RETIRING AT 30

How to retire early — 35 years early

Blogger who retired at 30 says it’s time to rethink spending


By Andrea Coombes

For many Americans, the idea of an early retirement is pure fantasy — many surveys suggest that a good portion of us are convinced we’ll never be able to retire at all. But what if retirement saving isn’t quite as insurmountable an obstacle as you think?

The idea that retirement — even early retirement — is within anyone’s grasp is a big part of the appeal of a popular personal-finance blog called “Mr. Money Mustache,” written by a 39-year-old man named Pete, who lives with his wife and 8-year-old son in Longmont, Colo. (The blog recently had 417,000 monthly unique visitors, and has had a total of 4 million unique visitors since it launched in April 2011.)

Pete, who prefers not to divulge his last name to protect his family’s privacy, retired when he was just 30. His wife retired with him and for the past nine years, they’ve been stay-at-home parents. Their investment income supports their lifestyle, but they also work when they want, on their own terms.

One secret to their success? They live on very little: About $25,000 a year for a family of three. They own a car, but mostly bike. Dining out is an occasional luxury. And shopping for stuff? That’s best avoided. But their philosophy goes beyond just scrimping, says Mr. Money Mustache. It’s about enjoying life with less.

MarketWatch asked Mr. Money Mustache about his philosophy on spending, how he retired early, and his take on retirement planning. Our Q&A is below. And, if you’re wondering about the name?

“Mr. Money Mustache is meant to be a bit of a character — a financial superhero,” Pete said. “He’s me, but a slightly bossier and more opinionated version of me. I find that people gladly obey the commandments of Mr. Money Mustache, even while they would scoff if plain old Pete, the former software engineer, stepped up and started giving them advice.”

How old were you when you decided to try to retire early, and how long did it take you to get to the point where you could retire?

It was a gradual process. I brought some frugal instincts along with me from childhood so I always tended to save a bit of money rather than spending it all. My wife has been a pretty reasonable spender since the time we met as well. So I graduated from college in 1997, we eventually moved in together, and after several years of full-time work, some cash was starting to build up in our investment accounts and we wondered if there was something useful we could do with it.

Sometime around 2002, we decided we wanted to be parents eventually, and that it would be great if we could retire from our relatively demanding careers in the tech industry before any babies came along. This really increased our motivation to spend less and invest more, and we cranked things up. At the end of 2005, our savings were sufficient to generate passive income that we could theoretically live off forever, so we quit the regular jobs and have been winging it ever since. And we now have an amazing 8-year-old-boy.

How did you decide how much money was enough to retire?

Based on a long-lasting hobby of reading books on stock investing, I realized that you can generally count on your nest egg to deliver a 4% return over most of a lifetime, with a good chance of it never running out. In other words, you need about 25 times your annual spending to retire. So we tracked our spending and our net worth, and when we hit the magic number, we declared ourselves “retired.”

(For more on Mr. Money Mustache’s take on the 4% rule here, read this blog post.)

Did you have a written retirement plan in place early on, or more of a ballpark figure you were trying to save up?

We did most of the saving before we knew all that much about early retirement. But once the picture became a bit clearer, we had a clearer goal. For the last few years, the mantra was “$600,000 in investments, plus a paid-off house.” This is enough to generate $24,000 of spending money, which goes quite far if you have no rent or mortgage to pay.

How important is it for people to have a written retirement plan, in your opinion?

It doesn’t matter to me if it’s written, verbal, or mental. But I do encourage people to open their minds to how real and possible an early retirement can be. It isn’t a vague, fluffy concept like, “someday,” “never” or “when I’m 65.” Retirement (or financial independence) simply means that you have your living expenses covered by nonwork income. In the worst case, this requires 25 to 30 times your annual spending, socked away into investments. If you’re eligible for a pension or Social Security, it’s even easier.

For more on how Mr. Money Mustache invests (hint: he’s a fan of low-cost, broad-based stock index funds), read this blog post.

Do you work with a financial planner or manage your finances on your own?

I have always enjoyed managing my own finances. On the blog, I maintain a good-natured battle with the financial planning industry in general, because they focus too much on retiring at a very old age with many millions in savings — just so you can continue to spend $100,000 a year until you die. It is much more efficient to get a handle on your materialism and spending so you can live more happily on a fraction of that amount, which can shave 20 years or more from the time you need to keep commuting in to that office.

How crucial is it, in your opinion, for people to have a monthly or annual spending plan or budget?

This really depends on your personality type. I’ve never had a spending plan or a budget at any point in my own life. Instead, it was a simple set of values to apply just before I make any purchase or commit to any expense: “Is this the best possible use for this chunk of money, if my goal is creating lifelong happiness for myself?”

Since I valued freedom and financial strength, this automatically ruled out quite a few purchases. For example, as a young man I was a major car enthusiast. But I didn’t run out to borrow money to buy an Acura NSX, because I valued having that money for other things more than I valued a fancy car. Nowadays I can finally afford a car like that without even borrowing, but I am happy to discover that the desire has disappeared.

See this Mr. Money Mustache article for details on the family’s spending in 2013

Some people might think so much cost-cutting is akin to living like Scrooge and not having any fun. How would you respond to that?

If you tell yourself that is how it will be, then you will create your own truth and life will not be fun. But if you understand the fundamentals of what it means to be a happy person, you realize that buying more stuff for yourself has no relationship at all to how happy you are. These fundamentals include things like close relationships with other people, health, rewarding work, a chance to be creative and help others.

Work on those things and you’ll start living a much better life immediately, and soon wonder where the odd compulsion to own a yacht with a submarine came from in your old self.

Surveys suggest there are a lot of people out there who are worried about retiring, who don’t have enough money saved, who feel like they may never retire. Can you offer people in that situation any words of advice in terms of how to turn their situation around?

The quickest way to turn things around is to realize that you are in much more control than you realize. The time to reach retirement depends on only one thing: your savings rate as a percentage of your take-home pay. And this depends entirely on how much you spend. So the moment you can learn to live a less expensive life, suddenly the clouds clear up and the financial picture brightens considerably.

Read Mr. Money Mustache’s 5 most important strategies for planning an early retirement.

What would you say to someone in his 50s or 60s who maybe doesn’t have any credit-card debt, but is paying a mortgage and has about $100,000 saved for retirement? Is there any scenario where that person would be able to retire in, say, his early 60s?

That’s not a great starting point, but the turnaround can be incredibly fast once you realize where your money has been leaking out, and change your life so that you can save much more of your income. Ten to 15 years is plenty of time for most people to go from zero to financial independence, so with a $100,000 head start and the kids all out of the house, this 55-year-old might be in a good place. Adding in Social Security income, the time to retirement would be even faster.

Do you think that the rule of thumb of needing about 85% of pre-retirement income in retirement is accurate, useful, dangerous, innocuous?

This is a good guideline for people who currently spend almost everything they earn, and plan to continue that habit in retirement. But for the rest of us, it is ridiculous!

A much more useful idea is to separate the idea of income from that of spending. Your income is determined by what you do for a living. But your spending should be decided based on your needs — the things and experiences that truly make you happy. As an example, my family’s needs and wants have always ended up adding to about $25,000 a year. So that’s how much we spent, whether we were making $25,000 or $200,000.

So as soon as our retirement income safely exceeded $25,000 a year, we were financially independent and we decided to retire.

I hate to get morbid, but the idea of how long one is going to live is sort of a crucial piece to a retirement plan. How are you handling this impossible-to-answer-yet-essential question? Are annuities and/or long-term-care insurance part of your long-term financial plan?

If you plan your retirement right, your expected longevity might actually have nothing to do with your planning. This is because the amount of money required to fund a 30-year retirement is almost identical to the amount to fund a person forever — an odd behavior of the equation for amortization of a large sum of money.

I’m not into annuities or any type of insurance myself, although those products do have value for some. Both of those ideas are based on statistics and probabilities, and when you do the math you can actually be safer handling things yourself. With a big enough collection of income-producing assets (stocks, rental property, etc.), your savings will easily outlive you, and probably be much larger by the time you die. This big chunk of savings also allows you to pay for unexpected expenses without rocking the boat too much — you have many years to adjust if you do hit a bump that forces you to deplete part of it for something like a medical expense.

You have said in the past that it’s important to “make your dollars work for you.” Does that mean the idea of an emergency savings account at the bank is overrated? Should people be investing more of their savings in the financial markets, via a taxable account, rather than using bank accounts?

Yeah, I’ve always questioned the idea of an emergency fund. It’s a great tool for the financial beginner who lives from paycheck to paycheck, and for whom a broken water heater would make the difference between making ends meet and borrowing via a credit card. But once you get off the ground, your credit card is a monthly buffer and your investment accounts are the emergency fund.

So I have no savings account at all, and keep just a few thousand dollars in the checking account. If a huge unexpected expense ever came up that was greater than my income, I would put it on the credit card along with all other monthly spending. Then just sell some shares of an index fund and transfer that back to the bank before the credit-card automatic payment happened at the end of the month. And I’ve still never had to run a credit-card balance in my life.

The great part is that if your spending is much lower than your income, these emergencies become very rare, because there is always a surplus which you have to sweep away into investments each month. So if the water heater dies, you buy a new one and just invest a little bit less that month.

To what degree would you say rental income was key to your ability to retire early?

A small degree — I haven’t had the most brilliant landlord career so far, so my results have been only average. But rental properties chosen wisely can return much more than stocks, which could really speed up a savvy person’s retirement program. In my own case, I probably saved only about one year of work by using rental houses along with stocks.

Would you say it’s better to use extra savings to pay down one’s mortgage, or to invest in the financial markets?

For people in a high tax bracket, 401(k) plans in low-fee index funds win this battle pretty easily, especially if there is an employer match. For investment in taxable non-retirement accounts, it all depends on the interest rate (and if you’re pretty well-versed in investing, the stock market’s valuation or P/E 10 ratio).

Right now, with stocks expensive and interest rates very low, it’s probably a somewhat uninspiring tie in my opinion and you could do either. But if mortgage interest rates were 6% or more, I’d start getting more excited about paying off a house.

For people with other debts, like student loans, car loans, or credit-card debt at higher rates, I’d prioritize debt payoff even more.

It sounds as though a lot of your success has to do with cutting costs. But I know that some of my readers are really tired of hearing the “cut out the lattes” idea. What would you say to those readers?

For most people, cutting costs is by far the most powerful way to increase wealth. This is because it is easy to burn off almost any amount of money — just ask the 78% of NFL players that have financial problems shortly after turning off the cash fire hose of a pro-sports career. It is also possible to cut almost any budget in half, leaving the happy latte-cutter saving 50% or more of her income.

But the key to making this work is not cutting out treats — it’s eliminating your desire for those treats in the first place. Driving my 2005 Scion hatchback would be a chore if I had a desire for a 2014 BMW. But since this little Scion is more than enough car for all of my wants (and I usually ride a bike anyway), I am actually winning and living a happier life even while saving $20,000 a year in depreciation and other costs. The handy part of all this is that anyone can eliminate the desire for any of the expensive luxuries currently dominating most of our spending.

Do you have any sorts of items you love to buy and won’t give up?

That’s a tricky question, because our lifestyle does include quite a few luxuries that are fun to have around. I enjoy nice coffee at breakfast and wine many nights at dinner, and the food we eat is very high-end these days. And we live in a pretty fancy house full of nice stuff and take a lot of trips. While I enjoy all of these things, I also make fun of myself for living such a decadent lifestyle, as a reminder that none of these things are essential components of happiness. I would give them up in a heartbeat if we couldn’t afford them — for example if we were in debt or if they compromised our ability to live a free life. But since life is an adventure and there is no need to seek perfection, we dabble in all of the normal treats of American life.

You write a lot about doing things oneself — including being your own handyman. What would you say to people who feel they aren’t good at fixing things and aren’t confident enough to work on their own homes? Is home maintenance going to be a budget killer for them?

You get better at what you do. I think that every homeowner, with possible exceptions for very busy CEOs and rock stars, should be able to take care of a house and can easily learn how to do it. Outsourcing these basic chores is expensive and fussy — it often takes more time to find and supervise a contractor than it takes to do the job yourself.

The key is starting with the assumption that everything is easy, because it is. Then you just grab a book from the library and watch a few YouTube videos on the topic, and dive in. You can also attend the free workshops at Home Depot and ask for help from the handy people within your network of friends. People generally love to help others, and I spend a lot of my own free time giving free home-renovation advice and help to my own friends when they ask for it.

When it comes to spending, what about travel to foreign lands? A no-no because of the steep expense?

Travel can be as expensive or as inexpensive as you choose to make it. We do quite a bit of it these days, spending every summer in Canada and a good part of last winter in Hawaii, with other trips to quite a few other countries in recent years as well. But if you live like a local once you get there, going for the slow and authentic experience rather than flashy hotels and bungee jumping every day, it costs a lot less. One of my favorite trips was a winter driving trip from Colorado down to the Gulf Coast, where we brought along a tent and a kayak and hung out on as many beaches and waterways as we could find in the tropical belt of Texas for a month.

Why did you start your blog?

It was a 50/50 mix of inspiration and exasperation. My wife and I retired from real work at the end of 2005, but all of our friends and peers kept working around us. As their careers blossomed and earnings grew, I kept hearing these complaints about money being tight and retirement being an impossibility. But looking at their lifestyles, I could see exactly where the money was leaking out unproductively — even while they seemed to be missing it. So I decided to start the blog and share the ideas with the world, rather than annoying friends with unrequested financial advice.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-to-retire-early-35-years-early-2014-01-17

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Stucky
Stucky
January 17, 2014 10:52 am

Retire NOW !!!!
[imgcomment image[/img]

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
January 17, 2014 10:57 am

If you love what you do, then work and retirement are the same thing. If you don’t, then retirement at any age is just an excuse to engage in the hobby known as alcoholism. That is unless you’re weird like SSS and golf sober.

AWD
AWD
January 17, 2014 11:00 am

“the mantra was “$600,000 in investments, plus a paid-off house.” This is enough to generate $24,000 of spending money, which goes quite far if you have no rent or mortgage to pay.”

A paid off house does not negate property taxes. If 1/3 of your $24k investment income goes to property taxes, and another 30% tax on your capital gains, you have to live on $11k a year. And that’s if the stock market doesn’t collapse. I love these idiots who think they have it all figured out, because something always goes wrong, and the government is NEVER don’t fucking with you and stealing your money. The only way to retire is to live on a deserted island (see the gilligan island post). Even then, you’d owe the government back taxes. And WTF are you going to do with yourself if you retire at 30? Imitate the FSA?

Hope@ZeroKelvin
Hope@ZeroKelvin
January 17, 2014 11:14 am

This guy has it exactly right. It is all about the lifestyle and being frugal.

Honestly, I am happiest when I at home cooking a nice dinner, hanging out with the kids and Mr. HZK, walking the dogs and watching the sunset from my patio. I am living on 1/3 of my income as it is and if I cut out the beemer, the maid and the cleaner, I would be in even better shape. And of course if I could get Mr. HZK to stop buying tractors.

Thinker
Thinker
January 17, 2014 11:19 am

I had to agree with the frugality message, as well. But at the back of my mind throughout most of this, I kept thinking he’s in trouble if he’s counting stock-market investments and Social Security as part of a “sound” plan. To my mind, neither can be considered either wealth or permanent… you just can’t count on them and they’re completely out of your control.

Now, if he’s invested in real estate that is paid off and delivering income to him — above and beyond taxes, which are also out of his control — then that’s great. But placing your bets on interest rates, mutual fund managers, government interaction or anything else is a fool’s mission.

TeresaE
TeresaE
January 17, 2014 11:19 am

He has a lot of good advice. And is 100% right about assessing happiness and wants/needs.

Also has lots of optimism that this house of cards is going to remain pretty much the same going forward.

Good luck to them. If the investments go to zero and the taxes and energy costs and quadruple, or worse, wonder what then?

At least he’ll have his fancy house to sell to some Chinese guy that believed in investing in real assets, not stock/paper.

TPC
TPC
January 17, 2014 11:23 am

I like working, though I will admit I’d rather have my own business. My wife will retire early, my children will not grow up strangers to their own parents.

$24,000 a year? I admire their thought processes and drive, but I think AWD is right in that they are one hair away from catastrophe. The stock market will lose 40-60% of its value next crash, and that will rip apart their earnings.

I value experiences and self sufficiency over materialism and consumerism, but I’m not delusional enough to think that these people have it all figured out.

Nobody has it all figured out, we are all just trying to do our best.

harry p.
harry p.
January 17, 2014 11:41 am

i don’t mind “working” either, i would jsut prefer to work the schedule i want and not have to commute.
the basic thought process is sound but i would add in the engineering fudge factor known as the FOS (factor of safety).
a good add on would be to have say 5-10 years go assets that could be used to live off so the investment assets wouldn’t have to be touched in case a tragedy happens.
AWD made the great point that once they have a hiccup and have to pull 100k out of investments they now don’t have the assets to provide the income they need and applied for. One of the big benefits they have is that taxes on “income” won’t affect them like someone making 6 figures because their income is technically really low. they do have to worry about a wealth tax and of course property taxes (rent paid to govt for something you already own).
I would calculate the assets (say 600k) and then mutlipe that by 2.5-3 and continue to live on the 24k.
they seem to have things better figured out than 80% of the people out there but they need to make sure they don’t let their hubris get in teh way of not being prepared for an inevitable black swan event.

treemagnet
treemagnet
January 17, 2014 11:44 am

Okay I’ll drink Busch light, if its cold, but thats as far as I’m willing to go. And I don’t want to live in a world without tater tots too. Its about standards. What the hell is this family gonna do, even hang gliders come back to earth eventually.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 17, 2014 12:09 pm

Frugality and money management should be everybody’s daily, weekly and monthly routine. Retiring at 30 will most likely involve risky, leveraged investments IMO. That said, that game plan is likely to lose your wealth and add 35 years to your retirement age, not subtract it.

bb
bb
January 17, 2014 12:22 pm

None of you are going to be able to retire.Do you ever remember what you read on this site ?We are heading for financial ruin and probably civil war.Most of you will be killed for your belongings or die of disease.This is your future so plan accordingly with GOD.

TJF
TJF
January 17, 2014 12:44 pm

I read Mr. Money Moustache’s blog. He takes being frugal to levels that I do not want to try, but it is an interesting idea. He may be retired, but he stays busy – he is building a new house for one example.

dirtythong
dirtythong
January 17, 2014 12:53 pm

gots to keeps that income low, to increase them obammy cares subsidies

treemagnet
treemagnet
January 17, 2014 12:58 pm

@bb, I must say, I read a post like ‘making energy part of your portfolio’ or similar and sort of stop and think just what you posted. 4th turnings have never been so pent up as this one, I too just don’t see this ending without bad, bad, things.

flash
flash
January 17, 2014 12:59 pm

Invest in the stock market and retire on your returns, he said…

LOL..

AWD
AWD
January 17, 2014 1:01 pm

Fuck the government and taxes. When I’m ready to retire, I’m going to have a motor coach home, or a sailboat, preferably the later. Because I refuse to pay property taxes, or any taxes. The government is a criminal organization, stealing more money every year than all the criminal organizations throughout history combined. I’m not supporting the 30 million union affirmative action government drones. Fuck them and fuck their pensions, and fuck the FSA. Once my kids are adults, I’m out.

bb
bb
January 17, 2014 1:23 pm

AWD ,I heard you say that before but where will you sail to.Where will be safe?Not the open ocean.Being on the water will be just as bad as the interstate and you would leave your children?What if they need you ?What if they get sick?You would really be selfish no-good jerk if you just sailed away.I will never leave America but I will probably move next to BILLY and let him do all the fighting.

bb
bb
January 17, 2014 1:39 pm

Tree.,I see nothing but destruction for America and there will be very few places to hide.I have been reading a lot about other nations that have collapsed economically and it’s not good.Just go to YouTube and look up civil war in Syria if you want to see what could happen here.It’s a blood bath.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 17, 2014 2:45 pm

“I see nothing but destruction for America and there will be very few places to hide. I have been reading a lot about other nations that have collapsed economically and it’s not good. Just go to YouTube and look up civil war in Syria if you want to see what could happen here. It’s a blood bath.” – bb

bb,

Sit down. Close your eyes. Breath through your nose. Relax. Everything’s going to be okay.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 17, 2014 2:47 pm

Breathe. Breathe. Breathe. Feel the energy.

Al Martin
Al Martin
January 17, 2014 3:53 pm

Great Read…best advise you could hear…..retired early at 62 and loving it.

Regards,
Al

El Coyote
El Coyote
January 19, 2014 12:54 am