from 1979. There is something wrong with this graph, notes Heller, since the minimum is actually higher now than 10 and 15 years ago, but the crude straight black ‘trend’ line tricks the eye into missing this. He plots the data as a moving average to show the real trend more clearly.

We see here the end of the decline in summer sea ice started a decade ago. The low point on which most fanciful forecasts of a North Pole passage are based is 2012. Heller notes that sea ice changes are cyclical, not linear. And he is right. Drawing a straight line down from a 1979 high point to a lower point tells us nothing about current trends.

Heller then goes on to ask why the graphs start at 1979. The NSIDC and NASA say it is because satellite  records started in 1979.Heller says this is a good story “except for the fact that it isn’t true”. He goes on to quote the first UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report in 1990 that stated: “Satellite observations have been used to map sea ice extent routinely since the early 1970s. The American Navy Joint Ice Center has produced weekly charts which have been digitised by NOAA [the U.S. weather service]”.

It might not be a surprise to learn that sea ice extent was lower in the 1970s and it peaked in 1979. By starting the graph in 1979 a ‘fake’ linear downward trend is produced. What they are doing, is hiding crucial data, Heller says.

This ‘hidden’ data is clearly shown above in a graph from the first IPCC report in 1990. The lower levels of ice in the 1970s are plotted and the peak is 1979. But by 2001, the IPCC had removed much of the increase of that decade, and now the chart shows the ice actually starting to fall from 1975. Heller also provides evidence that the 1950s, which are not shown on these charts, had lower sea ice than the 1970s, meaning the 1970s were a recent peak. He goes on to note that the 2001 IPCC report also saw the publication of the ‘hockey stick’ temperature graph that became notorious for removing the medieval warm period.

Sea ice in the Arctic, like most if not all climate trends, is cyclical not linear. Heller notes the influence of the Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation, a cyclical ocean current whose warming and cooling seems to be influential in controlling Arctic temperatures. Records and observations going back to the early 1800s show considerable variations of the ice extent. Attenborough is not alone in forecasting boating at the North Pole. It’s been a cut-and-paste scare story for decades. Heller notes a comment in the New York Times from 1958 that read: “Some scientists estimate that the polar ice pack is 40% thinner and 12% less in area than it was a half century ago, and that even within the lifetime of our children, the Arctic ocean may open, enabling ships to sail over the North Pole.”

Meanwhile the latest updates on the Arctic sea ice and the Greenland ice sheet show a continuing improving trend towards higher extents. Since these improvements do not generally figure in the mainstream headlines, the Daily Sceptic can report that November sea ice was 1.05 million square kilometres greater than a record low in 2016 of 8.66m sq kms.

The surface mass of the Greenland ice sheet (above), measured by the Danish Meteorological Institute, has shown some stonking improvements over the last two months, with the 2022-23 blue line ahead of all the previous marks shown.

Tony Heller’s investigative work is important in calling out the ‘settled’ climate science cartel that runs a postmodern, pseudoscience campaign designed to implement a politically-contrived Net Zero agenda. Perhaps the fact checkers of mainstream media might like to start acting less like political poodles, and start investigating some of the biased data that bombards the carefully-curated public discourse – starting with climate model forecasts that are never correct, attribution studies that invent stories about humans causing bad weather, and corrupted surface temperature databases that continually adjust their ‘record’ figures higher.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Boogie
Boogie
December 16, 2022 7:31 am

Their not Scientists, their appointed experts. Big difference

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Boogie
December 16, 2022 7:51 am

Trust the bought and paid for court science whores:

THE FAUX FAITH OF MODERN SCIENCE

The Faux Faith of Modern Science

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines,” stated Dr. Marcia Angell, the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. “I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor,” she wrote in a 2009 piece titled “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption.”

Years later, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet echoed this sentiment: “… Something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations … The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Anonymous
December 16, 2022 9:52 am

They tell us to follow the science, while the “cientists” are following the money.

mark
mark
  TN Patriot
December 16, 2022 11:16 am

TN, Brian,

We are surround in every aspects of our lives by SCIENTISM:

rhs jr
rhs jr
  TN Patriot
December 17, 2022 10:29 pm

FAMU gets a lot more money than real colleges because this leftist government earmarks a lot of money for minority college research. I was good friends with one of their Doctors (name withheld in courtesy) in charge of research to maximize fish pond production. The USDA Black Farmer’s program gave him a Grant of about $10,000 to upgrade his own goat farm. The County Farm Tour organization removed his farm from their list because it was so unsanitary, and he later died of a wasting disease he claimed was a “metabolism disorder”.

brian
brian
  Anonymous
December 16, 2022 10:06 am

The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.

Multiple studies have shown that more than 2/3’s of papers submitted have outright fraud, gross miscalculations, under sampling or just plain poor lab practises. The peer review process is broken as well. Papers that failed were often resubmitted under another name and passed. Theres a hierarchy and a narrative control in the religion of science as there is in any other organization.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  Boogie
December 16, 2022 12:25 pm

Not just ‘appointed’ experts — but ‘self-anointed’ experts … those are the best kind …

CCRider
CCRider
December 16, 2022 9:01 am

Sir David Attenborough???

Anyone with a “Sir” in front of their name is a sellout.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
  CCRider
December 16, 2022 9:04 am

Hmmm…good call. Damn.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Abigail Adams
December 17, 2022 10:31 pm

Lord…

C.A.L.
C.A.L.
  CCRider
December 16, 2022 11:53 am

I just watched the Frozen Planet over the couple of days. David Attenborough’s series were a favourite of mine way back when. I still have the Life in Earth books.
I have been a fan of his series. They are visually stunning and the footage is hard won. They must have massive budgets to produce these episodes.
And then, my hero starts burping out the same old tired bullshit about starving polar bears and Siberian tigers and stat lies.
I still enjoyed the series but winced everytime he read his climate change script. It still looked incredible but it is just feeding the lie.
The series cost a fortune and he’s not going to give up his share.
Who do you think puts up the money?
Another hero stripped to reveal their scrawny truth.
Peace

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  CCRider
December 16, 2022 12:28 pm

Beg to argue a bit on that … Sir Paul McCartney, Sir Sean Connery, Sir Thomas Beecham, Sir Adrian Boult … all knighted for their contributions to the Realm …

Billy
Billy
  CCRider
December 16, 2022 1:33 pm

Sir? Like in biological male? (gasp)

Yahsure
Yahsure
December 16, 2022 9:07 am

The whole global warming thing is a scam. It’s 9 degrees outside right now where I live. GW is the least of my worries.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Yahsure
December 16, 2022 11:38 am

The Dimming, Full Length Climate Engineering Documentary

From

Geoengineering Affects You, Your Environment, and Your Loved Ones

C.A.L.
C.A.L.
  Yahsure
December 16, 2022 11:59 am

You didn’t get the memo?
Global Warming didn’t pan out.
It’s called Climate Change now.
Weird, eh?
I have always expected change in the weather and continue to do so.
What hasn’t changed are the endless streams of lies, lies, and more lies about it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  C.A.L.
December 16, 2022 12:19 pm

Anthropogenic Global Narrative Change

(Or AGNEC, for ease of soundbite)

No, no, wait: Anthropogenic Global Narrative Switcheroo – AGNES for short. Now Greta will have an equally, apoplectically aggrieved bestie to trade righteous witch-burning scowls with. Yipe.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  C.A.L.
December 16, 2022 4:00 pm

Another thing that has not changed is the endless streams of currency flowing to those who bow at the altar of Globull Warming.

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 16, 2022 9:11 am

As Admin wisely stated in the post about jobs numbers:

Do not trust any statistic produced by your government or touted in the MSM. It’s all lies

Anonymous
Anonymous
December 16, 2022 9:28 am

“Their not Scientists, their appointed experts. Big difference”

Well. At least some of the appointed experts ONLY steal luggage.

The first Climate Scientists? Stole ALL the penguins from the North Pole.

Jdog
Jdog
December 16, 2022 10:17 am

If it is government, or anything associated with government it is lying to you. If you have not figured that out on your own, your odds of survival going forward are greatly diminished.

B_MC
B_MC
December 16, 2022 10:55 am

comment image

mark
mark
  B_MC
December 16, 2022 11:19 am

and there is SCIENTISM!

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
December 16, 2022 12:29 pm

Here … ‘Documenting Earth Changes During The Next Grand Solar Minimum’ … debunks the whole kit and caboodle of BS …

https://electroverse.co

i forget
i forget
December 16, 2022 3:56 pm

Brochure bait swallowed. Thru the literacy slot. Or the oral tradition slot.

Then the switch. And the ensuing contortions that “digest” all the fraud.

“I ain’t full o’ shit. I am a fully incorporated night soil manufacturer. I am a pillar of my community. Feed your head, the dormouse said, with the mushroom clouds that sprout in my medium.”

“The science” … “civics” … central bank mediated “free market capitalism” … “paid off the mortgage & now I own it free & clear” … the list is long.

Deference to “experts” or whatever name authority takes is perennial.

Deference erases personal responsibility. It’s “free” incorporation” to anyone who wants it. Damn near everyone wants it. Which is why it’s the un-killable projectile-invasive weed.