Tag: Roe vs Wade
“Night Of Rage” Flyers Spotted In DC Ahead Of Roe v. Wade Decision
Any day now (likely Thursday), the Supreme Court could publish its final decision on whether or not to overturn Roe v Wade. If the nine Justices overturn the court case, the decision to ban abortions will become a state matter. It would spur demonstrations as disturbing flyers have already begun appearing across Washington D.C., warning about riots if the case is overturned.
National Reviews’ Ramesh Ponnuru tweeted a picture of a flyer slapped on the side of what appears to be a concrete base of a light pole on the side of a street in D.C. The flyer reads:
“DC CALL TO ACTION NIGHT OF RAGE … THE NIGHT SCOTUS OVD.CTURNS ROE V. WADE HIT THE STREETS YOU SAID YOU’D RIOT.”
It continues: “‘TO OUR OPPRESSORS: IF ABORTIONS AREN’T SAFE, YOU’RE NOT EITHER.’ JANE’S REVENGE.”
Ruth Sent Us
Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
The Roe v. Wade document was released to the public to stir up emotions prior to the midterm elections. An extremist group called “Ruth Sent Us,” named after the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, deliberately leaked the addresses of six conservative members of the Court. The group has not been condemned, and they are permitted to operate and invoke terror in Biden’s America. “Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights. We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics,” the group claims on their website.
Justices Amy Coney Barrett, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch have been targeted. The situation reached a peak when a man armed with a pistol was arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s house. He was carrying zip ties, a knife, and extra ammunition for his gun when he arrived at Kavanaugh’s home via taxi before being apprehended.
Are All Court-Created Rights Now in Peril?
Guest Post by Pat Buchanan
What does this fear that if the Alito decision overturning Roe becomes law, all these other decisions are in peril as well, tell us? It suggests that the national establishment lacks faith that the American people have truly and fully embraced the social reforms that progressives have gotten the Supreme Court to impose by fiat.
In the storm that erupted over the leaked draft opinion of Justice Samuel Alito, which would overturn Roe v. Wade, a secondary alarm has arisen among our elites.
If Roe is overturned, it is said, a whole raft of Supreme Court rulings rooted in the same principles and legal reasoning could be overturned as well.
Pillars of our progressive society could come crashing down.
In an op-ed in The Washington Post, legal scholars Melissa Murray and Leah Litman wrote that Alito’s draft opinion “declares that the Constitution ‘makes no reference to abortion’ and argues that abortion rights were ‘entirely unknown in American law,’ throughout most of the nation’s history.”
Continue reading “Are All Court-Created Rights Now in Peril?”
Dems Speak Out on Roe! Release the COVID Variants!
Guest Post by Ann Coulter
I guess Democrats realized that having feminist harpies fan out across the airwaves to shriek about the vital importance of aborting babies wasn’t helping, because we all woke up Monday morning to …
A NEW SURGE OF CORONAVIRUS!
Maybe that will distract the dingbats. They probably all think they have “long-haul COVID.”
In response to the Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion returning abortion to the states, Hillary Clinton said: “Any American who says, ‘Look, I’m not a woman, this doesn’t affect me. I’m not Black, that doesn’t affect me. I’m not gay, that doesn’t affect me’ — once you allow this kind of extreme power to take hold, you have no idea who they will come for next.”
On the other hand …
1) Women themselves don’t seem to view abortion as a “women’s rights” issue — in fact, a lot of polls show women more opposed to abortion than men. Nobody’s wondering, for example, how Justice Amy Coney Barrett voted.
Continue reading “Dems Speak Out on Roe! Release the COVID Variants!”
Don’t Divert Your Attention to Roe v. Wade
Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
A coming Supreme Court ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade was secretly “leaked.” Uncoincidentally, the news came right before the 2022 US midterm elections. Everyone is understandably up in arms after Biden formed a Disinformation Governance Board to become the ultimate authority for what we may believe is true. Most Americans want Biden out of office, with only 37% saying he should run for re-election.
Continue reading “Don’t Divert Your Attention to Roe v. Wade”
Alito Will Save Lives, Not Biden
Guest Post by Ann Coulter
When the draft Supreme Court opinion overruling “Roe v. Wade” leaked on Monday, my first thought was: WHY COULDN’T THEY WAIT UNTIL NEXT YEAR? (“Roe” is in quotes because Planned Parenthood v. Casey already overruled Roe, but “Roe” is still used to describe the nonexistent right to abortion.)
Yes, it’s human life we’re talking about. Millions of babies are killed in their mothers’ wombs each year — it’s a massacre. On the other hand, I thought, ending late-terms might end the midterms.
But then I read Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion and was intellectually offended all over again by the idea that one of our precious constitutional rights, enshrined in a founding document, is the right to kill an unborn baby. Anyone complaining about the decision should be required to cite the exact parts Alito got wrong. Be specific. And keep in mind, no important discussion of constitutional law has ever begun with the words, “My vagina …”
Roe v. Wade Overturned
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473
A leaked draft of a Supreme Court decision reveals the majority of the court has decided to overturn Roe v. Wade by a vote of 5-4, according to Politico, which calls it a “full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right.”
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito in the draft which was circulated inside the court before someone leaked it to the news outlet. “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.”
Pro-Life Means Pro-Reality: The Case For Repealing Roe V Wade
Via The Blue State Conservative
There isn’t any blacker a stain ever witnessed in the history of humankind than the practice of baby murder, in whatever form it takes, whether in the womb or weeks after the baby enters the world, as we have recently seen in some states, like California and Maryland, move to make “law”. This is evil incarnate and a politically backed movement that has taken nearly as many lives — almost 64 million through “legal abortions, during the 49 years since Roe vs Wade, as the numerous genocides of the 20th century, while these immoral, malevolent psychopaths, who have wormed their way into public office, act like they are representatives for Death and those abortion cultists who hold to the world depopulation ideas of Thomas Malthus and Margaret Sanger much more so than anything espoused by our Christian Bible or thoughts expressed by our Founders regarding the right to life.
Continue reading “Pro-Life Means Pro-Reality: The Case For Repealing Roe V Wade”
Aborting Roe Will Not Save the Dems in 2022
Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter
The panicking Democrats are tweaking the old “When life gives you lemons, make lemonade” cliché, arguing that when the Supreme Court gives babies life, try to make that aid their campaigns. But “You won’t let us kill kids!” may fly in Scat Francisco and other barren, childless blue hellholes, but as a campaign theme (along with such perennial favorites as “Stop being mean to criminals!” and “You are all racist!”) it’s not a winner. When families are trying to find $100 to fill up the old Dodge Caravan, “Republicans made it harder to abort babies in red states” loses to “Democrats aborted Keystone” every time.
Continue reading “Aborting Roe Will Not Save the Dems in 2022”
Vaccine & Employer Mandates
Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
Houston Methodist Hospital is telling employees that if they refuse to take the vaccine, they will be fired. Now 117 employees have joined a lawsuit against the hospital, and they are saying that the hospital is trying to force people to take an experimental vaccine. Instead, the dictatorial hospital management is comparing it to the flu vaccine and refuses to acknowledge that there is even a difference. Quite frankly, this does not look like a hospital you should allow a family member to even enter. They obviously have no respect for human rights. How can the protests against restrictions against abortions be covered under the right of privacy but not this experimental vaccine?