Is Income Inequality Fair?

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

Is Income Inequality Fair?

Some Americans have much higher income and wealth than others. Former President Barack Obama explained, “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.” An adviser to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who has a Twitter account called “Every Billionaire Is A Policy Failure” tweeted, “My goal for this year is to get a moderator to ask ‘Is it morally appropriate for anyone to be a billionaire?'” Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren, in calling for a wealth tax, complained, “The rich and powerful are taking so much for themselves and leaving so little for everyone else.”

These people would have an argument if there were piles of money on the ground called income, with billionaires and millionaires surreptitiously getting to those piles first and taking their unfair shares. In that case, corrective public policy would require a redistribution of the income, wherein the ill-gotten gains of the few would be taken and returned to their rightful owners. The same could be said if there were a dealer of dollars who — because of his being a racist, sexist, multinationalist and maybe a Republican — didn’t deal the dollars fairly. If he dealt millions to some and mere crumbs to others, decent public policy would demand a re-dealing of the dollars, or what some call income redistribution.

You say, “Williams, that’s lunacy.” You’re right. In a free society, people earn income by serving their fellow man. Here’s an example: I mow your lawn, and you pay me $40. Then I go to my grocer and demand two six-packs of beer and 3 pounds of steak. In effect, the grocer says, “Williams, you are asking your fellow man to serve you by giving you beer and steak. What did you do to serve your fellow man?” My response is, “I mowed his lawn.” The grocer says, “Prove it.” That’s when I produce the $40. We can think of the, say, two $20 bills as certificates of performance — proof that I served my fellow man.

A system that requires that one serve his fellow man to have a claim on what he produces is far more moral than a system without such a requirement. For example, Congress can tell me, “Williams, you don’t have to get out in that hot sun to mow a lawn to have a claim on what your fellow man produces. Just vote for me, and through the tax code, I will take some of what your fellow man produces and give it to you.”

Let’s look at a few multibillionaires to see whether they have served their fellow man well. Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, with a net worth over $90 billion, is the second-richest person in the world. He didn’t acquire that wealth through violence. Millions of people around the world voluntarily plunked down money to buy Microsoft products. That explains the great wealth of people such as Gates. They discovered what their fellow man wanted and didn’t have, and they found out ways to effectively produce it. Their fellow man voluntarily gave them dollars. If Gates and others had followed President Obama’s advice that “at a certain point” they’d “made enough money” and shut down their companies when they had earned their first billion or two, mankind wouldn’t have most of the technological development we enjoy today.

Take a look at the website Billionaire Mailing List’s list of current billionaires. On it, you will find people who have made great contributions to society. Way down on the list is Gordon Earle Moore — co-founder of Intel. He has a net worth of $6 billion. In 1968, Moore developed and marketed the integrated circuit, or microchip, which is responsible for thousands of today’s innovations, such as MRIs, advances in satellite technology and your desktop computer. Though Moore has benefited immensely from his development and marketing of the microchip, his benefit pales in comparison with how our nation and the world have benefited in terms of lives improved and saved by the host of technological innovations made possible by the microchip.

The only people who benefit from class warfare are politicians and the elite; they get our money and control our lives. Plus, we just might ask ourselves: Where is a society headed that holds its most productive members up to ridicule and scorn and makes mascots out of its least productive and most parasitic members?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
P2
P2
March 13, 2019 3:23 pm

Williams: “Where is a society headed that holds its most productive members up to ridicule and scorn and makes mascots out of its least productive and most parasitic members?”
Obama: “You didn’t build that.”

Where we are as a society, in a nutshell. Promoted by the ex (thank God for term limits) President.

BB
BB
  P2
March 13, 2019 3:35 pm

Well ,I don’t care if it all burns to the damn ground. Then the poor and envious can starve. They vote for this socialist shit like clockwork. Then they can reap what they sow.

P2
P2
  BB
March 13, 2019 4:15 pm

Unfortunately, the other people living in the house, who didn’t set the fire, also suffer.

Dutchman
Dutchman
  BB
March 13, 2019 4:34 pm

Yeah, the people in Venezuela voted these socialist dictators, several times.

Llpoh
Llpoh
March 13, 2019 4:24 pm

I really like Walt. His common sense is oh so uncommon.

AC
AC
March 13, 2019 4:43 pm

Say, how does lobbying work?

comment image

So, they’re spending this money to benefit their fellow man?

Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
  AC
March 13, 2019 10:11 pm

AC,

Nice. Also…

“Millions of people around the world voluntarily plunked down money to buy Microsoft products.”

Really? Try buying a computer without Microsoft on it. Where is the competitor? A REAL competitor.

Onnie
Onnie
March 13, 2019 6:16 pm

Former President Barack Obama explained, “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”

Well, being he and his wife are still collecting $$$ for giving lectures and selling books, I guess he’s figured he hasn’t made enough money yet. But at least he knows how much money you should have!

doug
doug
  Onnie
March 13, 2019 9:01 pm

Our money, by the way. (((HE))) never has enough; arrogant *******

Platoplubius
Platoplubius
March 13, 2019 9:48 pm

Apparently us white men have been polluting all the minorities’ air

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/11/air-pollution-inequality-minorities-breathe-air-polluted-whites/3130783002/

Blacks and Hispanics disproportionately breathe air that’s been polluted by non-Hispanic whites, according to a study. This new research quantifies for the first time the racial gap between who causes air pollution – and who breathes it. 

“Pollution is disproportionately caused by whites, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities,” the study said.

Poor air quality remains the largest environmental health risk in the United States, the study warns. In fact, with 100,000 deaths per year, more Americans die from air pollution than car crashes and murders combined.

“Even though minorities are contributing less to the overall problem of air pollution, they are affected by it more,” said study co-author Jason Hill, an engineering professor at the University of Minnesota, who is white. “Is it fair (that) I create more pollution and somebody else is disproportionately affected by it?” 

P2
P2
  Platoplubius
March 13, 2019 10:10 pm

Existing while white is now racist.

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Platoplubius
March 14, 2019 8:33 am

Truly insane…

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
March 14, 2019 12:17 pm

I will agree up to the point where the companies directly and indirectly benefited from the immoral actions of federal and state governments. When 1/4 of all computers are owned by the US government, and file sharing and other interactions drive software compatibility between the government and vendors, etc., having the lucrative monopoly computer position with the worthless government, definitely gives you a significant advantage over your competitors. As well, when there are no savers, so there should be no money for loans, and the government’s protected crime organization – the Federal Reserve – steps up and creates money out of thin air to lend, big, connected businesses are able to grow and expand, while the common man gets the shaft from the banking sector AND from the inevitable loss of purchasing power of his dollars. I don’t fault anyone who makes it rich selling wares in a completely voluntary exchange, with completely voluntary consumers, but all the rest owe a major portion of their riches to the power and violence of government and the way it has been employed on their behalf. And NO, taking advantage of these existing circumstances may be something that everyone can do…and these folks did it better, but that does not absolve the immorality of the conditions, or make their riches any less tainted.

FreeEarCandy
FreeEarCandy
March 14, 2019 7:06 pm

I don’t really consider myself a socialist, but people who have a lot of money can do a lot of damage. Yes, a person with a lot of money can also do what seems to be a lot of good. But again, people are more prone to make mistakes, and ultimately, who really knows what the greater good is? If I killed Hitlers parents before he was born I’m a criminal at that moment in time. However, if we could peer into the future I’d be a hero. We just don’t know what the greater good is. So, I feel inclined to say, large sums of money in the hands of the few will likely not turn out well.