RUSSIA’S NEW MILITARY DOCTRINE

Russia’s new military doctrine lists NATO, US as major foreign threats

AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova

AFP Photo / Natalia Kolesnikova

Russia has adopted an updated version of its military doctrine, which reflects the emergence of new threats against its national security. NATO military buildup and American Prompt Global Strike concept are listed among them.

The new doctrine was approved on Friday by President Vladimir Putin. Its core remains unchanged from the previous version. The Russian military remains a defensive tool which the country pledges to use only as a last resort.

Also unchanged are the principles of the use of nuclear weapons which Russia adheres to. Their primary goal is to deter potential enemies from attacking Russia, but it would use them to protect itself from a military attack – either nuclear or conventional – threatening its existence.

The new sections of the doctrine outline the threat Russia sees in NATO’s expansion and military buildup and the fact that the alliance is taking upon itself “global functions realized with violation of international law.”

The doctrine lists among major foreign military threats “the creation and deployment of global strategic antiballistic missile systems that undermines the established global stability and balance of power in nuclear missile capabilities, the implementation of the ‘prompt strike’ concept, intent to deploy weapons in space and deployment of strategic conventional precision weapons.”

The Yury Dolgoruky nuclear-powered submarine.(RIA Novosti / Pavel Kononov)

The Yury Dolgoruky nuclear-powered submarine.(RIA Novosti / Pavel Kononov)

Another new point in the doctrine is that one of the Russian military’s goals is to protect national interests in the Arctic region.

READ MORE: Sneak peak at Russia’s ‘under renovation’ Arctic base

The document also points to the threat of destabilization countries bordering Russia or its allies and deployment of foreign troops such nations as a threat to national security.

Domestically, Russia faces threats of “actions aimed at violent change of the Russian constitutional order, destabilization of the political and social environment, disorganization of the functioning of governmental bodies, crucial civilian and military facilities and informational infrastructure of Russia,” the doctrine says.

Moscow sees international cooperation with countries sharing its effort to increase security, particularly members of BRICS, the OSCE, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and others as the key to preventing military conflicts, the doctrine states.

Traditional threats that Russia must deal with mentioned in the doctrine include extremism and terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and rocket technology and actions of foreign intelligence services.

The document notes that modern threats are increasingly drifting from a military nature to informational, and states that the likelihood of anyone launching a fully-fledged war against Russia is decreasing.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Westcoaster
Westcoaster
December 27, 2014 1:54 pm

Great, just great. Way to go “Ketchup” Kerry and the Obamanation, you’ve set back foreign relations with the world’s other great superpower by 50 years. For no reason. We’re the bad guys in this for our attempt to ever-expand NATO and overthrowing duly elected governments around the world.
If the U.S. just kept its word on the treaties it has signed over the years, there would be no need for a huge mil/ind complex and the Indians wouldn’t be trying to pay back the white man with all those fucking casinos.

yahsure
yahsure
December 27, 2014 2:06 pm

The west knows all this would happen. You think they expected Russia to lay back and be a punching bag. Fucking Military/industrial complex and their greed make me sick.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
December 27, 2014 6:06 pm

“and the Indians wouldn’t be trying to pay back the white man with all those fucking casinos.”

How the hell are Indian Casinos “pay back” to the white man?

wip
wip
December 27, 2014 10:01 pm

Is there anyone on this site with credible knowledge of whether or not the US has the ability to financially and/or militarily enslave the entire fucking planet?

flash
flash
December 28, 2014 7:08 am

The history of banking in the modern era (since the establishment of the Bank of England in the late 17th century), has been nothing but an ugly cavalcade of theft of sovereign national treasuries too vast to calculate. From the beginning, these large private central banks (the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, etc.), were intentionally designed to operate freely above the rule of law in their respective nations. They have been the financiers of most of the conflicts and wars in the last two centuries and are continuing to do so unabated to the present. Countless millions have died in these bankers’ wars in service to the unbridled greed of these financiers.

Bankers Tell It Like It Is