The Origins of the Global Warming Scam

Guest Post by Doug Ross

It was all about money and power — and nothing to do with the environment

“This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.” — Barack Obama, 3 June 2008

In the late nineties, members of the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were tasked with assessing the scientific validity of the Kyoto Protocol.

The Protocol was an international emissions reduction treaty which required signatories to cut overall greenhouse gas emissions.

The IPCC subsequently produced the Special Report on Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry.

The report found that “carbon offsets” and “carbon trading” were viable ways to barter the right to pollute, because they would fund new forestry initiatives.

But one critical detail was never disclosed in the report.

That is: members of the IPCC, such as Pedro Moura-Costa (above) and Gareth Philips, had major conflicts-of-interest. They owned, created and/or worked for businesses — such as Ecosecurities and SGS Forestry — that would directly profit from the report’s conclusions.

In fact, the IPCC panel members’ companies were positioned to earn millions of dollars from the report. But the mainstream media did not report these conflicts and instead piled on the “global warming” and “carbon offset” bandwagons.

Solar energy portal Ecotopia reported that members of the IPCC “…had vested interests in reaching unrealistically and unjustifiably optimistic conclusions about the possibility of compensating for emissions with trees… [and] should have been automatically disqualified from serving on an intergovernmental panel charged with investigating impartially the feasibility and benefits of such ‘offset’ projects.”

The IPCC panel consisted of:

* Richard Tipper of the Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management (ECCM), a consulting company deriving revenue from carbon-absorption forestry projects. According to Ecotopia, “ECCM works closely with Future Forests… Tipper helped form ECCM some months after being appointed to the LULUCF panel.”

* Mark Trexler, a founder of Trexler & Associates, a pioneering firm “poised to make millions of dollars by promoting and monitoring carbon sequestration and other ‘climate mitigation’ projects.”

* Pedro Moura-Costa, an executive of Ecosecurities Ltd., a consulting firm specializing in the “generation of Emission Reduction Credits” from carbon-offseting activities. Ecosecurities has offices in the US, the UK, Brazil, Australia and The Netherlands.

* Gareth Philips of SGS Forestry, a division of the Societe Generale de Surveillance (SGS) of Geneva, the world’s largest inspection, auditing and testing company. SGS Forestry derives revenue from its carbon forestry projects. SGS certifies Costa Rica’s carbon offsets and “hopes to expand its work.”

* Sandra Brown of Winrock International, an Arkansas-based organization which accepts contracts from “public and private” sources. Winrock “provides forest carbon monitoring technical services to U.S. government agencies and a wide range of private sector and non-governmental organizations. ”

* Peter Hill of Monsanto Corporation, which has a “large stake in genetically modified organisms, including, potentially, organisms modified to take up or store carbon more efficiently.”

The World Rainforest Movement investigated these bizarre financial ties and concluded that the IPCC report “must now be shelved due to their clear conflict of interest and a new report instigated which will be free of the taint of intellectual corruption.”

In short, the very authors of the original UN climate report that justified the carbon market were themselves poised to profit from that market.

And if any of us thought the corruption in the UN ended with the “Oil-for-Food” scandal, it appears we were all sadly mistaken. The UN had no right doing business with any of these firms. By continuing to do so, they are reinforcing America’s image of the organization: that it is utterly useless and thoroughly infested with corrupt officials.

Furthermore, the project developers and the “auditors” co-wrote the chapter justifying the carbon offset market! In what other field — aside from the UN, that is — would companies and their “auditors” both be permitted to conspire in such a fraudulent manner?

The carbon offset market quickly exploded. And, just as quickly, it became the subject of rampant allegations of fraud.

In 2009 the market was estimated to be $100 billion; it was so rife with questionable trading that the United Nations suspended the world’s largest auditor of ‘clean-energy’ projects.

Put simply, a wide range of respected scientists, environmentalists, researchers, agriculturalists, and activists believe that carbon offsets are a “scam”, “fantasy”, “fiction”, “nonsense”, “fraudulent” and worse. And they’ve been saying so since 2000, though to read the daily fish-wrap you wouldn’t know it.

To demonstrate the fraudulence of the carbon offset market, one need only request quotes from various carbon offset sellers.

The price for offseting a flight from London to Toronto and back?

  • $85: from Climate Care (UK), which says 6 tons of CO2 must be offset.
  • $60: Carbon Neutral (UK), which says 4.3 tons of CO2 must be offset.
  • $195: Climate Friendly (Australia) asserts that 11.63 tons of CO2 must be offset.
  • $180: Green Seat (Netherlands) says 8.68 tons of CO2 must be offset.

Executive Summary: they’re all making it up as they go along.

Whether you believe the world is warming or cooling, there is no arguing Democrats want more expensive energy for American citizens.

All that said, the real problem — and the reason Pelosi really does deserve blame — is that Democrats’ political goal of reducing carbon emissions continues to trump their populist rhetoric on gasoline prices. The two stances are impossible to reconcile. Try as they might to blame oil companies for the pain Americans feel at the pump, the Democrats want higher prices for gasoline — and for all forms of energy that emit carbon. Economic barriers against CO2 emissions are a requirement for environmental progress in the Democrats’ view, and this is the entire purpose of the carbon cap-and-trade system… to create economic disincentives for emitting CO2.

Because of the falsity of its premise, cap-and-trade is intended to do one thing: allow Democrats to control industrial policy.

It all comes back to carbon offsets, which represent the currency for the “global warming” scam promoted by the UN’s IPCC and the Democrat Statists in Washington.

Whether it’s through unelected bureaucrats at the EPA, carbon “sequestration”, or John Kerry’s climate agenda, the economic toll on Americans is and will continue to be devastating. GDP losses of $2.1 trillion and consumer electricity price increases of up to 42% are estimated in less than two decades’ time.

Democrats want to control your life. Your health. Your private property. And they don’t care what kind of scam they use to justify it.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
WilliamtheResolute
WilliamtheResolute
June 4, 2023 5:19 pm

The Globalist/WEF thinks Climate extortion is going to be a bigger cash cow than war…the grift is world wide.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  WilliamtheResolute
June 4, 2023 9:14 pm

ONE sentence , from one book , proves it is all fake.
And the book was written by ” The Big Club ” themselves.

The First Global Revolution is a book written by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, and published by Pantheon Books in 1991. The book follows up the earlier 1972 work-product from the Club of Rome titled The Limits to Growth. The book’s tagline is A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome

” In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ”

( And now you know , The Rest Of The Story , Good Day ! )

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
June 4, 2023 5:20 pm

Grifters are always looking for the next grift. The more power government is allowed to possess, the more the grifters know they will be successful simply by purchasing the power and violence of the government.

Huh
Huh
June 4, 2023 5:45 pm

NOT sure.

Was it the idea of goldman-sucks/algore, OR, did they steal the idea from the anunnaki ? (Various spellings)

ramAustralia
ramAustralia
June 4, 2023 6:58 pm

Fossil fuels are just that, fossils. Once they are used up they are gone. Effectively forever on human time scales. The world’s mega-yacht owning, private jet flying elites don’t like us “commoners” using up “their” fuels, hence the scams and the vax’em to death depopulation programs.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  ramAustralia
June 4, 2023 9:09 pm

NOPE. The stuff generates in the crust constantly. Rockefellers and Standard Oil paid for advertising to ” sell ” the scarcity angle, to keep prices high.

ramAustralia
ramAustralia
  Anonymous
June 4, 2023 11:46 pm

And all the geologists and geophysicists working for the many petroleum companies of the world are all wrong? Prices are high because the stuff is costly to extract and supplies are being exhausted.

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker
  ramAustralia
June 5, 2023 5:42 pm

Fuck dude. Plenty of Russian research that shows that oil is abiotic, and constantly regenerated within the earth. Thinking oil comes from fossils is just a stupid as thinking diamonds come from dinosaurs. But rUsSiAn dIsiNfOrtian.

They want us dead and/or easily controlled. Expensive energy solve that ram

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Long Time Lurker
June 6, 2023 12:25 am

i will buy the argument that oil is abiotic but how fast do depleted fields refill?

Rockefellers and Standard Oil paid for advertising
Rockefellers and Standard Oil paid for advertising
  Anonymous
June 5, 2023 8:11 am

Kinda like https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-flexner-report-and-the-cartelization-of-modern-medicine/

“…And while the report was commissioned by the Carnegie Foundation, “​Flexner’s report was virtually written in advance by high officials of the American Medical Association, and its advice was quickly taken by every state in the Union,” Murray Rothbard explained in Making Economic Sense.
Using the Flexner Report as a guide, the AMA was able to use the state to cartelize the medical industry. Rothbard wrote,…”

YourAverageJoe
YourAverageJoe
  ramAustralia
June 4, 2023 10:46 pm

Sorry.
I waited in the oil embargo gas lines back in the 70’s.
There ain’t no shortage of oil.

ramAustralia
ramAustralia
  YourAverageJoe
June 4, 2023 11:49 pm

Depends on at what price.

poordude
poordude
June 4, 2023 7:35 pm

No surprise here and it pisses me off. My college major was Mining Engineering. As such, I had to take 5 semesters of geology. The earth has had all kinds of crazy climate changes over time. Some were quite extreme. The truth is at this point in time we are living in a quiet and decent climate situation. We are lucky. The climate has always changed and it always will. The left is trying to use the climate change hoax in an effort to get around the constitution and control basically everything. No where in the constitution does it say the fed gov is supposed to control everything. The truth is the opposite – the constitution was written and adopted as the law of the land to constrain the fed gov. Unfortunately, we now live in a post constitutional America. The left/deep state hates the constitution and is hell bent on imposing some kind of crazy tyranny upon us. This has to be stopped no matter what it takes. Everything the left touches is destroyed. There is nowhere to flee to. This is the last free place on earth.

If you look back in history you will see that whenever the left seizes power they never voluntarily relinquish it. There are many examples. Cuba, North Korea, the USSR, China, Cambodia (Pol Pot), and others. The left seized power in America when they stole the 2020 election. They have built a large and well funded election fraud machine. They have built a large and well funded censorship machine. They have taken over the education system, the legacy media, the medical system, much of the justice system, and more. One way or another they are not going to allow the American people to vote them in mass out of power in 2024. It is just not going to happen. People have time between now and the 2024 election to prepare for what is coming. I hope people are doing that.

YourAverageJoe
YourAverageJoe
June 4, 2023 10:40 pm

I have a June 1965 Houston Chronicle that shows the high temp that day at 94 degrees.
The average high in Houston in June 2022 was 87. 3 degrees!
And…they say it was the all time high record!
https://www.google.com/search?q=june+2022+average+high+temp+in+houston&oq=june+2022+average+high+temp+in+houston&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRirAjIHCAQQIRirAjIKCAUQIRgWGB0YHtIBCTE3ODAzajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
By the way, the Galveston Jettys I first saw in 1966 are still above sea level!
It’s a miracle!

Bauls
Bauls
June 5, 2023 10:40 pm

Wow un corruption I am shocked