Keeping the Peace

Guest Post by Eric Peters

If police concerned themselves exclusively with keeping the peace – that is to say, dealing with people who have caused harm to others or their property – then no one who isn’t a criminal would ever have to deal with them. Would not have any reason to fear them.

As it ought to be.

It’s not as it ought to be, because “offenses” have replaced crimes – and “crimes” now encompass “offenses” against the state.

These range from the petty to the serious. Examples of the former include traffic “violations” – which are considered “offenses.” You are issued a piece of paper demanding money as punishment – for what? For having offended the authority of the state.

The same goes for serious “offenses.”

If the state charges you with a “crime” that is in fact just another offense writ large, the attending paperwork will so describe the facts. The indictment will read: The state of (insert here) vs. John Smith. It is a confession before the proceedings even begin that there is probably no victim; i.e., no human being who has been harmed by the accused.

But the proceedings proceed, regardless.

This is bizarre, even hallucinatory. If no one has been harmed, then what is the offense? More finely, is it not an offense – a crime, properly speaking – to harm people (as by fining, indicting, prosecuting and jailing) people who’ve not caused any harm?

Consider what goes on in traffic court as a case-in-point:

You are called before the judge. The charge is read. You are accused of, let us say, “speeding.” This offense is defined in law as exceeding by even 1 mile-per-hour whatever the statute says the “speed limit” is.

You are already damned – assuming you are “guilty” of having driven even 1-mile-per-hour faster than whatever the “speed limit” is. The only legally relevant question is: Did you – or did you not – drive faster than whatever the “speed limit” is?

Not whether anyone was harmed. Whether there is a victim or even a  plaintiff (other than the government).

You can question the witness against you – who is the government agent who issued the so-called “ticket” and whose version of events is taken at face value as true (whereas your version is “hearsay”). What cannot be questioned is whether it matters that the state has produced no victim of the alleged “offense” – beyond the state, itself.

And the nature of that offense is solely that its authority was affronted – its rules (“statutes”) disobeyed.  Put more finely, it is irrelevant – legally – that you caused no one any harm. It is no defense. And it can be conceded in open court.

It does not matter.

The only thing that does – as far as “the law” is concerned – is whether the facts support the accusation that you transgressed the rules. It is a game – played by pedants with degrees most of us lack, organized by the pedants to render us largely helpless before its arcane procedural legerdemain.

It is the same with the higher “crimes,” too.

The state will assert – in its indictment – that you have done (or not done) something the state posits as “the law.” It does not matter whether “the law” is right – morally speaking, which would be (again) defined by the fact (or its lack) of someone who has been harmed in some way by the actions of the accused.

All that matters is whether “the law” was “violated.” It is like “violating” the rules of a children’s board game, except the consequences are often much more serious than paying a fine of $50 – in Monopoly money – before you roll the dice on either of your next two turns.

These consequences include the potential that you will be assaulted – perhaps murderously – by one of the state’s agents. They are styled “police” but this is disingenuous in that rather than policing they are enforcing. Their primary job, in plain language, is not to keep the peace. It is to actively seek out people who have “violated” a “statute” or committed a “crime” – irrespective of their peaceful actions.

And this is why they are a threat – implicit as well as actual – to the vast majority of peaceful people, who are not criminals in any moral sense. It is why people who’ve done nothing to cause harm to anyone – and know it – are nonetheless uneasy and often alarmed when they see one of these enforcers behind them or beside them. It is easy enough to understand why, for they know that the enforcer could gin up an excuse – there is always an excuse when there are so many “laws” and “statutes” and when innocence of having caused any harm is no defense – to “pull them over” and possibly, worse.

It is a kind of Jungian collective conscious instinctive affirmation of the understood danger of the situation.

This danger would disappear at a stroke if the “police,” as they are styled, were replaced by keepers-of-the-peace.  And these would not even need to be “official.” It could simply be every man who is willing and able to act defensively when the need for such arises. Those who fret that such would engender abuses sidestep the officialized abuse of “police,” which is systematic and far worse. They also forget to to remember that, in a moral society, it would be considered a crime to abuse anyone – that being defined as threatening to or actually harming someone who had not harmed anyone.

It it will take a kind of Great Reset – of consciousness as well as conscience – for this transition to take place.

But that doesn’t mean it can’t.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
39 Comments
Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
July 16, 2023 5:39 pm

I don’t know. Anyone think it’s wise to allow people to drive 100 miles per hour?

Or drag race through the neighborhood?

The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
  Glock-N-Load
July 16, 2023 6:05 pm

I’m not sure how I want to answer that. I’ve driven so beyond 100mph. I raced (I guess we’ll call it that) a Mitsubishi (forget the model, but they were said to do over 160+) on the interstate while on my sport bike a bunch of years back. I quickly looked at my speedometer and was already at 135 before I said, nope. But then there are simply things that are beyond a driver’s control such as a child wandering into the road. A broken-down vehicle of some type on the road; any number of unforeseen things. Drag race through the neighborhood, nope. No good reason for that one. While a lot of things don’t make good logical sense, who are you (anyone) to decide what someone else should do? Karen?

America is a Tijuana Donkey Show
America is a Tijuana Donkey Show

If you kill someone, does the family get to torture you for as long as they want before the state puts you to death? I’d consider making that trade.

The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
  America is a Tijuana Donkey Show
July 17, 2023 4:26 am

I don’t get to answer that, but I think most people wouldn’t need any additional torture knowing what they did and having to live with that on them for however long they’re still breathing.

Call me Jack
Call me Jack

You only live around White people?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Glock-N-Load
July 16, 2023 6:06 pm

Anyone think it’s wise to allow people to drive 100 miles per hour?

Ask an Autobahn user. Or an Italian.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Glock-N-Load
July 16, 2023 8:17 pm

On the 240 South loop in Memphrica, 90 – 100 is normal speed, especially on a Friday or Saturday night.

The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
  TN Patriot
July 17, 2023 7:26 am

Oh, I know that 240 all too well. I used to call it Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. All the time, late at night or in the afternoons, there’s a wreck about every mile and a half during the day and at night, it’s like Stevie Wonder driving an F1 car at full throttle.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

It now includes drive-by shootings at all hours of the day and night, making it more like Mad Max. I try to stay off of it, but when travelling to OK to see relatives, I have to go through Memphrica and the south loop is the quickest way and least amount of time spent in the city.

The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
  TN Patriot
July 17, 2023 6:07 pm

If you can and if it makes sense, use it around 3 in the morning. Still not that safe, but far safer than mid-day or 6-9PM. And keep in mind, I don’t even live in TN anymore. But I am well familiar with that shithole. Coming from Nashville, it was exit 10 I believe to get on it. I instinctively knew when they widened it, it was only going to get worse, and guess what….

TN Patriot
TN Patriot

They could have taken I-40 straight through to the bridge, but some rocket scientist decided to go straight through the beautiful Overton Park area, rather than through the not so nice area about 3/4 mile north of the park. As a result, they routed it north onto the former 240 North loop, adding quite a few miles to your trip.

Yes, it has gotten worse since they widened it. Driving the speed limit is hazardous.

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
  TN Patriot
July 18, 2023 6:30 pm

Do it Huck’s way. Get a raft and bypass Memphrica.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Call me Jack
July 18, 2023 7:43 pm

If they saw a raft with a white man on it, it would be target practice for the natives!

Bauls
Bauls
  TN Patriot
July 21, 2023 3:40 am

For 4 years about 12 years ago I had the unfortunate need to go to Memphis. We lived in Mississippi and very rarely took all the kids to town. It was a clusterfuck then, can’t imagine how it is now

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Bauls
July 21, 2023 8:45 am

A lot more white folks moved out, mexicans moved in and it is a lot more violent. I venture into the city fringes and occasionally into the near hood when I have to take the grandson for medical treatment. ALWAYS well armed.

Squawkin' Squid
Squawkin' Squid
  Glock-N-Load
July 17, 2023 9:38 am

Well, there has always been laws preventing OBVIOUSLY reckless and inherently dangerous (to others) activities. Driving at an extremely unreasonable speed or manner which presets a “clear and present danger” does dramatically increase the danger to others. That can greatly increases the probability of danger to others, and infringes on their rights.

100 on the interstate? Well they are designed to be long and flat with a lot of protective bariers and usually distant from pedestrians and properties. I don’t see the danger or problem.

100 on a city street? The ambient danger is greater since you can easily come in conflict with people or their property. Slow down, buddy.

Traffic “laws” are mainly just an ettiquette to others since we are meeting and greeting one another at a high rate of speed. They shouldn’t be criminal unless you are just a walking (or ‘driving’ in this case) hazard.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Squawkin' Squid
July 17, 2023 10:14 am

Before the 55 speed limit was imposed by fed.gov, there were some states with “Reasonable & Proper” speed limits. If you had an accident, then it was not a proper speed.

Squawkin' Squid
Squawkin' Squid
  TN Patriot
July 17, 2023 10:45 am

Exactly. Traffic laws mainly exist to determine culpability in the event of an wreck. To assign which party erred or was at fault and is the cause of the wreck, and thus is responsible. No tickets need to be issued (unless malice plays a part). The injured party seeks the one at fault for restitution and that’s all you need.

Mandatory insurance and the traffic court’s ‘administrative law’ are just complications that muck up the system. Insurance shifts responsibility from the person being liable to some third-party.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Squawkin' Squid
July 17, 2023 10:49 am

“Court costs” normally are twice as much as the fine around here. It’s a racket the mob would be proud of.

Squawkin' Squid
Squawkin' Squid
  TN Patriot
July 17, 2023 11:11 am

Yup. Why does a constitutionally protected right cost anything? All criminal cases and all civil cases >$20 you have a right to jury trial. What costs? For the judge or jury? Those are constitutional, and thus payed properly by taxes (one of thse ONLY legit reasons for a tax)

I believe the Surpeme Court has said again and again about the “converting of a Right to a Privilige and charging a fee for it.”

BB
BB
  TN Patriot
July 17, 2023 6:41 pm

My daughter had cat food on the porch for her cats last year and a dog wandered in the yard and started eating it. A neighbor saw the dog come out of the yard and called the pollice saying that her dog got out and was roaming the neighborhood. The police came and issued her a ticket all the time she ws protesting that it wasn’t her dog. They gave her a summons where she went to court and told them the same thing. Cost her 600 dollars.

Jackie Puppet
Jackie Puppet
  Glock-N-Load
July 17, 2023 10:22 pm

I went over 100 mph on the tollway today – when construction was finished on it a few years back with more lanes (and wider, too), the first time on it, I was doing 90 without even realizing it.

I’ve always had a bit of a lead foot.

The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
The True one and only Caitlyn Jenner's testicles.
July 16, 2023 5:59 pm

If I were a liberal, I’d try that defense in court. No doubt. But I’ll reserve my fight for when your average police force turns to Gestapo. Then….

Euronymoose
Euronymoose
July 16, 2023 6:35 pm

It’s not as it ought to be, because “offenses” have replaced crimes – and “crimes” now encompass “offenses” against the state.

These range from the petty to the serious. Examples of the former include traffic “violations” – which are considered “offenses.” You are issued a piece of paper demanding money as punishment – for what? For having offended the authority of the state.

When you voluntarily sign a contract where you agree to obey a set of “driving laws”, I think you are actually obligated to comply with those laws no matter how silly they become.

A Driving License is a contract between you and your dmv system to obey all of the traffic code all of the time.

_______

Weigh all this with the knowledge that a certain segment of the population is openly being permitted to commit crime with zero punishment.

Obbledy
Obbledy
  Euronymoose
July 16, 2023 9:13 pm

A license is something you need to practice something that’s been made illegal……
The Constitution says your are to be INDICTED by a jury of your peers before an arrest warrant is issued.
If you are arrested and thrown in jail under any other procedure
YOU HAVE BEEN KIDNAPPED AND HELD FOR RANSOM!
When the FBI was created they had(have)NO authority to touch you!!…..they had to go to the local constabulary and make their case to them before anybody went anywhere!
Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION!!! now enforcement!…..

BB
BB
  Obbledy
July 17, 2023 6:50 pm

So, if you are a felon, shouldn’t your jury be made up of felons?

Squawkin' Squid
Squawkin' Squid
  Euronymoose
July 18, 2023 8:22 am

You are required to sign that contract in order to enjoy your right to go to work, or the grocery store.
Your right to freely travel about unimpeded has been converted to a privilege. A contract signed under duress is not legally binding.
And all Americans are under duress when signing for a DL, since most people need to travel distances to earn a living, procure supplies, and generally live a life, pursuing their own happiness.

Texas Khaan
Texas Khaan
July 16, 2023 6:54 pm

Those who are now called “law enforcement officers”, were in the past known as “peace officers”, what’s in a name?

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Texas Khaan
July 16, 2023 7:48 pm

I remember that. That’s way back when they used to call us citizens, before we became cosumers.

Texas Khaan
Texas Khaan
  hardscrabble farmer
July 16, 2023 8:51 pm

Citizen, how I miss being treated as one, serfdom is our de-facto status.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
  Texas Khaan
July 16, 2023 11:02 pm

I only want to be treated like an illegal alien – Howie Carr

Anonymous
Anonymous
  hardscrabble farmer
July 16, 2023 9:07 pm

Now we are “useless eaters”

TCS
TCS
  hardscrabble farmer
July 17, 2023 8:14 am

Would you rather be a citizen of the U.S. or the Kingdom of Heaven? I only bring it up because God doesn’t accept dual citizenship.

I refuse to swear loyalty to what amounts to a fucking bus station! I got some place I’m trying to get to and the Greyhound depot ain’t it.

Also, a fine good morning to you, sir.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
July 16, 2023 8:15 pm

Traffic enforcement is generally a revenue source for the government. When the cop unions are negotiating, tickets/revenue go down. When they get a nice raise, tickets/revenue increase.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 16, 2023 8:31 pm

Depolicing: Keeping the Peace?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/depolicing/

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 17, 2023 2:25 am

I agree that when you sign for a driver’s license you agree to make a good faith effort to follow the statutory law. However, if you own real estate and you own a motorcycle and you are riding your motorcycle on your property I may argue that there is no such contract. That being said on any trip in a car I take I usually see people breaking the statutory law. Most of the time those who are caught pay a simple fine. We may wonder if the law really is a deterrent?

Other statutory law involving corruption at all levels of professional society involves so called drug crimes. In the meanwhile there is a general danger to society while infringing on our constitutional rights. Tucker Carlson suggest that as free beings we have a right to determine what medicines we should be able to have or not have. He also suggest there is a lot of innocent blood on the hands of the so called authorities who have participated in the infringement of our rights. Do you agree with Tucker Carlson?

July 15, 2023 Tucker Carlson speaks. He laments the Tyranny of our times with regard to Covid 19. That certainly it is within our rights as individuals to choose what medical treatments or medicines to have or not have. From there he laments all the death caused by Fentanyl. That the people who died got poison rather than what they thought they were getting. Why is it they did not get what they thought they were getting? Though the argument is perhaps covert the conclusion is obvious.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 17, 2023 2:32 am

If you add up all the various Covid death along with just the Fentanyl death that’s a lot of murder they are responsible for, wouldn’t you say?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=aibak9_ewXo&feature=share9

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 17, 2023 3:03 am

Here is a good article for those of you who want to rely solely on our medical and other authorities, enjoy!

‘She could have been president’: Hospital just ‘leaves baby to die’

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
July 18, 2023 6:23 pm

I got a 120 buck speeding ticket last May.Yes,the officer was young.Yes,i should’a kept my mouth shut. Instead i asked,” Is this your first ticket?” “Why,the officer responded?” Me.” Well,you just seemed so excited.”