Guest Post by Eric Peters
Google just announced a “Sensitive Events” policy – and you can probably imagine what that means.
Naturally, Google – the tech enforcement arm of the Left that has seized control of the public square in this country and arrogated to itself both the power and the moral authority (sic) to lay down the parameters of acceptable (allowable) speech – says what it means evasively, in the greasy-sickly-sweet patois of the Left:
A “Sensitive Event,” according to Google, is “an unforeseen event or development that creates significant risk to Google’s ability to provide high quality, relevant information and ground truth and reduce insensitive or exploitative content . . . during a Sensitive Event we may take a variety of actions to address these risks.”
Lots of italics added.
“Significant risk”? Of what, exactly – and according to whom? Well, the Leftists technocrats who control Google, of course. As far as what – why that’s anything the Leftist technocrats who control Google decide creates a significant risk – to the information control of the Left.
As for example the significant risk – during the event marketed as a “pandemic” – that people might discover that a “case” did not mean a death (or even that the “case” was seriously sick) or that there were safer and more effective treatments for those who did get sick than the dangerous drugs pushed as the only treatment for the sickness.
There will almost certainly be a significant risk of pro-Trump sentiments being expressed during the coming months and naturally, that will result in the Leftist technocrats who control Google (and who are provably in cahoots with the Leftists who currently control the government) “taking a variety of action to address” such a risk.
The oily-kumbaya-speak does not specify what those “actions” might be but everyone knows what they are. Those who dare to give utterance to “insensitive” or “exploitative” sentiments will be suppressed via what amounts to de facto censorship – the latter formerly something only the government had the power to do. But that was before the government partnered with privately owned technocracy to do exactly that, without any bother about the First Amendment to the Constitution – which has proved as impotent to prevent speech from being suppressed as it has proved itself impotent to prevent our pockets being picked. Indeed, it has arguably facilitated both – via the deliberate use of wording and language subject to interpretation – thereby giving the government the power to interpret its own powers.
Similarly, Google’s language about is “policy” is slippery. Deliberately. Specificity being limiting – and the last thing Google wants is limits placed on the “actions it may take,” based on what it says constitute “significant risk” – which it won’t specify. That way, anything can be a “significant risk.”
And because no one can know what, exactly, that is – insofar as Google is concerned – everyone will know that anything they say could be deemed exactly that, by Google.
A neat trick. One similar to the trick played by the usurpers of the Articles of Confederation who met in secret conclave to replace them with a Constitution “the people” never authorized them to write. This Constitution contained slipper words and phrases, too – such as “general welfare” and “necessary and proper.” No one ever seems interested enough to ask, according to whom?
Why, according to the men who met in secret conclave to replace the Articles, which “the people” hadn’t authorized them to do.
They were not stupid men. They chose the words and phrases carefully, with intent. And that intent was not to clarify, nor to establish boundaries (such as this is acceptable – but that is not). In order to keep people guessing. Which is to say, in order to keep them uneasy about where they stood in relation to . . . policy.
And we all know what it is, which is anything those who write it decide.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
The gates of free speech are being closed as the border is being held wide open.
A baffling situation as to why though.
It’s a Democrat Party voter registration drive. They need bodies in the Blue states that people are fleeing in droves, as to not lose anymore congressional seats. They don’t give a dam about the collateral damage of all the fentanyl deaths and terrorists pouring into the country.
The irony is that, largely as a result of these actions, by the time comes for the next US census, there won’t be another US census because there won’t be a US, there won’t even be a Former US.
They don’t need the bodies in the blue states, they need them in what is left of red states to turn them blue.
They need them to replenish the military, and Dickhead Durbin, D-illinois, wants to give them citizenship as reward for joining up. Replacement theory…
And compared to their shithole countries, the salary and benefits will lure in lots of them. From military age illegal invaders to a Manchurian military filled with disloyals.
Voting doesn’t matter. The left right and red blue stuff is all bullshit division tactics obviously.
LOL I think “fuck google” and “google is evil” pretty much says it all from where I’m sitting.
Where the fuck are my 25 down votes? I’ve been cheated.
Someone needs to decommission their servers.
Or their servants
You got a plan for defunding the CIA?
Are they going to ban these?
&ct=g
&ct=g
fuck off Trump is controlled oppo dumbfuck
Another actor who people believed was our dear leader
Remember when the google-jywish wen to North Korea? Me neither
I had a couple of uncles who went to North Korea, a place called the Chosen Reservoir, it didn’t turn out well.
C’mon, man. Everybody knows Dems always vote at 3 AM. Timeliness is a characteristic of white supremacy. Don’t be racist.
I suspect that the people who actually control, Google, AKA Alphabet, are not the front men Larry and Sergey, but the folks who run that Alphabet agency in Largely, Virginia.
Why/how did Google even become the most popular search engine anyway?
Hard to.say, AltaVista and All the Web were better, but over time they disappeared.
Goolag
Interesting. I brought up the slippery words about the 2A earlier today.
Completely expected and therefore only mildly newsworthy and afa I’m concerned completely irrelevant as I never, ever use “Gobbledegook” for anything whatever.
Is writing KIKE-NIGGER-FAGGOT-CUNT-ILLEGAL ALIEN insensitive ?
Swartzenshnitzels to you, pal.!
If you still use Google, Fakebook or any mass media CIA creations…well, time for your next booster.
Linux OS, Brave browser with Adblock Plus. A vpn is quite handy also… Guck Foogle! commie kuntz.
Peace, L.