The Ultimate Regulatory Reform: Abolish Fractional Reserve Banking!

fractional reserve banking II

The Trump Administration has presented the first part of its plan to overhaul a number of Wall Street financial regulations, many of which were enacted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.  The report is in response to Executive Order 13772 in which the US Treasury Department is to provide findings “examining the United States’ financial regulatory system and detailing executive actions and regulatory changes that can be immediately undertaken to provide much-needed relief.”*

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

In release of the first phase of the report, Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin stated: “Properly structuring regulation of the U.S. financial system is critical to achieve the administration’s goal of sustained economic growth and to create opportunities for all Americans to benefit from a stronger economy.  We are focused on encouraging a market environment where consumers have more choices, access to capital and safe loan products – while ensuring taxpayer-funded bailouts are truly a thing of the past.”**

Some of its highlights include:

  • Community financial institutions – banks and credit unions – are critically important to serve many Americans
  • Capital, liquidity and leverage rules can be simplified to increase the flow of credit
  • We must ensure our banks are globally competitive
  • Improving market liquidity is critical for the U.S. economy
  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau must be reformed
  • Regulations need to be better tailored, more efficient and effective
  • Congress should review the organization and mandates of the independent banking regulators to improve accountability***

Not surprisingly, most of the banking industry expressed support for the report, critics (mostly Democrats) pointed out that it would lead to the type of practices that produced the 2008 panic in the first place.  Both opponents and those in favor as well as the clueless financial press fail to grasp the underlying cause of not only the recent crisis, but the majority of those which have occurred for the past century.

Quite simply: the fundamental cause of the 2008 financial crisis was fractional-reserve banking (FRB).  FRB is the practice whereby banks keep a “fraction” of the funds deposited by customers in their vaults lending out the rest at interest and “profit.”  Banks are thus inherently unstable since if all depositors came at once and demanded their money (a “bank run”), banks could not be able to redeem their deposits.  Moreover, FRB encourages banks to engage in exceedingly speculative and risky behavior which creates unsustainable bubbles throughout the economy.

The nation’s central bank, the Federal Reserve, was created by the banksters and politicos to enshrine this immoral and economically ruinous practice into the heart of the American financial landscape.  Any “reform” of Wall Street’s financial practices that does not address FRB by doing away with it and the institution (the Fed) which enables it to exist, is doomed.

The banks in collusion with the Fed are able to expand the money supply through this process while enriching the banksters’ balance sheet.  On the macro level, the creation of money through FRB is the genesis of the destructive boom-bust cycle.

This is why banks and the entire financial system are so prone to reoccurring crisis and no regulation, reform, or Treasury Department “findings,” can make such a system “stable.”  The only true reform is to abolish FRB and establish a monetary order that requires all financial institutions to keep 100% reserves of depositors’ assets.

The Treasury Department’s recommendations are mere window dressing by the very banksters whose opulent livelihoods are predicated on FRB.

The elimination of FRB would go beyond a beneficial financial revolution, but would affect the foreign policy of the USSA.  Without the ability to create money via FRB, the murderous American Empire could simply not exist, nor would the nation’s draconian domestic security state.

With his selection of crony capitalists and members of Goldman Sachs to his economic team, it is apparent that President Trump does not understand the true nature of the nation’s financial woes or what precipitated the last financial crisis and what will assuredly lead to a far bigger mess down the road.  If he did, his next Executive Order would be to implement steps and procedures to eliminate the scourge of fractional reserve banking forever.

*U.S. Department of the Treasury, “A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities.”  6 June 2017.  https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/sm0106.aspx

**Ibid.

***Ibid.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
34 Comments
Gilnut
Gilnut
June 27, 2017 11:48 am

We need no new laws. All we need to do is enforce those already on the books. Break up the banking monopolies and enforce usury laws. Problems fixed…..never happen though. Lawyers never “fix” problems, they obfuscate them.

Fiatman60
Fiatman60
June 27, 2017 11:56 am

“……it is apparent that President Trump does not understand the true nature of the nation’s financial woes or what precipitated the last financial crisis and what will assuredly lead to a far bigger mess down the road.”
No Shit Sherlock!!! BUT….
Removal of the FRB system would immediately put the nation into insolvency. The major problem here is there would is no disconnect between currency and debt, especially if the banks have anything to say about it! What is needed is to make currency and debt separate entities, so that currency becomes a store of value once again. Your labor (Time = currency) should not be gambled with.
Savings accounts are a “loan” to the bank to do with as they please. WRONG! It should be 100% redeemable for everyone at once.
No matter…… it’s going to fail one day soon. My only hope is that we replace it with something much better.

Jason Calley
Jason Calley
  Fiatman60
June 27, 2017 2:06 pm

I do not know if it was ever changed, but in the original papers detailing the incorporation of the Federal Reserve, there was a buyout clause. The first partners of the Fed put up a total of $100 million capital, and the US government retained the option of buying out the bank (including any accumulated assets) for that same $100M. Chump change these days… If the US government bought the Fed for $100M then the assets and the US bonds it holds could be liquidated or erased.

Ed
Ed
June 27, 2017 12:25 pm

Trump’s cabinet picks are performing as expected. You can bet that Trump doesn’t understand any of what Mnuchin is proposing, and he doesn’t want to be told about it. It’s easy to picture him sitting and listening to what his GS appointees are planning while his eyes glaze over and he fiddles with his iPhone, wishing he could just go back to tweeting another rallying cry to his trumpeteers.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Ed
June 27, 2017 8:48 pm

Or he might completely understand and want to stay alive.

Ed
Ed
  rhs jr
June 27, 2017 10:24 pm

Yes, RH there’s that, too. Good point.

starfcker
starfcker
June 27, 2017 1:06 pm

This guy needs to study up for about ten more years. Reminds me of kevin williamson at nro writing a column stating that Trump didn’t understand business with China. Who’s judgement to trust, Trump, a man who has done tons of business with China, or williamson, who’s chinese business experience involves buying a microwave at walmart. Hmm… Back to aquaboy. You have a fundemental misunderstanding of what Trump is trying to do with banking, number one, and second no idea how the financial sector functions. Maybe Secretary Mnuchin isn’t the right guy for the job. Maybe. But he probably is, judging by his stated goals and actions to this point. So he worked for goldman. So did Saint Bannon. Was a time, coming out of college, a job offer from goldman was why you went to college in the first place.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
June 27, 2017 1:20 pm

Start by auditing the Fed so everyone can see the multi-trillion dollar crime spree they have been on since their creation in 1913. Then abolish the Fed. Abolish the FDIC as well (or more importantly the US taxpayer safety net for this sham of an “insurance” plan). With the Fed gone, it will be impossible to maintain the criminal and fraudulent system of fractional reserve banking. Bank runs and the like will put the worthless criminals out of business while 100% reserve, HONEST banks, will take over the market (so long as the government gets out of the way). This is a tightly knit, mutually supporting, criminal enterprise that rests on far more than the fraudulent crime of fractional reserve banking.

BL
BL
June 27, 2017 1:33 pm

Can you live in an ultra tightened money supply without credit?

Fractional banking is money magik that expands money supply to give you availability of funds that will not be there if you change back to the old system of metal backed currency. The tightening will send this consumer driven society into complete insanity.

I am NOT a fan of fractional banking and money magik which the joos laid upon us BUT it will be very hard to buy that 500K house or that $600 IPhone if there is very little currency available to consumers. It would be like going cold tukey off opium……ouch.

That said……I could do it, could you?

starfcker
starfcker
  BL
June 27, 2017 1:49 pm

Great post, Bea

BL
BL
  starfcker
June 27, 2017 2:08 pm

Star- Maybe the answer to how you could end fractional banking is MASSIVE deflation? Or a partial metal backed currency, which could still be abused?

Do we really want that car we paid 30K for spiraling into the dumpster at 8K overnight? There would have to be a jubilee, no?

Or hyper to inflate away the debt.

starfcker
starfcker
  BL
June 28, 2017 6:00 am

Bea, your first sentence is probably right on the mark. But it will be gradual.

Maggie
Maggie
  BL
June 27, 2017 2:29 pm

I could do it, but you are right. It would be ugly to watch the results amongst the sheeple.

BL
BL
  Maggie
June 27, 2017 2:43 pm

Maggie- You have enough canned dead bunnies to live through two revolutions and a major collapse. Not to mention your TP supply. 🙂

If anyone here can live through the “Great Unwind” it is you Mags.

fleabaggs
fleabaggs
June 27, 2017 1:41 pm

Fractional reserve banking created a new for of money known as “Credit”. We have now taken it to the point that bad credit can be used as collateral for more loans. Beam Me Up Scotty.
At least Antonio is getting very close to the source of the problem instead of trying to put band aides on symptoms. If enough Sheeple can be persuaded to look into fractional reserve banking just enough to see how it corrupts they will know enough to see the source and eradicate it.
When this form of credit is combined with Fiat currency we get the monstrosity we have now. We can only assume a quadrillion in derivatives is close to the mark. It could be 4 times that.
Gresham’s Law states the Bad Money Drives out Good Money. Is there any good money left. Even PM’s are being artificially set in price.

BL
BL
  fleabaggs
June 27, 2017 1:56 pm

flea- Good question, where is the good money? It’s here somewhere.

I remember the days of people getting only one pair of shoes in a year or maybe two years, you opened a closet and ladies had 5 or 6 outfits to their name. Closets were tiny, people rarely ate out in restaurants as that was a real treat or special occasion. Sitting on the porch and conversing was how you spent evenings, not renting movies or going to movies/eating out/shopping.

I’m not really sure how to unwind this mess but it won’t be painless.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  BL
June 27, 2017 5:23 pm

BL.
Just painful would be the good scenerio, we should be so lucky. I measure how bad I think it will get by the amount of Fiat, credit and debt gets added each year. In my health I don’t expect to live through it because it will be too ugly and too long. All the bad Karma stored up in all the fake financial schemes has to be repaid.
I was born in a tarpaper shack in 48 and we didn’t get a TV till 58. Believe it or not, those were the only happy times I had in the first half of my life. It was better to not tell Mom about the holes in the heels of our socks because being the good woman she was, she would sew them and the you got sore heels from the stitches rubbing when you walked. If you let the hole get big enough then she would put a big square patch on it and the stitches would be under the arch or above the heel where they wouldn’t rub.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Fleabaggs
June 27, 2017 9:04 pm

Hot Dang Fleabag, ya’ll had tar-paper on your shack! I bet ya’ll had an indoor pitcher pump and a Sears Catalog in your outhouse too!

fleabaggs
fleabaggs
  rhs jr
June 28, 2017 1:34 pm

rhs
Sears womens undies section was poor boys playboy mag. The pump was outside and had to pour hot water down the handle on real cold mornings. Bathtub was galvanized stock tank and had a real Ice Box. Ice man would drive up and ask 1 block or 2. That was still pretty normal back then. Kids were just hired help, not the precious little darling snowflakes of today.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  fleabaggs
June 29, 2017 12:50 pm

Fleabags, OK I think you are for real and you even beat me although you didn’t mention wash days, hoeing, butchering, having no car, canning a few hundred jars every year, moldy hams, home made beer, hand me downs, walking to school, bag lunches, etc. I’d hate to have to go back to those good old days.

fleabaggs
fleabaggs
  rhs jr
June 29, 2017 1:22 pm

Rhs.
Wasn’t trying to play top this. If it came across that way I apologize.
We did have a car when it ran but since I mentioned all that other stuff on here several times I didn’t bring it up again. I liked the farm so they weren’t bad times for me except for wash day. I’ve said for years that the washer and dryer were the greatest inventions of all time.
When we moved to the city I never adjusted and never had another happy moment till I climbed out of fog at 34.

mark branha
mark branha
June 27, 2017 1:42 pm

The following statement is incorrect:

“FRB is the practice whereby banks keep a “fraction” of the funds deposited by customers in their vaults lending out the rest at interest and “profit.”

Banks never “loan” anything… every so-called loan is newly created money, out of thin air. Prior to 2008 ALL so-called money was actually debt, owed to a bank. Since the bank never created the interest due on any “loan” more debt needed to be created to pay off previous “loans.” That’s why banks have all the money and you, the average American, have all the debt.

It should be obvious that the current monetary system is a Ponzi scheme. “Their” challenge is to transition to the next monetary system without crashing the entire world’s economy.

Ed
Ed
  mark branha
June 27, 2017 10:37 pm

Mark, that’s how I see the loan business, too. The money doesn’t exist until it is loaned into being. That makes all the debt invalid, since the banks didn’t have the money to lend until it was loaned into existence. Repudiation of the “national debt” is the only way I see of stopping the cycle.

I don’t remember who wrote about it, but I read once that the banks that emerged as financial powers after Lincoln’s war had been allowed to loan money into existence for the greenbacks scheme during the war. That sounds like good work if you can get it: loaning money that you don’t have to a government that can “repay” you principle and interest in real gold from revenues collected from people who received no benefit at all from the loans.

BL
BL
June 27, 2017 3:21 pm

WARNING Will Robinson……WARNING…….WARNING:

Just posted on Drudge/from CNBS, Janet Yellen says , “Another financial crisis is not likely in our lifetime”.

In FED double-speak, that means……Holy shit, this thing is about to blow!!!! Are you prepared???

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
June 27, 2017 3:24 pm

Fractional reserve lending falsifies the the true amount of savings in the economy and thus falsifies the price of savings and leads to unneeded investment in capacity.

Go back to the basics of economics. One can consume all of their production or save part of it. For the world economy summed up it cannot consume and invest more than it produces. Money is just a claim ticket showing you contributed to the pool of goods and services. So when money (claim tickets) are made out of thin air through fraction reserve lending, it cheapens the cost of investment through supply and demand. A claim ticket on a claim ticket (debt) spends the same as a normal claim ticket. These fake claim tickets entitle the holder to access goods and services just like real claim tickets, that in fact which no one contributed to the pool of goods and services.

Now there are more claim tickets floating around then goods and someone decides claim tickets are somehow easier to come by these days and raises their prices in terms of claim tickets to access there goods. This is monetary inflation; more money chasing the same amount of goods. Fractional reserve lending it inherently inflationary.

Now go back in history. Until the FED there were lots of panics. Why. Well in a modern economy with innovation and constant productivity growth, things get cheaper. Deflation is the rule of the game. Taking out debts in a deflating money is asking for trouble because with deflation your real cost is higher. Now couple the fact that the banks could lend a multiple of their capital with the fact that lending in a deflationary environment is risky. You have to worry about your customer being able to overcome the deflation and also pay the interest. Because you are lending a multiple of your capital and if a double digit portion of your customer base can’t pay and word gets out you have a bank run. There were multiple panics before the FED because innovation was rampant and deflation was the name of the game. Remember Free Silver? That was a suggestion to combat deflation buy adding silver to the money supply. So the banks got together and pushed through the FED, to be the lend of last resort, even though Fractional Reserve Lending was the instability causing panics. Today the FEDs secret job is to create inflation to overcome the inherent deflation. This lowers the cost of borrowing and allows the borrower to repay with at least easier to repay inflated dollars.

One can use an engineering system analogy to the economy. You can compare the fractional reserve ratio as the “gain” for the system. The higher the reserve ratio, the less potential instability in a system. The lower the reserve ratio the more instability the system will have. It will be subject to more oscillations and higher oscillations the higher the gain. Booms and busts are caused by the oscillations in the system with a high gain.

To have a stable system, the savers have to agree to a time frame they want to loan their savings and the banks must only lend that money out for that time frame. (matching durations) Duration mismatches killed the Savings and Loans when inflation hit. The S&Ls were stuck with short term financing for long term loans.

If someone does not deposit their saved production to be specifically lent out, the bank can’t lend it out. If money is only intended to be parked for a short time and not lent, then the bank should not touch it and charge the own a safe keeping fee.

In my opinion fractional reserve lending falsifies the price of real savings and distorts the economy in favor of investment as the multiplication available in the money multiplier makes it appear there is much more saving then there really is. It give the economy false signals and lead to investment in too much capacity and then mal investments. A good recent example is all the unneeded steel capacity in China put in place by cheap money and easy credit.

If one insists on fractional reserve lending, they also have to accept the instability and problems it creates. If you live by the sword then prepare to die by the sword to.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Flying Monkey
June 27, 2017 9:45 pm

Flying Monkey is a Fed apologist who’d say the bankers in the propaganda movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” are typical good guys. Woody Guthrie in Pretty Boy Floyd was right that “some men rob with a six-gun, some with a pen”. The United States grew well and had zero inflation for 200 years before the Fed Beast took over in 1913 and financed the ZOG. It will probably enslave US and endure until Jesus drives the Money Changers to Hell.

Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
  rhs jr
June 28, 2017 9:13 am

Why am I FED apologist? I was calling it as I a believe history developed. I though my words were not overly complementary of the FED and it only can onto being supposedly to bail out banks who got in over their head with Fractional Reserve lending.

On the whole it not one of my favorite institutions. Maybe I am misunderstand your definition of “FED apologist”.

I really don’t understand your objections. Maybe you just need to kick your cat or dog more to get it out of your system.

rhs jr
rhs jr
  Flying Monkey
June 28, 2017 7:41 pm

Sorry Mr FM, you did a great job explaining pre-Fed banking then used the Fed’s own arguments about depreciation and recessions to justify the creation (and now the continuation) of the Fed; and I went hyper on you. For everyone’s sake, the Central Banks are owned and run by Globalist who were allowed to print money without public oversight and buy everything their fiat paper can buy. They are now working on destroying all their fiat currencies and conning folks into accepting only digital money that they will control. That is The Beast of Revelation. Probably 99% of Politicians, MSM, Professors, Scientist, CEOs, etc serve the Central Bankers (dissenters have fatal accidents). They will require everyone to take The Mark of The Beast to be able to buy or sell and if you do, you lose your soul. Unless we destroy the Beast’s System somehow, TPTB will destroy the World’s economy and then enslave us. If we could, even if just in the USA, charter all banks through states and restrict their ownership and size; replace the Fed fiat with Treasury Notes partially backed by something of value; and then maybe by God’s help, replace all the Beast’s Minions with non-Illuminati individuals, we could foul up Lucifer. I believe you are a good and very bright guy but even supporting the Fed unsuspectingly indirectly is like defending communism or the Devil himself. Please forgive my extravagant exuberance against you.

fleabaggs
fleabaggs
  Flying Monkey
June 28, 2017 1:40 pm

Flying Monkey.
I think you are missing the point that fractional reserve banking is dishonest at its best and nefarious and indsidious on a normal day.

BB
BB
June 27, 2017 4:16 pm

To all Jewish Bankers ,Gargoyles , Demons and Vampire blood suckers.
The Goy is getting wise to our Banking crimes.The goys know.We must immediately development a plan of action to distract the Goy.War is an excellent candidate . Maybe in combination with a super strain of plague .That such do it .

Your sincerely Screw Tape .

Other annon
Other annon
June 27, 2017 5:08 pm

India gone cashless any news updates seem to be blacked out.Must be a real big turd in the punch bowl over there.

Fleabaggs
Fleabaggs
  Other annon
June 27, 2017 5:25 pm

Other.
Yeah, I noticed that also. News of it just kinda fell into a black hole.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
June 28, 2017 6:49 am

OMG , if Janet Yellen sees no problem then there is an enormous “PROBLEM” . Buy more storable food and ammo !

BL
BL
  Boat Guy
June 28, 2017 2:28 pm

Boaty
Can you even imagine that Yellen would say such a thing? Why would we bother to come here and talk doom daily? That statement stinks to high, high heaven IMO.