Lots of Smoke Here, Hillary

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

Lots of Smoke Here, Hillary

Prediction: If Hillary Clinton wins, within a year of her inauguration, she will be under investigation by a special prosecutor on charges of political corruption, thereby continuing a family tradition.

For consider what the Associated Press reported this week:

The surest way for a person with private interests to get a meeting with Secretary of State Clinton, or a phone call returned by her, it seems, was to dump a bundle of cash into the Clinton Foundation.

Of 154 outsiders whom Clinton phoned or met with in her first two years at State, 85 had made contributions to the Clinton Foundation, and their contributions, taken together, totaled $156 million.

Conclusion: Access to Secretary of State Clinton could be bought, but it was not cheap. Forty of the 85 donors gave $100,000 or more. Twenty of those whom Clinton met with or phoned dumped in $1 million or more.

To get to the seventh floor of the Clinton State Department for a hearing for one’s plea, the cover charge was high.

Among those who got face time with Hillary Clinton were a Ukrainian oligarch and steel magnate who shipped oil pipe to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and a Bangladeshi economist who was under investigation by his government and was eventually pressured to leave his own bank.

The stench is familiar, and all too Clintonian in character.

Recall. On his last day in office, Jan. 20, 2001, Bill Clinton issued a presidential pardon to financier-crook and fugitive from justice Marc Rich, whose wife, Denise, had contributed $450,000 to the Clinton Library.

The Clintons appear belatedly to have recognized their political peril.

Bill has promised that, if Hillary is elected, he will end his big dog days at the foundation and stop taking checks from foreign regimes and entities, and corporate donors. Cash contributions from wealthy Americans will still be gratefully accepted.

One wonders: Will Bill be writing thank-you notes for the millions that will roll in to the family foundation — on White House stationery?

By his actions, Bill is all but conceding that there is a serious conflict of interest between his foundation raking in millions that enhance the family’s prestige and sustain its travel and lifestyle, while providing its big donors with privileged access to the secretary of state.

Yet if Hillary Clinton becomes president, the scheme is unsustainable. Even the Obama-Clinton media might not be able to stomach this.

And even Clinton seems to be conceding the game is up. “I know there’s a lot of smoke, and there’s no fire,” she said in self-defense this week.

She is certainly right about the smoke.

And if, as Democratic apparatchik Steve McMahon assures us that there is “no smoking gun,” no quid-pro-quo, no open-and-shut case of Secretary Clinton taking official action in gratitude to a donor of the family foundation, how can we predict a special prosecutor?

Answer: We are not at the end of this scandal. We are at what Churchill called the “end of the beginning.”

Missing emails are being unearthed at State, through Freedom of Information Act requests, that are filling out the picture Clinton thought had been blotted out when her 33,000 “private” emails were erased by her lawyers.

Someone out there, Julian Assange, Russia, or the rogue websites doing all this hacking, are believed to have many more explosive emails they are preparing to drop before Election Day.

And why is Clinton is keeping her State Department calendar secret from the AP, if it does not contain meetings or calls she does not want to defend? She has defied requests and the AP had to sue to get the schedule of her first two years at State.

Moreover, the AP story on the State Department-Clinton Foundation links was so stunning it is sure to trigger follow-up by investigative journalists who can smell a Pulitzer.

Then there are the contacts between Huma Abedin, her closest aide at State, and Doug Band at the Clinton Foundation, the go-betweens for the donor-Clinton meetings, which has opened a new avenue for investigators.

These were unearthed by Judicial Watch, which is not going away.

The number of persons of interest involved in this suppurating scandal, which has gone from an illicit server, to a panoply of Clinton lies to the public that disgusted the FBI director, to erased emails, to “pay for play,” and now deep into the Clinton Foundation continues to grow.

All that is needed now, to bring us to an independent counsel, is calls for the FBI to reopen and broaden its investigation in light of all that has been revealed since Director Comey said there was not evidence enough to recommend an indictment.

If Clinton controls the Justice Department, calls for a special prosecutor will be resisted, but only until public demand becomes too great.

For there were independent counsels called in Watergate, Iran-Contra and the scandals that led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton says there is no fire. But something is causing all that smoke.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 26, 2016 8:50 am

Pat’s wrong. Clinton’s supporters would never demand a special prosecutor. Nor would the press. Watergate and Iran-contra happened under republican presidents. Obama’s already been far more corrupt than Nixon ever was. There’s a different rule for democrats: no rules at all.

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Iska Waran
August 26, 2016 9:01 am

Iska took the words right out of my comment.

Crimson Avenger
Crimson Avenger
August 26, 2016 9:26 am

The public’s not going to demand anything. No one cares anymore, at least not a sizeable enough group, and the media sure as hell isn’t going to stir the pot.

Where’s the media coverage and/or the outrage over the Pentagon losing $8.5 trillion over the years (almost half our debt)? Show me the consequences for that, and I’ll start to look for consequences elsewhere.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 26, 2016 9:38 am

Some of Hillary’s latest “vast right wing conspiracy” against her style of statements about her critics seem almost irrational.

I’m wondering if she has developing paranoid mental problems or if her advisers and writers are getting desperate and she is letting them control what she says?

pablum
pablum
August 26, 2016 9:47 am

we now live in a state of undeclared war, against countries with little to no Navy or Airforce, yet, somehow we can’t win, I guess we suck at war.

4 moar years of money printing for the MIC, 4 moar years of obamacare increases, 4 moar years of bombs missing ISIS towns, 4 moar years of 0.001% interest on your life savings.

Hint: ISIS is the cover story for the Banksters/MIC. They were created to replace communism as the greatest threat to humanity. With no threat, there is no MIC, and with no MIC there is no profit for Banksters.

mark
mark
August 26, 2016 10:11 am

And what becomes of this vast right wing conspiracy?

Nothing without a mass Non Complience movement depriving the government its money.

Crash and burn is the only thing that can tilt it to 70/30.

At least 30% of the people are hopeless.

Slayer of Sacred Cows
Slayer of Sacred Cows
August 26, 2016 1:20 pm

None of this matters. We’re headed toward WW3 and a global financial collapse whether or not she wins the election. It’s the system, not the people. Fortunately, after the collapse, a new, decentralized and global world will emerge.

Stucky
Stucky
  Slayer of Sacred Cows
August 26, 2016 1:25 pm

“Fortunately, after the collapse, a new, decentralized and global world will emerge.”

Possibly.

And what are the chances this “new, decentralized and global world” will be benevolent or better than what we have NOW??

Be careful what you wish for.

Slayer of Sacred Cows
Slayer of Sacred Cows
  Stucky
August 26, 2016 1:34 pm

The root of almost all of the worlds problems stems from the belief in authority, that some people have the right to rule over others, and those authoritarians abuse of the system. By moving to a decentralized world where our systems are ‘trustless’ (not reliant on the honestly of middlemen), the apparatus that enabled the gross abuse of power will no longer exist. Once we’ve transitioned to a decentralized currency, governments will no longer be able to fund themselves as they will no longer be able to control money and trade. Without that platform of control, free market capitalism will reign supreme. Trade will replace war, innovation won’t be stifled by regulations, cronyism will vanish, entire cultures of people won’t be suppressed by drug laws, affirmative action, subsidization of poverty, etc etc. Decentralized and encrypted technology is the path to freedom, and due to the imminent collapse (within 10 years) and exponential growth of the decentralized tech, and if you survive the collapse, you just might see actual freedom in your lifetime.

harry p
harry p
August 26, 2016 1:49 pm

I like Pat but he’s high on hopium, just like Judge Nap was when he thought the FBI was going to be legit and indict.
It might be logical but things arent logical today where 2+2=fish.

if she gets elected she will not see the scrutiny of a special prosecutor.
Those who care are already against her and the vast majority with her wont be swayed by any evidence.

Stucky
Stucky
August 26, 2016 2:09 pm

“The root of almost all of the worlds problems stems from the belief in authority ….” —— Slayer of Sacred Cows

That’s quite a statement. I strongly disagree with it. Our worldviews must be quite different. I’ll leave it at, as I have lots of shit to do here.

The rest of your post sounds like something from a Fairy Tale book. Can you name me just one example of such a society … free feel to scan of of human history for such an example.

I think you need to read Lord Of The Flies.

Slayer of Sacred Cows
Slayer of Sacred Cows
  Stucky
August 26, 2016 3:26 pm

Why would you disagree with my statement about the belief in authority is the root of most of the worlds problems? Virtually every mass tragedy was born directly from a ruling class (aka government, kings, priests) directing those they have authority over to do evil things. War, genocide, mass starvation, socialism, etc etc are traced back the belief in authority. Do you believe that other people have the right to rule others? Are you the property of someone else?

I’ve read the Lord of Flies and it’s nothing but a patronizing belief that you need a big brother to rule over you. It’s an excuse for socialism.

Just because what I’m proposing hasn’t happened doesn’t mean it won’t. That’s like saying flying would never be possible back in 1902. The reason decentralization hasn’t happened is because it’s new technology. Decentralization is happening as we speak. It’s still mostly under the surface but once you see it, it will utterly change your perspective of the future.

Answer me this: if the world transitioned to a decentralized currency such as bitcoin, how would governments fund themselves, let alone war? They can’t tax it, they can’t print it, they can’t even track it. It’s completely outside of their control.

cynic
cynic
August 26, 2016 4:58 pm

What about the idea that Hillary isn’t the real Democratic candidate? She seems like a drugged-up Islamic terrorist vehicle bomb driver under intense fire from left and right as she rolls or staggers towards her detonation point. Her ‘supporters’ may be happy enough to see all the bad news from her past and her Foundation dumped on her, because when she dies just before the election, her replacement can appear as Mr. Clean and cruise through on a wave of renewed enthusiasm.

David
David
August 26, 2016 9:22 pm

Even the Obama-Clinton media might not be able to stomach this.

Hahahaha, please stop, you are killing me.