Guest Post by Katie Pavlich
A woman who accused Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault admitted to congressional investigators she made up her claims to “get attention.”
According to a letter sent to Attorney General Jeff Sessions late Friday afternoon, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred Judy Munro-Leighton for criminal prosecution and revealed her actions were part of a ploy to take down Kavanaugh’s nomination.
From the letter, bolding is mine:
Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky.
On November 1, 2018, Committee investigators connected with Ms. Munro-Leighton by phone and spoke with her about the sexual-assault allegations against Judge Kavanaugh she had made to the Committee. Under questioning by Committee investigators, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original “Jane Doe” letter. When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the “Jane Doe” from Oceanside California who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: “No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention.
She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination.
Regarding the false sexual-assault allegation she made via her email to the Committee, she said: “I was angry, and I sent it out.” When asked by Committee investigators whether she had ever met Judge Kavanaugh, she said: “Oh Lord, no.”
Grassley has also referred Julie Swetnik, Michael Avanetti and an unnamed man for criminal prosecution after making false claims to congressional investigators.
“The Committee is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know…But when individuals intentionally mislead the Committee, they divert Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations and materially impede our work. Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal,” Grassley wrote. “It is illegal to make materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements to Congressional investigators. It is illegal to obstruct Committee investigations.”
Womyn are liars and professional ball busters.
Witness Hitlery.
Ivan, I thought of the old proverb; If it bleeds, it leads. That makes the old bags ineligible for the presidency. Neither Hillary nor Hiawatha have hemorrhaged a drop of hemoglobin since Halloween of ’76
They’ve got to prosecute this woman with more than a slap on the wrist. People who make false accusations have to understand there are severe consequences for doing so.
The proof will be in the pudding. That means prosecution and punishment. If only they were politicians. They could lie, cheat and steal and get away with it.
Wow. A liberal abusing the legal processes of our society for their amusement and agrandizement. Who saw that one coming?
I’m not holding my breath for any of the pussies in Washington to hold Ballsy Ford responsible for her lies to Congress.
Looking at the article’s pic it struck me that the left consists of beta males and alpha females. Small wonder they’re insane. They’ve turned nature on its head.
Weak mea culpa. Only cuz she got caught. Hammer her, and any others, with steep fines + jail time.
Send a strong message that this BS will not be tolerated anymore.
But But …
We Have to “Just Believe.”
F That.
Meh, just drop her ass off in a muslum or ms13 encampment. Attention she wants, attention she will get.
So I texted my RINO “Saturday Breakfast Club” friend this morning that I couldn’t make it today because I had something else going on, and that started another mini-textfest.
He wanted to bet me $1,000 that the repubs will lose the house. I declined by telling him I wouldn’t bet against the insanity of Blue America. At the same time, though, I said Kavanaugh may prove to be their Alamo and:
He responded by saying Kavanaugh “hung himself on national TV” and that he acted like a “spoiled brat alcoholic”.
I replied:
He responded by saying that I had to admit Kavanaugh proved himself to be wrong for the SCOTUS by losing his temper.
I responded to that thusly:
That seem to have ended the conversation.
And now this post? Lol
Life is good. For today, at least.
Your skills and knowledge did you well in that exchange. But I doubt your debate partner’s mind will ever be opened. Well played, tho.
Even though I’ve been refined by the fires of so many online and 3-D shitfests past…. and even though schooling my breakfast pals is like taking three-year-olds to a Saw movie… I just can never shake that suprised feeling of disgust and disillusionment at the overall depth and breadth of their epic ignorance regarding current events.
Even when progress is made, their rubber brains bounce back to stasis, and the next week they’re back to quoting me excerpts from the New York Times.
They believe what they see, and disregard that which the Orwellian Media won’t show them.
Advertising really does work.
Jeff Sessions , in the interest of civility and rule of law, put that cunt in prison.
I wish Bea hadn’t left. He asked what I thought of the Kanye flip and now I think he may have been upset that Trump didn’t offer him a cabinet position after the mid-terms, I mean that’s what suporters get, no? He kissed Tump’s ass, he should get DHS or at least a Supreme Court nomination. Think of it as Kanye did; Chief justices Kavanaugh and Kanye.
Bret ‘party in the house’ Kavanaugh and Kanye ‘I bring the party’ Kardashian would bring the SC crashing down like the proverbial Samson.