Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
I grew up with debates and discussions all the time about the Constituion. It was the Age of McCarthy who was ignoring everything just to win as they are doing today. As I have said, Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 prohibits the arrest of a Congressman or Senator to interfere in their vote. The president cannot be the exception. Article II, Section 4 makes it very clear that ONLY Congress can charge the President, and he can ONLY be put on trial in the Senate:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
I really do not understand fighting on immunity when they should be fighting on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction to appoint some prosecutor who is UNELECTED and UNSUERVISED by the Senate, and he can bring charges against a president who interferes in the 2024 election. This is not going to look good historically. Justice Kavanaugh is very smart, and he understands precedents well. He explained: “It’s going to cycle back and be used against the current president or the next president … and the next president and the next president after that.” Justice Gorsuch’s comment that they are “writing a rule for the ages” is absolutely correct.
I am very disappointed in Trump’s lawyers – VERY DISAPPOINTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Merrick Garland and Jack Smith acted as Traitors and should be prosecuted for their actions without any authority for violating their oaths to uphold the Constitution. This would be true even against prosecuting Biden. That must rest in the hands of the House to Impeach (Indict) and the Senate to put on trial in both cases. I am shocked that nobody in Congress has moved to IMPEACH both men, and they should be put on trial themselves.
The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States and, importantly, limits the offense of treason to only two types of conduct: (1) “levying war” against the United States or (2) “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort.” In the good old days of England, they would have been hanged for treason. The Court held in Cramer v. United States 325 U.S. 1 (1945) that they MUST have given aid and comfort to an enemy. You may sympathize with an enemy’s view but you must also commit an act of comfort to the enemy, else there is no treason. This raises the question of Treason domestically when what they are doing is trying to aid the foreign economic policy of Karl Marx – a socialist. I cannot see how nobody has challenged in court that their redistributing wealth violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
We cannot have liberty and justice for all, and then we claim that monetary means are the exception. This is so hypocritical it goes right to the foundation of liberty and equal protection of the law. I have studied INTERNATIONAL LAW and how it has evolved since ancient times.
This is not being partisan. We are indeed staring into the eyes of the ABSOLUTE death of the United States. This is why these people want Biden; he is senile and lets them do whatever they want. They are bringing down the United States, and we are looking at not just writing a rule for the ages; we are looking at the total collapse of the United States. These people hate Trump so much that they are destroying everything the Founding Fathers envisioned, all for personal corruption.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Just stop with the antisemitism, bruh.
Anti-Semitism is a Natural Response to Jewish Behavior – Albert Einstein
Anti gentilism came first.
Those people don’t hate Trump so much they are willing to destroy the United States– destroying the United States IS their objective.
Trump set up “Biden” for the layup, and now Trump is going to dunk off “Biden’s” back. It is going to be absolutely horrific, folks, I am telling you.
In case no one has noticed, we’ve arrived at that weird moment in time when the law is both relevant AND irrelevant at the same time. This condition might pass almost instantaneously, or it might get dragged out as long as possible. But, to deny this state of existence is to expose yourself to unnecessary risk and danger.
It isn’t even a two tiered system any more. We’re all marching up the spiral staircase of Roland Deschain’s nightmare, The Dark Tower. What will we find in the highest level there? Perhaps the Tower will fall before we have to find out.
We’re fresh out of good options, boys and girls. Prepare to defend yourselves.
ChodeGPT sez wot?
More random incoherencies from Marty
CONstitutions do not restrain governments:
“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.”
― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
http://www.sobran.com/reluctant.shtml
EXCERPT:
Hans-Hermann Hoppe . . . argued that no constitution could restrain the state. Once its monopoly of force was granted legitimacy, constitutional limits became mere fictions it could disregard; nobody could have the legal standing to enforce those limits. The state itself would decide, by force, what the constitution “meant,” steadily ruling in its own favor and increasing its own power. This was true a priori, and American history bore it out.
Correct. People with GUNS restrain Governments. Always have…and we’ve got a SHIT TON of them! So…what are we waiting for?
ChodeGPT sez wot?
Enough with the provocations, Scrote. Time for you to STFU.
LOL… Assuming the system is honest and will function because of honest men in power is the first mistake, and the fatal one.
Maybe we can all just vote moar harderer and get the system fixed by voting in the right guyz… That should work, amirite or what!!!
They don’t listen too or respect the supreme court rulings. The supreme court gets it power from the willing.
It’s called full anarchy. The rule of law is dead in America.
Instant Karmas gonna get you……
Bragg, Smith, James, and Willis have all colluded with the justice department to bring these phones charges against Trump in huge cases of election interference. If this doesn’t qualify for sedition or treason, I don’t know what does. We will see if any of these four or Garland go to prison for this.
That’s hilarious. Did Trumptastic put anyone in prision? Do ypou know of anyone else whio could be elected to do so. I think not. Time to stop living in fantasy land.
Smith the Jesuit looking fcuk and Garland the Bolshevik Jew…apparently in the end times the old team gets back together.