THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Eisenhower gives famous “domino theory” speech – 1954

Via History.com

President Dwight D. Eisenhower coins one of the most famous Cold War phrases when he suggests the fall of French Indochina to the communists could create a “domino” effect in Southeast Asia. The so-called “domino theory” dominated U.S. thinking about Vietnam for the next decade.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

By early 1954, it was clear to many U.S. policymakers that the French were failing in their attempt to re-establish colonial control in Indochina (Vietnam), which they lost during World War II when the Japanese took control of the area. The Vietnamese nationalists, led by the communist Ho Chi Minh, were on the verge of winning a stunning victory against French forces at the battle of Dien Bien Phu.

In just a few weeks, representatives from the world’s powers were scheduled to meet in Geneva to discuss a political settlement of the Vietnamese conflict. U.S. officials were concerned that a victory by Ho’s forces and/or an agreement in Geneva might leave a communist regime in control of all or part of Vietnam. In an attempt to rally congressional and public support for increased U.S. aid to the French, President Eisenhower gave an historic press conference on April 7, 1954.

He spent much of the speech explaining the significance of Vietnam to the United States. First was its economic importance, “the specific value of a locality in its production of materials that the world needs” (materials such as rubber, jute, and sulphur). There was also the “possibility that many human beings pass under a dictatorship that is inimical to the free world.” Finally, the president noted, “You have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the ‘falling domino’ principle.”

Eisenhower expanded on this thought, explaining, “You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is a certainty that it will go over very quickly.” This would lead to disintegration in Southeast Asia, with the “loss of Indochina, of Burma, of Thailand, of the Peninsula, and Indonesia following.” Eisenhower suggested that even Japan, which needed Southeast Asia for trade, would be in danger.

Eisenhower’s words had little direct immediate impact–a month later, Dien Bien Phu fell to the communists, and an agreement was reached at the Geneva Conference that left Ho’s forces in control of northern Vietnam. In the long run, however, Eisenhower’s announcement of the “domino theory” laid the foundation for U.S. involvement in Vietnam. John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson both used the theory to justify their calls for increased U.S. economic and military assistance to non-communist South Vietnam and, eventually, the commitment of U.S. armed forces in 1965.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
April 7, 2018 7:52 am

Milton Friedman use to poke fun at Marxist projections that would wind up, not just wrong but 180 degrees off of what they had projected. For example marx projected that a communist government would eventually just melt away in bliss and wonder. The reality is that they grew until they ended in misery and total destruction. Proving, once again the u.s. government’s ability to fuck things up with Marxian certainty, this ‘domino theory’ (you have to give them credit on originality of bullshit terms) is a great example of such. No, those “domino’s” didn’t all go communist after the u.s. finally gave up it’s slaughter in Vietnam-they went capitalistic-the opposite of what Ike predicted. And he was among the more astute president’s of my life.

Think of that when some yammering bullshitter on fox news tells you of what devastation will occur if we pull out of Syria. Same shit-different decade.

22winmag - refugee from ZeroHedge who just couldn't take the explosion of doom porn and the avalanche of near-hourly Bitcoin stories
22winmag - refugee from ZeroHedge who just couldn't take the explosion of doom porn and the avalanche of near-hourly Bitcoin stories
April 7, 2018 8:12 am

Soundbyte foreign policy.

Same as it ever was.

suzanna
suzanna
April 7, 2018 10:13 am

“Same as it ever was” Indeed, and please know Eisenhower was just another
Globalist Shill doing his part in advancing the war powers’ power. Nasty prick
as well…he rounded up millions of Germans and left them to starve and freeze
in open air camps with zero facilities. Remember, “Hitler” was the worst human
ever…so that made those murders a-okay.

Anyone that believes the “official” narrative of WWll needs to rethink it. The “war”
was financed and orchestrated to benefit a specific group of people. Ultimately, the
world bankers and their useful minions. The rest were the “extras” and normal people
convinced they were doing something useful by dying of gut wounds in the trenches.

It is all a game, theater, propaganda or bullshit. You decide.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 7, 2018 12:47 pm

Got to keep in mind that this was shortly after WWII and in the early days of the cold war era. It was less than two years later that Khrushchev made his famous “We will bury you!” speech. It wasn’t exactly one sided paranoid sort of thinking at the time.

Hindsight is always 20/20, wish foresight was as well.