IS SHE REALLY THIS F*CKING STUPID

yes

Maybe

In this case she is actually correct. The Democrats, even back in the 1940s were already the party of dead voters. I see no reason to think they would not have gladly expanded upon their proven political strategy by going ahead and nominating the corpse of FDR for another term of office!

There was a tradition of two terms based on the first president, Washington, and his decision to step down in 1796 even though most wanted him to continue as President. Washington was concerned that the office of the Presidency could morph into a quasi-monarch, which he strongly disagreed with, and voluntarily stepped down to emphasize that the man was subservient to the office.

FDR broke that strong tradition because of the dual set of circumstances: the Great Depression during his first two terms and the second world war during his third. and fourth term.

FDR’s 3rd and 4th terms predated the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution which sets US Presidential term limits at 2 terms and was ratified in 1951.

AOC is able to re-interpreted history because it too hard for the “attendance trophy” generation to read all the words in the history books, dat’s TDLR dude., that’s why she will continue to represent the people who are unable to get library cards, due to previous felonies.

she is a gift to the democrats, who are in the process of cannibalizing their own members.

IS [Trump] REALLY THIS F*CKING STUPID

“They say a wall is medieval. Well, a wheel is older than a wall.”
No, no it isn’t.

Addressing Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau “Didn’t you guys burn down the White House?”
No, no they didn’t.

“the reason Russia was in Afghanistan was because terrorists were going into Russia.”
No, no they didn’t.

“I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little bit later you wouldn’t have had the Civil War.”
Yes, yes we would have.

https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a25854256/trump-vs-history-wheels-walls-and-every-time-hes-got-the-past-wrong/

Please do not allow the enemy to set the stage by establishing the norms for language. By allowing them to declare what we call things, we cede power, even if it’s a seemingly small way.
AOC is Alexandria Occasio Cortez. Don’t call her AOC. Seize the high ground and come up with your own name for her. Maybe it will stick if you spread it out there. Me, I call her Comrade Allie or Comrade Ocrazio Cortex or The Bartender. Allowing them to set the stage, even in this small way, cedes power to them in conversation and ideas. The Bartender is a lot less cool when you deride her with pet names, like Allie. Ugly Illhan Omar, Bitch McConnel, John McStain or McLame, Frankenstein-I mean John Kerry, etc. nicknames, or Dimunitions, can be an affectionate thing between friends and family,i.e. Sasha for Alexander, but they erode the respect and authority demanded by those in power or those for whom you have no respect.

Just remember, at one point they replaced Venereal Disease, which was fine, with STD. They replaced Transvestite, which was fine, with Transsexual. They turned Homosexual to Gay back to Queer, which I don’t get, and now you have an entire alphabet LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ$100&*()+#$>><<???{}{}]][#@. That one in particular is like their own special torture as they keep modifying it to make it harder and harder to call them something other than FAGS. I like FAGS because it's 1 syllable and easy to remember. When Fakebook can put up over 4 dozen "gender" options, I think we need to get back to FAGS as a commonsense description of the 57 varieties of freak they've managed to come up with. They took Oriental, which was fine, and replaced it with Asian, which is annoying and practically the same thing. They turned Negro, which was fine, into Black, which was also fine, into African American, which is fake and takes all week to say. They also turned Colored, which was fine, into People of Color. Which is absurd, if you ask me. Why is it more appropriate if you just keep tacking on syllables and needless jargon or modifiers? Ultimately, the idea at the root of the term doesn't change. Call a Black guy Colored, Person of Color, Negro, or African American, or even Suspect #1. The point is the same- Black Guy. What is gained by these verbal gymnastics, other than your discomfort and the approval of libtard language minders?

Seize language back when you can and you force them to dance to your tune for a change. It also really makes them squirm when you do that to them, like calling Abortion Baby Killing or Infanticide or Good Liberal Parenting.

she was off on dates & exact facts but the gist of what she was saying about the great democratic coalition that held disparate groups together & is slowly being re built was correct–
ridicule her publicly sympathizers so as to take her down but never underestimate her or the people who created her & support her–