Big Pharma-funded paper recommends taxing the unvaccinated

Guest Post by Kit Knightly

A new paper published by Oxford University’s Center for Business Taxation discusses – and in the end supports – the idea of a special tax levied on those who decline to be “vaccinated” against “Covid19”.

The paper’s authors argue that a vaccine-related tax would be “justified” because “Taxes on behaviour that is considered undesirable are nothing new“.

And that even if the “vaccines” do cause serious harm to some people…

some states do adopt policies that can lead to serious harm in exceptional cases when they consider that the benefits outweigh the costs

Yes, you did read that right.

They go on to suggest all sorts of ways of correcting this “undesirable behaviour”, from straight taxation to tax credits for those who have been vaccinated, to vaccine mandates and compulsory Covid insurance for the unvaccinated (which is just another way of saying “taxation”).

Now, here is where we could – and normally would – break down the article paragraph by paragraph. We would dissect the arguments, include data they ignore, highlight logical fallacies…you know, the usual.

We’re not going to do that today.

We could point out the infection-fatality ratio for Covid “cases” is minuscule.

Or that the so-called “vaccines” don’t prevent either infection or transmission of the alleged new disease called “Covid19”.

We could launch into a legal argument on civil rights, the Nuremberg Code, and medical coercion.

But we’re not going to do any of that.

Because it’s been two years of this, and life is just too damn short. We’ve done it enough, the facts are all there for anyone who cares enough to find them.

Instead, we’re just going to quote the ‘About’ page of the Oxford Center for Business Taxation, with a bit of added emphasis…

The Centre for Business Taxation was formed in 2005 and was initially funded by substantial donations from a large number of members from the Hundred Group. A number of these companies and others continue to support the CBT. Donors during the year were AstraZeneca [and] GlaxoSmithKline Plc

To be clear, the Hundred Group is a lobbying group which works on behalf of the all the members of the FTSE100.

GlaxoSmithKline is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, and partnered with French giant Sanofi to produce a Covid vaccine which netted the companies billions in supply contracts, despite the fact it is yet to be approved for public use.

If you know anything at all about Covid, you don’t need us to tell you who AstraZeneca are.

The CBT – and therefore the paper – are funded by big business and big pharma.

Do we really need to add anything else?

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
May 18, 2022 7:01 am

Why do papers that wouldn’t be accepted as an undergraduate assignment get such publicity?

That’s rhetorical: of course it is because there is no integrity in academia.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 18, 2022 7:10 am

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 18, 2022 7:34 am

It’s like taxing people who DONT drink or smoke.

I propose a tax on people who don’t use logic.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 18, 2022 7:45 am

I propose a “head tax” for all of the sociopaths who have violated the Nuremberg Code and forced an experimental gene therapy on unsuspecting, innocent people, resulting in significant injuries & deaths. The tax will be their head rolling off of the guillotine. These people have become far too arrogant for their own good and it’s far past time to put the rabid dog down.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
May 18, 2022 8:07 am

One good thing about the advance of time is that more and more psychopaths keep coming out of the woodwork every day. All this means is some day, society will know the names of those who need to be lined up against a brick wall and given summary justice.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Coalclinker
May 18, 2022 12:03 pm

fuck, we’re gonna need to find more brick walls!

GNL
GNL
  Coalclinker
May 18, 2022 1:21 pm

But before then, they’re coming for the kill. Watcha gonna do?

Boogie
Boogie
May 18, 2022 9:50 am

I propose a sin tax on the LGBGQTHEFUCKED community.

Chas
Chas
May 18, 2022 12:15 pm

It would seem that they should be invited to come to this country for a lecture, then met at the airport so they can then be transported to a New Jersey landfill for proper disposal… Just an idea… Feel free to expound..

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
May 18, 2022 12:56 pm

The State of Rhode Island has already proposed a tax on the unjabbed … $50 per month/person and State income tax at double the rates as the jabbed …

Sounds pretty unconstitutional to me … but, then, I’m not a ‘Constitutional’ scholar …