Washington’s Rejection of Russia’s Security Proposal Is a Bad Decision

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

As expected, Washington and its NATO arm have rejected the Kremlin’s joint security proposal, preferring dire consequences to peace. By rejecting the Kremlin’s proposal, Washington and the Europeans have told the Kremlin that Washington intends to continue its aggressive policy of placing NATO and US missile bases on Russia’s borders and arming Ukraine for attack on Donbass. The rejection also tells Moscow that Ukraine and Georgia, formerly constituent parts of Russia broken off during the period of Russian weakness following the collapse of the Soviet government, remain candidates for NATO Membership despite the Kremlin’s statement that Russia will permit no such membership.

Vladmir Vasilyev, the parliamentary leader of the ruling Russian party said: “We have waited a long time for a reasonable decision to prevail in Washington, but this is not happening. We only hear about sanctions, and about weapons being sent into the conflict zone. We cannot accept this.” The Americans “are pumping up Ukraine with missile systems, grenade launchers, and other supplies.There are also instructors there to train them how to use this equipment. This is a great danger. It is preparation for military action, and nothing else. Military action against the peaceful population that lives there.”

The Russophobic neoconservatives who dominate US foreign policy controlled the decision and got what they want. But will they want the consequences?

Washington offered to “engage in dialogue” and “listen to Russian concerns,” completely useless reassurances to the Russians. The Kremlin has already conveyed its concerns, and they have been ignored. The Kremlin made it clear that the time for talking is over and that they are not going to be drawn into endless talk that goes nowhere.

At this point the Kremlin cannot possibly back down without inviting even more provocations. So get ready for the dire consequences.

The outcome will not be favorable for Washington. American corporations have told Biden to forget about sanctions as the sanctions hurt US companies worse than they hurt Russia, and NATO is already cracking under the strain of expectations that Russia is going to start playing hardball. Two NATO members, Croatia and Bulgaria, have announced that they won’t be sending any troops to join NATO in any confrontation with Russia in Ukraine, and Germany denied the British flyover permission for their airlift of arms to Ukraine. European governments understand that NATO lacks the military means for a confrontation with Russia.

The available US and NATO troops are just token forces. Washington is reduced to deploying 1,000 soldiers in Bulgaria and Romania to reassure the countries and deter Russia. 1,000 soldiers have no possibility of deterring any Russian army, as the countries understand. No thanks, said Bulgaria.

Stoltenberg’s assurance that NATO has “plans in place” to activate 5,000 French troops and the US will be sending 8,500 troops has the opposite effect of providing comfort. No Russian force would take any notice of such a small number of soldiers. What Stoltenberg has shown is not strength, but Western military weakness.

Washington might be thinking in outmoded ways. It was once thought that a few US soldiers scattered about would prevent an attack because of reluctance to go to war with the US. But the Kremlin has already made it clear that the current security situation is unacceptable to them and that they are not going to continue living with insecurity.

I don’t think war is close at hand unless Washington succeeds in provoking Ukraine to invade Donbass in order to solidify Washington’s hold on Europe and the election for Biden by causing Russian intervention. In which case, it would be a short war with Ukraine sacrificed for Washington’s political purposes. Instead, Russia will target all of Europe with their hypersonic missiles, including the US bases in Poland and Romania and all military facilities in Ukraine as well as Kiev. They will let Europe live under the strain of rising tensions. Europeans are more harmed than benefitted by American hegemony, and sooner or later Europeans will conclude that NATO is a greater threat to them than Russia.

Washington’s decision to reject the security proposal is nonsensical. I suspect the consequence will be a reduction in American power. Washington will replace Russia as the country whose concerns are ignored.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
January 28, 2022 7:39 am

It’s a poor decision for rational people with the interests of the United States in mind.

For people who have other concerns it is exactly the right decision.

Do not make the mistake that these people are operating recklessly or incompetently, they aren’t.

War is a racket, this is simply a business decision based on the profitability and consolidation of power that arises necessarily from that conflict.

Ken31
Ken31
  hardscrabble farmer
January 28, 2022 4:21 pm

It is a point worth repeating, because people are having a hard time processing it. Mistakes are not being made. Crimes are being made.

flash
flash
January 28, 2022 8:19 am

Putin, if you’re reading this, please send help !

comment image

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
January 28, 2022 9:27 am

I see tremendous similarity between this conflict and 1962 Cuba, with Putin playing the part of JFK and our administration playing Khrushchev. Let us hope that JFK wins again.

We should be doing everything possible to find common ground with Putin, as together we could face off the Chinese who are sitting back enjoying this conflict and waiting for their turn to be the world’s great superpower.

August
August
January 28, 2022 10:31 am

>>>Washington will replace Russia as the country whose concerns are ignored.

Retaining its European vassals for another few decades is the entire point of the FUSA’s Adventure in Ukraine. Still, one day, Europeans will inevitably conclude that NATO is a bigger danger to themselves than Russia is. Delaying that day is very beneficial to the current Western Deep State… because after it comes The Deluge.

The FUSA should be content to control the economies of the Western Hemisphere, which it is quite capable of doing indefinitely. By attempting to control the economies of the entire planet, the FUSA has doomed itself.

We are the next Spain.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
  August
January 28, 2022 11:02 am

Or are we Babylon?

‘Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.’

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum <—-===

starfcker
starfcker
January 28, 2022 4:00 pm

Let me try that again.