Leaked Pentagon Plan Calls For 120,000 Troops To Counter Iran

Via ZeroHedge

As Michael Pompeo travels to Brussels to discuss the Iranian threat amid a flare-up in tensions that has brought the US to the brink of an armed conflict, the New York Times has published details from a confidential military plan presented to top national security officials that envisions sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or start ramping up work on nuclear weapons (something it has promised to do if its European partners don’t meet their commitments under the Iran deal).

Bolton

Though the revised plan – it had been modified to incorporate suggestions from John Bolton – doesn’t include plans for a land invasion, it does reflect “the influence of Mr. Bolton, one of the administration’s most virulent Iran hawks, whose push for confrontation with Tehran was ignored more than a decade ago by President George W Bush.”

It’s unclear whether Trump himself has seen, or been briefed on, the plan. Asked about it, Trump said “we’ll see what happens with Iran. If they do anything, it would be a very bad mistake.”

Here are a few key details from the plan according to more than a half-dozen senior administration officials who spoke with the NYT:

  • The 120,000 troops called for in the plan would be close to the size of the force that invaded Iraq in 2003. The reversal of the US troop presence in the region under Obama and Trump has reportedly emboldened leaders in Tehran and the IRGC that there’s no appetite in the US for a war with Iran. Deploying this many troops would take weeks or months.
  • The most likely trigger for a US military response is still an attack by the IRGC The guard’s fleet of small boats has a history of approaching American Navy ships at high speed. Though the plan includes provisions for a US response if Iran once again starts stockpiling nuclear fuel. If Iran does start stockpiling enriched uranium again, the US would have more than a year to formulate a more coherent response, since it would take at least that long for Iran to stockpile anything close to enough to fashion a weapon.
  • Cyberweapons would be used to paralyze the Iranian economy during the opening salvo of the conflict, in the hopes that this would be enough to cripple Iran before any bombs were dropped. Such an operation would call for “implants” or “beacons” inside US networks. Though, given Iran’s increasingly sophisticated cyberweapons, such an attack would still pose “significant risks.”
  • This is not the first time since joining the administration that Bolton has sought updated plans for an invasion of Iran. Though it’s widely believed that the president remains opposed to such an incursion. Bolton requested an update after Iranian-backed militants fired three mortar shells into an empty lot on the grounds of the US embassy in Baghdad.
  • One of the options offered up as a proportional response was a strike on a Iranian military facility that would have been “mostly symbolic.”

While a war with Iran still seems unlikely, if Iran starts stockpiling enriched uranium again as it has threatened to do, it could give Bolton and his fellow neocons exactly the opening they need to successfully push for a military intervention.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
gatsby1219
gatsby1219
May 14, 2019 7:07 am

People still believe the NY Times ?

javelin
javelin
May 14, 2019 7:34 am

Essentially this article says that the US has discussed a plan in case we are attacked— oh my, I’m shocked ! Seriously, it would actually be a bigger story if it was, “US Has No Plan in Place For Potential Iran Attack”.

PS: I believe we should bring our troops home and let the Saudis and Israelis fight their own wars…. but the premise of this article is silly…

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  javelin
May 14, 2019 8:13 am

I was a Bomb/Missile Wing Officer stationed at GFAFB ND 5.5 years and at Hqs SAC AFSATCOM 2 years. I’ll bet my ass we have a very through JCS SIOP Plan (or several) for attacking Iran.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
May 14, 2019 8:05 am

This is much more that planning a response to some attack by Iran: sending a carrier task force, several B-52s, building and deploying Raytheon missiles as fast as humanly possible, two “false flag” attacks on Saudi oil tankers, US State Dept threats and foreign meetings, etc. The Zionist & NeoCons are working to get US into a war with Iran plain as day.

steve
steve
May 14, 2019 8:14 am

They leak and BS about everything EXCEPT ACTUAL TROOP MOVEMENTS. Even for the scum bags running the show that is a bridge too far.
The article says SHOULD Iran attack….there’s a plan SHOULD Iceland attack.

wdg
wdg
May 14, 2019 9:57 am

NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
May 14, 2019 10:42 am

More American young adults and likely millions of innocent Iranians, dying for Israel and Saudi Arabia’s foreign policies. Wonderful.

nkit
nkit
May 14, 2019 3:33 pm

comment image

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
May 14, 2019 5:24 pm

If this is true, then Justin Raimondo was right with this column: https://original.antiwar.com/justin/2019/05/02/will-the-real-moron-please-stand-up/