Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter
Not-Senile-At-All Joe Biden inarticulately joined the “Take All The Gunz” chorus the other day, joining the rest of the socialists, socialists lite and fake Indians who make up the Democrat slate in thinking we’ll just hand-over our arms because of their wanting us to. There are good arguments against their position, including not wanting to rip our country apart with a bunch of Waco redos, but I don’t argue except for money, and I especially don’t argue about my gun rights since they are not up for debate. If I were to argue over the right to keep and bear arms, my position would be simple. Fifty percent of my “argument” would consist of the naughty word the media squees over Beto now uses when babbling about disarming us, plus the word “you.”
The elite, including their pet media, are no longer lying about how they are not going to try to take our guns. They are now all in on disarming you. We need not worry that Donald Trump will roll over on gun rights because that’s political suicide, and a hara kiri move that would leave his family at the mercy of a Democrat Department of Justice who will no doubt be much less picky with his people about who they charge with crimes then they have been with Democrat faves. However, there are weak-hearted GOP congressmen and senators who would love to surrender because that’s what squishes who read the NYT and respect it do. They need to fear our electoral wrath. They need to know that we will destroy them at the ballot box if they allow their cowardice to bring our country to the brink of chaos by empowering the same folks who brought you Spygate, and who let Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit off, prosecute millions of Normal Americans for “crimes” that are legal acts today and that the Constitution says are our natural rights.
No gun bans, ever. You feel us?
But you can argue about gun rights if you want to – here are some suggestions how – but I prefer the threat of the total political destruction of those who would betray us. That’s not because our arguments are weak – our arguments are ironclad – but because arguments mean nothing anymore, since the goal of the gun grabbers is not enacting good policy. If it were, they wouldn’t be targeting law-abiding citizens like us. Nor would they have tolerated decades of bloodbaths in every Democrat big city. They would have unleashed the cops to bust the drug-dealing, gang-banging scumbags who wander about loose today because the liberals in charge simply do not care about scores of dead inner-city citizens.
There’s no good faith argument to be had because our gooey elite, supported by the Ahoy Division of Fredocon submissives eager to once again receive their ration of establishment table scraps, don’t care about facts or reason. They already have their objective and they aren’t going to let bourgeois conceits like “evidence” and “rights” get in their way.
They want power, and they want to demonstrate their power over those knuckle-dragging cisgender Jesus people who work for a living, like you, by taking away a right that is central to your conception of yourself as an American citizen. Guns represent your power to protect yourself and your family, and your power to remove a tyrannical government. Taking that from you allows them the delightful opportunity to rub your face in your own submission, and it puts you in your place. Oh, and there’s also the practical value of depriving you of the power to remove a tyrannical government, since that’s what the elite aspires to enact. Disarmed, you are at their mercy and, as the history of left-wing governments teaches, they have none for such as you.
We hear a lot about how our position that citizens owning guns can be a remedy for a government that decides to ignore the consent of the governed is crazy talk that’s crazy spoken by crazy people. Except, it’s the notion that 100 million armed citizens is powerless that’s crazy. And what’s even crazier is the notion that our blazin’ dumpster of a ruling class could never, ever, at some point, require some kinetic citizen feedback. “But but but,” our betters stammer. “We elites always mean the best for you and we wish to rule you for your own good with your best interests in mind and Iraq and the Wall Street collapse and Obamacare and Jeffrey Epstein and yada yada yada.”
Yeah, they got our backs – in their sights. Our elite is garbage, and everything it says is a lie and a scam. You just need to look around and be willing to see the truth. At home, we have a Deep State that shamelessly runs a dual track justice system, one for the connected and one for you. If you get uppity, it comes down on you – look at the IRS scandal and look at what they’ve done to anyone helping Trump. Then look at how those within the elite skip out on accountability. Gee, I bet if we disarm that will all change and they’ll start respecting our rights n’ stuff!
We have a media that lies to you and tries to demolish your history in order to undermine the moral foundation of your right to participate in your own governance and to live as you see fit. And what does the royal caste think of us? Glance at social media, and before you get so disgusted you need to run to the shower (with the crappy lo-flo shower head the elite imposed upon you as a sacrifice to their Angry Weather Goddess), you’ll see how our betters are intent on limiting what you can say, think and do. Well, the nice ones. The less circumspect ones will happily tweet about how they want you dead.
Over in Old Blighty, the global elite’s London franchise decided to let the unwashed have their little referendum to put an end to those unseemly rumblings about the EU’s impositions on the UK’s national sovereignty and – uh oh – the proles voted wrong. That was three years ago, and the elite’s promise that the people’s decision on the referendum would be honored has, of course, been broken. And across the globe, in Hong Kong, the Chi-Coms are in the process of breaking their word about letting HK be free. But hey, the socialists here will totally respect your rights once they take power, especially if you are disarmed and defenseless. Chet, who is my pet unicorn, is willing to bet his liberty on it.
But I’m not.
Do you think, for even a second, that a Supreme Court appointed by Big Chief Warren or Not Mrs. Willie Brown or that insufferable furry Tex Kennedy would hesitate to find that the First Amendment has a hidden exceptions for “hate speech” (an elastic term that includes anything you might want to say that the elite does not wish to be said), that the Constitution allows your religious practices to be subjected to their control, and that the Second Amendment actually means you can’t own any weapons at all?
Their Second Amendment arguments are always interesting, and their bottom line is that this part of the Bill of Rights actually provides us no right at all, none. “Shall not be infringed” actually mean “Infringe away!” “But but but,” they blubber. “There were muskets then and now we have scary ARs and the Founders could not have wanted that.” Actually, the Founders would love the idea of citizens owning real assault weapons and wonder why so many of our countrymen are half-stepping slackers without the capacity to do their duty in the defense of their communities and Constitution.
And that argument itself is embarrassingly dumb, both legally, as Antonin Scalia pointed out in Heller, and just in terms of basic coherence. The people hoping to oppress us also have ARs. Does it make sense that the Founders would want us to fall so far behind the capabilities of the people who our guns are supposed to keep at bay that we can’t deter them anymore because we’re stuck with muskets? No, but who cares? The libs don’t. They are not asserting an argument as much as a superficial, poorly-conceived, pseudo-clever meme that the kind of dumb people who watch late night TV comics think is smart. It’s not smart. It’s not even smert.
Here’s the deal. No disarmament ever. Buy guns and ammunition, if you are a law-abiding, healthy adult. Train on them. And be ready, because the minute you disarm you will be a serf. Look at England. Look at Hong Kong. Then get yourself the weapons you need to be a complete American citizen.
If you want to read a vivid account of what happens if the Democrats succeed and get to disarm us, which is the first step to establishing the kind of one-party dictatorship you see in California and Venezuela, check out my action-packed yet hilarious novels, People’s Republic, Indian Country and Wildfire. The Never Trump losers call them “appalling,” meaning patriots like you will call them “awesome.”
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
My stock standard suggestion to the anti firearm brigade is this. Go ask a Polish Jew that survived the Holocaust/Holohoax (depending on your view) if they could redo their time again, would they still give up their guns or go ask a Tutsi or Twa would he/she have loved to own a firearm in Rwanda back in 1994. They become slack jawed gawpers with nothing to say.
Better yet, look at what is going on in Hong Kong this very day. Do you think the “police” would be attacking 2 million armed citizens?
My friends wifes mom had the tattoo from her time in the camps. For a frail old woman, she sure could shoot. “Never again will i go willingly. And i’m taking some with me next time.” Rest in peace Bina, you taught me alot.
Quite often, firearms owners are their own worst enemies.
The duck hunters don’t like the AR-15 “black rifles” so they see no problem if attempts are made to ban them. The traditional rifle owners don’t like machine guns, so they have no problem with them being legislated out of existence. Some pistol owners see nothing wrong with certain long guns being outlawed just as some rifle owners would have no problem seeing pistols banned.
You see, anti-gunners want them all. They will chip away a little at a time until their goal of civilian disarmament is complete.
They have an excuse for banning every firearm. Scoped bolt-action rifles are defined by anti-gunners as “sniper rifles” because they are “too accurate”. Magazine-fed weapons are suspect because of high (actually normal) magazine capacity. Handguns are suspect because they are “easily concealable”. The gun grabbers want them all and have made (flimsy and suspect) excuses for banning every type of firearm. They don’t care how long it takes. and will use incrementalism to their advantage.
Friends, ALL firearms advocates must “hang together” and realize that an assault on ANY means of firearms ownership and self-defense is an assault on ALL forms of firearms ownership and self-defense.
There is absolutely NO ROOM for complacency among ANY Second Amendment supporters. An attack on one is an attack on ALL…
ALL firearms laws are unconstitutional on their face. Imagine the hue and cry if “reasonable” restrictions were placed on First Amendment activities, especially with the “mainstream media”. The Second Amendment is clear–what part of “shall not be infringed” do politicians and the media not understand…of course, they understand full well…it’s part of their communist agenda…
Even the NRA bears some responsibility for capitulation on matters concerning firearms. The NRA failed when it allowed the National Firearms Act of 1934 to stand without offering opposition, the 1968 Gun Control Act, the NICS “instant check” system, the “no new machine gun for civilians” ban in 1986, the so-called “assault weapons” ban in 1994, and other infringements of the Second Amendment.
Let’s face it. What better way to increase membership than to “allow” infringements to be enacted and then push for a new membership drive. Yes, the NRA has done good, but its spirit of “compromise” will only lead to one thing…confiscation.
If the NRA is truly the premier “gun rights” organization, it must reject ALL compromise…
Spot on! I was on the range recently and a grandfather and son were zeroing two large caliper bolt action rifles with scopes. One was a 30.06 and the other a 270. They had a bench stock so as to be very accurate. I was firing a new AR15 with hard sights and a Winchester Model 1873 chambered in 357 (also with hard sights). I asked them about the rifles they were shooting and after telling me about their rifles one of them pointed to my AR and said, “we don’t like those”, “we just like shooting for fun”. I’m thinking like what the fuck does that mean? So I said, “me too”, “and I enjoy the challenge of hitting tight shot groups at 100 yards without a bench stock or bipod”.
They were getting consistent shot groups within a half dollar at 100 yards with bench stock and high powered scope (3 shots, and they only fired every couple of minutes so as to allow the barrel to cool). I was getting softball sized groups of twenty shots with both of my rifles (hard sights and sandbag support on forehand only) while shooting in quick succession. Shot 30 rounds to their 3 rounds in the same amount of time. When we all went down to look over our targets I commented that their rifles were very accurate. Then I pointed at my target with a softball sized swiss cheese hole and said, “that’s the best I can do”… Chip
Yeah, I run into these gun owners that basically hate handguns or scary looking rifles. So both comments are spot on. It’s not just the non-gun owner that is irrational and willing to give up their rights. But Biden’s “ban all magazines” must make even some ignorant gun owners cringe. That would defacto ban every gun I have except my shotgun. Almost all my guns are hunting rifles, most of them 22’s of some sort. My bolt action 22’s use magazines. My 30.06 has a plate that can be removed and could be used with a magazine. You would basically be banning 95% of guns.
Under most conditions hunting rifles are theoretically the most dangerous guns to have, if used by a smart person, rather than a crazy one. Being able to shoot accurately from a long distance is a HUGE advantage. AR’s a fun low kick guns to use and have their place. But outside 300yards almost no one is hitting much of anything without alot of practice and some great optics. Yet alot of people can easily hit targets outside 300+ with some typical hunting rifles 30.06, .308’s both which were “military style” weapons back in the day, and last I remember Army Snipers still often use .308’s.
Ultimately its the tyranny of mostly uniformed people trying to control and take away freedoms from minorities. Being a “gun owner” doesn’t mean jack shit, a large percentage of guys know almost nothing about their guns, don’t use them anymore, or bring them out for two weeks only for deer season.
Duck hunters might not be happy with the goal to ban all semi-auto’s either, say goodbye to your semi-auto shotguns. Goal is to make people defenseless peasants and lots are on board with this. Freedom minded people are rare indeed, people like the comfort of their own dellusions and their sense of self-righteousness. We already saw that “snipers” that move around can paralayze entire communities with fear and often can get away with it for awhile, compared to the crazed mass shooters that are mostly angry suicidal crazies that want to die, but want the world to know how much hate they have and project their pain onto innocents before they go. This happens in non-gun countries as well, with bombs, trucks, gasoline etc. As the Samurai used to say, Life is inherently dangerous, safety is a temporary illusion at best.
If Car owners that killed people, smashed things and all the rest were paraded on TV endlessly, people might not feel good about allowing people to drive either, or maybe they would only allow mopeds!
Spot on. I love my Winchester Model 70 – .308. But also my Ruger 10/22 which is one of the most fun and cost effective rifles I have. Paired with a “Sweet 22” Scope it’s cheap and highly accurate… Chip
yeah I have the ruger 10/22 as well with a banana magazine for plinking. It’s my favorite gun to shoot with, plinking spinners, shooting at cheap toys from garage sales etc. I rarely shoot my larger cal guns b/c they kick big and ammo is expensive. My most used gun is a marlen .22 bolt action with a 7 round magazine. I’ve used it to do battle with ground hogs since I was a teenager. Some months its the only gun I shoot, since ground hogs and I are constantly at odds. They have destroyed a large area that I’ve filled in over and over again, year after year. There are alot of groundhog skeletons in those tunnels. Some years the only reason I get the hunting license is to shoot those annoying critters.
Its beyond ridiculous that my .22 marlin bolt action is on the list of bad guns b/c it has a magazine. Most hunting rifles take magazines. And you can quick change revolvers really easily as well in no time at all. Pump action shotguns are some of the most versatile and devastating guns out there, but apparently since they don’t have a magazine they aren’t scary, unless you add on a forearm and “tactical” add ons, then it is scary.
Honestly, I’m so sick of people now adays, people are pathetic and are afraid of everything under the sun, the internet and TV endless bombarding people with violent news stories doesn’t help. Data says overall violence is down, yet most people think its the worst it has ever been, goes to show you that logic and data don’t drive politics, emotions do and the puppeteers now have people believing that emotion is their “truth”.
Don’t you think that private transportation will be the next thing to be banned after the big, bad, gun?
One favored method for mass disarmament of a citizenry is to make high-profile arrests of those who are vocal about their firearms “rights”.
Another way is to enlist the “help” of the communist “mainstream media” to demonize anyone who has an interest in firearms, allowing the media to be present at “raids” and in general use “loaded” terms such as “arsenals”, “weapons of mass-destruction”, “weapons of war”, “machine guns” and other sensational terms, to inflame the non-knowledgeable public, introducing them to their “unstable” neighbors who are being (illegally and unconstitutionally) raided.
It’s all about perception, which the left uses to good effect, utilizing tactics from jew communist Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals. The “mainstream media has always been dishonest and against firearms rights.
High-profile raids will push the firearms owning public underground. Those who choose to “fight back” will be regarded as “terrorists” and “enemies of the state and good order” by the mainstream media, who will fan the flames of hysteria, attempting to get the general public on their side—supporting mass disarmament. If and when they are murdered by “law enforcement” very little, if anything, will be mentioned about the illegality of these “raids”.
All one has to do is look at how firearms owners are treated presently by the mainstream media-looked upon as “pariahs” and other unstable types.
The “key” to resistance may be to “cache” your firearms, leaving a few firearms accessible both for protection and as “bait” to “feed” the gun-grabbers if and when the raids come.
The left is expert at using “incrementalism”, chipping away at rights a little-bit at a time. From arbitrary classification of firearms, declaring certain “features” illegal, to specifying barrel lengths, magazine capacity, to outright banning the production and ownership of newly-manufactured machine guns, the left has been busy.
There are no easy answers to the situation we are presently in, but surrendering one’s rights is never the answer.
A good read, “Unintended Consequences” by John Ross, about our present situation and possible “solutions” was written in 1995 and is still available in print and as a free pdf. This book is a good reference, history lesson, and comes up with possible solutions to the assault on our freedom.
This book was considered so volatile when it first came out that sellers were routinely harassed by FBI, ATF, and DEA types for displaying and selling it.
To quote Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst; the cursed machine would have ground to a halt . . .
— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
The system will not allow me to give you enough thumbs up.
Some very good comments here. Well thought out and reasoned. There will be Red Flag Laws, just think of the goal of disarming us as being incremental, one small step after another. The gun grabbers are patient and persistent, a few more false flags and mass shootings and voila, Great Britain and Australia and the rest of the world we come.
https://archive.org/stream/JohnRossUnintendedConsequences/John%20Ross%20-%20Unintended%20Consequences_djvu.txt
I have a copy of “Unintended Consequences” somewhere in one of my book boxes in the barn and need to find it and re-read it, and pass it out…thanks for the reminder.
Definitely find it! An original hardcover is worth over $100. Very interesting read along with Chittum’s “Civil War Two”. Another good one is “A Failure of Civility” by Garand and Lawson. Expect to spend about $200 for that one.
ragman,
Yea…I have it and Chittum’s book, don’t have or have read “A Failure of Civility” but at $200 I’ll just have to stay with my tactical memories of snooping and pooping in Nam.
I checked THRIFT BOOKS below…my go to source for a copy of anything but they didn’t have one (27 people want one on the link below) if you haven’t found it yet go here before you go to Amazon or anywhere for a book – sometimes huge savings.
https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/a-failure-of-civility_mike-garand_jack-lawson/9828250/#isbn=0615670105
Not only high profile raids will push gun owners underground, but the red flag laws are intended to as well.
The media and the indoctrination centers have been demonizing firearms for many years.
“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” Vladimir Lenin
Take you children and grandchildren shooting, teach them firearm safety and encourage them to bring their friends when you go to the range. Bring their friends parents, as well.
The problem is, we have allowed the anti Second Amendment crowd to define the terms.
A firearm is a tool which possess no evil intent on its own. Assigning intent to an inanimate object is the epitome of insanity. Demonizing a weapon on “looks alone” also marks the accuser as an unstable individual who is also insane. Call them out on their illogic and insanity.
Another dirty tactic the anti-Second Amendment crowd uses exposes children to potential and actual harm by putting them in “gun-free zones”. These people care not one wit about children, but uses them for their own nefarious purposes.
We need to TAKE BACK the argument…
When the antis blame the firearm for the actions of a criminal, state that: “a firearm is an inanimate object, subject only to the intent of the user. Firearms ARE used to preserve life and make a 90 lb. woman equal to a 200 lb. criminal.
When the antis attempt to justify their “gun free zones” counter their misguided argument with “you mean, criminal safety zones” or “victim disarmament zones”. State that “we protect our money, banks, politicians and celebrities, buildings and facilities with PEOPLE WITH GUNS, but protect our children with “gun-free zone” signs”.
When the antis state that: “you don’t need and AR-15”, counter with, “Who are YOU to consider what I need?”
When the antis criticize AR-15s in general, counter with: “you mean the most popular rifle of the day, useable by even the smallest, weakest person as a means of self-defense. Besides, AR-15s are FUN to shoot”. Offer to take them to the range and supply them with an AR-15, ammunition and range time. I have made many converts this way.
When the antis state that: “You don’t need an AR-15 to hunt with”, counter with “AR-15s ARE used for hunting, but in many states, are prohibited from being used to take large game because they are underpowered”.
When the antis state that: “AR-15s are high powered rifles”, correct them by stating that “AR-15s with the .223 or 5.56mm cartridge are considered medium-powered weapons–NOT “high-powered” by any means”.
When the antis state that: “the Constitution was written during the time of muskets, and that the Second Amendment should only apply to “weapons of that time period”, state that: “by your logic, the First Amendment should not apply to modern-day telecommunications, internet, television, radio, public-address systems, books and newspapers produced on high-speed offset printing presses. Only “town-criers” and Benjamin Franklin type printing presses would be covered under the First Amendment”.
When the antis state that “only law enforcement and government should possess firearms”, remind them of the latest school shooting, as well as Columbine, where “law enforcement” SAT ON THEIR HANDS while children were being murdered, afraid to challenge the shooter, despite being armed to the hilt. The government-run murderous sieges at Ruby Ridge and Waco are also good examples of government (mis)use of firearms.
Gun-banners want ALL guns, even if they attempt to get them a little at a time, chipping away at the Second Amendment. Here are the “excuses” that the anti-gun crowd uses to “justify” their misguided position:
Handguns–“too concealable”
Rifles–“too accurate”
Shotguns–“too deadly”
The Second Amendment is the most “infringed” of any part of the Constitution.
This tome can be used to counter any argument against any infringement of our Second Amendment.
Well said… Chip
Here is an example of the post being more informative than the article.
We see lots of gun violence in places like Chicago….30+ shot over a standard weekend and 5-15 dead. Chicago has extreme “gun control” and yet the “youths” still have guns, don’t follow the law and shoot each other constantly.
The Leadership of Chicago say: “The guns come in from other places, like Indiana so we have to ban guns everywhere”………
Now the kicker, of course, is that Indiana being a normal conservative/GOP state has NO GUN PROBLEM! There is not a Chi-Raq like problem in Indiana despite more guns!!!!!
So logically we must conclude it ain’t the guns, its the people and leadership in Chicago that is the problem……..
From my cold dead hands……
90% of homicides are committed by minorities, mostly black, with illegal guns..yet the homicide rate keeps dropping…Gun grabbers want power, not safety, and they won’t grab them from their black and hispanic allies…
A dumb argument about gun control;
“Take the guns first, due process later” ~ DJT
I add this bit of info to the narrative. “The future of military small arms.” Which may make some hoard more traditional lead. Could the PTB make traditional ammo contraband? But you can keep the guns?
“A new kind of ammunition could reduce by up to 40 percent the weight that the average soldier or marine carries in combat, which can easily exceed 100 pounds in combat. This “cased telescoped” ammo replaces brass bullet casings with polymer ones to achieve considerable weight savings, making U.S. troops deadlier in the process.”
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/news/a27414/plastic-ammo-textron-cased-telescope/
You gun nuts, former grunts and patriots please comment as I have only discovered this information. And as a felon it macht nichts to me.
I’m watching the Army NGSW contract competition for a new light machine gun/service rifle to replace the M16/M4 and possibly the USMC M27 and M249 SAW. The plan is switching out from 5.56mm rounds to a 6.8mm variant that has better terminal ballistics at range. There are three competitors using three different types of ammo – SIG, Textron, and General Dynamics. One is the type you mentioned, the second resembles a belted magnum casing using two different metals, and the third is a polymer casing.
Max effective range of the 5.56mm is close to 500m. The new round and rifle will change the qualification training and extend those ranges out to 800m … or 1000, comparable to the ballistics of the 7.62X51 and 6.5mm Creedmoor. I also see an opportunity for a civilian semi-auto version later, which could find its way into the NRA Service Rifle competitions.
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/09/03/sig-sauer-ngsw-prototype/
it’s amazing how many weak people there are. So trusting and They sure didn’t learn anything from their history class. my family talked about German soldiers marching unarmed Jews off to the trains.
A deer rifle with a scope for stuff far away and a semi-auto for closer stuff. Shotguns and a .22 rifle for closer stuff also. A pistol for really close stuff. I try to picture scenarios in the future. I picture asking the people at my gate if they ever took an oath? U.N. Soldiers won’t give a shit. The people in charge who pushed for this Constitution breaking stuff need to go. One way or another. I push for term limits all the time.
The coming solar minimum cold weather will result in people being pushed into cities where they can be controlled easier. The offer of food will male many just come a running. I hope the rural folks will just be left alone to die. Many will, but many will survive.
yah sure,
Just built two more Cold Frames.
Mark, content that you offer up, like the year round gardening source, is why your comments get an automatic view, for my eyes.
Akin to following other on other social media platforms, due to the value of wisdom and experience they project.
For me, you’re one of maybe a dozen, that I pay attention to consistently.
You’ve become a great contributor here.
Seconded
Thanks L & nkit…the book is excellent. I’m shifting into high gear in my year round gardening capabilities and if Niki Jabbour (beauitful woman by the way) can grow food all year in Nova Scotia I can do it in North Cackalacky!
Some of the most clueless are jews. For supposedly smart people they learned absolutely nothing from the holocaust.
Older but well worth watching and passing on brief video on the weak willed, disarmed, British idiot serfs.
One relentless tactic of the Luciferian Globalists is to force Gun Control to the point of Civil War 2. To them it doesn’t matter who wins, as after that river of blood stops flowing, who/what survives will have shattered America into disunited enclaves and regional powers taking the U.S. off the world stage as a Superpower. That will allow for TPTB New World Order two class system to finally rule internationally. Then TPTB can deal with the enclaves and regions one at time.
The problem with the title of the article below is Liberals are just USEFUL IDIOTS and their puppet masters Luciferian Globalists are well aware that Gun Confiscation will start Civil War 2. To them that is a twofer, take the US off the world stage and significantly reduce the number of useless eaters.
WHAT LIBERALS DON’T UNDERSTAND: A SERIOUS ATTEMPT AT GUN CONFISCATION COULD LEAD TO CIVIL WAR
https://pjmedia.com/trending/liberals-dont-understand-serious-attempt-gun-confiscation-lead-civil-war/
Civil War 2 in the 2020’s is a strong contender in my mind why the U.S. is absent from Bible last days prophecy as a force in the world? Our tribulation could start with self a inflicted war as the Luciferian Globalists fund and fuel the start of it…then just sit back and wait.
Of course one of the Elephants in this room is a open southern border. Because we all know weapons could never be smuggled into the country, much like people, drugs and money, sure glad they are trying so hard to keep us safe, and fully trust them to do so in the future… might as well stick your neck freely into a guillotine and hope they won’t pull that lever too.
I have said this before but it bears repeating.
We have gone far enough down the “infringe”road.
It isn’t working.
I suggest a 180 degree turn.
Issue a federal executive order and make conceal carry manditory for every citizen over 18.
1000$ fine for NOT carrying.
You may not vote until the fine is paid.
There are no exemptions, and no mandate to actually use it, but you must carry loaded.
We have tried every version of your plan and it isn’t working.
Try mine.
It will work.
An armed society is a polite society.
Feel free to copy and paste if you agree.
Thank you.
Your pal
Scott.
Liberals would refuse to comply and engage in massive civil disobedience, and the enforcement would be a nightmare.
However, it would be interesting to see the effect on crime. My guess is it would make a much bigger dent than anyone would believe.
Part of my point is to strip liberals of their voting rights for non compliance.
So it’s carry
Or pay the fine
Or loose every election while we fix this country.