Finally some good news about mobile phones. The neutered male wussies seeking safe spaces from micro-aggression on campuses across America really are getting neutered – by their phones. The inability for these pussified excuses for males to reproduce would be a huge benefit to mankind. The iGadget addicted zombies will just shuffle through life like a dog with its balls cut off.
Mobile phones are ‘cooking’ men’s sperm
Study finds sperm levels of men who kept their phones in their pocket during the day were quite seriously affected in 47 per cent of cases
Fertility experts are warning man that using a mobile for as little as an hour a day is “cooking sperm” and lowering level significantly.
The new study shows that having a mobile phone close to the testicles – or within a foot or two of the body – can lower sperm levels so much that conceiving could be difficult.
The findings have led to a leading British fertility expert to advise men to stop being addicted to mobile phones.
The study – by highly respected specialists – found that sperm levels of men who kept their phones in their pocket during the day were seriously affected in 47 per cent of cases compare to just 11 per cent in the general population.
Professor Martha Dirnfeld, of the Technion University in Haifa, said: “We analysed the amount of active swimming sperm and the quality and found that it had been reduced.
“We think this is being caused by a heating of the sperm from the phone and by electromagnetic activity.”
The team monitored more than 100 men attending a fertility clinic for a year.
Photo: ALAMY
They found that besides men keeping their phones close to their groin many spoke on the phone while it was charging and kept it only a few centimetres from their bed.
Even keeping the phone on a bedside table appears to raise lower sperm cell counts
The findings are in the journal Reproductive BioMedicine and support a long-feared link between dropping fertility rates in men and the prevalent use of cellular phones.
The quality of sperm among men in Western countries is constantly decreasing and is considered crucial in 40 percent of the cases in which couples have difficulty conceiving a child.
Professor Gedis Grudzinskas, a fertility consult ant St George’s Hospital London and in Harley Street said: ” Men need to think about their well being and try to stop being addicted to their phones.
“If you wear a suit to work put the mobile in your chest pocket instead of close to your testes. It will reduce the risk of your sperm count dropping or dropping so much.
“And do you need to keep the phone right next to you on the bedside table. Some men keep their mobile in their shorts or pyjamas in bed. Is that really necessary?”
Professor Dirnfeld said: “I think this is a warning to men to change their habits to improve their chances of having children. Women generally don’t carry their mobiles on them so maybe a mobile phone won’t affect their fertility. That’s not something we have looked at.”
Professor Alan Pacey, a fertility research scientist at Sheffield University has scoffed at suggestions that mobile phones could be damaging male fertility and insists he will be carry on putting his mobile in his trouser pocket.
Professor Dirnfeld said: “Dr Pacey might not need to worry about his fertility, but for younger guys it is a worry. If you a trying for a baby and it doesn’t happen within a year you might want to think of whether it could be your mobile phone habit that is to blame.”
Suddenly the Obamaphone program doesn’t look so bad.
More proof of the pussification of men in ‘Murika. Back in my day just one sperm — not millions — was all that was needed.
I found an old video clip of one of my boys doing his thing.
[img
[/img]
bb’s sperm
[img
[/img]
El Coyote’s sperm
[img
[/img]
great pics…still laughing
Thumbs up for Stucky!
[img
?w=600&h=569[/img]
Huh. A whole new reason for owning a spermy, formerly known as selfie, stick.
This place is a fucking trip. But I like it.
This article may have some validity, but haven’t our sperm populations been in radical decline for generations? If those reports are accurate, what was the cause before cell phones?
GMOs and vaccines for two.
When your wife or girlfriend asks why you glued your i-Phone to your balls, tell her you don’t like condoms.
That’s it, man. I ran out of Trump articles to disparage and now I’m slumming in an article on semen. All kinds of perverted penis pics and ejaculation. Before William Smith confessed to sexual assault, that term was never used in polite company. Today ejaculation is more acceptable than speaking about lactation.
https://youtu.be/p6_S0PGryAY?t=3
ottomatik: tight pants and underwear, artificial food, environmental contamination, lead pollution (c.1920 – c.1980 in the US, from auto fuel), drug use, and I strongly suspect, more frequent ejaculation both with and without a female partner (there are several prominent TBP posters you can ask if you need “without” explained).
Also, has anyone stopped to consider how exactly they would have statistically meaningful sperm count information going back before 1960 or so? I mean, just how many people do you think were jacking off in an exam room so a doctor or scientist could check for a sperm count under a microscope? The claim of declining sperm counts is commonly made but I’m highly skeptical of the data. People think climate data is dubious and then accept sperm count data from 80 years ago?