A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine – but the study was removed within 24 hours.
The paper, a pre-print that was awaiting peer-review, is written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and their colleagues at the Wellness Company and was published online on Wednesday on the pre-print site of the prestigious medical journal.
However, less than 24 hours later, the study was removed and a note appeared stating: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” While the study had not undergone any part of the peer-review process, the note implies it fell foul of “screening criteria”.
The original study abstract can be found in the Internet Archive. It reads (with my emphasis added):
Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.
Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.
Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
The full study does not appear to have been saved in the Internet Archive, but can be read here.
Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.
Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist and co-Chair of the HART pandemic advisory group, says that in her view the approach taken in the study is sound. She told the Daily Sceptic:
The VAERS system [of vaccine adverse event reporting] is designed to alert to potential harms without necessarily being the best way of measuring the extent of those harms.
Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country.
However, this is imperfect as a deficit of deaths would be expected after a period of excess deaths, making the accuracy of any baseline dubious.
An alternative approach of auditing such deaths through autopsy is sound.
There may be a bias [in the study] towards reporting the autopsies of deaths where there was evidence of causation and the likelihood of causation might be exaggerated by that bias. For example, 19 of the 325 deaths were due to vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) but these reports may be overrepresented because of the regulators’ willingness to acknowledge such deaths.
Nevertheless, it is important that attempts are made to quantify the risk of harm and censorship of these attempts, rather than open scientific critique, does nothing to help reassure people.
Dr. Harvey Risch, one of the study’s authors, told the Daily Sceptic he deems it “pure Government-directed censorship, even after the Missouri v. Biden injunction”.
“Meanwhile, my colleagues are studying what they call ‘Long Vax‘, which is vaccine-caused damage. But of course that is a rare, rare, rare outcome, except that they seem not to be having any problem finding such individuals to enroll in their study,” he added.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
When the very first line of the article is a lie, how can you believe anything that follows: “ A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine”.
It wasn’t a Lancet review.
The most damaging study ever was a lie?
Exactly.
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/medical-fraud/
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/science-fraud/
.
.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/?s=birx+fauci
.
They simply made it up, as they admit – as they’re now making up more lockdown narratives about climate, etc. – and the morans will do as they’re ordered. For the children. Or owls.
Antivaxxers Blamed for “Hijacking Data” as Birth Rates Continue to Decline in Australia and Sweden
Climate Change is the Main Culprit, Australian Experts Say
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/antivaxxers-blamed-for-hijacking?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=441185&post_id=133496370&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
Evil people are the culprits.
I encourage all Covidiots to keep getting those boosters.
and mask up!
Yep, anyone who keeps taking experiment shots will die.
“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” While the study had not undergone any part of the peer-review process, the note implies it fell foul of “screening criteria”.
Interpretation-“The study conclusions were deemed incorrect before the study was reviewed.”
The “Ministry of Truth” strikes again.
Clearly censorship. This can be determined by the fact no peer review was allowed. If peers had reviewed the paper and determined the study methodology was defective they would publish that and their reasons for that determination. Then, if the paper was removed it would be understandable. But that is not what happened.
The conclusions of the paper simply could not be allowed to spread through the population. The powers that be must have thought if it was peer reviewed that other experts would have agreed with the paper’s conclusions. Therefore, peer review could not be allowed.
Many people already suspect the conclusions of the paper are true. Legacy media can continue to lie and censor in an effort to cover up what actually happened but that will not work forever. Eventually there will be a reckoning.
These days, even peer review is just a circle jerk. It’s a cartel. It’s a bunch of Skull ‘n’ Bones types who each know what the other did last summer.
That is unknown to me. I do not have insite into the peer review process. But, what you say would not be a surprise. It looks to be a fact they did not want a peer review process for this paper. That begs the question of why ?
Insight.
LOL – very good. You are correct. Thank you. It will not allow me to change it.
>>> I do not have insite into the peer review process.
I never published anything substantial, but have friends and relatives who had careers in academic medicine. The peer-review process is not totally corrupt, but it is unambiguously consensus-based, and strongly inclined to reinforce the currently dominant mode of thinking.
When I first heard about this Lancet publication, I was surprised that it had seen the light of day; now that it has been deleted, we can all go back to sleep…..
You actually have to ask why?
I don’t trust the CDC or NIH on anything about Covid, but this small cadre of doctors has continually been overwrought and they routinely get out over their skiis. McCullough, Kory, that Canadian guy who owns the diagnostic clinic, etc. Also non doctors and non scientists like Kirsch and Berenson. They’re all too personally invested in it to be objective. Some studies out of Denmark about the harms of the vaccines are interesting because they seem less censored than the American medical establishment. I get that there aren’t many (or any) journalists willing to write on this, and few people are capable of wading into statistics, but I admit to tuning out when I see McCullough make a claim because he’s over-hyped things in the past.
We are all in this together err…..you don’t want to kill granny, do you?….er….safe and effective…er
The cure for the clotshot is grapeshot.
The amazing part of all of it is the jabs are not safe or effective. The fact they are not effective has permeated the population at this point. I believe this is why the number of new jabs has dropped significantly.
The safety part is the real story. A lot of people have been injured and/or killed by the vaccines. The government is desperate to keep this info from the general population. They knew the jabs were not safe when they gave the “vaccines” EUA status. Then lied about it constantly for years.
They’re actually proving to be very effective.
We all knew they were going to be deadly WELL before they were even released. But so did Pfizer, Moderna, AND the FDA.
I have talked a lot of people, repubs and especially dems, that felt to varying degrees (depending on their political views) that some of the institutions of government were corrupt and some not so much. What people tell me is they mostly thought the CDC/NIH, the health/medical institutions were less corrupt and more likely to tell the truth than others such as the DOJ/FBI before covid. Now after they have seen what happened with covid there has been a change. Basically, they no longer trust ANY government institutions. Most believe the government has gone out of control and failed the people of America big time.
If you go to the page now it says:
“Paper removed by “The Lance-it” for heresy against Settled Sceance.”
” It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”
We have been lied to from the beginning as per recommendation number seven of Event 201 (https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise#recommendations) the last simulation/training exercise the conspirators conducted before the COVID PSYOP/global coup d’état/reconfiguration went operational. The WEF, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health the Gates Foundation and others sponsored Event 201 https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise#players who have been actively working to implement and codify all the recommendations including censorship, suppression and debunking all narratives at odds with their agendas.
The plutocrats used their money, media and influence to initiate global campaigns of fear, intimidation, coercion and manipulation to get us to where we are now; bamboozled and cowering, afraid of invisible microbes and pathogens that may not even exist. More people are realizing we’ve been duped, deceived and manipulated but there are still so many like Pavlov’s dogs who have been conditioned to mindlessly react to the PSYOP, and in their induced stupor have forgotten the overlords can’t fire everyone, stop all of our economic activities, put all of us in jail, detention centers or concentration camps. The only hold they have over us is our minds.
The shots are lethal but they will not kill all of us right away so there is still time to bolster a resistance movement by freeing our minds clearing out the lies and propaganda we have internalized and substitute them with truth and the knowledge to heal ourselves.
Too many dead people because of the shots. Run around it all you want the vaxxes are killing people.