“Nor tolerate those who do. . .”

Guest Post by Simon Black

It’s been nearly two and a half decades since I was a brand new, freshly bald-headed cadet entering my first summer at West Point.

Everything about it was agonizing. We operated on little sleep. The hazing never stopped. There were constant military and physical exercises. And it was only the beginning of four years of endless pressure and stress.

In retrospect I can admit it was definitely a character-building experience. And I understand why they deliberately make it so stressful.

The entire purpose of West Point is to develop men and women of integrity to be able to lead soldiers into combat. They’re not playing around– it’s serious business.

And I remember one of the first things they drilled into us from Day One was the Cadet Honor Code.

At West Point, the Honor Code is incredibly strict. It says that a cadet shall not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do.

If they can’t trust you to tell the truth about something mundane, or to not cheat on a physics test, how can they trust you with people’s lives?

The ‘toleration clause’ is especially unique; tolerating someone else’s dishonor made you dishonorable. If you knew someone else had violated the code, but you didn’t do anything about it, you were complicit.

It’s not to say that cadets don’t have strong bonds of loyalty to one another. We do.

But our sense of duty prevailed above all else, even if that duty required expelling a friend for an honor code violation.

The Corps of Cadets has been ‘self-regulating’ in this way for more than two centuries; the cadets themselves are responsible for weeding out the occasional bad apples who manage to make it through the Academy’s absurdly rigorous admissions process.

This system works. And institutions that don’t have duty-first, self-regulating culture tend rot from within.

Just look at the Catholic Church: decades of criminal sex abuse and cover-ups show that their priority was NOT to seek justice or take care of their devoted followers.

Instead, they took care of their own by quietly and internally reassigning serial sex offenders who had a history of abusing children.

There were plenty of Church officials who knew about it. But they ignored their fundamental duty to their followers, and instead put their own people first. That makes them complicit.

It’s often the same with police. While their primary duty is supposed to be protecting and serving their communities, cops will frequently take care of their own, first and foremost.

And the video that surfaced last week of Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin pinning his knee to the neck of George Floyd– a defenseless, handcuffed, unarmed suspect in clear medical distress– is a example of this value system.

Chauvin displayed horrendous moral depravity. Yet there were three other officers on the scene. They knew what was happening. They saw Chauvin essentially strangle George Floyd. But they did nothing to stop it.

Maybe they didn’t want to be disloyal to Chauvin.

Maybe they were worried that the other cops at the precinct would think they were a rat if they said or did something to stop Chauvin.

Maybe Chauvin was the ranking officer and they felt that they didn’t have the authority to stop him.

Whatever the reason, none of the officers present had the humanity or courage to carry out their sworn duty.

Now, whenever something like this happens, the apologists usually say, “Oh that’s just a few bad apples.”

Maybe so. And in fairness, there are countless police officers who put their duty first on a daily basis.

But are we really to believe that these four bad apples just happened to respond to the same call, at the same time, on the same beat? Is this really some wild coincidence?

Or is it possible that, maybe just maybe, there’s something in the cultural DNA of police departments that prioritizes personal loyalty above fundamental duty?

Consider that the immediate response of the Minneapolis Police Department was to issue a vague statement that Floyd died “of a medical incident during a police interaction.”

So even in the department’s official response, their first instinct was to protect the four officers.

Then, when the uproar started, the police union in Minneapolis issued a statement of support for the officers. They were trying to take care of their own.

And despite all the evidence– the multiple videos and eye witness accounts– it still took four days to arrest Chauvin.

Plus the other three officers have not yet been charged, and at least two of them were allowed to leave the state.

That would never happen for a regular civilian. If you or I were caught on video strangling someone, the cops would be at our door that very day to arrest us.

There would be no statement of support, no professional courtesy. They’d arrest us first, and then build the case.

But again, the police take care of their own, even if that means abandoning their primary duty to the public. This is part of the cultural DNA of police departments around the world.

According to data pulled by the Wall Street Journal, there have been more than 2,600 civilian complaints filed against Minneapolis police officers since 2012. Only TWELVE of those 2600 (0.46%) resulted in any discipline against the officer.

This is not isolated to Minneapolis; in major cities across the country, from Baltimore to Chicago to Los Angeles, the rate at which civilian complaints against police officers are ‘sustained’ is typically in the low single digits.

Is this also a wild coincidence?

It seems obvious that culture is a major part of the problem. And little will change as long as taking care of their own outweighs their fundamental duty to the public.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Lars
Lars
June 1, 2020 7:27 pm

“The Corps of Cadets has been ‘self-regulating’ in this way for more than two centuries; the cadets themselves are responsible for weeding out the occasional bad apples…”

Not anymore, Simon. A lot has changed since your were there, and the degeneration started long before your plebe year. The critical turning point, IMO, was 1976 when an amendment to that year’s Defense Authorization Bill forced the academy to admit women.

As for the honor code, here is a compelling letter from a graduate and former faculty member:

Exclusive: Former West Point professor’s letter exposes corruption, cheating and failing standards [Full letter]

https://www.vibe.com/2019/05/black-women-cadets-west-point-history

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Lars
June 1, 2020 8:12 pm

I was going to say same thing. That code has been obsolete for a while now.

Steve
Steve
  Lars
June 1, 2020 8:42 pm

Lars,
I can second that. Our HQ was at WP. I was there( 2012-2015) on a monthly basis.
Christ, they had an avowed commie there and no one spoke up.
Sorry, the standards aren’t quite up to par.

Yahsure
Yahsure
June 1, 2020 9:17 pm

This all bleeds into other job fields as well. The lack of effort and lax standards by many professions is all around us.

Semi-Retired
Semi-Retired
June 1, 2020 9:23 pm

When I went through a California law enforcement academy 30 years ago (has it really been that long?), there was the same “… lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate anyone that does” statement of the wall of each classroom over the chalkboard. At the Academy, you believe that stuff. Once you get in the field, it really does become “us vs. them”. I thought us vs. them was bad 30 years ago. At least there was still some “to protect and serve” appearances back then. Now, even after having been a cop for a few years back in the day, I wouldn’t talk to the police now for any reason without a lawyer present.

Cops are looking for a reason to arrest you, not help you, these days. Never help them find that reason to arrest you… or choke you out, for that matter.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
June 2, 2020 7:15 am

https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops

I remember almost 20 years ago when this happened. A good friend of mine and a decorated combat veteran had applied to join the NJ State Police. It was something he had planned on doing since high school and his military service was his ticket into the academy- or so he thought. This young man was an exemplary soldier committed to his mission, focused on his duties and loyal to both his command and his subordinates. I knew him to be of good character, possessing a sharp mind, and unquestioned probity. In short, you could hardly do better than to have someone like him serving as a law enforcement officer.

He took his entrance exam and several days later was informed that unfortunately the State of New Jersey would not be able to consider his application due to the results of his testing. The score was too damn high.

I won’t tell you that it ruined his life- he went on to become a broker for Morgan Stanley and eventually as a VP where he now makes the kind of money most people would never imagine in their wildest fantasies. I can tell you that it completely undermined his belief in a functioning system based on merit and equality and that his decision to enter the financial field was not one of need, but of cynical opportunism. It was his DILLIGAF moment when he figured if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. He went from a deep seated belief in law and order to a resigned acceptance of the rigged system he lived in, so instead of contributing to it in a meaningful way for the greater good, he would strip as much from it for his own benefit and self enrichment as his abilities would allow. I don’t believe he was even aware of the choice he had made in that moment, but as the years went by he embraced it and used his superior intellect to rob as much money as he could- legally of course- from anyone foolish enough to invest with his company. He is now an extremely wealthy man living like royalty; isolated, alone, fat and unhappy.

These are the consequences of the short term thinking- or deliberate malfeasance- of corrupt or incompetent governments. Moronic psychopaths in uniforms victimizing the people they are sworn to serve and protect because intelligent men have been barred from leading a better cadre of public servants with duty and honor.

As ye sow, so shall you reap.