Guest Post by Alex Berenson
More on the genius of Judge Terry Doughty’s decision yesterday in the Missouri v Biden social media censorship case
Imagine if we learned Biden Administration officials had secretly jawboned the New York Times on trans issues. Or told baseball teams they should fly pride flags – or face antitrust hearings. Or complained to the History Channel over a documentary depicting the discovery of crude oil positively.
The First Amendment concerns would be obvious. We’d all wonder why government officials thought they could tell private companies what opinions and news to carry.
The American government is hugely powerful. Not even the biggest company can ignore a call from the White House. If the executive branch has something to say, it should do so with press conferences and open advertising – not secretly threaten the media to carry its water.
Yet when it comes to social media companies, the left has forgotten this simple fact. Instead it claims a new age of information warfare demands that the Constitution be set aside – as if propaganda campaigns haven’t always been a feature of mass media. It has forgotten the importance of an open marketplace for ideas and debate.
Now, in a lawsuit brought by two states against the federal government over social media censorship, a judge has reminded the left – and all of us – of what the First Amendment means and why it matters.
And he’s done so in the simplest, most profound possible way.
Yesterday, Judge Terry Doughty of the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction that – in essence – tells the White House and much of the executive branch to stop bothering social media companies over opinions and reporting and other content they carry.
Judge Doughty’s ruling doesn’t violate the federal government’s own First Amendemnt rights to speak.
It doesn’t say the White House can’t use Facebook or Twitter. it doesn’t say the White House can’t express its own views on vaccines or Russia or other issues as forcefully as it likes. It doesn’t say that law enforcement agencies can’t go after child pornography or terrorist threats on social media.
What it says is government must end its aggressive and growing censorship and quasi-censorship complex – and whose reach and power Judge Doughty details in the 155-page memorandum supporting the injunction.
What is says is that if speech is legal and protected by the First Amendment, social media platforms have the right to carry it, and the federal government must stop telling them not to do so. (Whether social media platforms – especially the biggest ones – must carry that speech is a separate and much more complicated question, but that is NOT the issue here.)
—
(Hey, all you government officials telling us what we can and can’t think, stop, okay? Just stop.)
—
Doesn’t matter if the speech is true or half-true or false. Doesn’t matter if it’s anti-mRNA or pro, anti-lockdown or pro-, anti-Russia or anti-Ukraine, pro-Israel or pro-Palestine. Doesn’t matter if it says that Hunter Biden is the world’s worst crackhead or only in the top three, doesn’t matter if it says Uncle Joe pooped himself when he met the Pope (yes, this rumor was around for a while).
If an American says it on a social media site, and it’s legal, IT IS NOT THE BUSINESS OF THE WHITE HOUSE OR FBI OR ANYONE ELSE IN THE GOVERNMENT TO TRY TO SUPPRESS IT.
The government should stay away from telling media outlets what they can and cannot run – whether those media outlets are newspapers, cable companies, or anything else, including social media sites.
The end.
—
This genius of this vision it that is simple, clear, easy to understand, and obviously should apply equally whether Democrats or Republicans are in power.
Maybe I’m too hopeful, but I think that within a few months public opinion even on the left will have shifted hard against these unconstitutional efforts. I’m hopeful we will shake our heads over the fact that senior federal and law enforcement officials ever thought they could tell social media companies what opinions to carry.
I’m hopeful we will look at this censorship episode like World War 2 interment camps for Japanese-Americans – as a terrible, unconstitutional, never-to-be-repeated mistake.
And if we do, the power and clarity of Judge Doughty’s opinion will deserve a lot of the credit.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Now , reinstate the Smith-Mundt act. Propaganda by GOV. was made legal when that was reversed.
Hope in one hand and shit in the other and tell me which one fills up first.
Soon it will sink in that we are not going back. Soon we will see the once liberty is lost it does not come back without revolution.
Welp one recent time in history. I thought it might work. South Africa almost pulled it off but it turned out the violence started after the revolution. Hate to be a white farmer…..
This decision strikes me much like the affirmative action decision. Explicit anti-white discrimination was not just acceptable, but necessary to preserve the actual first amendment, which is the pursuit of Our Greatest Strength.
The decades of “unconstitutional” racial discrimination and the State forcing private industry to rectify imagined injustices of nature, that same nature to which constitutionalists nod toward when those rights’ origins come into question, were perfectly fine. It wasn’t until one of the rising powers of a darker-than-white faction became de facto white by nature of their groups’ relative out-performance that the discrimination became a constitutional matter once again.
Similarly, we have “free speech” First Amendment head fakes to protect evilcorp media from State interference in the alt-reality of social media. Which also happen to be presently flaunting their artificial status as both persons and corporations, platforms and editorial “free press”, to control, limit, shape, and propagate “content” as they see fit, all while profiting from the personal information scraped from the sheeple.
Free speech is not being protected. Content on social media corporate property is being protected.
Meanwhile in the real world, the First Amendment remains an empty suit in which the most basic of individual rights are subjugated toward that Greatest Strength and the multitude of its intrinsic failures are visited upon White Americans as debts in perpetuity to be exacted across every institution, public or private, up to and including the physical act of free association.
But I reckon if I made my living on a social media “platform” I’d be more optimistic.
No it has not forgotten. We are living in a soft tyranny that is fast becoming a hard tyranny. It knows that open debate and a tyranny do not go together. The big social media platform owners are all for hard tyranny as long as they benefit.
Twitter is getting worse and worse. Musk was a Trojan Horse, just like Trump. Twitter will soon go down in flames and deservedly so. People should abandon Fakebook but many people use it to do business and sell stuff on marketplace. Even so, it’s stock is plunging because the “metaverse” is worthless and no one is interested in it including GenZ
I predict AI will also go the way of the Dodo Bird. It will not be all it’s hyped up to be.
AI = cats paw ?
Bastards may blame AI for ________ fill in the blank ?
Censorship and the Fourth Turning:
.
Take a good look at France, and see a preview of what will soon be happening here. The plan is all playing out.