Murdering the Innocent in Order to Support the Lie

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

As my readers know, I reported, factually, on the Boston Marathon alleged bombing case. I interviewed carefully the pro bono attorney, John Remington Graham, who intervened in behalf of the Russian aunt, a lawyer in the Russian Federation, in behalf of the falsely convicted younger Tsarnaev brother, Dzhokhar, the older brother having been murdered by the FBI. Graham conclusively proved that the FBI’s own evidence proved beyond any doubt that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was innocent, which means so was the older brother.

It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that there was no real bombing at the Boston Marathon and that the alleged terrorist event, using crisis actors, was an orchestration designed to convince dumbshit Americans that they really were under a “Muslim threat.” The entire foreign policy of the United States in the 21st century is based on an orchestrated “Muslim threat.”

The orchestrated threat was also used for a practice exercise in closing down one of America’s largest cities in order to manhunt with intent to kill a young man chosen as the villain for the orchestrated event. American citizens were forced at gunpoint out of their homes while Homeland Security, a Nazi reminiscent name from the Hitler era, disrupted the life of an entire city and its airport service in behalf of this orchestrated event that murdered American civil liberty. The entire exercise was based on a lie, an event that never happened, like Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and so forth. Just another lie in behalf of the “exceptional people.”

A number of websites have disproved the false case against the Tsarnaev brothers. Attorney John Remington Graham has brought the case to the justice authorities, but the US Department of Justice (sic) has no interest whatsoever in justice.

Now comes forward an attorney, Mary Maxwell with a book. It is available online free. I read the first eight chapters, which was sufficient to comfirm me in my independent conclusion that there was no Boston Marathon bombing by terrorists.

I recommend to you Mary Maxwell’s account. However, I will say that I believe that she uses irony excessively and that on occasions her irony gets in the way of the factual message. Knowing this, stick with it, and read her account.

Irony is the style that she has chosen, and we must respect a person prepared to stand up to the murderous American establishment and to challenge one of the founding myths of the American Police State and Washington’s wars against the world.

Read her book here: https://daliamaelachlan.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/boston-ail-book-jan-5-9.pdf

Any US citizen that believes the falsified case of the Boston Marathon bombing is a dangerous and direct threat to American civil liberty and to the lives of millions of people on planet Earth.

If Americans do not wake up to the orchesrations to which they are subjected, they will forfeit their freedom. And they will not be able to prevent Earth’s destruction in thermo-nuclear war.

The Russians and the Chinese are individually and together more powerful than Washington, and they are not going to put up with the lies with which insouciant Americans are content.

If Americans cannot take back their country from self-serving oligarchs, Americans are doomed.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Rob
Rob
January 6, 2017 10:47 am

Oh shit, Paul is off his meds again. Somebody get over there and help him down off the roof.

starfcker
starfcker
  Rob
January 6, 2017 4:52 pm

This is why they invented the term “batshit crazy”.

kokoda the deplorable
kokoda the deplorable
January 6, 2017 11:22 am

This one is a tad hard to swallow. I agree with the others, and to piss some fucks off, JFK was assassinated by others than Oswald.
However, I will read the referenced book, 256 pages, prior to making an opinion.

Dutchman
Dutchman
January 6, 2017 11:25 am

As long as he’s harmless to others, let him rant.

starfcker
starfcker
  Dutchman
January 6, 2017 5:04 pm

Dutch, as much as I am not a conspiracy guy, there are a bunch of very, very convenient deaths in the last couple of years. Key witnesses, etc. Seth Rich and Michael Hastings come to mind. Trump has his links to the doubters in Roger Stone and Alex Jones. Who knows what they know. Stay tuned.

Vic
Vic
  starfcker
January 7, 2017 5:08 am

I simply don’t believe anything my government tells me, unless a third party proves it.

Pete H
Pete H
January 6, 2017 11:26 am

I dunno about this one, Paul…

Of course, the American people have been lied to for so long by so many that it’s virtually impossible to parse the truth from everything that’s said. I believe what I see. I watch the mechanics of what’s going on out there, and come to my own conclusions. And frankly, I don’t like what I see…

Gayle
Gayle
January 6, 2017 12:10 pm

One thing I find intriguing is that there has never been, to my recollection, any published or broadcast serious interview with anyone who was a credible witness to or victim of (by way of injury) about one of these so-called terrorist attacks (911 and Oklahoma being exceptions). On-the-street interviews were done as part of the immediate news cycle, but after that, apparently the follow up interview possibilities have never occurred to any mainstream journalists in all of this time.

Apparently no one from Sandy Hook, Boston, Orlando, San Bernardino, Colorado is ever interested in explaining the experience, reflecting on what they observed, or analyzing the effects upon themselves from the perspective of time passing. The one interview I read after San Bernardino was with a survivor who discussed the heroic actions of a victim which saved her life. Nothing else about the event was touched on at all.

Am I wrong here?

nkit
nkit
  Gayle
January 6, 2017 1:04 pm

I think that if you were to pick up a copy of Philip Haney’s new book titled “See Something Say Nothing” you might change your perspective, Gayle. In case you are unaware of Haney, he became a whistleblower after being a founding member of DHS, a CBP officer for many years, and served two tours of duty at The National Targeting Center where he was promoted to the Advanced Targeting Team. He has over 40 years experience in Islamic theology and the strategy and tactics of the Global Islamic Movement. He was highly acclaimed in his work and retired honorably in 2015.

In his book, he spends a good deal of time on the Boston Marathon bombing and the presence of a bloodied Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi at the finish line. Alharbi was detained at the hospital but later inexplicably released and aided in his disappearance. Alharbi was designated a “Bravo 10” – the highest designated threat to national security. Haney explains how the Muslim American Society and the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) played a role despite being involved, at the same time, in outreach programs with the FBI, DHS, and the DOJ. Years earlier, Haney had warned about the ISB and their radical imam, Yusufi Vali and their radical ideology, but Obama and his Muslim brothers paid no attention, and later targeted Haney for discipline for his astute warnings and writings that did anything but praise Islam.

People frequently rant about the Jews in our government, but they would do well to consider the depth of infiltration by the Muslim Brotherhood and their many, many front groups that decide and forge our policies regarding violent Islamic jihad. Obama’s policy of “Countering Violent Extremism” or CVE is a policy of protecting the civil rights of Muslims at the expense of American citizens’ rights and national security. Our government is literally crawling with Muslims and the Muslim Brotherhood Society that control how we deal with Muslim terrorism and how the press must (or must not in this case) deal with it.

The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood (which despite Obama’s protestations) is a terrorist organization is as follows: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope. Allahu akbar!”

Mohamed Elibiary (member of another Muslim Brotherhood front group) who was appointed by Obama to the Homeland Security Advisory Council in Oct. 2010 resigned after his role in the “inappropriate sharing of sensitive law enforcement documents.” This after he claimed that The U.S. would become a Sharia-compliant Islamic caliphate. In short, our government, especially under Obama, genuflects at the altar of Islam and is literally squirming and wriggling with Muslims that desire to destroy the U.S. and Western civilization. Our government (and their lapdog presstitutes) is/are complicit towards those ends. The book is excellent and I highly recommend it. Likewise, “Stealth Invasion” (Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad) by Leo Hohmann is also an excellent read.

annon
annon
  Gayle
January 6, 2017 5:23 pm

Regarding the OKC bombing:
look up Sgt Terry Yeakey. One of the first to arrive at the blown up building. A mighty man “suicided” by the fbi because he saw some explosives being carried out of the building by guys in black suits. He did not go quietly into the night.

Vic
Vic
  Gayle
January 7, 2017 5:14 am

Actually, CNN always interviews people involved in these “attacks,” parents, other victims, which leads me to believe the allegations I’ve heard that they’re actors. Even the news anchors, such as Brooke Baldwin, act as if they’re tearing up only to recover within seconds. It’s so fake and they’re so bad at it, how can anyone believe them? They were all especially bad during Sandy Hook and when the reporter was supposedly shot. And based on that, they demand guns be outlawed.

David
David
January 6, 2017 1:37 pm

Just because the USA has done some, ok many, bad things, it does not mean every competitor to the USA is good and innocent of charges as the author seems to be heading towards as he ages.

Vic
Vic
  David
January 7, 2017 5:20 am

Actually, he’s finding out things he didn’t know about before and feels the need to inform others and warn them.

Stubb
Stubb
January 6, 2017 7:42 pm

I am sure the real truth will be seen in the new movie called Patriots Day starring Mark Wahlberg and Kevin Bacon:

Wip
Wip
  Stubb
January 6, 2017 10:15 pm

Haha, I was just thinking the same thing. This will be the “truth” any “good” American will believe.

Sam J.
Sam J.
January 7, 2017 1:37 am

I don’t know enough about the Boston bombing to conclusively say it was falsely attributed to the brothers. There are a couple of facts I do know that cast doubt in my mind. One is the picture of the backpack one of the brothers was wearing. It’s not the same as the one shown blown up. Two, the back pack that was blown up appears to be identical to one worn by a private military contractor, or at least he was wearing the same uniform they wear, from Craft International security. He had his picture taken by a spectator before the bombing wearing the backpack. He was also standing at the time near the window that was blown out and near where the bomb went off. After the bomb went off he was photographed standing in the middle of the road with no backpack on.

There’s another event that makes me doubt the governments story. Building #7 fell the same speed as a rock dropped beside it in free air for roughly 108 feet. This means the building had no resistance to falling except air.

All materials fall the same speed in a gravity field disregarding air friction which I don’t thing we need to worry about for a building falling. So the speed of our imaginary rock falling next to the building is just gravity related. The speed of the buildings falling, the exact same as the rock, is just gravity also. This means that there was NOTHING to slow the fall of the building. The density of the material under the imaginary rock falling was air. The building fell the same therefore the density of the material under the building was also air. We know this is not true. Building #7 was not hovering in the air. The lower portions of the building were demoed out from under it.

It’s makes NO difference how big the fires were. The buildings density never reached the same value as air! The fires did not boil away the building structure where it was light as air! All the talk about damage, fires, this, that, all bullshit because the building fell with all four corners almost level the same speed as a rock in AIR. If a building falls as fast as a rock and the rock is falling through JUST AIR then the building is falling through JUST AIR also. Simple equivalence. 1=1, 2=2, big rock falling in air=small rock falling in air=building falling in air. One problem is people sometimes believe that a really heavy thing will fall faster than a lighter thing. Not true. Look at this video of the Apollo astronaut dropping a feather and a hammer on the Moon. They land at the same time.

So why should I believe the governments story on Boston?

Vic
Vic
January 7, 2017 5:33 am

You should look up Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Another good person to look up is Sibel Edmonds, who worked at the FBI as a translator during 9/11. She says treason was going on. The George W. Bush administration declared her an “Unclassified Woman,” which ended up being the title of the book she wrote on the subject. She was forbidden by the White House from testifying before Congress because they said the information she knew was “classified” and could not be disclosed, even to Congress.
Corbett Report is another good website on 9/11.

You know, if Congressmen are supposed to be the representatives of the people and they are also in charge of oversight of the intelligence community, it seems to me nothing should be classified in a way that any member of Congress can’t review it.

Another point, it’s not just Obama or the Democrats. The Republicans are just as bad.