Financialization

Guest Post by The Zman

One of the things that ails us in the modern age is we have yet to adjust our thinking to the modern economy. The great political-economic thinkers lived in a time when money was either gold, backed by gold or a fiat currency. The result is our political and economic debates are based in the logic of a world that no longer exists. The modern global economy is not based on fiat money or hard money. It is based on credit money, which has a unique set of characteristics.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

For instance, the US government is no longer able to print up greenbacks and sprinkle them on the economy. Instead, when they expand the money supply, they expand lending, both domestic and global. It’s not just any sort of lending either. The central bank can buy up long term notes in order to drive down long term lending rates, thus expanding lending for capital goods. Alternatively, they can buy up short term debt and increase the amount retail lending. The Federal Reserve holds close to 2 trillion in mortgages, for example.

There’s no question that this new form of currency arrangement has had benefits to the West. Libertarians and goldbugs will spend hours arguing against this sort of currency manipulation, claiming it will lead to a financial collapse, but so far, the opposite has been true. The mortgage meltdown of 2008 did not result in a global depression. The worst you can say of it is the result has been a long, localized recession. The rulers look at current asset values and see a ringing endorsement of credit money and central banks.

Putting that debate to one side, there are longer term problems that come with credit money. One is the slow eating away of the middle class by eating away at small and mid-sized business. The most obvious example is the collapse of retail. The old joke was that Amazon turned big box stores into their showroom. Consumers would go to Best Buy to look at electronics, get free advice and then go on-line to buy them. This can only last for so long and the mass closure of retail stores we see this year suggests the end is near.

The libertarian argument is that the more efficient business has displaced the less efficient business, and that’s not completely wrong, but it ignores the salient aspects of this phenomenon. A world in which everyone either works for or buys from a global company run by a Bond villain is not a world most people want for themselves or their progeny. There’s also the question as to whether it is economically sustainable. Business needs customers and customers need jobs in order to have money to be customers.

There’s also the fact that Amazon would not exist without credit money. In a world of real money, Amazon would have gone bankrupt long ago. This is true of the social media companies that now control public debate. None of them would have made it past the hobby stage if not for the financial system’s ability to conjure credit money. In effect, we now live in a world where the rulers can make their money more valuable and your money worthless, simply by manipulating the amount of credit money.

There’s another way in which the financilization via credit money erodes social stability by undermining the middle-class. Take the example of industrial supplies. This has always been a middle-class, local business. The “value” added was the owners willingness to invest in their location and facility in order to meet the needs of their local customers in the commercial trades. They were almost always family businesses with the wife running the office and the husband running the shop.

The miracle of credit money has allowed investors to back the acquisition and consolidation of these mom and pop businesses. The way it works is investors back one business buying up other shops in the area. This allows the new owner to replace the previous owners with low cost salary men. It also allows for the consolidation of accounting, IT, human resources, etc.. This makes the over all business more efficient, giving libertarian economist a tingle in all the wrong places.

This increase in efficiency does not mean lower prices to consumers. It often means the opposite. In some areas, there’s no longer competition so prices rise. The economic gains from efficiency show up in the returns to the investors. The lack of community investment, like sponsoring local little leagues and social organizations, is also stripped out and returned to investors. This is great for a Bain Capital, but it is terrible for the local communities. Instead of communities, we now have areas populated by strangers.

Another useful example is education. Just a generation ago, a college diploma had real value that exceeded the purchase price. The financialization of college has not only decreased the initial value of the diploma, it has stripped away much of its long term value through the student loan rackets. The only people benefitting from college today are the people running the colleges and the money men financing it. The school makes millions staging mock combat with retarded black men and your kid gets saddled with the debt.

Credit money has unleashed financial pirates on the American middle class, turning every small town and family business into a Lindisfarne, in the eyes of our financial class. A big reason why the economic data looks good, but the the people are revolting is the social capital that held together the American middle has been financialized and moved to the balance sheets of global financiers. Increasingly, the relationship in the modern American economy is not between buyers and sellers, but between predators and prey.

At least when the Vikings raided a village, they did not demand that the locals celebrate their ruination. It was a raid and the local authorities tried to prevent it. That’s the other aspect of this that is eating away at our civic life. It used to be that government worked to reign in the financial tricksters, not because they cared about the suckers, but because it was bad for politics. Today, if the political class has anything to say about it at all, it is usually a celebration. The Danegeld has now become an institution.

When Alfred the Great faced off against the Great Heathen Army, he quickly learned that adherence to old customs and old ways was a liability. The world had changed. In fact, it changed so much that he nearly lost his crown before he could adjust to the new realities presented by the Viking raids. The Norse played by a different set of rules and they had no respect for the Anglo-Saxon ways. In fact, they sought to exploit those ways to their advantage. To survive, Alfred had to embrace new tactics and new methods.

Eventually, Alfred resorted to guerilla tactics, something previously seen as dishonorable by the Anglo-Saxons, to weaken the Danes and maneuver them into the decisive battle at Edington. The point here is that those old economic arguments from the libertarians, like those constitutional arguments from the Buckley Right, are no longer relevant. In fact, they are now hindrances. The modern pirates have figured out how to turn our virtues into vices. That means we will need new virtues and new tactics.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Mario8282
Mario8282
May 21, 2017 3:21 pm

This posting is quite confusing.
“The modern global economy is not based on fiat money or hard money. It is based on credit money…” – well, ALL MONEY comes into existence as a credit to be paid back with interest. Oh excuse me, there is no such word as “interest” in the post above. But good to know about the tactics against the Vikings.

The post only criticizes secondary aspects and consequences of a money system without mentioning that by design the system is digging itself in infinite debt. The main trouble is not identified: the incurred interest has no currency coverage whatsoever. Everybody who understands the design of the current system knows for a fact that there is no way of changing the game and survive financially. More and more will enter bankruptcy. It is a mathematical certainty. The actual money system must be abolished, here is why:
Monetarism vs Sovereign Currency

Monetarism vs Sovereign Currency

Then it should be useful to understand why “economists” never predict a crisis:
An example of WHY CONFORMIST ECONOMISTS NEVER PREDICT A “CRISIS”

An example of WHY CONFORMIST ECONOMISTS NEVER PREDICT A “CRISIS”

Thx for the time.

jackson
jackson
  Mario8282
May 22, 2017 9:24 am

The Zman is a dolt.

He just can’t resist getting in a dig on Libertarians.

This guy has probably never read any of Murry Rothbard’s work, but he’s going to tell you about Libertarians.

It’s obvious the Zman believes the Koch brothers and their bought and paid for economist, Tyler Cowen, are the Libertarian standard. Please excuse me now while I vomit.

rhs jr
rhs jr
May 21, 2017 3:24 pm

A fifth grader can understand it’s now a Monopoly Game using Monopoly Money and the Bankers are the Elite; all the other players will go broke or become debt slaves.

Mario8282
Mario8282
  rhs jr
May 21, 2017 3:47 pm

The Monopoly game does not explain how money comes into existence.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Mario8282
May 21, 2017 6:39 pm

Ok, the Bankers print paper with green ink and then loan it to “players”.

BB
BB
May 21, 2017 3:45 pm

I thought credit money was Fiat money since all Money comes into existence as debt borrow by someone.And there is the problem of interest since there is never enough money in system to repay the interest more debt has to be created.The whole debt monetary system is a global debt creation machine which will eventually collapse in on itself.I think Zman is a little loopy these days.Must be something in the water.

WIP
WIP
May 21, 2017 4:18 pm

Do not shop at corporate stores. Only eat at small, family owned businesses.

General
General
May 21, 2017 4:36 pm

#1. The US economy has been shrinking since the year 2000.

#2. Credit money is a form of fiat money. Lincoln’s Greenbacks were also fiat money, but not credit money.

#3. The bankers are destroying the US just like termites destroy wood. Eventually, it will lead to collapse.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
May 21, 2017 4:50 pm

I’m with BB. That’s not Fiat? Fiat means by decree. In the bad old days of serfdom the King simply decreed “from now on, No More Foreplay, No More Lube” you are going to use this lead in place of gold period.
Now the Decree is issued by any one of many stooges but the Decree ends with “and you will thank big brother”.
If it came into existence out of thin air it will go out as thin air but us nobodies will still pay for it. If the whole system collapses we will still pay for it with all the interest so far incurred in suffering and death.
Why? Because God created the law of Karma for people who don’t believe in God. If we want to dance we must pay the Piper and the Piper always gets his money. Just because he didn’t collect today doesn’t mean he won’t collect. Remember the end of the story? He led all the children away.
So glad I could cheer everyone one up again so soon after my dismal article.

jamesthedeplorablewanderer
jamesthedeplorablewanderer
May 21, 2017 6:40 pm

The useful characteristic of MONEY is that is has INTRINSIC value; if you don’t want to use your gold coin as money, you can melt it down into jewelry, plate an iron cup with it, etc. ; it won’t corrode or decay, conducts electricity (the reasons for gold contacts on integrated circuits), and so on. You can do other things with it than direct commerce.
Printed paper is nearly worthless except as CURRENCY; and it can become non-current.
0s and 1s in a computer are even more worthless, which makes me doubt Bitcoin will retain its value for any long period of time.
Which was are bankers, TPTB and government pushing us? How long before it all collapses back into barter? I suspect we will see it in my lifetime, and I’m past 50 already.

General
General
  jamesthedeplorablewanderer
May 21, 2017 8:06 pm

Personally I think the way forward, to get away from fiat currencies, is cryptocurrencies.

Imagine rural towns and communities using the their own cryptocurrencies free from banker influence.

Mario8282
Mario8282
  General
May 22, 2017 6:46 am

It won’t work.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
May 21, 2017 7:47 pm

Not only is “credit money” fiat money, it’s a better deal for the bankers. No presses, no ink, just hit “enter” and let the digital dollars flow. Either way it’s still created “at will” and is totally worthless.
Fractional banking, with derivatives, created from electrons! What could go wrong?

doug
doug
May 21, 2017 9:20 pm

Credit money is a social disease we caught from a few clever Jewish gentlemen quite some time ago. I’ll bet you can think of a cure….

Mario8282
Mario8282
  doug
May 22, 2017 9:32 am

Credit money or money as debt is NOT the problem.

Anon
Anon
May 22, 2017 7:18 pm

Credit money has one very large Achilles heal, and that is when the normal’s can no longer even pay the minimum payment on the credit. That day is coming – fast. It is already largely happening in housing. If it was not you would not see B of A now saying that they will not count student loan debt against a borrower for a mortgage. Just think about that for a minute – a lender for a mortgage will say ‘oh don’t worry about it’ in regards to a substantial payment, in some cases above 600.00 / month, which CANNOT be bankrupted, and will follow the borrower till their death. Even as far as garnishing SS payments. Most folks DTI (debt to income) is already way too much under traditional lending standards, and most down payments are non existent.
They see the math, and so does everyone else. The pie is getting smaller, and exponents work in both directions. The pie will halve at a much faster rate moving forward, and eventually you get to the last half that will cause the whole damn thing to implode. That is when the real fun starts. There just are not enough rich people.
Any process that uses mathematics at its core is subject to its rules. Credit money, bitcoin, ‘real’ money etc. all MUST follow the basic fundamentals of math. Bankers love compounding interest, however they are playing a game where eventually they will over play their cards, and then have no where to go. Any politician that can use an Excel spreadsheet knows this. Their challenge is to leave office before they are blamed.
The Fed is stretching, but ultimately they will lose. The only way to avoid the inevitable end is to move to a new currency, then you effectively start at zero. Considering we are the ‘world reserve currency’ that just may be a little disruptive. The question is, when it comes to the end point, do they decide changing currency is more disruptive than letting the current system crash. Either way, we are fooked.

Mario8282
Mario8282
  Anon
May 22, 2017 11:25 pm

“The only way to avoid the inevitable end is to move to a new currency, then you effectively start at zero.”
Wrong!
If you restart this very same system, in a few decades it will bring mankind to the same result as today. The problem is the money system. Read carefully why:

Monetarism vs Sovereign Currency

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
May 22, 2017 7:58 pm

Anon.
Right you are on many counts. Funny you should mention paying minimum. A long time friend just told me he is at that point now. Can’t even pay interest now. Has been hanging on to some chevron stock but now has to cash out.