One attribute I like most about Glenn Greenwald is that he never pulls punches. One of his most prescient and cutting political lines came earlier this year when he made some observations on the upcoming 2016 Presidential election, in which two status quo, corrupt, bloodthirsty con-artists will compete for the Oval Office. While we don’t yet know which crony the GOP will put up, Hillary is pretty much a foregone conclusion for the Democrats. Greenwald observed:
Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a fucking hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.
You can read that and more in the post: Glenn Greenwald on the 2016 Elections – “They’ll Probably Have a Gay Person After Hillary.”
Well Greenwald is back, and this time he outlines exactly who’s excited about Hillary’s forthcoming run for the Presidency. Here are some excerpts from the Intercept:
It’s easy to strike a pose of cynicism when contemplating Hillary Clinton’s inevitable (and terribly imminent) presidential campaign. As a drearily soulless, principle-free, power-hungry veteran of DC’s game of thrones, she’s about as banal of an American politician as it gets. One of the few unique aspects to her, perhaps the only one, is how the genuinely inspiring gender milestone of her election will (following the Obama model) be exploited to obscure her primary role as guardian of the status quo.
But one shouldn’t be so jaded. There is genuine and intense excitement over the prospect of (another) Clinton presidency. Many significant American factions regard her elevation to the Oval Office as an opportunity for rejuvenation, as a stirring symbol of hope and change, as the vehicle for vital policy advances. Those increasingly inspired factions include:
Wall Street
Down on Wall Street they don’t believe (Clinton’s populist rhetoric) for a minute. While the finance industry does genuinely hate Warren, the big bankers love Clinton, and by and large they badly want her to be president. Many of the rich and powerful in the financial industry—among them, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Tom Nides, a powerful vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, and the heads of JPMorganChase and Bank of America—consider Clinton a pragmatic problem-solver not prone to populist rhetoric. To them, she’s someone who gets the idea that we all benefit if Wall Street and American business thrive. What about her forays into fiery rhetoric? They dismiss it quickly as political maneuvers. None of them think she really means her populism.
The Israel Lobby
Let’s be clear. When it comes to Israel, there is no Bill Clinton 2.0. The former president is probably unique among presidents for the depth of his feeling for Israel and his willingness to put aside his own frustrations with certain aspects of Israel’s behavior, such as settlements. But this accommodation applies to Hillary too. Both Bill and Hillary are so enamored with the idea of Israel and its unique history that they are prone to make certain allowances for the reality of Israel’s behavior, such as the continuing construction of settlements.
Interventionists (i.e., war zealots)
“I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy,” Mr. Kagan said, adding that the next step after Mr. Obama’s more realist approach “could theoretically be whatever Hillary brings to the table” if elected president. “If she pursues a policy which we think she will pursue,” he added, “it’s something that might have been called neocon, but clearly her supporters are not going to call it that; they are going to call it something else.”
Like what, the “Mook Mafia” platform? (you’ll catch that reference later on).
Old school neocons
After nearly a decade in the political wilderness, the neoconservative movement is back. . . . Even as they castigate Mr. Obama, the neocons may be preparing a more brazen feat: aligning themselves with Hillary Rodham Clinton and her nascent presidential campaign, in a bid to return to the driver’s seat of American foreign policy. . . .
Other neocons have followed [Robert] Kagan’s careful centrism and respect for Mrs. Clinton. Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted in The New Republic this year that “it is clear that in administration councils she was a principled voice for a strong stand on controversial issues, whether supporting the Afghan surge or the intervention in Libya.”
It’s easy to imagine Mrs. Clinton’s making room for the neocons in her administration. No one could charge her with being weak on national security with the likes of Robert Kagan on board. . . . Far from ending, then, the neocon odyssey is about to continue. In 1972, Robert L. Bartley, the editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal and a man who championed the early neocon stalwarts, shrewdly diagnosed the movement as representing “something of a swing group between the two major parties.” Despite the partisan battles of the early 2000s, it is remarkable how very little has changed.
There’s quite a bit more to the post, which I suggest reading in full.
If for some strange reason that isn’t enough to get you jazzed up for oligarch-coddler Hilary Clinton’s campaign, perhaps some insight into the people who might run her presidential bid will change your mind. They refer to themselves as the “Mook Mafia,” and it’s basically a couple of power thirsty adolescents. Some of their emails were leaked to ABC News:
For the past five years, a prominent Democratic operative who is a leading contender to manage a Hillary Clinton presidential campaign has maintained a private email listserv for friends and associates that carries a provocative name: the “Mook Mafia.”
The listserv, which one member said reaches more than 150 fellow campaign veterans, has been a means for Robby Mook and a close friend Marlon Marshall to stay connected with many of the operatives who would likely populate a Democratic presidential campaign in 2016. Mook and Marshall have both been mentioned as possible Hillary Clinton campaign managers.
“I know many of you are out there on campaigns, crushing it mafia style,” Marshall wrote. “We unfortunately didn’t do a call this year, but Robby and I wanted to start a chain to acknowledge many in our great family who have been out there busting their tails for all that is right in the world.
“We also wanted you to know that this years reunion will actually be held early next year, January or February, and likely in New York for a weekend. Apologies for the late notice and for not sending anything out on a reunion. Please believe there will be one. The planning committee has just been a tad busy!”
The email was signed “MM,” with Marshall adding a hashtag: #mafia4life.
In the more substantive messages, though, Marshall emerges as the more aggressive of the duo. Writing in January 2010 to urge fellow “mafia” members to work hard on behalf of Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley, Marshall offered “an overall big thank you to everyone on this list who continues to fight the good fight.”
“F U Republicans. Mafia till I die,” he wrote. “If you have just a few minutes, hop on that activate and punish those voters!” (“Activate” is an apparent reference to a software program allowing volunteers to contact targeted voters by phone from anywhere in the country.)
The following year, in confirming news that he would be taking a new job that would include a move to Chicago, Marshall offered special thanks to Mook.
“First, the mafia never separates, it just continues to grow and expand and move into other states in order to destroy Republicans,” he wrote. “A special thanks to none other than the namesake himself, Deacon Robby Mook. Without him, there would be no mafia and I for sure know I would not have learned as much as I have in this business and have this opportunity.”
Mook responded by announcing “mandatory” attendance at a goodbye party for Marshall at a Capitol Hill bar.
“It’s true: Marlon Marshall is leaving our fold. Today is the day the grownassman [sic] grows up and leaves for America’s Second City. I know this prodical [sic] son will return to the mafia manger soon enough to smite Republicans mafia-style,” Mook wrote.
You can’t make this stuff up. I don’t know about you, but…
In Liberty,
Michael Krieger
Hitlery has a hell of a lot of baggage and the albatross of Obongo/Obongocare hanging over her candidacy. In addition she’s so damn UGLY. Don’t think she’s the shoo-in Krieger fears. Stand with Rand and BC-LR to all.
In addition she’s so damn UGLY.
We’ll apparently you don’t know where the” war on women” mantra emanates from.
It’s really women who are too ugly to be married or a least too ugly to be a trophy wife and reach the Cinderella life they’ve been promised since birth.
Being Ugly is an asset for a Democrat Women and a liability for a Republican Women.
Can you imagine a Barbra Mulkuski given the keynote at the Republican National Convention? Or Having a Debra Wasserman Schultz be a close advisor to Mitt Romeny? A reversal of Sex roles in Beauty and the Beast if you would.
Hillary is Eleanor Roosevelt’s love child…..both are ugly as hell.
I have some news for you all: women in America are NOT going to be nearly as invested in Clinton’s candidacy as some folks think. I really believe that Clinton supporters are going to be very disappointed if they are counting on women voting as “women” to elect Clinton.
Most women, including feminists like me, really don’t give a fuck what sex the president is. They have no particular loyalty to women as such. Frankly, most women dislike and distrust this woman, and, outside a few doctrinaire marxist-feminists types in the universities and among the most left-wing of the liberals, this woman is not going to win a lot of support. She is seen as greedy, power-hungry, a war hawk, and a plutocrat- all of which she is.
She talks a good game about supporting women’s pet issues, but, for most women, money, and the declining fortunes matter more than anything. Stay-at-home mothers and women who would LIKE to stay at home if only their and their husbands’ combined incomes would suffice to keep the bills paid, feel no identification with her. Uber-liberated single women with good jobs don’t identify with this woman who coat-tailed her husband and stayed with a serial philanderer because he was her ticket into the inner circle of powerful politicians. Lesbians don’t really identify with her, and they are a tiny voting block at best.
I probably will be voting for no one. I didn’t even bother to vote in the mid-terms, so disgusted was I at the “choices” before me. I will bother to vote only if there is a Libertarian on the ticket. I don’t care what the sex or gender identity or race of the candidate is, and neither do most women. All we want is someone who would have the will to roll back the welfare state and the warfare state, and let us keep some of our money for our own families.
We already have a gay president (and possibly a transsexual first… ummm… ladyboy?). So I don’t see that being a big thing in 2024. Maybe 2024 will be our first blatantly foreign born, non-US-citizen, antidemocratic mass murderer? Or it could be Dwayne Elizondo Mtn. Dew Herbert Camacho.
Chicago , do feminists like you give blow jobs to white guys like me ?
NOPE.
Lazy bitch
Russia has released image of MH17 being shot down by a jet. Cannot find the story in US MSM anywhere.
[img[/img]
Don’t be rude and offensive to the ladies, bb. We already have too few of them to learn from at this forum. I urge you to consider that the next time you comment.
Indiana icdytre ,she called herself a feminist. What does that tell you about this woman?Meathead?
Two years of listening to her screech. The agony! I think the coubtry is burned out on the democrats. Its time to bitch about a republican not getting anything done. Could anyone do worse?
Jimmy Carter would be a step up right now. I kinda lean towards Ron Paul right now. Maybe some thinking from his dad rubbed off.
I may be a party of one, But I don’t think Hilary will run.
She’ll be near 70 by then, I think she has some serious health problems she’s covering up, and I don’t think she’s got the stamina any more to run a 2 year political campaign and then serve 4 years in the presidency till she’s almost 75.
What about the Dems running a Kennedy kid? They’re are dozens of them in the political arena and plenty of money to back them.
I wouldn’t get too worked about about Hilary as Prez. I don’t think there’ much of a chance it will happen.
bb you ignorant puddle of miction.
I know, bb, I’m a lazy bitch.
Are you good-looking? Will you wax my floors and take the air conditioners down to the basement for the winter?
Obutthole got elected because he’s black. Cankles will get elected for being a woman. It only follows that Chelsea will divorce her husband and get full custody of any elitist demon spawn they have, go gay first then transsexual before getting elected on a LBGT single mother/father platform.
Actually I don’t believe Hillary Roadham Cankles Clinton will get elected either but not enough deluded boomers have died yet to preclude it.
Chicago, don’t even engage that intellectual gonorrhea bb. Not. Worth. The. Time.
I’d like to hear your stance on feminism. You may have already posted about it but I’m not sure.
bb says: Chicago , do feminists like you give blow jobs to white guys like me ?
bb, maybe Hitlery will give you a blowjob, ever thought of being and intern at the White House?
The Lefty population of government teat suckers has been the only thing that has grown under this administration, the food stamp program is proof enough of that.
This ruthless nasty bitch will no doubt remind them where their beer, rent, lottery ticket, and drug money comes from.
Romney explained it rather well.
Hillary who?
O, ya’ll all talking about the Cyclopian CFR Bilderberg shape shifting psycrow alien from Jupiters moons.
Why dint yah jes say so…
Yeh, just let the dysfunctional financial system run amok with govt assistance. Sounds like a great plan.
https://survivalblog.com/hillary-rodham-clinton-the-queen-of-codeword-compromiseamericas-1-unprosecuted-felon/