The New “Stop Resisting”

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Obeying the speed limit (or any other law) is no defense against vindictive armed government workers, as the first video which follows below shows.

The AGW who stopped this car with the threat of murderous violence – implicit in every non-consensual interaction with an AGW – admits, openly, that the driver was not exceeding the posted speed limit – but asserts that his not exceeding it is itself “suspicious.” This assertion of “suspicion” gives him, the AGW, pretext to stop anyone he likes and subject them to an Authority Display.

“I seen (sic) you going 31 miles per hour in a 45,” the AGW illiterately exclaims. The driver points out that this is not illegal. This fact cuts no ice. “Suspicious vehicle,” exclaims the shaved-head agent of the state. But adduces no violation of any law.

The reasoning would startle Kafka.

If you drive faster than the speed limit, you’re subject to being mulcted at gunpoint by an AGW. If you don’t drive faster, you are “suspicious” and subject to being waylaid at gunpoint by an AGW, so that he can fish for other pretexts to mulct you.

In this instance, the AGW and his partner keep bright flashlights trained on the vehicle’s interior as they visually search it. Luckily for the car’s driver and its occupants, all their “papers” were in order and the AGWs had to sulk away without any booty (or bodies).

But not before subjecting the car and its occupants to an Authority Display, including a threatening baton-twirling display with a skull-cracking Mag light flashlight. Had the men not been obviously recording the incident, it might have turned out differently.

This “suspicion” business is popping up in the Authority Displays one can find all over YouTube and other online media, so it is certain that it is not an aberration but rather a new “tool” that AGWs across the country are being “trained” to use.

Not officially, of course.

The thinnest lip service must still be given to the law, which exists only as a fungible, nebulous thing subject to the random interpretation of those who enforce it.

But in practice, the law amounts to do whatever an AGW says it is. Questioning the AGW’s assertions is extremely dangerous because it constitutes “resisting” – and that gives the AW the green light to commence Submission Training, also known colloquially as a Hut! Hut! Hutting!

Thus, AGWs have endowed themselves with – cue Emperor Palpatine voice – unlimited power.

“Suspicion” is like a Swiss Army knife in that it can be used for almost anything. It is even better than a Swiss Army Knife because the knife only has the blade, the screwdriver, the magnifying glass and the fish scaler.

You are walking down the street at night. It’s legal.

“Suspicious!” Let’s have your papers.

You are parked the side of the road – legally parked – going over some papers, or waiting- none of these actions illegal.

But they are mighty “suspicious.”

Taking video in public. Looking askance at an AGW.

You know what that is.

The new magic words. When an AGW eructs them, the entire Bill of Rights vaporizes. A government worker with a gun forces you to submit to his harangue, at the very least. Often, he will force you to hand over your identification, which is technically illegal absent probable cause to suspect the person has committed or is about to commit a specific illegal activity.

“Suspicion” does not qualify as probable cause precisely because it is non-specific.

But that “ties the hands” of what is styled “law enforcement” (AGWs) who must be given every “tool” to “keep us safe.”

That, at any rate, is the argument peddled – mostly (and ironically) by “conservatives,” many of whom who suffer from raw tongues from all the badge licking they do. It’s ironic because “conservatives” will tell you they are concerned about what they style “Big Government,” which they claim they do not trust with too much power. Yet they practically worship armed government workers who exercise arbitrary, unlimited power.

It’s an interestingly cognitive dissonant aspect of their thinking.

The broader point is the lawlessness of “law enforcement,” which ought to be of concern to everyone – irrespective of one’s politics. Whatever the law ought to be can be debated. But once the law is codified, that ought to be the limit.

But AGWs are asserting no limits – de facto and (if the noxious doctrine isn’t firmly repudiated by the courts, soon) it will be de jure. Any of us, at any time and for any reason, will be subject to an Authority Display and Obedience Training at the whim of any armed government worker who asserts we are “suspicious.”

Our having broken no laws, nor even being suspected of having broken any, specifically, won’t matter.

In which case, there no longer is any law – except the arbitrary exercise of power by armed government workers.

If that isn’t the essence of tyranny, then the word has no meaning.

Like “freedom,” for instance.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
oldtimer505
oldtimer505
April 28, 2019 1:59 pm

So what does anyone suggest we do in this situation?

BB
BB
  oldtimer505
April 28, 2019 2:17 pm

Just be respectful . You don’t have to kiss ass just don’t be a smart ass. I have never had any problems with cops as far as violence toward myself. Just be respectful.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  BB
April 28, 2019 4:36 pm

bb,
when you hand over your id after they had no business asking 4 it you are submitting & kissing ass–
i haven’t had problems with them but once or twice,and i mostly brought it on myself,but imo they are becoming far more intrusive than they should be–

Jdog
Jdog
  BB
April 29, 2019 11:03 am

Like a rabid dog, understand the most LEO’s are phycopaths looking for a reason to go phyco on you. That is why they were attracted to a job where they could get away with it.

not me
not me
  Jdog
April 29, 2019 12:03 pm

The psychos are definitely a larger percentage of the LEO population than the overall general population. Once upon a time a person might’ve been attracted to the profession because they really wanted to be a force for good, however, today those folk are truly outnumbered.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
  oldtimer505
April 28, 2019 2:28 pm

Never admit your are guilty of an infraction. Many attorneys on You Tube mention to say as little as possible, and be respectful as you use your rights.

Chris Mallory
Chris Mallory
  Crawfisher
April 29, 2019 4:16 pm

Exactly. Never argue speed with them. If they say 80 in a 55, don’t say I was only going 65. That is still speeding and you just confessed. Saying nothing is your best defense.
Cops are trained liars, the less you say, the less they can twist your words.

Tom
Tom
  oldtimer505
April 28, 2019 4:15 pm

Respectfully shoot the bastards.

SaxonWrath
SaxonWrath
  oldtimer505
April 28, 2019 6:38 pm
Donkey Balls
Donkey Balls
April 28, 2019 2:27 pm

True dat.

thetruthonly
thetruthonly
April 28, 2019 3:04 pm

This is not new exactly. I had police pull over behind and check me out just because my car was parked off the roadway on a wide shoulder at night. I was doing nothing except getting something out of the back of my truck (some pastries to much on). Even after explaining this I had to go through a DUI check, which I passed, it was total BS. Never answer you had two beers many hours ago which was true (I know better now).

Diogenes’ Dung
Diogenes’ Dung
April 28, 2019 3:37 pm

Go for the laugh. You know, the one where the LEO starts scurrying backwards like a blinded rat, getting his own medicine. I laughed right along with the driver.

Added to shopping list: six D-cell Flashlight with strobe.

Maya
Maya
April 28, 2019 3:56 pm

“Dispatch, I’m going to need backup. I’ve got someone with a camera here talking about rights and they know the law better than I do.”

The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
April 28, 2019 4:32 pm

I’ve been in state law enforcement for nearly 30 years and agree “suspicious” persons or activity is far to often used, and unlawfully so, as though it is synonymous with probable cause.

There is suspicious and then there is reasonable suspicion. In ascending order both are less than probable cause.

To lawfully and intentionally stop a person, by lights and siren or verbal command against their will to question or ID them, typically requires probable cause or evidence that it is more likely than not except possibly in the most extreme of circumstances that an offense is about to be committed, is being committed, or has been committed.

Otherwise it is constitutionally an unlawful stop.

This does not mean a LEO cannot request you stop and talk to them without probable cause it just means you aren’t necessarily lawfully required to comply.

If the LEO does have probable cause to lawfully stop you you still have a constitutional right not to incriminate yourself. You still must comply with lawful orders though.

LEO’s are equally charged both with the lawfully authority to enforce the law and the responsibility to protect individual personal liberty while doing so. Not just to catch so called violators by any means at any cost.

Neither LEO’s or the general public should be viewed as the enemy but there are always a few bad apples in every bunch.

Everyone on both sides should always first treat one another how they would want to be treated or have their family members treated under similar circumstances unless things unfortunately escalate to the point where other necessary lawful means to control a given situation arises.

We all have a responsibility in this and are all in this together.

The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
  The blind who will not see
April 28, 2019 4:40 pm

Also often times a LEO may just stop to see if you are ok if parked along the roadside or if you are acting strangly or erratically.
It could actually just be out of true concern and not to just bust your chops.
Let us all learn as we go along to be better people.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The blind who will not see
April 28, 2019 8:41 pm

You sir are FULL OF IT

ILuvCO2"
ILuvCO2"
  The blind who will not see
April 28, 2019 9:58 pm

Five words: “Am I free to go”

Jdog
Jdog
  The blind who will not see
April 29, 2019 10:59 am

LEO’s have made themselves the enemy of the people by usurping powers they do not legally have and suppressing the rights of Citizens.
There is no such thing as an honest Cop, there are the ones who victimize Citizens, and there are the ones who are complaisant by ignoring it or covering it up.
They are all criminals.

not me
not me
  Jdog
April 29, 2019 11:57 am

Civil Forfeiture where they stop and determine what they may steal. Still happening, despite recent Supreme Court rulings, especially if the cop thinks the victim is too stupid or poor to fight back and the state where the cop commits his theft allows it. They will look for something of value, including the car itself and gin up some fake crime to justify their theft.

Trumpisantigun
Trumpisantigun
April 28, 2019 9:49 pm
old white guy
old white guy
April 29, 2019 9:36 am

In Canada today it is legal for a cop to stop you anytime anywhere, even enter your home without a search warrant. Did Canadians argue or fight this? No. Did they vote for this? No. Now tell me just how stupid is the average Canadian?

Jdog
Jdog
  old white guy
April 29, 2019 10:54 am

Canadians are not Citizens, they are subjects. Big difference.

Jdog
Jdog
April 29, 2019 10:28 am

The author of this article needs to do some research on what a conservative is because it is obvious he does not have a clue. Anyone who supports govermental denial of Citizens rights is not a conservative they are a liberal.
The political spectrum is determined by one simple issue, soverignty. A true conservative believes that the Citizen is soverign, which is to say they own their body and their life, and that government is subservient to the Citizens. A liberal on the other hand believes the goverment is soverign, and owns the lives and bodies of the Citizens.
Do not confuse Conservatives with Republicans because the vast majority of Republicans are in fact liberals, they simple dissagree with Democrats about which Citizen rights government should suppress.
The fact is that most AGW’s in this country are illegal due to the fact they are not directly answerable to the Citizens they claim to have authority over. Elected Sherriffs are the exception to that.
All government power comes directly from the Citizens, and if the Citizens have not agreed to that authority, then by law, it does not exist.
Most AGW’s usurp power they have not been granted by the people. Their authority is in fact tyranny by force.
Before you can begin to solve any problem, you must first understand what the problem is.

Chris Mallory
Chris Mallory
  Jdog
April 29, 2019 4:19 pm

The men who founded this nation were liberals. The conservatives fought for the king then ran away to Canada. Free speech is a Liberal concept. Citizens being armed is a liberal concept. The restrictions on the government in criminal proceedings are liberal concepts. What we have today in both parties are progressives, not liberals.

Jdog
Jdog
  Chris Mallory
April 30, 2019 11:14 am

This is absolutely wrong. Liberalism is the belief that the State is sovereign and that the majority has the right to impose their will on the minority.

Conservatism is the belief that the individual is sovereign and the State is the servant of the individuals. It believes that the individual is born with unalienable rights, and that no vote of the majority can take away those rights. That freedom and liberty are derived from those rights and without those rights freedom and liberty do not exist. This country was formed on the concepts of freedom and liberty.

Liberalism in practice today robs individuals of all the unalienable rights recognized by the Constitution. It seeks to take the individual rights away from the individual by claiming to do so is in the interest of the majority.

Chris Mallory
Chris Mallory
April 29, 2019 4:02 pm

“AGE” is better than “AGW”. “Worker” implies that these parasites actually do productive work. They are Armed Government Employees. Employed, but not productive.

sitarzan
sitarzan
July 4, 2019 12:27 am

Tenn just passed a new phone holding law this month (July 1) where you can now get a ticket just for holding your phone as you drive. This includes being stopped at a traffic light, etc. So, IF you’re caught you’ll get a ticket. And since they’ve got you pulled over anyway they’ll want to check your vehicle for drugs & alcohol. If you should decide to pull over to the side of a road or perhaps into an empty parking lot to sit in your non moving vehicle so you can talk they’ll conveniently pull up behind you to ask if you need help? ..then will ask for license, insurance & proof of registration.. & just because it’ll be “suspicious” that you were stopped & sitting in your car they’ll ask you if you had been drinking or doing drugs ..then search your car. Got us coming & going. :/