Will ‘Sexist’ White Males Derail Warren?

Guest Post by Pat Buchanan

Will 'Sexist' White Males Derail Warren?

The three white males are denigrating and piling on the woman who is the front-runner with attacks on her personality for which conservatives, if they used such tactics, would be charged with “dog-whistling” the white working class.

After celebrating Tuesday’s takeover of Virginia’s legislature and the Kentucky governorship, the liberal establishment appears poised to crush its biggest threat: the surging candidacy of Elizabeth Warren.

From the tempo and tenor of the attacks, establishment fears of Warren’s success are real — and understandably so.

Two Wednesday polls show Warren running even with Joe Biden nationally. And a new Iowa poll shows Warren in front of the field with 20%, and Biden falling into fourth place with 15%.

The danger for Democrats: While Warren is now the party’s front-runner, they fear she’s a sure loser to Donald Trump in 2020.

And, again, with reason. A recent poll of six battleground states, including Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan, showed Trump beating or tying Warren in all of them except for Arizona.

Nightmare scenario: Warren wins the nomination, but when her neo-Marxist agenda is exposed, Middle America recoils in horror.

The economic elite is already sounding the alarm.

Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase says Warren “vilifies successful people.” Microsoft founder Bill Gates says her proposals would imperil “innovation” and “capital formation.”

Writing in The New York Times, Obama adviser Steven Rattner describes a Warren presidency as “a terrifying prospect.”

Warren would “extend the reach and weight of the federal government far further into the economy than anything even Franklin Roosevelt dreamed of (and) … turn America’s uniquely successful public-private relationship into a dirigiste European-style system.”

“If you want to live in France” — where half the GDP is controlled by the regime — says Rattner, “Warren should be your candidate.”

What finally shocked anti-Warren liberals into action was her recent revelation of how she intends to pay for her “Medicare for all” plan.

Warren’s plan would require at least $23 trillion more in federal spending over a decade. Other experts say the added costs could run to $32 trillion, raising the U.S. government’s share of the GDP by one-half and abolishing the private health insurance plans of 156 million Americans.

“Many of America’s global champions, like banks and tech giants, would be dismembered,” writes Rattner, “Shale fracking would be banned, which would send oil and natural gas prices soaring and cost millions of Americans their jobs.”

Beyond “Medicare for All,” Warren has other plans. Universal child care and free schooling from pre-kindergarten through college and the cancelation of student loans, plus a new look at reparations for slavery.

How would President Warren pay for all her “plans”?

She would raise the corporate rate to 35% from 21%, and slam a 40% tax on the profits of companies that try to flee the country.

She would raise the capital gains tax, impose new estate taxes, raise Social Security taxes on folks with higher incomes, and confiscate 2% of the wealth of those with $50 million in assets and 3% of the wealth of those with $1 billion, every year.

Writes Politifact: “All told, we counted $7 trillion in new spending over a 10-year period, and that’s without Medicare for All. On the flip side, Warren offered specific tax proposals that came to $4.55 trillion.”

Still, Warren’s socialism is not what her main rivals, all white men, are zeroing in on. They’ve decided to play hardball.

Thursday, under a headline, “Warren Faces Accusations that She’s ‘Angry,’ Which Supporters Say is Sexist,” The Washington Post reported:

“Two of the leading male candidates in the Democratic presidential primary race — Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg — have escalated separate lines of attack as they attempt to counter the field’s most prominent woman: Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is antagonistic and angry.”

Warren has a “my way or the highway” approach, said Buttigieg, she is “so absorbed in the fighting that it is as though fighting were the purpose.”

Biden says Warren, who has a real shot at taking the nomination, reflects “an angry unyielding viewpoint that has crept into our politics.”

This is “treacherous,” warns the Post, “given that many Democrats remain upset over what they view as the sexist treatment of Hillary Clinton, the party’s last nominee.”

The Democratic Party today defines itself as an inclusive party of women, gays, Hispanics, African Americans and other people of color.

Yet three months out from the decisive early contests of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, the party is going into the semifinals of its contest for a leader and future president without a single person of color in the final four.

Moreover, the three white males are denigrating and piling on the woman who is the front-runner with attacks on her personality for which conservatives, if they used such tactics, would be charged with “dog-whistling” the white working class.

When one looks at the approval-disapproval rating of the president, re-election appears problematic. When one looks at the Democrats’ agenda and field of candidates, the odds of Trump’s re-election seem a good deal better.

This thing is by no means over.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Ivan
Ivan
November 8, 2019 6:39 am

Like Hitlery and the Kenyan they’ll want her because diversity. They’ll likely settle for Big Mike and the Buttplug.

credit
credit
November 8, 2019 6:52 am

“The economic elite is already sounding the alarm.”

translation:

you can’t win the election without the support of AIPAC and jewish oligarchs.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  credit
November 8, 2019 9:07 am

Need a clue?

AIPAC and Jews are a straw argument.

You CAN win a fair win the election with the *thinking womans* vote.

flash
flash
November 8, 2019 7:14 am

Still not tired of winning !

President Donald Trump has signed off on a plan that continues a dramatic drop in the number of refugees taken in by the U.S. to no more than 18,000 in fiscal year 2020.

https://www.kcra.com/article/president-trump-approves-plan-to-cap-refugees-at-18000-in-2020/29677184

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  flash
November 8, 2019 9:27 am

Very “sobering.”

TALK TO YOUR WOMENFOLK!

TC
TC
  flash
November 8, 2019 9:31 am

Clamping down a few thousand political refugees while a million stream across the open border. Winning?

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
November 8, 2019 7:16 am

That’s a sweeter deal than the “I’m an Indian” routine. Enter the race using the advantage of being the first woman President and complain the entire time that men are being unfair to you for the same reason.

A true have your cake and eat it too moment in American politics.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  Hardscrabble Farmer
November 8, 2019 9:13 am

Do you remember anyone but me turbo posting about next year’s 100th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment?

Anyone?

Why has everyone been so quiet?

Because “my people” made the concept of fair voting, women voting, and non-intoxicated voting a reality.

Only the concepts.

Now 100 years later, my people are pointing out it’s concept vs. reality or die.

Live free and think free or die.

There is still plenty of time to talk rudderless women down off the ledge they were forced onto. Save the ones you can right now.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  22winmag - w/o tagline
November 8, 2019 9:46 am

My daughter and I had a lively conversation about women’s suffrage the other evening.

Care to expand on your concept v. reality premise?

Anonymous
Anonymous
November 8, 2019 7:41 am

Even Pat is doing Clinton’s bidding.

Crap . This will be the least costly and the least effort any nominee will have to endure to the nomination.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
  Anonymous
November 8, 2019 9:21 am

The Clintons, Holder, Comey all served as the ultimate sleeper cell for the good-guys.

Clinton would only run for the purpose of herding more bad rats into a corner.

Jewish informers have played good rat/bad rat since before black powder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judah_P._Benjamin

Just try running a two-horse police force without them, let alone a national government.

22winmag - w/o tagline
22winmag - w/o tagline
November 8, 2019 8:58 am

Pat, it’s okay to put the pen down.

Take a break. You deserve it.

The war is hot now and I know you had your role to play despite the harsh words.

😉

TC
TC
November 8, 2019 9:29 am

Pat says it all at the end. This election is being served to the Democrats on a silver platter. The fact that they can’t seem to field a viable candidate tells you everything you need to know about the process. Think Dukakis, Dole, Kerry. McCain. Were these guys really the best available? Of course not, but the fans don’t stay engaged when watching a blowout Superbowl, and American politics is no different.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  TC
November 8, 2019 9:47 am

Is it possible that they do not want the office at this particular juncture?

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
November 8, 2019 10:09 am

comment image

gilberts
gilberts
November 8, 2019 12:18 pm

Did they accuse her of being angry, or mad? There is a difference.

Why anyone would want to support that cardboard cutout of a person, I don’t know. I thought Bubba was full of crap and Bathhouse Barry was as fake as a $3 bill, but Warren takes the cake. She even passes Mittens in the fake and unlikable department, and I was certain he was a replicant or a T-800 programmed by Mr. Howell.

If the fake Indian nonsense didn’t turn people off, how about the fake I-Drink-Beer-Too act? Or her lies about being pushed out of teaching because she was pregnant? Watching the dimms try to find a leader is like watching a someone get ready to play a game of Russian Roulette with all the chambers loaded.

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  gilberts
November 8, 2019 1:04 pm

I have a better question: Who is stupid enough to copulate with that troglodyte?

KaD
KaD
November 8, 2019 6:31 pm