Trump “Overrules” Cabinet, Prepares To Unleash Global Trade War

Tyler Durden's picture

While one of Trump’s recurring campaign promises was that he would “punish” China and other key US trade counterparties if elected, for taking advantage of free-trade by imposing steep tariffs and duties on foreign imports to “level the playing field”, the President’s stance changed drastically after the election, U-turning following his amicable meeting with China’s president Xi Jinping in March, but mostly as a result of pressure by his ex-Goldman advisors to keep existing trade arrangements in place and not “rock the boat.”

Now, all that may be about to fall apart.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

According to Axios, behind the constant media scandals, “one of the most consequential and contentious internal debates of his presidency unfolded during a tense meeting Monday in the Roosevelt Room of the White House” where with “more than 20 top officials present, including Trump and Vice President Pence, the president and a small band of America First advisers made it clear they’re hell-bent on imposing tariffs — potentially in the 20% range — on steel, and likely other imports.”

In other words, Trump – true to his campaign promises – is set to launch a global trade wars after all, one where then main country impacted would be China, however the collateral damage would extend to Canada, Mexico, Japan, Germany and the UK.

And what may be even more striking is that Trump overruled his cabinet, as “the sentiment in the room was 22 against and 3 in favor — but since one of the three is named Donald Trump, it was case closed.” Axios adds that while “no decision has been made, the President is leaning towards imposing tariffs, despite opposition from nearly all his Cabinet.”

Needless to say, if Trump follows through, the outcome would have a profound effect on U.S. economic and foreign policy; Trump will formalize his decision in the coming days.

What is also notable, is that this is the first time  – so far off the record – in which Trump has openly defied his Wall Street establishment advisors, while siding with the Bannon “populist” front:

In a plan pushed by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and backed by chief strategist Steve Bannon (not present at the meeting), trade policy director Peter Navarro and senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, the United States would impose tariffs on China and other big exporters of steel. Neither Mike Pence nor Jared Kushner weighed in either way.

Everyone else in the room, more than 75% of those present, were adamantly opposed, arguing it was bad economics and bad global politics. At one point, Trump was told his almost entire cabinet thought this was a bad idea. But everyone left the room believing the country is headed toward a major trade confrontation.

As Axios adds, the reason why Trump defied the guidance of his Wall Street-derived advisors is Trump’s base “which drives more and more decisions, as his popularity sinks — likes the idea, and will love the fight.

This, more than anything, should send shivers down Wall Street’s spine, because for all his bluster and outrageous media outbursts, Trump had largely been in Wall Street’s pocket so far.

Not anymore, and with Trump’s base hell bent on punishing the 1% (which includes Wall Street), if Trump indeed launches global trade war, his future decisions will become increasingly market unfriendly.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Flying Monkey
Flying Monkey
June 30, 2017 9:05 am

In my opinion it is not the free trade but our limitless money supply. No one has honest money anymore. As long as we get physical stuff for trading paper and IOUs we are getting the better deal, and nobody has to go to work in US to make the stuff. The Americans can spend their time eating and maybe developing a opioid habit, or even drinking. That will keep the domestic medical industry complex busy too. Oh how that is good for GDP!

Now if you are worried about how Americans will use all that free time that is freed up by the foreigners doing all the dirty work, then you might be concerned about “free trade”. Free Trade means that literally. The goods are “free”, since we give nothing of comparable value in exchange for them. When you give paper for goods you get nearly “free” trade!

DurangoDan
DurangoDan
June 30, 2017 9:49 am

The Chinese and peasants of many other countries are our virtual slaves under our current economic regime. We don’t have to house them, feed them or smell them. Why would we want to mess with a system that is so weighted in our favor? Government always does the wrong thing. Always!

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
June 30, 2017 10:42 am

Greetings,

I believe that this is all bluster to get China to calm down over the most recent announcement of arms sales to Taiwan. The Chinese may be fuming about that but the threat of tarriffs will knock the wind out of their sails. Their economy is in much worse shape than ours.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  NickelthroweR
June 30, 2017 5:29 pm

Not many people realize how much danger the Chinese economy is in, or why it is so very vital to them to keep it functioning and keep the population occupied to prevent revolt.

Anon
Anon
June 30, 2017 11:55 am

Bring it on. Go ahead Trump, unleash the dogs of war on China. I am so sick and tired of this country kissing everyone’s ass. It would be real nice to start saying to these environmental arbitrage enablers that we are not competing against slaves in other countries and dumping our waste in their backyard. Now, as was mentioned above, we also need to kill the Federal Reserve and then have some real currency that is scarce, and no one has authority to simply print, and we MAY have some form of real capitalism again. BTW, getting rid of environmental / labor arbitrage at the same time you get rid of money printing, almost immediately gives the productive citizen of this country a vote – with their wallet. Currently, we are constantly overruled by the Fed. Without the fed, the politicians have to start listening to us.
There is also talk this morning about repeal of Obamacare. Now we are getting somewhere there as well. Since the hospitals / doctors / pharma cannot survive without the gun of government up our ass, that would seal the fate of that scam as well. Now, lets just take the bankruptcy exemption from student loans, and property taxes away, and watch as all of a sudden the average citizen has some real influence again – for good or bad….

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
June 30, 2017 1:21 pm

I suspect a trade war will start the next crash in our economy. However, since the Goldman boys are against a trade war, I’m willing to give it a try.

starfcker
starfcker
June 30, 2017 3:10 pm

Did you think he was kidding this whole time? Who gives a fuck about China? They want to dump steel, they’ll have to find somewhere else

TampaRed
TampaRed
June 30, 2017 5:40 pm

Last paragraph-since when is Trump’s base wanting to punish the 1%?
We just want the parasites taken out,not people who have earned their wealth,right?