Donald Trump Rips Ginsburg: “Her Mind Is Shot, She Should Resign” As NYT Says Trump Is Right

Tyler Durden's picture

 

Following two days of inexplicable attacks by none other than a Supreme Court Justice, who said she would move to New Zealand if Trump were elected, as well as calling Trump “a faker”, the Donald finally snapped and ripped Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a Twitter message late Tuesday. “Justice Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court has embarrassed all by making very dumb political statements about me,” Trump wrote on his Twitter account. “Her mind is shot — resign.

As Fox notes, Trump has been on the defensive after Ginsburg told the Associated Press last week that she felt he was unqualified for the position. She said in an interview that she didn’t want to think about the possibility that Trump would be president and predicted that Democrat Hillary Clinton would win.  Trump told the New York Times earlier Tuesday that her comments were “highly inappropriate” and a “disgrace to the court.”

“It’s highly inappropriate that a United States Supreme Court judge gets involved in a political campaign, frankly … I think she should apologize to the court. I would hope that she would get off the court as soon as possible,” he added.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that it was “totally inappropriate” for Ginsburg to criticize Trump. McConnell said that members of the Supreme Court shouldn’t weigh in on American elections.

“It raises a level of skepticism that the American people have from time to time about just how objective the Supreme Court is, whether they’re over there to call the balls and strikes, or weigh in on one side or another,” he said.

None of the above was unexpected, but in a truly surprising twist none other than liberal media bastion, the NYT, issued an Op-Ed overnight titled “Donald Trump Is Right About Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg“, in which it said “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling.”

In this election cycle in particular, the potential of a new president to affect the balance of the court has taken on great importance, with the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, other justices are nearing an age when retirement would not be surprising. That makes it vital that the court remain outside the presidential process. And just imagine if this were 2000 and the resolution of the election depended on a Supreme Court decision. Could anyone now argue with a straight face that Justice Ginsburg’s only guide would be the law?

Judging by the surprising move in swing states which now support Trump over Hillary, it appears that Ginsburg’s intervention may have once again ended up helping Trump at a time when he sorely needed an outside intervention to prop up his presidential chances.

The full NYT Op-Ed is below:

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling.

Three times in the past week, Justice Ginsburg has publicly discussed her view of the presidential race, in the sharpest terms. In an interview with The Times published Sunday, Justice Ginsburg said, “I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” joking that if her husband were alive, he might have said, “It’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”

Earlier, in an interview with The Associated Press that appeared on Friday, when asked to consider a Trump victory, Justice Ginsburg replied, “I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.”

On Monday Justice Ginsburg doubled down, calling Mr. Trump “a faker,” who “has no consistency about him.” In that interview, with CNN, she added: “He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego.”

Mr. Trump responded on Tuesday. “I think it’s highly inappropriate that a United States Supreme Court judge gets involved in a political campaign, frankly,” he told The Times. “I couldn’t believe it when I saw it.”

There is no legal requirement that Supreme Court justices refrain from commenting on a presidential campaign. But Justice Ginsburg’s comments show why their tradition has been to keep silent.

In this election cycle in particular, the potential of a new president to affect the balance of the court has taken on great importance, with the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, other justices are nearing an age when retirement would not be surprising. That makes it vital that the court remain outside the presidential process. And just imagine if this were 2000 and the resolution of the election depended on a Supreme Court decision. Could anyone now argue with a straight face that Justice Ginsburg’s only guide would be the law?

Mr. Trump’s hands, of course, are far from clean on the matter of judicial independence. It was just weeks ago that he was lambasting Gonzalo Curiel, the United States District Court judge overseeing a case against Trump University, saying that as a “Mexican,” the Indiana-born judge could not be impartial.

All of which makes it only more baffling that Justice Ginsburg would choose to descend toward his level and call her own commitment to impartiality into question. Washington is more than partisan enough without the spectacle of a Supreme Court justice flinging herself into the mosh pit.

 


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
64 Comments
Llpoh
Llpoh
July 13, 2016 9:13 am

Ginsberg has put on a despicable display. I too am wondering if her mind us shot. She will have to recuse herself on anything to do with Trump.

She looks to have gone senile. As well as morphed into some kind of shrivelled up iguana-type thing.

The Fourth a Turning is accelerating. Even the Supreme Court is abandoning any semblance of the rule of law.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Llpoh
July 13, 2016 9:31 am

Anything to do with Trump or anything to do with the election if it ends up there again.

Stucky
Stucky
July 13, 2016 9:20 am

This one time I will openly welcome as many anti Joo comments as possible about this TSJC (Tiny Stupid Jew Cunt).

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
  Stucky
July 13, 2016 12:16 pm

Good! The jews at SCOTUS brag about being devoted to the hideous talmud, the anti-gentile hate piece written by deranged Moses-following scum.

Wanna see the hate in their “holy” book? http://www.talmudunmasked.com

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
  Stucky
July 13, 2016 12:51 pm

@ jooz

Occam’s Razor Destroys the Holocaust Industry
By: StingRay
Tags:

CORPORATE MEDIA COVER-UP/DECEPTIONS/PROPAGANDA CURRENT EVENTS ISRAEL RELIGION/ATHEISM WHITE HOUSE

I’d like to see Holo-study course transferred into science departments, so that a critique of the evidence would be possible. If I may give just one example, we have a figure for Auschwitz of the total amount of coke used in the cremation ovens over a couple of years. Each oven took say a couple of hours to incinerate a body. Loads of these had to be installed once the big typhus epidemics broke out in the summer of 1942. It does sound macabre but the point is the ground was too damp to bury any bodies so they had to be cremated.

Now the quantity of coke needed per body under these circumstances is a fairly normal science-technology kind of question. It will give you numbers in accord with what we know of the typhus mortality in that camp. It absolutely rules out some huge extra number from a ‘human gassing’ fantasy, it gives a ceiling on mortality in that camp. In my experience Revisionists tend to be guided by material and rational argument and logic, whereas Holo-believers go more by stories, which they have been told.

Read more: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz4EJBNJ2FK

lysander
lysander
  Swamp Fox
July 13, 2016 1:12 pm

Swamp Fox is 100% correct. Several years ago I researched the hell out of the holohoax and found the same figures about burning the bodies. It was materially and physically impossible for the number of bodies claimed by the holohoax industry to be burned at any of the camps.

BTW, if you could see, as I have, what they call the gas chambers, you would choke. It was an air raid shelter that had some of its walls knocked out after the war to try to appear like some kind of ‘gas chamber’. It’s a stand-alone structure that is half buried in the ground. Actually it’s not far from the inmates private swimming pool (I’m not kidding). The inmates had a swimming pool, a bandstand (where they played every weekend) and a little store that sold domestic items like shampoo and cigarettes, which the inmates paid for in ‘work credits’.

The pictures you see of the piles of corpses and half-starved inmates were taken AFTER the war. These were work camps. The Germans were evil bastards for forcing people there, but they weren’t deliberately killing them. Who kills their slaves or workers? The poor inmates died like flies of typhus and dysentery and WERE half-starved by the end of the war because everything was breaking down for the Germans.

But up to late 1944, it wasn’t like what you were told.

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
  Stucky
July 13, 2016 1:27 pm

This is a long essay, but you’ll never see jooz the same way again, it exposes what they truly are.

THE BIOLOGICAL JEW by Eustace Mullins

THE BIOLOGICAL JEW by Eustace Mullins

“HATRED

Because of its total dependence upon the gentile host, the Jewish parasite develops a deep hatred and a contempt for the animals which provide it with food and shelter. This hatred is a protective frame which acts as a shield for the Jewish community, and prevents it from accepting the life and goals of the host people for its own. Herbert Spencer may have been focusing upon the Jewish parasitic phenomenon when he wrote, “If a group places a premium on the quality of enmity, in contrast with that of amity, a criminal type evolves.

Since the Jew is the only group which places a premium on the quality of enmity, Spencer must have been making an oblique reference to the Jewish parasite. From the standpoint of the host people, everything that the Jew does is a manifestation of a criminal act, but from the parasite’s standpoint, he is only following the procedures of his life cycle which have evolved and been established over a period of thousands of years. The conflict comes from two separate and irreconcilable codes of ethics, that of the host, which places a premium upon decency, honor and self-reliance, and that of the parasite, which operates from an established modus vivendi of parasitism.

The Jew lives in constant fear of rejection, of being thrown off of the host, which would mean his starvation and death. As a result, the Jew sees everything in the light of how he “relates” to the host, or how he maintains his parasitic situation.”

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Swamp Fox
July 13, 2016 1:48 pm

Swamp Fox – you are one ignorant motherfucking anti-Semite. You could not have an original thought if one fell on your fucking head. You post the same shit over and over, and claim you have “read” it yourself. You are simply spewing forth that which you are being fed.

You do not even know what the fucking Talmud is. You call it the holy book, ignorant asswipe that you are.

Same goes for you Lickasser, you ignorant cunt. You researched the hell out of the holocaust? Going down to the local KKK does not constitute research. You would not know research if it bit you on your ass.

Why don’t you both take your shit and shove it up your asses, you fuckwits.

By the way SwampDick – I believe not a fucking word you spew. You are a blowhard one truck pony. Your stench is fouling up the place.

Stucky
Stucky
  Llpoh
July 13, 2016 4:42 pm

Well, I more or less accused SwampDick of the same. He said to me, “I’m not anti-Semite. I’m only telling the truth.” I’m not making this shit up.

It really really is annoying how he uses TBP as his One Man Dog And Pony show to spread his “truth”. I guess he thinks he’s making converts. Strange how he actually gets thumbs ups. Then again, we have quite a solid cadre of Joo haters here. Their nonsense has on more than one occasion almost driven me away. And I’m not even a Joo.

——

Edit: Well, I just read the rest of the posts. I could have saved myself some time. Heh. Ol’ Swampy, R.I.P., … we hardly knew ye. Sniffle sniffle.

lysander
lysander
  Llpoh
July 13, 2016 9:47 pm

@ lipoh………Wowee, that there is one intelligent response. I guess that rules out you being a Jew, huh?

Next time you want to counter someone’s argument, try using facts and logic instead of personal attacks. It works like a charm.

llpoh
llpoh
  lysander
July 13, 2016 10:02 pm

Lysander – I was being nice. You would not like me angry. But your horseshit re the holocaust, couched as research, caught my attention. There is simply no credible research that it did not happen. All the supposed research saying that is found on hate sites. Dig something up from a major university, and I will take a look. I have read tens of thousands of pages of real research and history on this subject. So spare me your supposed research. You are delusional at best, hate filled at worst.

Full Retard
Full Retard
  lysander
July 13, 2016 10:18 pm

Lys, your being snide. If you could cup LLPOH’s jock strap and then your own, the difference would correlate to intellectual difference as well. It isn’t manners that keeps you from going off on LLPOH, it is simply that you are unarmed.

Swampy was passing out hate literature like it was The Watchtower. This is not the place for Joo-bashing, I know Billy or BB haven’t got the memo. It’s a bit ironic that the person defending this site would be the last to agree with them. Billy knows that and yet, like a fucking snake, he can’t help but bite the hand that reaches out to him.

I know I can be tiresome preaching the same old gospel but dammit, at least I put some variety into it. How many times do we have to read that MLK was really just plain Mike the pimp from the 30 blocks? At least he did something. He didn’t sit on his ass at the local JIB posting hate ‘literature’ on a blog like it was going to ‘enlighten’ anybody.

Llpoh
Llpoh
July 13, 2016 9:27 am

Stuck – that twat is seriously one ugly bitch. You could roll her in flour, but I guarantee there is no wet spot on that dried out old hag.

And here is another thing – she is disrespecting tens of millions of Trump supporters. She is a a Supreme Court justice and has no understanding of democracy, and of the people she serves. She knows better than them.

It is truly disgraceful.

Persnickety
Persnickety
  Llpoh
July 13, 2016 10:28 am

Much like the EU people claiming that British voters “got it wrong” and should not have been allowed to vote.

The leftists (and others) only favor “democracy” when it produces the result they want. Anything other than their desired result is wrong, dumb, racist, stupid, childish, ignorant, bitter old white men, etc.

Ed
Ed
July 13, 2016 9:33 am

Well, the repukes in Congress aren’t about to impeach her. They agree with her.

kokoda
kokoda
July 13, 2016 9:35 am

Bad Jew !, Bad Jew ! (like you would correct your dog).

Proves that members of the SCOTUS are politicized, just like everyone else in this country. If you want to be ostracized, start talking politics (like me).

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
July 13, 2016 10:10 am

So a Trump victory would ensure Ginsburg moving to New Zealand and half of Hollywood moving to Canada. Let’s all come together on this.

Persnickety
Persnickety
  Iska Waran
July 13, 2016 10:27 am

CHANGE we can believe in!!!

Tucci78
Tucci78
July 13, 2016 10:33 am

In the presidential election, Ginsberg has totally recused herself from to the duty of serving as a Supreme Court justice. She’s incapable of serving as a judge in any court on this country.

Whether she formally resigns or not, Ginsberg has permanently become “null & void” as a member of the SCOTUS, no matter what else she continues to do.

Dutchman
Dutchman
July 13, 2016 10:48 am

Old, ugly, cunt.

iggy
iggy
July 13, 2016 11:30 am

I have an even better Idea its time for our own program to rid this country of these dual loyalty Jew time bombs which have infiltrated and now control all levels of our government . They have a strangle hold of banking , media , law, finance the insurance and medical fields . There only motivation is protecting their rackets , Israel and their fellow Jews, also known as conspirators.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
July 13, 2016 11:32 am

Out,out damn spot….er cunt.

NZ does not want her either I’m sure. Why did she pick a doomer location like NZ? If the SCOTUS judges start heading for the hills we will know the owners are about to pull the pin.

TJF
TJF
July 13, 2016 1:36 pm

Disgraceful. We should hope that the Supreme Court is at least comprised of adults and not petulent children, but I guess this explains some of the bizarre and convoluted rulings they come up with.

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
July 13, 2016 1:59 pm

Obama Turns Dallas Police Memorial Into America-Bashing Race Lecture, They REFUSE TO APPLAUD.

Read more: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz4EJS7tNuh

Llpoh
Llpoh
July 13, 2016 2:03 pm

Swamp Dickhead – you must own stock in that website the number of times you link to it. Seriously, are you fucking retarded or what? How about you come up with something original. I know, I am asking the impossible, right? That would require actual thinking and such. Easier to spew someone else’s’ pablum.

Llpoh
Llpoh
July 13, 2016 2:06 pm

SwampCunt – I am going to count coup on your sorry ass until you either stop your bullshit or fuck off. You are going to love the experience you fuckwit.

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
July 13, 2016 2:11 pm

Ooooo, another fact-hating keyboard kommando. Are you another jooish-nigger?

You assholes who declare war on truth are disgusting pieces of shit and should take your own lives, miserable cunts.

Life must suck being a nigger joo.

Thinker
Thinker
July 13, 2016 2:21 pm

Time for a skinhead swamp fox to meet an original big dog… [imgcomment image?1[/img]

Swamp Fox
Swamp Fox
  Thinker
July 13, 2016 2:27 pm

@ Thinker

How come you to be so inappropriately named?

anon
anon
  Swamp Fox
July 13, 2016 5:16 pm

Keep up the great work Swamp! TBP needs the truth and nothing but the truth!

LLPOH is innumerate even though he has an MBA from a top IVY league school. He cant figure out holocaust math. 2 million + 4 million (at Auschwitz) = 6 million… this is in a history book.

If the 4 million, is now revised down to 1 million or lower.. according to the sign outside the Auschwitz building… somehow, 2 + 1 = 6!

This is why Admin hates IVY league MBAs… they got an answer without doing any fact checking or math.

By the way, Bea Lever is the biggest dog here.. definitely the most informed and top commenter besides admin and bb.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  anon
July 13, 2016 6:11 pm

Anon – hide, you little rodent. I no of no were where Auschwitz figures are more than about a million. There were a lot of camps, and the Nazis killed in a vast variety of ways. Around 3 million Polish Jews were killed (damn, those “rich” Polish peasants sure had it coming, right?).

If you want to play, come out of the shadows. Your post shows the mental ability of a gnat, so I expect you to keep hiding under the bed like a cockroach.

Stucky
Stucky
  Administrator
July 13, 2016 4:45 pm

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

BuhBuy Swampy!

Thinker
Thinker
July 13, 2016 2:32 pm

You’re the one living in an echo chamber / prison of your own making, not me.

EDIT: @Admin — thanks. Though the fight with LLPOH would have been epic.

Llpoh
Llpoh
July 13, 2016 2:33 pm

Admin – well, that went well. I guess he could not take constructive criticism. Now there is a surprise. I was just getting revved up, too. He was a hate spewing mental midget trying to pass hate off as original thought and research, and he finally annoyed me. I am too thin skinned in my old age.

Guess I will have to spar with Stuck.

BTW – Thanks Thinker.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Administrator
July 13, 2016 2:55 pm

Why am I not surprised. Good riddance.

First line from his site:

“WHITE NATIONS FORUM HAS MOVED TO A ….HEBE FREE SERVER.”

Classy. What an asshole.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
  Administrator
July 14, 2016 10:09 am

What took so long to figure that out? He linked to it with his screen name with every post. Not sure why he came here…….traffic must have been down on his site. The frequency of his posts indicates he’s a FSA member or retired. Didn’t seem sharp enough to be retired though.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
  Administrator
July 14, 2016 11:04 am

My question wasn’t directed at you specifically admin. It was aimed at the larger TBP “consciousness”. I like that you give the idiots enough rope to hang themselves instead of banning them outright. Wasn’t it Swampy who just earlier this week declared how much he loves TBP?

Whenever I read TBP without signing in, I mouse over their screen name to see what, if anything, it leads to. That’s what led me to stomping all over Finnegan’s dick.

I wish you could find a way to prevent people from posting under “anonymous”. In the meantime I just skip anonymous comments and shockingly, my life still feels complete. 🙂

yahsure
yahsure
July 13, 2016 3:35 pm

I guess her comments could be used against her.To get rid of the senile old bag.

Mesomorph
Mesomorph
July 13, 2016 4:47 pm

So am I to believe that in our system of checks and balances, one of the most powerful of all the checks and balances has no faith in our system?
That makes me a bit nervous.
If Ginsberg truly believed that Trump was going to put the country on the wrong path, she would see it as her duty to stay on the job as long as possible.
Either she has gone senile or has shown she is a political tool and no longer capable of impartiality regarding anything Trump (lots of ways the SCOTUS votes could be the only votes that matter in this election like Bush/Gore). She should retire now and move to New Zealand before she loses what little remains of her credibility.

Admin, thanks for unhijacking the thread.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Mesomorph
July 13, 2016 6:00 pm

MESO – hang around. You will see some serious hijacking at times.

llpoh
llpoh
July 13, 2016 7:29 pm

Nothing like white supremacist, racist, anti-Semites to add a bit of class to the place. I really love the way they immediately threaten violence. Good Christians that they are and all.

And they are so-o-o-o smart. Really. They tell you so at every opportunity. Are they protesting too much? I suspect so. Reading and comprehension are just too hard for them.

The thing about SwampDick, it is becoming clear that he is inbred. His mammy is undoubtedly his sister, and his pappy seems likely to be a cousin as well. Just saying. He has all the traits.

I mean, here is a picture of ol’ Swampy with his pa:

[imgcomment image/revision/20140219111004[/img]

And here is the entire Swampy clan at a regular inbredfest:

[imgcomment image[/img]

And a common theme among these white supremacist types is, well, there is almost always a bit of dark blood in there somewhere. You know, a Negro in the woodshed. Swampy just cannot face the fact that his kinfolks liked a bit of dark meat on the side.

Hang in there Swampy. You will one day come to accept your homosexual tendencies and your mixed race roots. If you want to keep busy, you can always try to trace your family tree. That will carry you round and round in loops for ages.

llpoh
llpoh
July 13, 2016 7:47 pm

See, there the white supremacist goes telling everyone how smart he is. When he cannot even spell family. Too funny.

He is also beautiful. The only men I have ever heard talk about men being beautiful, are well, homosexuals, not that there is anything wrong with that.

Damn, why are all white supremacists rich. I do not know. But they all claim it, over and over. Yep, I guess I will believe that, same as I believe old Swampy is smart, well-educated, and good looking. Yep, I sure will believe that. Yessiree. Gotta be true because an upstanding, non-violent, true Christian like ol Swampy says so.

Unfriendly
Unfriendly
July 13, 2016 7:49 pm

For what it’s worth, I considered on several occasions draining the swamp and dining on some swamp rat prior to Llpoh belching up some swamp gas on this thread today.

The reason I didn’t is because it’s always the same with the jew haters. It is almost like a spiritual condition, or even a sickness, how some people will insert “jew” into every thread and/or every conversation.

The Nazi’s, Skinheads, Aryan’s etc., ad naseum, always predicate their arguments by referring to obscure publications and/or bizarre websites. And, it’s constantly 6 million, 6 million, 6 million. One million Jews dying from disease in Nazi concentration camps is OK. But 6 million?!! “Egads! 6 million is a gross overestimation! How dare you embrace that lie!”

These neo nazi’s also gloss over the teachings of the biblical Torah and it’s contribution to civilized society to instead focus on the crazy batshit written in the Talmud.

And, while Islamists rape and pillage the nations of the world, these morons are more concerned regarding Israel and the Zionist bogeymen hiding around every corner and in every dark crevice of their warped minds.

I know I will get ton’s of down votes on this comment because some will claim I have been deceived by the Zionist puppet masters. They might even claim I am able to be mislead because I must have nigger and joo joo juice flowing in my veins, and how if my Aryan lineage were pure, then my hatred would be too. But I will say as I have always said here what I believe: There are some illuminati who are jews, but to conflate all jews with TPTB is just plain wrong.

Again, that is how I see it, so, for anyone who wishes to tell me the errors of my ways, just go ahead either on this thread or others. But I will tell you, in my honest opinion, it all get’s boring after awhile. Just sayin’…

llpoh
llpoh
July 13, 2016 7:57 pm

Unfriendly – great comment. I am always astounded by the links these folks post. They always go to some batshit crazy site with no scholarship whatsoever.

What I know is this – real academics love to tear each other to shreds. If the holocaust was a lie, there would be hundreds of historians – real ones – screaming it out. Hell, they will debate endlessly for years over the details. I have seen much factual material personally, and these anti-Semite nitwits are simply hate filled buffoons.

I am all for an anti-Israeli debate, because no way the US should be supporting Israel worth billions each year. Either they can hold their land, or not. But the anti-Semite stuff is despicable.

Unfriendly
Unfriendly
  llpoh
July 13, 2016 8:19 pm

I hear ya. It looks like we are posting at the same time. During my short time here, we all have had “lively discussions” on various topics like Martin Luther King, Sandyhook, Volkswagen Diesels, 911, the moon, etc). Yet even with these, the arguments (for the most part) seem rooted in reality with the commenters debating from their own opinions and worldviews. With the jew bashers, however, it is like a whole other level of crazy. Just my observation.

Regarding Swampy, I was giving him a break for a couple of reasons. Stucky’s jew post from a few days ago almost seemed like entrapment (but some hilarity did ensue). And, I, too, was kind of a dumbass when I first started posting here (I know, I know, I am downplaying it!) but I was cocky and thought I new it all mainly because I liked to blog when I was drinkin’ and stinkin’ thinkin. Not so much anymore.

Also, I did like some of the non-jew related post Swampy posted and he did get quite a few likes.

But in the end, the fucker was just jew (I mean, too) crazy. In fact, he made BB, Archie and Lysander look like Meshach, Shadrach and Abednego. 🙂

Oh well…

Full Retard
Full Retard
  Unfriendly
July 13, 2016 9:56 pm

Unselfish, you could never have been as bad as the rube that called himself jFish.
Talk about making a splash, that dude had the belly flop down to a science.

Unfriendly
Unfriendly
  Full Retard
July 13, 2016 10:18 pm

No shit. That dude reminded me of that old joke:

Opie Taylor runs away from Mayberry and hitchhikes his way to Las Vegas where he stops into a bar. The bartender says: “whattya’ havin’ kid?”

Opie says: “Do have any rabbit?”. Bartender says: “what in the hell makes you think I would serve rabbit here?”

Opie says: ” because I saw one out back. In the garbage.” And the bartender laughingly replies: “you stupid jew! That was a dumpster rabbit”!

And Opie says: “Ha, ha! I knew that! I just wanted to know if you did! G’nite!”

Gayle
Gayle
July 13, 2016 8:00 pm

Thank you Admin. I can’t stand White Supremicists or ho0wever you spell that damn word. Just what we need gathering around TBP.

llpoh
llpoh
July 13, 2016 8:01 pm

Swampy – you are embarrassing yourself. Really. Admin is likely going to erase all your posts, and will continue to do so in all probability. You have your own back yard to play in, where you have friends. You should take a hint.

Edit: and the posts are gone. Thanks Admin.

Full Retard
Full Retard
July 13, 2016 10:02 pm

The thing about haters, whether they hate whites, blacks, browns or other, they contaminate malleable minds, those soft headed morans who will believe anything they read on the internet.

I have enough problems with the morans surrounding me at work and don’t need to join in an internet hate group to participate in a 20 minute hate of people I don’t know.

It’s amazing that folks find it hard to love a god they can’t see but find it just easy-peasy to hate a group of people they can’t see except in their wild imagination.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
July 13, 2016 11:25 pm

Swampy posted just a few weeks ago that sex was overrated. Maybe sex with women, and I am paraphrasing, he has no more interest in poking the insides of females. Yikes, maybe that’s why he is so stressed out and uptight. Maybe one of these would straighten him out, just saying:

Full Retard
Full Retard
July 14, 2016 1:17 am

Carbon, I recall a comment about not wanting to poke around in somebody’s intestines. I don’t recall who said it but it sounded anal. That or the commenter was remarkably innocent about (vagina).

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 14, 2016 11:16 am

The thread drift around this place could make your head spin.

Let me drag this back on topic for a second.

1) What does it say to you when a sitting Supreme Court Justice would publicly proclaim that she would abandon her country if someone was elected to serve by the people? Shouldn’t such a comment disqualify her from further service?

Here’s the text of the oath she swore when she took office-

“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

So at the very least she is clearly in violation of her oath. Some may argue that she wasn’t ruling on a case, simply giving her opinion. The oath, however, says nothing about in the course of judicial obligations, but as an American swearing to their character. That’s why you have the Promise Keepers organization, the oath is irrevocable.

Second she tell a blatant lie when she claims that the candidate Trump is “not qualified” to hold the office. The qualifications are quite specific and spelled out in the Constitution-

Article 2, Section 1

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

The lying part may not be a disqualification, but the failure to even be familiar with the qualifications of holding the office of President? That is Constitution 101. No sitting Supreme Court Justice who makes a statement like that should be allowed anywhere near a decision.

Maybe he is right, her mind is gone.

Undeniable
Undeniable
July 14, 2016 11:51 am

Great points Hardscrabble and well stated. Glad to be back on topic.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
July 14, 2016 12:09 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologized Thursday for “ill-advised” public criticism of Donald Trump, promising to be more discreet in the future.

The leader of the court’s liberal wing sought to quiet complaints that she crossed a line in her remarks about Trump, saying in a statement that judges should not comment on candidates for public office.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
  ILuvCO2
July 14, 2016 12:17 pm

“The leader of the court’s liberal wing sought to quiet complaints that she crossed a line in her remarks about Trump, saying in a statement that judges should not comment on candidates for public office.”

Yes they should comment……frequently……as it exposes the scam for all to see.

Undeniable
Undeniable
July 14, 2016 12:51 pm

Speaking of the Ginsburg / Trump flap and tying it into the “clash of the worldviews” / “thread drift” on this post from yesterday (as delineated in the above comments):

It is obvious Ginsburg, like others within the establishment, are threatened by Trump and his followers. It is because their establishment worldview is threatened to the point that, out of fear, they can’t help but lash out. And it all, perhaps, is only magnified because their worldview is based upon lies. Thus the messengers become like the boy in the Emperor’s New Clothes story. When the establishment’s lies are exposed, they feel naked and afraid. And they should, because their collective “gods” of liberalism, globalism, socialism and RHINO conservatism are being exposed and torn down by the proletariat and a presidential candidate who appears unafraid to speak truth to power.

How it all turns out, however, remains to be seen.

But the more I watch it the more I realize the turbulent times of which we are living now – and – that maybe all “clashes of worldviews” are rooted in theology one way or another.