Doing this one simple thing would take a huge bite out of poverty, research shows

Guest Post by Brett Arends

U.S. taxpayers spend about $878 billion a year on benefits and services for people with low incomes, according to the federal government.

That’s nearly a quarter of the entire federal budget.

And they spend another $284 billion at the federal, state and local level on policing, justice and law and order, including $87 billion a year just on prisons, much of which is devoted to people who grew up in poor and at-risk circumstances.

If that sounds like a dismal situation in which everybody loses, here is some cheerful news.

One simple fix could take a big chunk out of that spending, lift many more people into the middle class, and pay big dividends all around, researchers have just found.

The solution? Providing better quality and more intensive public education for children, especially from poor and at-risk backgrounds, that lasts from age 3 through third grade.

Research conducted on a unique long-term data set from some of Chicago’s most-challenged neighborhoods has found that four to six years of educational interventions in a child’s life ended up producing enormous benefits by the time the children made it into early adulthood.

Their average incomes were a remarkable 25% higher than peers who didn’t get the intervention. They were 30% more likely to earn more than a basic $20,415 threshold. They were 50% more likely to make it into the top 25% of earners, and less likely to end up in deep poverty.

The biggest gains were seen among those who had been growing up in circumstances that were most at risk.

Some 62% said they were better off than their parents.

The findings, conducted by psychologists Arthur Reynolds, Suh-Ruu Ou, Christina Mondi and Alison Giovanelli at the University of Minnesota, are being published in the journal “American Psychologist.”

The study looked at the CPC P-3 program, which stands for Child-Parent Center Preschool-to-Third Grade. The researchers looked at 1,329 former students who were born in 1979 and 1980, including 553 who benefited from four or more years in the program, and looked at where they had ended up 30 years later.

Researchers examined the program’s impact in 20 Chicago public schools in the city’s poorest neighborhoods. Some 93% of the pupils were African-American and the remainder were Hispanic.

The program “had smaller classes, more intensive and active learning for students, and family outreach and workshops for parents,” Reynolds told MarketWatch. It also included GED classes. All teachers had bachelor’s degrees, each class had a teaching assistant, and a leadership team ran the program in each school.

The cost? About $2,000 extra per pupil a year.

The U.S. Census says there are about 24 million children in the U.S. aged 3 to 8, so the annual cost would be a maximum of $50 billion a year — which sounds like a lot, until you look at the annual cost of dealing with poverty.

Critically, the benefits came from keeping the children in the program for four to six years. Just intervening at the preschool level didn’t work nearly as well. Children from poor and at-risk backgrounds benefited so long as they got at least four years of the program.

It is more than 50 years since the federal government launched early intervention programs such as Head Start as part of President Lyndon Johnson’s “War On Poverty.” Debate has raged about what has worked, what hasn’t, and why.

The programs have now been around long enough to analyze long-term outcomes: Not merely whether a program helped children have better reading levels at age 12, or jobs at 18, but how they fare well into middle age. The latest study is a case in point.

It is already known that early interventions can have big effects. Those who are behind by the time they make it to school have trouble catching up, experts have found. The latest study, however, shows that it’s not enough to improve pre-kindergarten education or to intervene for one or two years. However, what is remarkable is that just four to six years — a drop in the bucket compared with a lifetime — is enough to make huge chances in life chances.

For everyone else, that also means more people able to help pay taxes, and fewer people on welfare. Which compares favorably with a poverty burden that is nearly $1 trillion a year.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
October 11, 2019 1:53 pm

The poor kids of 2019 are not the poor kids of 1980.

M G
M G
October 11, 2019 2:03 pm

Two words block the plan.

Teachers Unions.

KaD
KaD
  M G
October 11, 2019 5:27 pm

End the DOE, return control of the schools to the smallest locality possible.

Whis Key
Whis Key
  M G
October 12, 2019 2:48 am

Communism Marxism

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 11, 2019 2:36 pm

Do you know what eliminates poverty?

Jobs. Not paychecks.

Jobs.

People want to produce something of value for payment of wages.

Or do they? Am I looking at this the wrong way?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Anonymous
October 11, 2019 8:38 pm

Too many of the poor do not know anyone in their family who has ever had a job. Mama, Grandma, Great Grandma and Great Great Grandma have never worked and have lived in public housing drawing welfare their whole lives. The little girls just want to get pregnant and have a baby so they can get their own apartment and get out “on their own” (supported by the taxpayers). The boys have learned they can get a girl pregnant, she gets an apartment and food, so their basic needs are met.

Generational welfare is a big problem and after 55 years of the “War on Poverty”, we are losing it at the cost of almost $1 Trillion a year.

starfcker
starfcker
October 11, 2019 2:55 pm

If you’re so fucking smart, Brett Arends, you Wall Street asslicker, you would tell us what poverty programs you intend to pull the 50 billion dollars from. Using your logic, this should be free.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
October 11, 2019 3:13 pm

Yeah, more public education should do the trick. Look at how well that’s worked over the past 50 years.

Donkey
Donkey
  Hardscrabble Farmer
October 11, 2019 3:48 pm

Those kids must get out of the clutches of their crackhead parents and out of high crime areas. Otherwise fougetaboutit.
comment image

Bob P
Bob P
  Hardscrabble Farmer
October 11, 2019 4:14 pm

I haven’t checked in years, but when I last did, the Head Start program was basically a bust in terms of helping overcome poverty. At minimum, they need to replicate the findings in this new study before allocating any money to it on an ongoing basis.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Hardscrabble Farmer
October 11, 2019 5:32 pm

Oh it has, we’re only $2000 per child short.

Neuday
Neuday
October 11, 2019 3:14 pm

So they say they can fix TNB if we spend $2k/yr per kid. Suuuuuure….
Never heard that promise before

Smoke em if you got em
Smoke em if you got em
October 11, 2019 3:21 pm

You lost me at ‘public education’

Ryan
Ryan
October 11, 2019 3:28 pm

Yes, Brett is spot on with this one! A government solution to a government created problem. Bravo! (eyes roll) /sarc off

TC
TC
October 11, 2019 4:54 pm

Mass deportations would be a lot more effective, I bet.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  TC
October 11, 2019 9:49 pm

Repatriation. There is lots of work to do in Mother Africa.

KaD
KaD
October 11, 2019 5:27 pm

“The solution? Providing better quality and more intensive public education for children, especially from poor and at-risk backgrounds, that lasts from age 3 through third grade.”
Oh, like reading, writing, spelling, geography and arithmetic, not gender studies and common core? Return REAL, useful subjects to the classroom. Not just dumping more money.

doug
doug
October 11, 2019 8:11 pm

The difference might be…. more attentive and intelligent teachers! You would win, BUT we have unions to preserve the jobs of incompetent, stoopid fill ins who pretend to teach.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
October 11, 2019 8:45 pm

Don’t concerned parents teach their kids to read, write and count before they start kindergarten? My almost 2-year old twin great-granddaughters are quite familiar with the alphabet and can count to 10, due to the investment their parents have made in time and teaching.

The problem we have is uneducated teenage girls pumping out babies and being taken care of by the taxpayers.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  TN Patriot
October 11, 2019 9:47 pm

Your grandkids are also likely much more intelligent…

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 11, 2019 9:26 pm

Doubtful….Head Start doesn’t work and this won’t either…school can’t makeup for lack of intelligence. And bad conditions at home.

Pequiste
Pequiste
October 11, 2019 10:00 pm

Gosh golly; Brett is right: MOAR money for edge-a-kayshun! That ought to fix it!
//Sarc off//

What a fucking imbecile.

After 50+ years of forced school integration, bussing, The Great Society, The Civil Rights Act, The Voting Rights Act, and trillions spent on welfare and education for minority students, if we haven’t figured out that there is no competing with a culture of ignorance, poverty, disease, and violence and throwing money at it is throwing money away, then we’ve learned absolutely nothing.

(Only when a strong family structure is extant, coupled to a serious work ethic and community self-respect, then the change required to have success in education, and most other societal realms, occurs.)

Llpoh
Llpoh
October 12, 2019 2:46 am

Throw money at it. Yup, that will work. Money will turn all those 85 IQ ghetto dwellers into Einsteins. Not.

Einstein
Einstein
  Llpoh
October 13, 2019 2:01 am

More money yet will turn those 85 IQ ghetto dwellers into 80 IQ ghetto dwellers.