In keeping with President Trump’s demands…
#JFKFiles pic.twitter.com/AnPBSJFh3J
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 28, 2017
The National Archives and Records Administration on Friday afternoon released hundreds more documents related to the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.
The documents can be found here.
As CBS reports, this latest batch of 676 records could yield more interesting results than last week’s release, as they are the ones intelligence agencies requested more time to review, citing national security concerns.
The majority of records from Friday’s batch – 553 of them – are from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Those records were previously denied in their entirety, according to NARA.
CBS points out some interesting findings…
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Oswald contacts Soviet embassy in search of visa
On Sept. 27, 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald called the Soviet embassy in search of a visa to visit Odessa, according to the files. Eventually, the Soviet Embassy says they have received no answer from Washington, and such a request will take four to five months. Oswald says he belongs to a pro-Cuban organization and can’t get a Cuban visa without first getting a Russian visa. The next day, Sept. 28, 1963, Oswald calls the Soviet embassy to ask for news from Washington.
Roofer told resident after JFK assassination: “I’m the man”
The Pentagon received a letter from a Betty Joe Dodge of Lubbock, Texas, in September 1978. The letter, addressed to General Westmoreland, noted that an ex-Green Baret named Robert H. Doty had stayed in Dodge’s home that summer while he worked as a roofer. On the evening the assassination news was reported, he seemed uneasy, Dodge said. When Dodge asked what difference it made, Doty told her, “I’m the man.”
“I was afraid to ask any questions,” Dodge wrote. “I could never tell whether he was testing my reaction to a wild statement or actually telling me the truth.”
Officials thought Oswald was “odd” in 1960
One U.S. official, Thomas B. Casasin, recalls that he thought Oswald’s behavior struck him as “odd” and “unusual” after reading a dispatch on him following Oswald’s return to the United States from the USSR. The official told his subordinates something along the lines of, “Don’t push too hard to get the information we need, because this individual looks odd.” The official remembers being particularly interested in what Oswald could provide on the Minsk factory where he had been employed.
However, perhaps the most interesting document released was a March 12th, 1968 FBI analysis of Martin Luther King Jr – just 3 weeks before he was assassinated – portraying the civil rights leader in a negative light.
The 20-page document released on Friday attempts to tie the civil rights leader to various communist influences and alleges financial improprieties at the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the African-American civil rights organisation founded by King, reports CNN. The document also contains insinuations and assertions about King’s personal life, including extramarital affairs and other sexual improprieties. However, it was not clear whether the authors of the document verified any of the information.
The King document was reviewed by the National Archives and Records Administration’s JFK Task Force in 1994 and marked with an “x” for “total denial” of its release. The options “release in full” and “release in part” were left blank on the cover page.
As CNN reports, The FBI analysis questions whether King should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. It concludes:
“These facts about the Nobel Peace Prize winner make his remarks seem incongruous when he replied after winning this cherished award, ‘History has thrust me into this position. It would be both immoral and a sign of ingratitude if I did not face my moral responsibility to do what I can in the civil rights struggle.'”
In another section, the FBI document labels the Southern Christian Leadership Conference “a tax dodge”. It also alleges that many of King’s associates had communist ties, CNN reported.
The document was authored while the FBI was led by Director J. Edgar Hoover, who had investigators trail King and spy on him.
Hoover had authorised an extensive surveillance programme on King in the 1960s.
In 1964, a package containing tapes and a letter to King was delivered to his house and opened by his wife, Coretta Scott King. The letter appeared to urge King to commit suicide. It included the line: “There is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. You have just 34 days.” A Senate committee later confirmed the anonymous package had been sent by the FBI.
* * *
So 50 years ago The FBI was writing ‘analysis’ that included questioning an anti-establishment leader’s sexual behavior, business taxes, morals, ethics, and communist/Russian ties – not much changes does it!?
* * *
Full FBI Analysis below:
Tear down those MLK Communist statues!
So, at least so far there is nothing new or particularly interesting that has been released. Most of it has been known and this is just more confirmation of it.
MLK and Joan Baez!!! The “King Dossier” makes the Trump dossier seem tame and it is factual unlike the one The Rodhamster paid for.
Fuck Martin Luther King Jr and his National holiday.
He was a communist parading around as a minister of the Gospel.If the media had told the truth about him there would never been this legal fiction called “Civil Rights ” a term invented by fucking Jews who were directing Their nigger .
“Civil Rights” is actually a legal term.
Look it up in your Black’s.
That’s a grimoire for black magicians.
” …. there would never been this legal fiction called “Civil Rights ” a term invented by fucking Jews”
The Village Idiot strikes again!
———————-
The Long History of the Phrase ‘Civil Rights’
The term civil rights has been used in English for more than 400 years
What do we mean when we speak of civil rights?
On the surface this would appear to be a simple question, and we need look no further than to the dictionary definition. But on certain topics—and civil rights is one of these—many people are interested in more information than can reasonably be offered in a simple dictionary entry.
The term ‘civil rights movement’ is commonly associated with the 1950s and 60s, but the phrase is much older than that
The term civil rights likely entered the English language in the early 17th century. What is currently the earliest known use comes from George Chapman’s 1614 translation of The Odyssey in a prayer spoken by Telemachus:
Hear me, O Goddess, that but yesterday
Didst deign access to me at home, and lay
Grave charge on me to take ship, and inquire
Along the dark seas for mine absent sire!
Which all the Greeks oppose; amongst whom most
Those that are proud still at another’s cost,
Past measure, and the civil rights of men,
My mother’s Wooers, my repulse maintain.
It is evident that Chapman, and many of the other writers who used civil rights in the 17th century, were not using it in the politically tinged sense that we often use it today.
By the 18th century civil rights had taken on on the definition in Merriam-Webster’s Unabridged: “those rights the enjoyment of which does not involve participation in the establishment, support, or management of the government.” Following the enactment of the 13th and 14th amendments to the U.S. constitution, civil rights came to be frequently used to refer more specifically to the rights afforded by these amendments: freedom from slavery and freedom from being denied “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
We also see this modern sense of civil rights in the slightly longer phrase civil rights movement. Although this movement may refer to any organized attempt working toward the goal of achieving civil rights for a specific marginalized group, it is most often used to refer to the movement to achieve equal rights for African-Americans. While the modern civil rights movement is commonly accepted to have begun in the 1950s and 1960s, the phrase had been used to refer to an effort to gain rights for black Americans since the 19th century.
In the presentation of this design, we know of no man more fitted for the work than the gentleman who has always represented Massachusetts in Congress, who was the foremost man in the so-called civil rights movement, which only failed of its full effect because the Democracy stood firm in resistance, united, undivided.
—The Daily American, 28 October 1880
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/civil-rights
excellent didactic , well said. I can see why bb is a pet peeve of yours.
[img
[/img]
[img
[/img]
I hope the FBI’s standards for report writing have improved since then, because these reports are awful reading.
You might as well get your intel from Bazooka Joe comics and listening to the Party Line.
“We-ell, I heard Joan and that Mister Brooks from down the street, well, you know hi-im. Hee’s the guy who was double-parked in front of the IGA last week. We-ell, I heard Mister Brooks and Joan were spotted walking out of the Moonlight Inn last Saturday moorning. Can you Bel-ieve it? The nerve of her to criticize my mother’s pot roast recipe at the Sunday picnic. Can you ii-magine?”
-Yep, sounds like good stuff to me. Chuck it in there, Agent Smith. -J.Edgar
Lol, Michael King, the fraudulent, whore mongering, semi-literate nigger that has become an American hero. What the fuck has happened to this country?
So King was a philanderer huh? Heaven forfend! Too bad he wasn’t as pious as J Edgar Hoover and all those Catholic priests and Protestant pastors over time, not to mention all those chaste politicians in d.c. over the millennia.
Let’s face it; everybody likes to fuck.
“Let’s face it; everybody likes to fuck.”
Until marriage anyway.
Yup. There’s no more potent a suppressant of female libido than wedding cake.
OrStucky ,the Civil Rights act was invented by Jews in this nation to benefit them so they would have free reign to use the Banking System to buy all the real assets of our society..Show me one other place on this Earth that has a Civil right act mean to be used in the dispossession of white people.Who came up with Affirmative Action and a hundred other programs.Who was the brains behind this shit . Meathead
Suise cute ,go stick a hot iron up your ass.
Compelling reaction to what seems a reasoned didactic.
[img
[/img]
Luv ya cause you’re awesome!
“Suise cute ,go stick a hot iron up your ass.”
Christ’s love washes over BB yet again.
If you’re going to pretend to be a Christian, at least pretend to be a Christian.
Don’t be too hard on the beebs dawg. Just feel the peace and luv of the Lawrd Jebus Chrispin. It is absolutely oozing from every word my little trucker buddy types and so for now it is baby steps for our little Grinch. Besides he shouldn’t be putting too much strain on that wonky ticker of his. Can’t be having a heart to expanded three sizes too soon.
[img
[/img]
Once he finds the true Lord he will find peace..
Yours in Odin,
RiNS
Everybody has Civil Rights under the Civil Rights Act but White Males, that is a Fact; look it up in that Communist act.
Nothingburger.
It has been known for years that MLK was a philanderer.
That Hoover was spying on him.
That Civil Right had Jews in their midst.
I’m looking forward to the dossier on Malcom X; maybe then we’ll see who Obama’s real father was.
forget his dad,i want to see who obama himself really is–
Look up Dreams From My Real Father. Fascinating documentary on the HNIC and his red roots.
You know something? This news isn’t anything new. I’ve heard for years MLK was a womanizer and a communist, so either someone leaked it or it wasn’t a real national secret to begin with.
On the one hand, I’m not surprised. The man had a dick and I think he knew how to use it. Why wouldn’t he take advantage of his position to grab ‘dat ass while he could?
On the other hand, it is always kind of fun to see the sacred calves of the left getting slaughtered, too. Since he wasn’t perfect, either, maybe we can pull his lame statue down at the end of the Mall. The feminists should be all over this one, since he apparently objectified women and used his position of power and influence to score tail. If they want to deconstruct Lee and Jefferson and Washington, let’s deconstruct MLK and X and FDR and Marx and all the rest. It’s always funny to see how they contort themselves to fight sin among their opponents, while ignoring it among their themselves.
If he was communist-controlled, it wouldn’t be a surprise. They controlled our hippie protest movement, too. It would fit with Soviet intel’s MO to foment, finance, and direct any kind of social activism or protest movement in the US. Anything to weaken and embarass us and push duh masses where they wanted them to go.
But even if MLK was evil incarnate and he didn’t bleed red blood like you and I, but some strange oily black ichor made up of broken black families’ tears and aborted black babies, would it change the value of what he said? I think the man, however faulty he might have been (and I ain’t no saint), said some reasonable and good things. Can you argue with the concept of non-violence? I think it’s perfectly legitimate for a man to protest non-violently against things he is opposed to. How about his line about judging a man by the content of his character, not the color of his skin. That’s pretty good. Shitbags come in all colors. He also believed education and working for a living were vital. If today’s blacks actually listened to MLK and followed his teachings, they and we would all be in a much better place.
I don’t have time to dive into everything the man wrote, but if he was a Communist, does it invalidate everything he did and said? I hate Communism, but it’s not a surprise that a Christian minister from a traditionally oppressed segment of society might feel drawn to a belief system that seeks to explain oppression and inequality and a offers a way to change it. The existence of Black Reds in the 1950s shouldn’t have been a surprise, since the existing system didn’t offer them a whole lot to be excited about.
Is this the Daily Stromer? Just checking.