Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
I was right. The COVID vaccines have killed massive numbers of people and the government covered it up. The paper, published as a pre-print, shows 74% of deaths post-vax due to the vax.
Head on over to Peter McCullough’s Substack for the details and please consider subscribing to his Substack. He’s terrific, a great friend, a great scientist, and a man of great courage.
This is a pre-print so not yet peer-reviewed.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137
I’m sure they will try to get this paper killed. It is amazing that The Lancet is a teller of truth in this case.
The paper shows 74% of deaths post-vax could be attributed to the vaccine being a cause of death.
The results are strongly consistent with the Schwab paper where 71% of the deaths appeared to be consistent with a vaccine death:
They basically were looking for the “cleanest” proof of death, but it’s likely that all 71% of the cases (25 out of 35) died from the vaccine, it’s just harder to “prove” that.
The question we all should be asking is why are we first hearing about this now? How could all of the CDC’s analyses show no relation to the vaccine? And why aren’t we allowed to see them?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
So-ooo, when do the indictments come down for murder & the trials begin? If none of that happens then this is all lip service. The people affected by this mass genocide will have died for nothing! Where are the attorneys, judges & Law enforcement on this issue?
Waiting on lawyers or cops to do the right thing at the risk of salary, pension, or career?
You’ll be waiting awhile.
Class actions never pay the victims much for ex: the breast implant suit payed $8. 00 per claim, Equifax hacking paid $7.00 per victim. Lawyers paid millions. Best they shut down these drug companies and arrest exec’s for murder.
I was persuaded to join a class action lawsuit and only got $00.75, that’s seventy-five cents on a check. However, I think the attorneys made a pile of money.
Crank it up.
It’s going to take a more virulent variant hitting the jabbed. (According to the rintrah blogger, covid is mutating to become more virulent as we speak.) Or a black swan event to get people to rise up.
RFK is opening eyes, but he is on the outside looking in. Biden will never be honest, nor will Trump.
Exactly. Any government that lies to the people by covering up and lying about the truth , is not a trustworthy government fit to rule. Trump could have been the one, but he chose the lie over the truth, too. It’s all warp speed downhill from here on out, bruh,
Lies on top of lies, backed up by more lies. This is the Federal government in a nutshell.
“Roger Stone was on Jack Posobiec’s show with stories about the JFK assassination. He discussed his theory that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot Kennedy and that the Mafia was involved. One thing that did strike a chord is when he said that then-President Trump saw the classified files and told him, “I can’t tell you. It’s so horrible. You wouldn’t believe it.”
Why doesn’t Mr. America, Donald Trump, tell us what was in them, then? After all, in his initial campaign, he accused Ted Cruz’s dad of being involved in JFK’s murder.
Fuck off, Trump.
Trump was still pushing these shots at his MAGA rallys after he was out of office. RFK and DeSantis are only ones levelheaded.
Where are the attorneys, judges & Law enforcement on this issue?
They all swear loyalty to the court system or the BAR or something unconstitutional.
I heard.
Sadly from what I can make out from the limited information provided, the paper just shows that three quarters of deaths days or weeks after vaccination were caused by the vaccine, based on three hundred and twenty five autopsies. It’s not that surprising a finding, and proves nothing with regard to the death rate or number deaths caused by the vaccines. It attributes a total of two hundred and forty deaths to the vaccine out of more than twelve billion doses. Sorry but that’s just how the covidians will deflect this finding. What’s missing is how many deaths after vaccination in total occurred for all doses administered, over a large sample group. It does however put down any claims that most VEARs reported deaths were just coincidental.
The fact that Steve Kirsch and Dr McCullough promote this as smoking gun evidence suggests they are not reliable sources of information.
People foolishly took the shots, lined up like livestock at clinics, taking similar risk as someone drunk, driving during rush hour or on the autovon at high speeds. People do stupid things and they pay the price. Kids an exception because parents had kids vaccinated. If people had critical thinking skills, common sense would tell them to avoid these experimental sshots that change a person’s DNA, this is not rocket science. I have since cut ties w/ former friends (and now home church) because of these dimwits kissing up to Fauci, Trump and Biden. My tiny circle must be likeminded. Warning: flu shots and RSV shots are laced w/ mRNA and who knows what else is.
Only bad news follows in the wake of the covid jabs.
My father in law told me the other day that his brother, a retired doctor, now has heart damage post-vax. He is only telling people about it now, 2 years after the fact. Imagine how many others are injured and keeping it to themselves?
MD’s are mostly money maddened, pension whoring vermin. Never trust one with your life.
A percentage of people got placebos otherwise it would look suspicious everyone having symptoms or died.
My sister’s best friend was healthy as a horse … then, after 2 jabs and one booster, she’s got Stage 4 cancer …
My brother’s wife was in remission for 5+ years … took the jabs plus 2 boosters … BINGO — cancer roared back and she lasted less than 3 months …
Sure … anecdotal evidence is meaningless … but pile together hundreds of thousands — maybe millions — of anecdotes saying the same thing and you’ve got an interesting cohencidence …
Sorry Steve, you’re going to have to provide better proof than some out-there Lancet study . GNL still does not know anybody who died from the genocide jab , and he knows hundred of people. Empirical evidence is real , just not for m.
I don’t know anyone at the Lancet so…
Btw, how come the Lancet isn’t putting a number out there? You know, the number of people they can PROVE that died of the pop-n-drop.
Glock- As long as you don’t know a single person that has died, I will continue to believe all is well. BTW, spoke to a client yesterday that lost both of his parents last year after the vaxx.(true) Couldn’t have been the shit shots, right Glock?
I don’t know anyone who’s had both parents die after the jab so…
One of my sheepshead buddies died from the jab, so there is that.
They wanted to keep test data secret for 75 years. NOW YOU KNOW WHY.
Fear of retribution.
From whom?
This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Further information is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq
Aaaaand it’s gone.
You didn’t really think they would allow this to remain online for the world to see, did you?
The most damaging paper got retracted?
OH MY!!
1) the headline is false. The article in question has not been published by the Lancet.
2) the preprint has been withdrawn from preprints because “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” In other words, it is a bunch of hooey.
3) the lead author has exactly (1) scholarly article published, including this one that has been pulled by the preprints.
It would be great if this stuff were vetted before being posted.
When you click the link to the pre-print, this is the first text you read:
Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed.
And it was pulled even from that forum because its conclusions are not supported. Aaaaand, it’s gone. I would guess Kirsch knew that before he even wrote this, hence him saying they would pull it – he likely knew it had already been skewered. It took all of a microsecond for peers to tear it to shreds.
And yet the headline says it has been published by The Lancet. Talk about misleading.
Even though I am an anti-jabber and the content agrees with my conclusions, I didn’t read the article because I knew it was fake news. I read dozens of articles before dropping by here and none of the sites I visited had anything about this. If it were true, I would have seen it already before coming here.
Hooey, huh? I should forget about my 54 year old friend who died suddenly last year?
Why would you want to still give the experts and the medical establishment the benefit of the doubt?
Kirsch is quoting a source you are discrediting. Make up your mind. And the source is gone, baby, gone, because you know, hooey.
I only trust The Lancet when they’re covering up Big Pharma crimes .The truth ain’t in ’em.
“Revered scientific journal The Lancet has created a ‘task force’ to investigate the origins of the coronavirus that caused a global pandemic, yet it has decided to employ as its leader the very guy who funded the dangerous gain of function research at the Wuhan lab and subsequently allegedly ‘bullied’ other scientists into avoiding looking into the lab as a potential source of the outbreak.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-04-lab-leak-scientist-in-charge-lancet-task-force.html
The + Lancet + lies https://yandex.com/ it , bruh. i.e they make shit up and provide cover for Deep Shekel ops.
Kirsch is quoting a source you say can’t be trusted. Make up your mind.
I don’t know Ketch from Lancet. As far as I know , they both work for Deep Shekels sowing chaos. Prove me wrong.
Far as I know, Ketch , by deliberately allowing his claims to be so easily discredited , is actually providing credence to a despicably corrupt organization. Can you see it, yet?
We must trust the scientism, bruh .
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. —Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet
lt is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. —Dr. Marcia Angell, physician and editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine
The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful. —Arnold Seymour Reiman (died 2014), Professor of Medicine at Harvard University and former editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine
Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud, and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them. —Dr. Linus Pauling, (died 1994), two-time Nobel Prize winner in chemistry
We should also consider how our own minds are corrupted with bogus science as well. How much of what we accept as fact is in reality, only theory? Such as Einstein’s General Relativity, Newtons Gravity and Stephen Hawking’s Black Holes. I would add that no case of evolution has been observed in the 160 years since Charles Darwin postulated his theory of natural selection. Why is it that unproven theories of such age are still in use? How much time has to elapse before they are discredited? Why do schools and universities teach this bunk as if it were fact?
The ” consensus ” said the Vaxx was safe too.
I know 5 people who have been severely injured from the clot shot. One died recently from cancer, one is receiving cancer treatment and is taking medication for blood clots, and the other three have all had strokes.
I did my best to warn them to not get those shots, but they wouldn’t listen. Only now do some of them realize what a bad decision they made.
More empirical evidence anons and m cannot accept. Show us da’ data’ from da ‘official organs of scientism…….reeeeeeee
Maybe Anthony Smith could visit with Dr Falsi and discuss his mom’s death with him.
Because no one would have got the vaxxes if they knew the truth.
To you point, Eud:
Paper didn’t get us into this, paper will not get us out.
The covidians don’t want the truth, they want to be validated. They never wanted the truth. Which is how they became covidians. The rest of the go-alongs and sheeples…
The “covid” is like climate change and diversity now. Anything that is allowed to emerge in public view serves not to deconstruct the flawed premise, the moral imperative of the “right side of history”, but rather to channel resources into the next phase.
Appealing to the Science, to rectify itself is like voting harder to put better black women in charge of the Republican Party such that we might finally wrestle the reigns of Progress out of the hands of the Democrats. The conservative case for…
The other aspect of all this that is that the population is incredibly unhealthy in general, and the healthcare system has long been a functionary of the pharma-insurance complex. There are no institutional venues to cultivate the truth, opposition to the Narrative.
And most people are technically sick regardless of their vexx status. Two of my family who got the vexx are obese and diabetic, sedentary and feed on goyslop. Should the dark tower release some “facts” about the vexx side-effects, they will most certainly be wrapped in bacon, which will assure these people that they did the right thing and its too bad they have some constellation of conditions that happen to mirror the myriad “lifestyle diseases” and here is your $600 from the fed and some “free” pills for those clots.
Oh, but yeah some lawyers will get paid. Its still America.
and the politicians and media will also get paid.
Yep. Like death and taxes. The house always wins in the long run. Etc. Plus, the politicians, being mostly lawyers, get paid twice. Thrice if they are savvy on the insider trading gambit.
Certain batches of poison cause injury and/or death to 100% of recipients
ANNN iits gone
The Lancet has been discredited for pulling even peer reviewed studies, particularly studies that supported the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. I’m sure Steve knew that. He probably will write a follow up to this.
Yeppers.
The Lancet seems to maintain zero integrity on certain subjects.
Why is the number of people listed?
Why is the number of people NOT listed?
looks like the journal pulled the paper, citing unverifiable stats or other bull shit as always the bolsheviks have censored yet another professional scientist with more to come
.
Deaths are a subset of those who got vaccine. Need to give that numbers too! Choosing a sample of people who all died first is not a good sampling method.
Pre-bunking?….
….and it’s gone….
You can read the “disappeared” article here: https://dailysceptic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/SSRN-id4496137.pdf
Very interesting. Another COVID-19 coverup!