Guest Post by The Zman
On the way back from Europe, there was a woman on the plane, who embodied pretty much all that had gone wrong with women in the West. She was 30-ish and as we were boarding, she found that the overhead bins were full in the front. She had no place to put her three carry-on items. Of course, if she had been more punctual, this would not have been a problem, but there she was in the aisle, throwing a tantrum, demanding the cabin crew rush to her aid. She managed to hold up the boarding process for ten minutes.
I was struck by the sense of entitlement. It was not because she was a beautiful women who knew all men desire her either. She was quite plain. Further, the women who work for Wow airlines are stunningly gorgeous. More important, they like being women that are stunningly gorgeous. To be blunt about it, the contrast between the beautiful Icelandic women and this American feminist underscored the fact that feminism is about dining out on appetizer looks. It’s bland women demanding unearned attention from men.
Watching this unfold in front of me, I started to think a big part of what makes American women so unpleasant now is that they are haunted by this reality. Not so much that they are average looking, but that they know the feminist lunacy in their heads is not true and that the old realities of sex roles are forever realities. If they were polite and decent, minding their own business as feminists, no one would pay any attention to them. The result would be a class of barren spinsters that live on the local university campus.
At least with nuns, they have their faith in God and whatever else happens in the nunnery, to give them purpose in their lives. There is an upfront acceptance of their separation from the normal life of mankind. The nun stops being a woman in the conventional sense, so she stops expecting to be treated as a woman. As a result, most nuns I have met are stern about their duties, but otherwise pleasant people. It is a role for them that has well defined rules that addresses the sexual, as well as the social dynamics of life.
Feminists are always in the center of a great mental conflict between what they wish were true about the world and the ongoing reality around them. The woman in the aisle, while surrounded by shield maidens of the first order, was a rage of internal conflict. Her eyes kept darting around the cabin, as she was clearly uncomfortable. The feminist sense of entitlement forced her to make demands on everyone, while her biological instinct was to look for a man to come her rescue. Instead, she was rescued by women from the past.
The irrationality of the feminist, the tantrum aspect to it, cannot be discussed in the mass media, but that is the weak point of it. Feminism is, in many ways, someone choosing to live in the backyard, rather than the house, because they are nursing a grudge against the person who made the house for them. Instead of being good at the thing they can be good at, like being a wife and mother, they choose to be terrible at something no one wants and no society has ever needed. Feminism is the wrath of the unloved and unwanted woman.
That really is the shame of it. I’ve trod this earth for a long time and I have yet to hear a man say, “The trouble is we have too many good women from which to choose.” No man thinks there is a glut of good mothers or women who make excellent wives. It is the complete opposite. Most men lament the dire shortage of women they would want to have as a wife or the mother of his children. This is something men of my generation have been discussing our entire adult lives. It’s why so many of us are unmarried or never married.
Men have adapted to this state of affairs, by developing a taste for Asian women. In my recent travels, I spotted probably a dozen American men with East Asian women. In baggage claim, the entitled feminist was standing across from such a couple. He was a millennial and his wife looked like the typical second generation East Asian female. Our feminist hero was glaring at them for the longest time. At the risk of being accused of sexual assault, I searched our feminist hero’s face, looking for the lights to come on.
All of this reminds me of something I’ve noticed when dealing with feminist women. The best thing is to dominate them. It is not only the best approach in the moment, but it opens a door for them to escape the torment of modernity. In the company of feminists, I often begin talking about repealing the 19th Amendment. I’m polite, but firm. The results are always positive. The reason is, modern women, like our feminist hero, are living lives of bitter isolation, an isolation from who they are as women. They are looking to escape it.
That’s why men should always open the door for women.
Women should have never been given the voting franchise. Before the feminists come out in droves, hear me out.
During the time of slavery, the slave owner or his overseer would “introduce” themselves to their newly-acquired slaves by punishing one male slave brutally for committing a minor infraction, in front of the slave women. After witnessing this, slave women did everything they could to keep their male slaves in check, making the male slaves “behave themselves”. They did not want to see their brethren punished, so they exerted much control over the slave community. This is one of the oldest “psychological tricks in the book”, and was used to good effect by slave owners..
Fast forward to the present-day, where black males use the oldest trick in the book to procure white women–guilt. “You won’t date me because I’m black”–the proper response SHOULD be “That’s right, I don’t date outside of my race”. Instead, weak-willed white women fall for the “siren song” of “racism” and submit themselves to blacks, destroying their genetic future in the process.
I realize that there are good, strong-willed white women out there, BUT there are too many who are not.
The voting franchise should be limited to property-owners, heads of households, current and former military and veterans, those who are financially responsible, and retirees. Excluded would be those on the public dole.
The “vote” or the franchise was granted women after the political leadership took note of the powerful block of voters and footsoldiers the women’s suffrage movement represented. After seeing the results of all those women demanding the evil drug alcohol be outlawed to save their husbands and children from the evil of drinking, the corrupted congresscritters, already drunk with the power of having stolen the Senate from the states control and lusting greedily after the neverending pile of fiat money the Federal Reserve was providing, well, Congress realized the more ignorant single-issue voters out there, the better off they were.
Anarchyst, I agree with you for this reason: The “vote” was a single vote by the smallest unit of political power in this country.
That smallest unit of political power was the FAMILY, with the husband/father as the head of house. It was/is a good foundation to build upon.
So, yes, giving women the vote was an intentional wedge meant to empower a pack of lesbian sluts to change our way of life. And since my husband’s ex-wife is a militant lesbian, I feel I have the experience with evil lesbian feminist sluts and how they destroy families to speak to the issue.
Excellent article. If I had to say it myself.I could not have said it better. A vast amount of women in this country have been duped by feminism. The women’s role weather she knew it or not was the most important role in the family unit. All the man had to do was earn the money.He did not even have to care if he sexually satisfied her. The women did everything else. However she was tricked into thinking that was beneath her. Marxists knew exactly what they were doing.
Enough about our Female Failures, tell us more about the Traditional Asian and Latin Women.
Open the door on the plane and toss her entitled ass out(while in the air).
Good article. Having spent much time in Latin America I can testify that every word is true. Virtually every young American man who spends time down here meets and marries a local girl. They are beautiful, smart, fun to be with, and extremely feminine. From time to time some spout some feminist nonsense they have heard about from the American media but few take it seriously. As for American girls, there are still plenty of normal, pretty girls out there but the herd has been severely thinned by the feminist/lesbian crowd. I just saw the lawyer for that “Dr. Ford” perjurer”. She is a creature out of a horror show. Debra Katz. Google her. This thing is enough to spark a pogrom all by herself. Frankly, I have no sympathy for American women who have fallen into the feminist trap. Every time I run into some rude, bossy, cold old harpy and I am a customer or client, I put them in their place. Their first reaction is shock. Then fear. Then submission. On the few occasions in which they have attempted to get in my face I immediately lodge a complaint with their supervisor. That invariably shuts them up for good. A large part of the problem can be found in low T men.
The OP wrote, “In the company of feminists, I often begin talking about repealing the 19th Amendment. I’m polite, but firm. The results are always positive.”
Hmmm. Tends to make me doubt he’s met any real feminists.
I’m responding to S. Sage, though, because his last sentence struck me: ” A large part of the problem can be found in low T men.” Amen to that. I may have related this earlier somewhere, but in 95% of the couples I know, the women run things and the men are wimps. I wish this were not somewhat the case in my own marriage; my husband told me after not too long that I would have to “be the general”. Being the general is ok sometimes, but I’m starting to get tired of it. He’s a good guy, and not dumb, but he’s not curious, either, nor does he have a ton of initiative.. so if there is some tool that doesn’t work or the toilet’s running, guess who has to deal with it.
We built a moveable octagonal deck platform, and the final pie piece didn’t quite fit. After some hemming and hawing, I said, “Well, you know what I would do: I’d take a sledgehammer and give it a great whack.” And he started barking at me as to how that was “impossible”. (That’s his favorite, saying things are “impossible”.) And we got into a big fight. Finally I went and got the sledgehammer, gave the thing a whack, and it all lined up perfectly. I threw down the hammer and for the next couple of hours I told him everything was “impossible”, until I got tired of that childishness.
I really feel bad for the guy sometimes, because if there are two ways to do something, chances are he will pick the wrong way. Then it’s my fault for pointing it out (the board installed upside down, the ends cut at 90.5°, etc.) and making him angry and frustrated and impatient because he doesn’t want to learn from these errors and do it over with more care. These types of projects suffer because I let corners get cut against my better judgment, because he balks at all the boring prep work. Sigh. I never claimed to be a good general.
P.S., I did not downvote the Cornelius Rye bit. I don’t agree with every point, but I think he’s correct to a not-insignificant degree.
On the one hand, you sound super cool. On the other hand you sound like a real nit picker. Your husband has faults. You expected otherwise? Jeezus.
Iska, CB said Bella Hadid looks like a lizard, I guess chubby is some slamming super hot chick.
It sounds nit-picky, but do you really want little triangle-shaped gaps between the ends of every single floorboard? I’m guessing no. And if it was the “little woman” whut dun it I can only imagine the cuss words going through some guys’ heads. So there.
Prep work is the most fun work and should include a beer run along with several trips to Lowe’s. I learned from a woman, our secretary, that things go smoother if you break jobs down into parts. For me, this is simply taking a break after completing a few steps. I breeze through a grill assembly, those are easy, but other jobs requiring muscle are best taken in steps, fit check, install, beer…
Why is that gorilla sticking each bit of food in his butt before he eats it?
Somebody gave him an avocado and he had a hard time passing it, now he does a fit check first.
Old crew chief joke
Low-T men aka “dweebs” are increasingly characteristic of what less-and-less I know of folks north of the Equator. At 72 and 20 years gone from the USA, 15 gone from Europe, I fear that simply you may have been born too late to have met and married “generals”. I don´t believe in divorce, but were I you…
Wow, you guys are tough. On the one hand, I’m too nit-picky; on the other, being less-than-handy is grounds for divorce!
Yeah, I could GMOW, but then I’d be accused of being “lonely and bitter”. 😉
That reminded me of a time a few years ago when I stopped into a Radio Shack that was going out of business to see what I could see. While looking around the store, I saw the tattooed and pierced 30-something-ish gal interact with other customers and came to the conclusion that she was a total bitch.
Later, when I asked her where something was, she frowned and pointed. When I couldn’t find it, I went back and asked her where it was again. She said it’s right over there and pointed again in a perfunctory way.
I looked right at her and said: “You don’t like your job very much do you.” It really wasn’t a question.
The reaction on her face was almost comical. First it was anger, but as I held her gaze, she then looked frightened before becoming downright obsequious. She got up and led me down the aisle to show where the product was before realizing they were sold out. She then apologized profusely.
Good girl. That was much better than before.
That’s a millennial-and-later thing. I was just in a new-ish breakfast-and-lunch place today, run by some young folks meeting that description (tattooed and pierced). The customer in front of me was ordering a breakfast sandwich, but with ham on the side, and this and that, and what he really wanted was just breakfast on a plate, but he didn’t see it on the menu. So, eventually, from behind the counter, tattoo guy lazily pulls out a 24×36 blackboard upon which is written, “Breakfast Plates”, with just what the guy is looking for. “Aha!” I say. “the SECRET menu!”. Tattoo guy mumbles something to the effect that, yeah, it’s Secret because (get this) they really want people to order the sandwiches, because they are easier to make. Then there’s a little befuddlement over the prices, and tattoo guy says, “I also keep this [the Secret Menu] hidden because the prices aren’t updated.” Did I mention it was a fucking blackboard? And that the guy behind the counter runs the place?
So here we have three customer service affronts in the space of about a minute and thirty seconds. In the background was the cousin of Radio Shack girl, her hair hanging over her face to the extent you couldn’t see her eyes, wandering slowly behind the counter like a zombie, with a pitcher of water. In the few minutes I was waiting there, I was unable to discern what she meant to do with the water.. it seemed like she was just trying to “look busy” to justify her employment.
The younger generation is really not on the ball, GENERALly speaking.
A man speaking up about this ridiculousness might get traction, might not. A woman is often seen as bitchy (at best nit-picky), so after my secret-menu crack I kept my mouth shut and vowed never to go back, as I tried to wrap my head around the fact that a restaurant owner would act so put-upon as to actively thwart people wanting to purchase his product.
As the 100% Irish-American (dual national) father-in-law of one of those Latinas, I concur. Not-quite-30, former beauty queen, college grad and entrepeneur mother (God willing in a couple of months) of three, I consider my 38-yr-old son a fortunate man. My lovely and professional successful feminist dtr is happily “married”, but at 42 has forsaken having children and much as I love her, I’m disappointed in how she’s chosen to live her life. She drank too much of the feminist Kool-ade at her “seven sisters” all-female college, but is a great childless aunt, so all is not lost.
Some (like the childless poof at “Counter-Currents”) might say my son is a “race-traitor”, given that my dtr-in-law has 1/8 Guaraní blood, but… But my grandchildren are being raised with n/w European values, etc., so I say to them, well, among other things, “Best of luck and don’t count blood as everything, because North America may not be the last stop on the train to happiness.
Latin America is full of race-traitors. Seriously, what pact did they or their ancestors make with other whites; what debt do they have to a knuckle dragging moran that they can’t choose of their own free will?
I wonder if I could call homos ‘gender traitors’? They betrayed my expectation of them right, right? They should be marrying these harpies.
The prevalence of “Low T” is probably due to estrogenic compounds in the environment and foods.
Just one example, any soy product not fermented the old fashioned way is chock full o’ estrogen-mimicking compounds. Lecithin, and maybe some other soy derivatives in some foods might be ok, but I am very careful to avoid soy at all costs most of the time. Traditionally fermented soy sauce is safe, but the modern crap that is processed is not. There are others from mostly Asian cuisine that are safe, but I don’t remember them at the moment.
Many pesticides also mimic estrogen. These compounds screw up both men and women. “The Whole Soy Story,” by Kaayla T. Daniel is a good reference on this topic. It’s available used on Amazon for sorta cheap, and is easy to read.
Powdered beets make you horny.
Thanks, I’ll read the soy story book. I would eat soybeans and tofu all the time in Japan.
“Feminism is the wrath of the unloved and unwanted woman.”
I would add:
“also, the mistaken belief that all men would fail to please, if unsuccessful relationships with men from the past are the experience. Consequently, they abandon attempts to develop a lasting bond with a man, and turn to other miserable women to strengthen the sisterhood bond, united and biased against a common, imagined enemy.”
Some modern Asian women bond together and perpetuate a tolerance of men, whitey in particular, instead of an appreciation.
I speak from experience, having dated a loving, caring American woman of Chinese heritage, for 25 years.
We found each other, after she got divorced. Independent, hard working, and a caring, generous soul.
Her story: Her ex cheated on her.
His story: She abandoned his needs for loving her man as soon as their daughter was born.
The kid became priority 1, at the expense of the husband, a common issue parents have to face and solve, or dissolve.
I’ve watched and experienced the Asian women of her family treat men, and even Caucasian women in the extended family with suspicion, alienation, and behind-the-back gossip of the worst variety.
At other times, with trust, inclusion, face-to-face compliments, friendship, generosity, and love.
They are the Queens of the double standard, with a healthy dose of hypocrisy, often.
The sisterhood, and caring for the little ones is the supreme priority.
All else falls lower on their totem pole of priorities.
In my case, the family pets get more consideration for their comfort, than improving a strong bond between us.
I’ve tried many methods over many years, and, although there have been brief, moderate improvements,
her default priorities always revert back to others, instead of US.
It’s why I never married her. Oh, and the descriptions above should include liberal, progressive, Demoncrats to the core, besides anti-white privilege, anti-conservative, anti-Trump, anti-gun, etc. You know the type.
post script:
The daughter had a strained relationship with her Dad, who truth be told, could be a dick at times. Smart, ‘tho.
Beautiful girl grew into a gorgeous woman, successful Masters degree in a marketable major, works for a major Corporation. Loves kids, animals, and has a moderate respect and love for me, as her Mom’s significant other.
Fiercely independent, just like her Mom. And in a sign of the times, just got married. To another woman. sigh….
In the olden days, women needed men to impregnate them, but also to support them. These days, with alimony and the government social safety networks, many women – of varying races – don’t need or want their men anymore once the impregnating and early childhood years are done. Wise women recognize the good things their man brings, whether it’s opening a jar, moving a couch or even their male way of looking at things, but there are plenty of people who aren’t wise, and there are plenty of men who grow complacent, set in their ways and boring.
Ask this one question of your prospective wife:
You and I along with our child are in a boat. It is sinking and one cannot be saved. Who do you pick?
If she indicates anyone other than the child RUN AWAY! You two can create another child but her choice tells you where you stand in the relationship. The clergyman ask this very question to each of us before our marriage. I picked the child. She picked herself. We divorced 10 years later.
I read this a couple of times. My first impulse was to cuss you out. But let’s look at it. Your last line invites us to conclude that your clergyman was right, you were making a mistake. Actually, I think she made the mistake and wasted 10 years of her life with a selfish asshole. You don’t mention the church, was it the church of Satan? What kind of fucked up man of the cloth asks that kind of question without advising you that you two were not in agreement and had to back up a bit to come to terms?
Can two walk together, except they be agreed?
Obviously this clergyman got his theology degree from some Unitarian mail-order site. How could he not know that couples should have a common foundation? What kind of fucked up motherfucker clergyman tells you that you can make more kids? This is not an American value. It isn’t even a Christian value. Solomon was not called wise because he advised the two moms that they could have more kids. The angel of god didn’t say, oh, go ahead and sacrifice Isaac, you and Sarah can have more kids.
I’m really pissed off and you don’t deserve the abuse, you have already paid for it with the loss of your 10 year wife. I’m pissed off at that dickless clergyman. Kids are defenseless, it is human nature to defend them. Hell, even animals defend their young with the fury of a mother bear or the desperate act of a mother cattle. If you listen closely, the young lambs call out to their mother for salvation. Only a heartless, soulless father could say, oh well, at least we are safe.
Fuck that shit. No, sir, that is not manly in the least. It’s cowardice plain and simple.
Sometimes, when I think of it, and I don;t like to think of it, I pray for that old man who lost his wife and grand kids in the wildfires up north. They said he was a couple of miles away and couldn’t find a way into the area where his family was trapped by flames. I won’t go on, it makes me cry to think of that tragedy. Poor man, I think he must regret waking up every morning and reliving that day. That there is a man.
There was a woman here, a bitch, and I say that with all due respect because she had the ovaries to shut down a commenter who she thought was admitting to child molestation. In this instance, there is no big dog here with the cottonballs to address thsi motherfucker coming her to advise lurkers that they should throw a baby overboard and save themselves. I can appreciate the diversity of TBP commentators coming out as lesbians or the coffee klatch crowd giving advice on dental care, using semen o get that ‘just brushed’ gleeming smile. However, things can’t have gotten so acceptable that some fucking asshole son of a bitch motherfucking piece of shit coward can come here and offer that kind of wisdom and nobody is going to shut him down, fuck that. Admin an’t monitor every damn comment but there used to be big dogs here. If they are gone, somebody has got to step up and speak for the weak and defenseless, the underdogs, the powerless like that big bitch did back then.
Kids are and should be the number-one-priority of the mother, as I taught my son many years ago. My blissful second marriage went out the window owing to this (I as the general elected to move transcontinental and suffered a mutiny), but I accepted this as a rule of nature.
Move on, bro’.
I get that, Monte. To an extent, the kids should be P-1. But not to the exclusion of a relatively young father trying to keep the fire, and his fidelity.
The parents need alone time that’s desired mutually, and not from a sense of reluctant obligation.
That’s well put, sir, as are some other comments below, and while it’s certainly true that parents need “alone time mutually desired, when push comes to shove, I still believe that once a man decides to have children with his willingly accepting wife, the onus is upon him to stay faithful. I say this from shameful failure to have done so, initiating a lamentable series of events that have taken decades to remedy. Meanwhile, 32 years later, my first wife and mother of my children now lives a couple of miles away and is turning out to be a very good grandmother. We see each other often, get along well (important for the the tykes to see), but beyond that… Nevertheless, imho we should have stayed together, as I was willing to do in spite of the fact that the fire had gone out. Obligations are duties we assume and I believe we must stand by them as we vowed to do when we married, though I failed to do so to no small degree of regret.
Agreed, ‘frio. There is iron in your words of wise truth and experience. I salute you.
“Her story: Her ex cheated on her.
His story: She abandoned his needs for loving her man as soon as their daughter was born.
The kid became priority 1, at the expense of the husband, a common issue parents have to face and solve, or dissolve.”
Bingo. I hear this all the time. Women don’t get that the kid would not exist without the relationship of the parents. This is paramount for women to remember after they become mothers.
Relationships are work, they just don’t magically stay “magic” after the first couple years. You have to keep the fun in your relationship and make it a priority.
I have seen this happen over and over. It’s not the only problem with the men/women dynamic today but it’s definitely up there in the top ohh, say first three. The others which I don’t have time to go into at the moment.
thx for the hat tip, mc. I don’t have a kid or an ex, but I’ve talked to enough married male friend parents who went through it, and some divorced. Granted, the guys have some blame too, if they’re screwing other women, and fall into lazy, unattractive characteristics, too. UR right. it takes a lot of work.
Happily married couples who still keep the fire burning for each other, through raising kids, then the adults showing signs of age…they are blessed.
“Ya can’t start a fire without a spark.”, eh?
MC, of all the anti-feminist topics El Doggy has broached, the one that brings him the most angry callers is the declaration that single moms are a bad selection. He’s explained many times why that is true but all the callers seem to have heard or understood is that single moms are bad women. Yes, he does rail against bad women quite often but he has never said single moms are necessarily bad women. The problem is the same one you bring up: the new husband immediately takes the back seat behind junior or susie. If new dad wants to correct the child, mom reminds him that he’s not the kid’s dad. He says the bio-dad may want to play white knight by trying to defend the child against new dad. El Doggy says the situation is messed up from the start and despite the odd success story, a single mom is a bad choice.
My oldest daughter is a single mother. I don’t want to talk about all of her problems but my 13 year old grandson is a good kid in spite of her. She is a self absorbed, messed up female. Never married and can’t sustain a relationship for very long. I love her because she is my daughter but I hate all of the choices she has made.
We put a lot of time into my grandson so he gets some male role modeling from my husband and sees what a working relationship looks like.
I don’t know what went wrong with her. My other daughter is completely opposite. She says not to blame myself for things I did wrong because what I know now, I didn’t know then. Maybe she is right but it’s hard to watch your child destroy her life while her son watches. He is getting wise to her ways and loves his mom but I’m not sure how long this will last as he progresses into his teen years. Dad lives halfway across the country so he only sees him in the summer and holidays.
Not all single mothers are bad, many do the best they can with what they have. But the kids are nearly always going to be playing catch up to kids that come from a well functioning nuclear family.
“Not all single mothers are bad, many do the best they can”
He seems to have a career insured because women keep thinking he said single moms are bad. He never said that. His unspoken message is that women should keep from having kids before marriage and he tells men (and indirectly, women) to take their time and don’t make babies with strange women before marrying the right girl.
He is super critical of modern sluts who prefer to party and flee from housework.
Yesterday’s “nota” was about men having to rush home to do laundry or make dinner while the slut takes it easy watching KUWTK.
I didn’t mean to imply that you said that all single mothers are bad. I got exactly what you meant. That’s the problem with text. Things don’t always get communicated properly because you forget that you are not right there with the person to clarify. I think I was trying to make the point that I personally don’t think all single mother are bad since my own experience with my daughters single motherhood had been not very good.
“He seems to have a career insured because women keep thinking he said single moms are bad. He never said that. His unspoken message is that women should keep from having kids before marriage and he tells men (and indirectly, women) to take their time and don’t make babies with strange women before marrying the right girl.
He is super critical of modern sluts who prefer to party and flee from housework.”
Exactly my point about my daughter. She made terrible decisions that is going to affect her child and maybe the next generation. Housework aside -that is the only thing she actually does well but she is OCD and everything must be done exactly her way or she gets her panties in a knot.
She may be ahead of the curve, traditional families are going the way of the dinosaurs. My granny lamented that she didn’t hear the honking horns of wedding processions driving down the street almost every weekend.
In the 50’s Juarez was a prosperous town with hotels, transit systems and plenty of work. Street vendors hawking comic books like Memin Pinguin, Lagrimas y Risas, Alma Grande, etc or coconut, pineapple and watermelon fruit slices or boiled corn on the cob.
By the late 70’s it was a run down hell hole with no bus system, and no tourists like before. One old time visitor familiar with the 50’s and 60’s scene said it was like a non-stop party. By the 80’s, unwed mothers were the norm as the maquilas destroyed men’s self worth, preferring to hire women to do the repetitive assembly work for the gabachos.
People complain about illegals coming north, they don’t see the culture of unwed mothers seeping across the border. This is the tide El Doggy is trying to stem. The feminists will have no part of his criticism, an attack on one is an attack on all. The culture be damned, women must be free.
Keep in mind, Wipper, that America has promoted this lifestyle; Hollywood has shown poor peoples in this hemisphere that straight is out, gay is in. A man may break a dozen unwritten laws by making advances on a seductive young woman but a queer is only expressing his unique individuality when he attempts to seduce a young man.
imagine joining a cult, where the rules are: you must remain unhappy, unmarried, and unloved, forever.
that, my friends, is feminism.
terrible, just awful.
My kind of Feminist
Camille Paglia (of the 50 foot Amazon fame) is a feminist that any high-T man should appreciate, because she appreciates you. She also appreciates the male Apollonian contributions that have freed her from washing cloths by hand and cooking over a smoking fire. She doesn’t think that false cultural imperatives override biology or that women are superior to men in any way, but she does opine that politically correct, pussy-whipped soy-boys are complete failures as men.
Oh, and the self-interred false prophets of anti-male feminism that steer all Humanities studies into the ditch of “Every problem can be traced back to unearned patriarchal privilege that can only be addressed by a notarized release before sex.
Man-hating feminists revile her, because she would call bullshit on…
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me while trying to take my clothes off.”
Camille’s recent book, Free Women, Free Men, was a tour-de-force bra-snapping for women who pride themselves in their unearned superiority complex.
“Women will never know who they are until they let men be men. Let’s get rid of Infirmary “Feminism, with its bedlam of bellyachers, anorexics, bulimics, depressives, rape victims and incest survivors. Feminism has become a catchall vegetable drawer where bunches of clingy sob sisters can store their moldy neuroses.”
Camille Paglia
“It [feminism] is mixed up with the muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.” – G.K. Chesterton
Inevitably when I see most of these specimens, the adjective porcine comes to mind.