Guest Post by Christopher Rufo
The embattled Harvard president’s dissertation raises troubling questions.
Harvard president Claudine Gay has problems. Touted as the first black woman to run the nation’s most prestigious university, she assumed leadership with high expectations, but her tenure, which began this summer, has been mired in scandal. As dean and then president, Gay has been accused of bullying colleagues, suppressing free speech, overseeing a racist admissions program, and, following the Hamas terror campaign against Israel, failing to stand up to rampant anti-Semitism on campus.
We have obtained exclusive documentation demonstrating that President Gay may face yet another problem: plagiarism of sections of her Ph.D. dissertation, which would violate Harvard’s own stated policies on academic integrity. (We reached out to President Gay for comment, but received no response.)
Gay published her dissertation, “Taking Charge: Black Electoral Success and the Redefinition of American Policies,” in 1997, as part of her doctorate in political science from Harvard. The paper deals with white-black political representation and racial attitudes. As evaluated under the university’s plagiarism policy, the paper contains at least three problematic patterns of usage and citation.
First, Gay lifts an entire paragraph nearly verbatim from Lawrence Bobo and Franklin Gilliam’s paper, “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment,” while passing it off as her own paraphrase and language. Here is the original, from Bobo and Gilliam:
Using 1987 national sample survey data . . . the results show that blacks in high-black-empowerment areas—as indicated by control of the mayor’s office—are more active than either blacks living in low-empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status. Furthermore, the results show that empowerment influences black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation to politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs.
And here is the language from Gay’s work:
Using 1987 survey data, Bobo and Gilliam found that African-Americans in “high black-empowerment” areas—as indicated by control of the mayor’s office—are more active than either African-Americans in low empowerment areas or their white counterparts of comparable socioeconomic status. Empowerment, they conclude, influences black participation by contributing to a more trusting and efficacious orientation towards politics and by greatly increasing black attentiveness to political affairs.
Though Gay does provide a reference to the original authors, she uses their verbatim language, with a few trivial synonym substitutions, without providing quotation marks. This constitutes a clear violation of Harvard’s policy, which states: “When you paraphrase, your task is to distill the source’s ideas in your own words. It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest; instead, you must completely restate the ideas in the passage in your own words. If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation.”
TOP STOCKING STUFFERS
Gay repeats this violation throughout the document, again using work from Bobo and Gilliam, as well as passages from Richard Shingles, Susan Howell, and Deborah Fagan, which she reproduces nearly verbatim, without quotation marks.
Second, Gay appears to lift material from scholar Carol Swain in at least two instances. In one passage, summarizing the distinction between “descriptive representation” and “substantive representation,” she copies the phrasing and language nearly verbatim from Swain’s book Black Faces, Black Interests, without providing a citation of any kind. Swain writes:
Pitkin distinguishes between “descriptive representation,” the statistical correspondence of the demographic characteristics … and more “substantive representation,” the correspondence between representatives’ goals and those of their constituents.
Gay’s version is virtually the same, with slight modifications to the diction and punctuation:
Social scientists have concentrated . . . between descriptive representation (the statistical correspondence of demographic characteristics) and substantive representation (the correspondence of legislative goals and priorities).
Gay’s use of Swain’s material is a straightforward violation of the university’s rule on “verbatim plagiarism,” which states that one “must give credit to the author of the source material, either by placing the source material in quotation marks and providing a clear citation, or by paraphrasing the source material and providing a clear citation”—neither of which Gay followed.
Later in the paper, Gay also uses identical language to Swain, without adding quotation marks, as required. “Since the 1950s the reelection rate for House members has rarely dipped below 90 percent,” reads Swain’s book, which is the same, excepting an added comma, to the language in Gay’s dissertation: “Since the 1950s, the reelection rate for incumbent House members has rarely dipped below 90%.” According to Harvard’s rules, this would be a violation of the policy on “inadequate paraphrase,” which requires that verbatim language be placed in quotations.
Third, Gay composes an entire appendix in the dissertation directly taken from Gary King’s book, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. While she cites King’s book—in fact, King was her dissertation advisor—Gay does not explicitly acknowledge that Appendix B is entirely grounded in King’s concepts, instead passing it off as her own original work. Throughout the appendix, Gay takes entire phrases and sentences directly from King’s book, without any citations or quotation marks. In total, Gay borrows material from King in at least half a dozen paragraphs—all in violation of Harvard’s standard on academic integrity.
What should the consequences be for President Gay, given these violations? Some critics might object to any punishment, arguing that her dissertation is decades old, or that these instances of plagiarism appear to be highly technical, or even trivial. But the dissertation is the cornerstone of an academic career, and universities impose demanding standards of academic integrity, with severe consequences for violators. Harvard, in particular, has a strict policy on these matters. If a current Harvard student were to commit violations of the same nature as Gay’s, it would lead to “disciplinary action, up to and including requirement to withdraw from the College.” The same standard should apply to the university president.
In light of this troubling evidence, we call on Harvard’s Board of Overseers to conduct a full investigation into Claudine Gay’s academic integrity. The precedent for such violations has already been set at other institutions: the president of the University of South Carolina, for example, resigned for plagiarizing remarks he made in a commencement speech; and the president of Hobart and William Smith Colleges resigned due to plagiarism that he committed in part of his dissertation. Gay’s case should be treated with equal seriousness. If she has violated the code of academic conduct, she must resign—or get voted out by the board.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
She may or may not be a plagiarist, that isn’t important, really. She is a late stage affirmative action hire, a token, a carefully created simulacrum of a ‘president’ created to satisfy the cargo cult that ‘higher education’ has become. Nots she isn’t in a responsible position like, say, a ditch digger, where results can be measured. Oopsie, donations CAN be measured, and too far is too far, you don’t poop in your own pool, even a token knows that!
She/it does kind of resemble a monkey.
But.. Does she have a “Wet-Assed Pussy”?
Does anyone believe that she became the President of Harvard University based on merit alone?
It is assumed as a default position that she is not qualified until such time as Affirmative Action is completely dismantled, not only as an official policy, but as a defacto structure thoughout our culture.
One of the unintended consequences of that foolish policy was to make every single person who belongs to that class, suspect.
Everyone lost.
I found this passage intriguing-
“Third, Gay composes an entire appendix in the dissertation directly taken from Gary King’s book, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. While she cites King’s book—in fact, King was her dissertation advisor—Gay does not explicitly acknowledge that Appendix B is entirely grounded in King’s concepts, instead passing it off as her own original work.”
That raises a few red flags. Either King failed to actually read her dissertation, as one would expect from someone who holds the title of dissertation advisor, or he didn’t recognize his own writing which calls into question whether or not he plagiarized his work. What writer doesn’t recognize his own words, especially if it is from a published work?
Once again this is a result of hiring people based not on character, merit and excellence, but on gender, race and ideology.
The days anytime I see anyone other than an older white man in charge of something, I presume they are a diversity hire who lacks the demonstrated experience or competence to hold said position of authority. This Harvard chick is no different.
She may be the first black president of Harvard but she’s still a nigger. I know it, you know it and she knows it.
She would have been more effective at BLM.
Remember the Diversity Bridge in Miami fell, killing a motorist.
The DEI professor’s name was removed from the web page after the failure. Supposedly air traffic controllers are now suspect based on recent incidents.
This is the real world we live in.
As an engineer one of the main things you study is making sure the bridge doesn’t fall down. In Canada, engineers wear an iron ring to remind them of their duty to protect the public in all their work. Initial versions of the iron ring were taken from a bridge that collapsed in Canada.
One hundred years later, those chicks in Miami were too busy congratulating themselves on being girl bosses to check the math on their bridge. There’s even an independent service in the US that will double check your math to make sure your structural design is sound. I hope being girl bosses comforts them when they remember the people they killed with their faulty bridge design.
It wasn’t even bad math. They put the thing in place using temporary supports. Accepting the accolade before doing the work.
That’s how I remember it, a fatally flawed installation process rather than a structural design flaw. Either way, there was a responsibility on the part of the engineers to assure that their work was done according to standards that wasn’t met. Maybe it could be shrugged off on the contractor, but that’s lipstick on a pig.
They just didn’t use enough Nigger; I mean “black girl” magic”..
Yep.
Diversity is not experience.
Hiring based on diversity is getting people fucking killed.
Entire communities are burning down while diversity hires fiddle their bums.
Do You REALLY think that is NOT intended “Gravy”?
Worked at a very well respected, successful high tech company that doubled down on the AA mandate, as in we will hire DOUBLE what the law requires. Not a single god damned one of those fuckers were worth a shit. Well, there was one exception: a white chick with a EE degree. But she left the company after a couple years-everyone who had any experience with the AA flunkies knew she was a keeper and also that she would not stay. The only lesson learned: it was a race to the bottom.
Harvard has a lot of money, so they will survive this evil woman. But, the donors are doing the right thing. They should not give money to an organization that openly supports terrorism and racism.
But that’s precisely what they are doing. If you’re contending that the people of Palestine are not terrorized, lo these past months, or that preferential hiring and admissions of their tribal counterparts along with their history of AA is not a form of racism, you’re not playing with a full deck.
The donors are simply serving their preferred race(s) and supporting their own terrorist activities.
You mean Israel?
Look, everybody. Our new hasbara troll is a professor.
Professor Downvote.
It is all about Jewish power plays, you dullard.
BINGO!
Blacks have a very low resistance to cheating and stealing.
You mean they have low to no impulse control. Lower than common domestic animals.
But they don’t fuck goats, do they?
If shes against Israel shes not so bad. See how they use Israel as a division tool to put the fake left against the fake right?. Most conservative/normal working guys I know despise Israel. They also are victims of 20 years of 9/11 propaganda and despise Arabs too. The jews are worse.
Let the Jewrabs sort out the Jewrab conflicts. It is never wise to get in the middle of a family spat.
Until they decide to go nuclear (with the nukes that we gave them), and really let the WWIII genie out of the bottle!
If shes against Israel shes not so bad.
Choosing sides.
When it is framed as A vs B it seems wise to ask:
Why, did I choose A or B,?
Are there other options beyond A or B?
If there are, why are they not being presented now?
Why?
Because the purpose is to have the word consumer choose A, or B.
In some cases, if you do choose a side, you instantly become an enemy to the opposing side.
If you do not choose a side, and broadcast as much, both sides will hate you.[its true]
Best to blend in and keep your head down until the dupes stop killing each other.
Not when it comes to Israel.
Just like MLK!
Diversity will be our downfall, not our strength. Things are going as planned.
She is an affirmative action hire. That is all I need to know.
Ugly too-and with a name “Gay”?
“Put a Chick in it.. And Make It Lame and Gay”!!
Give a white man an empty field and he will create a university.
Give a black woman a university and she will create an empty field.
or a field full of trash.
Look what the niggers “post Mendella” have made out of south Africa. They can’t keep the power on and none of those niggers are smart enough/ willing enough to farm.
Give niggers a beautiful city, and you will have rubble and mud huts in a couple of years.
Diversity hire.
You get what you get.
She was hired because she was a black female, not for her academic achievements.
She should not be judged on those (or lack thereof).
She has satisfied the requirements she was hired for admirably; being a black female.
Expose the higher ed woke for the clown show they are.
My gawd what an ugly nigger.
You need a mechanic.
You search your entire town and can’t find a diverse one.
But you know a diverse person.
You talk to him, he says he has no experience but will try to fix your engine.
After a week with your car, he has engine parts scattered all over the place.
You nervously ask him “How’s it going?”
He looks up at you and says sheepishly “My ring might have fallen into the cylinder. I almost got the head off.”
[You see a ring sitting on a table nearby “it couldn’t be” you think.]
You pick up the ring and ask “Surely it’s not this one?”
He looks up and says “Oh, there it is! Thanks! Oh, I have no idea what’s wrong with your car. You should take it to a mechanic. Good luck, see ya!”
You take your car to the mechanic, who takes one look at the buckets of parts and says “No thanks. I don’t perform last rites”
______
The car is a corporation, country, religion.
So if she is anti-semitic for criticising Israeli crimes against humanity anyone who criticizes her must be racist……
That’s not how it works when jews are the ones making the accusation …
Billy Ray Valentine probably did go to Harvard
Why should she be disciplined or resign? The current occupant of the White House has plagiarized his entire life, from law school until now, and never been disciplined. In fact, he’s been rewarded for it.
I believe she is a cunning linguist.
Colonel Angus!
Come on, say it: a linguistic cunt!
Fact the majority of blacks in high positions of authority are not awarded these positions on merit. That generally always becomes evident by their lack of ability to actually perform with accountability and responsibility for the positions they hold .
Should they ever have their feet held to the fire of accountability out pops two courses of deflection . First it’s immediately called RACISM !
Should that ruse fail then with black females it’s The Prissy Defense : I don’t be knowing nothing about no …..
Pick the subject !
Nobody gave a shit about this affirmative action hire or her plagiarism until some students on the Harvard campus said some mean things about the tiny hats and weren’t immediately expelled. That’s what this is all about. The tiny hats won’t rest until every college president that allowed students to say mean thigs about them is fired.
On the Fruits of Certain Devious Schemes to Police Campus Politics and the Quiet Second Revolution in American Academia (34 minutes ago)
Is “calling for the genocide of Jews” protected speech at elite American universities?
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/on-the-fruits-of-certain-devious
Funny how nobody cares when people call for the genocide of Whites. It only becomes unacceptable when it’s directed at the tiny hats.
Plagiarism, like racism, is a crime which only White people can commit. When Africans steal someone else’s words or thoughts, it is not really theft. It is simply their inherent nature and culture.
Plagiarism is part of the upgraded reparations package.
Kind of like when they ransack all the stores in a shopping mall.
Harvard and Yale were both founded by/for satanists.
How long can you keep trying to sell a rotten piece of meat before the stench becomes so bad nobody dares comes near it?
Her biggest shortcoming: failing to convert right before she was given the “job”. Maybe she never heard of Sammy Davis, Jr.?
Auntie loves it when the Communists engage in cannibalism; pass the dark meat.
LOL
I remember our brother Aaron Swartz being persecuted by MIT at Harvard for finding a gigantic file of pedophilia in the backup he made with the intention of freeing students from the need to pay to read academic articles and today I see this “Gay” shit ( there is no better name to describe Harvard’s problem) as president of the Institution and I ask myself: How was this possible? Bill Ackman was also at Little Saint James and is also one of the institution’s largest donors.
When are you Americans going to stop voting for those damn lobbyist political puppets in D.C.?
Kind of like asking when will needy women quit spreading their legs?
MOAR ‘jewfirmative blaction’! As usual, I’ll save my exhortations for the total incineration of KKKambrifge for GAB.