Poll: Two-thirds of US would struggle to cover $1,000 crisis

Whenever one of these stories comes out about how little savings the average family has, they always seem to concentrate on wealth inequality, stagnant wages, and rising costs. They rarely concentrate on personal responsibility, failure to grasp the concept of delayed gratification, lack of basic budgeting skills, and playing the blame game for your failures. I love how these articles describe a $1,000 “emergency” expense that is unexpected.

Only delusional, math challenged, live for today morons would consider having to get 4 new tires for your car as an unexpected emergency. It’s not an unexpected emergency when your 15 to 20 year old water heater gives out. Appliances crap out at 10 years or less. Roofs start leaking around 20 years. You and your family members get sick every year. None of this is an unexpected emergency.

It’s not an emergency when after 18 years your child enters college. You had 18 years to save. You cannot work for 40 years and be surprised by retirement. It’s a national disgrace there are so many households with so little. The excuses and rationalizations by the ignorant masses are a plenty. I understand the ravages of inflation and wages not keeping up, but that is no excuse for living above your means because your neighbor does so.

If you make $50,000, spend less than $50,000 and save the difference. If you make $50,000, you shouldn’t be living in a $250,000 home, driving a leased $40,000 vehicle, spending $400 per month on cable and smart phones, eating out three times per week, and taking exotic vacations every year.

The only way to accumulate savings is to live beneath your means. It’s that simple. Too bad most Americans have been brainwashed by the banker/media/corporate propaganda and have been running on a hamster wheel their entire lives. If you are 50 years old with $100,000 of household income and can’t handle an “expected” $1,000 expense, it’s no one’s fault but your own.

Via AP

NEW YORK (AP) — Two-thirds of Americans would have difficulty coming up with the money to cover a $1,000 emergency, according to an exclusive poll released Thursday, a signal that despite years of recovery from the Great Recession, Americans’ financial conditions remain precarious as ever.

These financial difficulties span all income levels, according to the poll conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Seventy-five percent of people in households making less than $50,000 a year would have difficulty coming up with $1,000 to cover an unexpected bill. But when income rose to between $50,000 and $100,000, the difficulty decreased only modestly to 67 percent.

Even for the country’s wealthiest 20 percent — households making more than $100,000 a year — 38 percent say they would have at least some difficulty coming up with $1,000.

“The more we learn about the balance sheets of Americans, it becomes quite alarming,” said Caroline Ratcliffe, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute focusing on poverty and emergency savings issues.

Harry Spangle is one of those Americans. A 66-year-old former electrician from New Jersey, Spangle said he thought he would always have a job and “lived for today” but lost his job before the downturn. He said he would have to borrow from friends or family in order to cover an unexpected $1,000 expense.

“I have a pension and I am on Social Security, but it’s very limiting,” he said. “It’s depressing.”

Having a modest, immediately available emergency fund is widely recognized as critical to financial health. Families that have even a small amount of non-retirement savings, between $250 and $749, are less likely to be evicted from their homes and less likely to need public benefits, an Urban Institute study found.

“People are extremely vulnerable if they don’t have savings,” Ratcliffe said. “And it’s a cost to taxpayers as well. Lack of savings can lead to homelessness, or other problems.”

Despite an absence of savings, two-thirds of Americans said they feel positive about their finances , according to survey data released Wednesday by AP-NORC, a sign that they’re managing day-to-day expenses fine. The challenge for many often come from economic forces beyond their control such as a dip in the stock market that threatens their job or an unexpected medical bill, risks that have shattered the confidence of most in the broader U.S. economy.

Yet when faced with an unexpected $1,000 bill, a majority of Americans said they wouldn’t be especially likely to pay with money on hand, the AP-NORC survey found. A third said they would have to borrow from a bank or from friends and family, or put the bill on a credit card. Thirteen percent would skip paying other bills, and 11 percent said they would likely not pay the bill at all.

Those numbers suggest that most American families do not have at least $1,000 stashed away in an accessible savings account, much less under their mattresses, to cover an emergency.

Americans’ struggle to save isn’t new. Three CBS News and The New York Times polls going back to the mid-1990s — the most recent one done in 2007 before the downturn — show a majority of Americans would have some difficulty covering a $1,000 emergency. The AP-NORC results also correlate with a 2015 study by the Federal Reserve in which 47 percent of respondents said they either could not cover a $400 emergency expense or would have to sell something or borrow money.

And the struggle impacts retirement savings as well. When AP-NORC asked if they will have enough savings to retire when they want to, 54 percent of working Americans say they are not very or not at all confident they will have enough. Only 14 percent say they are confident they can retire on time.

The findings in the AP-NORC poll illuminate how many Americans’ frustrations over the economy, income inequality and insecurity about their financial futures has contributed to this dizzying presidential election season.

Billionaire businessman Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party largely on a populist platform of kicking out undocumented immigrants, renegotiating free trade agreements and a promise to “Make America Great Again.” On the left, socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont captured voters with a message of dismantling Wall Street and higher taxes on the rich.

The reasons why Americans don’t save are complex. One economist says it’s a holdover from the ’70s and ’80s, when high inflation ate into the value of money stashed in a savings account. Others say U.S. tax policy rewards saving money for retirement or taking out a mortgage to buy a home over short-term emergencies.

The Great Recession and lack of wage growth in recent years have not helped. In the same AP-NORC poll, 46 percent of workers said their wages have remained stagnant in the last five years, and another 16 percent said they’ve actually seen salary cuts. Meanwhile, costs for basic needs, such as food, housing and health care, have risen.

“The lack of (savings) is symptomatic to other financial problems that families are having,” said William R. Emmons, a senior economic adviser at the Center for Household Financial Stability at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “Many families are still struggling with debt from the housing bubble and borrowing boom. And the recent economic stresses make it much more likely families are going to be fighting basic financial issues.”

Mitchell Timme, 26, said that his wages have remained basically flat for the last few years while his cost of living has increased. Once everything is paid “there’s nothing left to save,” he said.

“It definitely adds stress to everyday life. It hangs over you. While it’s not something you would complain about every day, it’s there. And it weighs on you,” Timme said, who works at a security company in Phoenix.

It may not be entirely bad that some Americans do not have much cash savings, Emmons said. In the poll, 21 percent of Americans say they would strongly consider the option of putting the unexpected $1,000 bill on a credit card to be paid in full when their statement came due.

“For financially stronger families, having access to low-cost credit is completely acceptable,” he said.

___

The AP-NORC poll of 1,008 adults was conducted April 14-18 using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.

Respondents were first selected randomly using address-based sampling methods, and later interviewed online or by phone.

The AP-NORC Center: http://www.apnorc.org/

Loading…

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
37 Comments
Tommy
Tommy
May 19, 2016 4:15 pm

Well admin, that won’t mean shit when they get hungry so I guess regardless – it’s a statistic to be wary of.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
May 19, 2016 4:29 pm

Just a moment ago I was thinking to myself, “Man, I’m so bored.” Then a stroke of genius happened and I decided to skim TBP. And what did I find – something to do… Pick a fight with Admin.

Ok, Lemme break this down. The M1 money supply is roughly $1.4 trillion dollars (if the Fed isn’t lying, which I seriously doubt). Of that $1.4 trillion of paper assets it’s estimated roughly 80% is $100 bills and the rest is $1-20 bills. The M2 money supply is estimated at $7.7 trillion dollars. Of both M1 and M2, it’s estimated 2/3 of those money supply are overseas.

There’s over 300,000,000 people in the United States. Assuming my facts are correct (supposing the Fed isn’t lying and statistics are up to date) how is 300 million people suppose to have $1,000 in savings if roughly $3 trillion dollars worth of the M1 and M2 money supply is in the U.S?

[imgcomment image[/img]

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
May 19, 2016 4:37 pm

Admin-

That was my point. I don’t believe the numbers. I believe the M1 and M2 money supply is being starved.

Muck About
Muck About
May 19, 2016 4:38 pm

Bad, bad, bad. Not a politically correct article or lead comment by Admin either!

If I may quote an old, yellowed and forgotten document, “All men are created equal.” That’s where the bullshit started because the founders neglected to write it thus: “All men are nat created equally but all should be guaranteed equality of opportunity.”

That would simplify the truth of todays rayciss crap and most everything else in the civil rights areas.

We are not created equal (two sexes for example that may compete well intellectually but never physically (assuming the contest is one of strength). Hence ladies in the Special Forces are going to few and far between and wouldn’t last at all in long term engagement.

Some are smarter than others, some work harder than others, some would rather steal than work, some have common sense and a lot don’t and so on and so on. Yet the PC world we live in expects equality in results in all respects for everyone. Ain’t gonna happen – ever.

MA

Muck About
Muck About
May 19, 2016 4:39 pm

That’s “not created equally” ……sorry..

MA

Muck About
Muck About
May 19, 2016 4:42 pm

@Stephanie: By “M1 and M2” being “starved”, do I take it you think all our problems would vanish is we just added to the debt and printed more cash?

MA

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
May 19, 2016 4:50 pm

Hey Muck!
AFAIK, the whole point of “all men are created equal” was the understanding BEFORE THE LAW. That is, no one gets preferential treatment, and all must obey the same laws the same way …
Except that today,
Eric Holder can sell guns to drug lords, ignore banking laws for preferred clients, fail to prosecute certain defendants for malfeasance in office (Lynch-Mob Loretta is acting the same),
Hillary is not in jail or even indicted for crimes to numerous to list here,
Harry Reid is not in jail or even indicted for his shady dealings in Nevada (like the Bundy Ranch business, Chinese-induced corruption in America),
Barack Obama can issue edicts from the Oval Office to bypass the Congress if he feels they aren’t acting on something fast enough (impeachment, anyone? Prison, anyone?),
The Clinton Foundation can take money from foreigners for political considerations from Hill and Bill,
and so many other examples.

Being unequal before the law leads to a breakdown in the law; I’m looking forward to the return of vigilante justice, duels, assassinations and anarchy. They will have earned every terror-filled moment of the Crunch, since they made it all possible.

Afterwards, a few amendments to the restored Constitution may be in order:
– must own property to vote
– must not be lawyer to run for office
– must not be banker to lobby for any legislation
– must go to jail if official malfeasance

and so forth.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
May 19, 2016 5:07 pm

‘@Stephanie: By “M1 and M2” being “starved”, do I take it you think all our problems would vanish is we just added to the debt and printed more cash?”

I don’t know. In the past money printing hasn’t worked and caused inflation leading to hyperinflation. But, our monetary system in the U.S today is vastly different than the Wiemar Republic in the late 1920s. Quite frankly, I’m siding with Silvio Gesell’s theory of money rotting and applying it to our modern economic model.

“Only money that goes out of date like a newspaper, rots like potatoes, rusts like iron, evaporates like ether, is capable of standing the test as an instrument for the exchange of potatoes, newspapers, iron and ether. For such money is not preferred to goods either by the purchaser or the seller. We then part with our goods for money only because we need the money as a means of exchange, not because we expect an advantage from possession of the money”

The Fed’s books are filled with “toxic assets”. To me, this means the money supply has rotted and the system wouldn’t repair itself with physical money printing of Federal Reserve Notes. A Gold and Silver backed currency should be printed instead of a FRN money supply.

Joe Down
Joe Down
May 19, 2016 5:13 pm

I’m sure in some manner all of this could be tied back to ignorance and or lack of education. But the blame has to rest on the gov and the removal of sound currency backed by gold or other physical medium of value. Although probably too late now, if our currency was based on a physical medium a lot of the monetary issues we are faced with today would resolve themselves. It’s hard to create inflation and other ills when you cannot manipulate the currency.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
May 19, 2016 5:17 pm

Admin,

I calculated population because 75 million “households” is too ambiguous. If a household was headed by two income earners I would say $1,000 is a terrible savings goal. Also, the “household” doesn’t mean two parents and children under the age of 18 anymore. Households can be single parent or two parent with elder parents or millennial adults living in a multi-generational household.

bb
bb
May 19, 2016 5:46 pm

Hey Admin , I had a thousand , I just didn’t have 40,000 thousand dollars to give the hospital. The Damn doctor was charging me 200 hundred dollars every 15 minutes she was in the room.The ambulance service charged me 3200 to take me less then 20 miles to the emergency room.The medicine was another 500.+ dollars.The total / final Bill is probably going to be close to 50,000.

I have decided on this one I will become part of the free shit army unless you let me put everything on your tab. How about it Admin. Show the world your compassionate side .Paid all my Medical Bills. Pretty Please.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
May 19, 2016 5:48 pm

Watch out Clammy, don’t make Red put his foot up your ass! 🙂

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
May 19, 2016 6:12 pm

Well, I’ll just bet you most of those sons of bitchez have at least two IPhones that cost them $1,000 per household AND playstations AND computer games that cost $100 each. That is a big reason they don’t have any money, they piss it away.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
May 19, 2016 6:13 pm

My advice to people is to turn saving money into a game or a challenge that you intend to win. The real trick to saving money is to get over the impetus to spend it as soon as you have some saved up. If you can do those two things you’ll be flat out amazed at how much you can save and how quickly it piles up.

Once I got into the habit of saving I found that my desire to spend practically went away. I got more gratification out of having saved a given amount of money than I calculated I’d get out of buying something I had been wanting. The sense of security a fat savings account gave me cancelled the urge to spend.

A good way to start is to “reward” yourself for getting out of your nice comfy bed every day, going someplace you don’t want to go and doing a bunch of shit you’d rather not do with people you’d rather not be with…..in other words……work. For me that “reward” was saving 10% of my pre-tax paycheck for *ME*. You can play with the percentage a bit but pay yourself FIRST, right off the top then put that money away and forget about it. Once you’ve done that, pay your bills adjusting as needed to avoid dipping into your “reward”. If you can establish and maintain that habit for 3-6 months it will become second nature and you’ll find other ways to save even more like banking any raises or bonuses you might get.

I’m just a working stiff like most of you but I can’t tell you how nice it is to need a roof for my house or a new furnace or just a new TV and not have to sweat where the money will be coming from. It’s infinitely more gratifying than the few minutes of instant gratification one might get from pissing away money on shit they don’t really need.

I might just put together a little post on all the Jedi Mind Tricks I use to save money.

YODA_bite me (you know who)
YODA_bite me (you know who)
May 19, 2016 7:04 pm

“People are extremely vulnerable if they don’t have savings,”

Thanks for ZIRP, President O’POS.

Gator
Gator
May 19, 2016 7:26 pm

I agree with IS. It’s quite satisfying to know that you have the ability to buy a whole bunch of things if you wanted to, but having the restraint not to. Being able to look at something and think to myself, nah, I like having the money more.

I did recently buy an nice pistol I’ve been wanting for a long time though. I bought using only cash rewards on my credit cards, which I typically pay off literally as I’m leaving the parking lot, never carry a balance around, haven’t for a year and a half now. Also, since I use cash for most things other than has and groceries, loose change that I rolled up and took to the bank for cash. It adds up, quick. It took me about 9 months to save $700 is change and cash rewards, and although I could have just bought the thing at any time I wanted, setting that goal and being patient was a great feeling.

As an aside, it’s much easier to justify the purchase to the wife if that’s how I paid for it….

Walt
Walt
May 19, 2016 8:41 pm

“NEW YORK (AP) — Two-thirds of Americans would have difficulty coming up with the money to cover a $1,000 emergency, according to an exclusive poll released Thursday”
“Despite an absence of savings, two-thirds of Americans said they feel positive about their finances , according to survey data released Wednesday by AP-NORC”
Ah, American exceptionalism, or cognitive dissonance? Or are they one and the same?

Gator
Gator
May 19, 2016 9:23 pm

Another funny point about this that I didn’t think of until after commenting earlier- the WP released an article just a few days ago basically blaming the American people for “saving too much” rather than spending everything they earn for preventing Obamas glorious ‘recovery’ from being even more glorious. Which is it? How can there be a savings glut when most people can’t even come up with a thousand dollars for an emergency? In my opinion, before you eat anything other than baked chicken and rice for dinner, and before you even THINK about eating out, you should have, at a minimum, 1k in cash in a safe place in your house. And you better not be buying alcohol either.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
May 19, 2016 10:33 pm

Gator,
Of course you can buy alcohol – you will need “trade goods” for after the Crunch, and alcohol might become the next best currency, after gold and silver.
Oh, you meant for personal consumption – never mind, my bad.

Paulo
Paulo
May 19, 2016 10:35 pm

Admin,

Well said. you made some very good points in yhou article. And Bea, I agree with you. I have run into many supposedly poor people who basically live hand to mouth and are always short. But, they smoke, and have I-phones, and etc etc…… I am also amazed at how many folks hit the drive-throughs instead of packing a lunch. I have a couple of trades and a couple of degrees and can easily afford to eat out every day if I wanted to. But not when I was young and starting out. I packed a lunch the night before for forty years. I have seen kids spend $5.00/day buying junk for lunch at the corner store because there was no food in the house. Supposedly. Their teacher, (me) packed a lunch and ate it at his desk so kids could work over lunch if they wanted to. I have never understood it. It just seems so obvious. You cannot spend more than you make. Simple.

Pirate Jo
Pirate Jo
May 19, 2016 10:49 pm

My politically-incorrect take on this is that if you can’t put your hands on $1,000 you SURE as hell have no business having kids. Yes yes, I realize I am a big ‘ole meanie on this, but don’t look at me – look at the people who pass poverty on to the next generation.

We had a sympathy article in the local paper about this couple who each worked a fast food job and had a hard time supporting their three kids. I mean at least the couple was married, but what are you doing having kids at all if you each work for minimum wage? I was supposed to be sad because the minimum wage wouldn’t support a family. Well I know it doesn’t, because I worked for minimum wage myself – in high school.

I’m not happy that upward mobility has all but disappeared. But given that this unhappy fact is the truth, you should not be having kids if you are that poor. All you are going to do is make more poor people.

Billah's wife
Billah's wife
May 20, 2016 12:50 am

Oh mah gawd Pirate Jo drops in ter plop uh massive turd on what has been otherwise very cordial commentary. The real question my old friend is whether it’s better ter be poor and exist er ter just not exist. Many poor people prefer the former. I wrote uh awesome rap fer you:

Pirate Jo
Closeted lezzie
With mangled ovaries
Hatin on kiddies
Wears uh bag on her butt ugly face
Her cooter never gets bumped
And she hates Donald Trump
Cottage cheese in uh bag
Is her fly-ridden rump
It takes burying jizm
Ter spit out some chirren
And ain’t no one bonin
Pirate jo

Sing this along ter Tupac’s California, its awesome. Cmon Pirate Jo, let some love descend on yer black soul. Later

Uncle Charley
Uncle Charley
May 20, 2016 1:24 am

BO: “Stop “peddling fiction.””

Llpoh
Llpoh
May 20, 2016 5:01 am

Admin – your intro is wisdom for the ages. It is as true today as ever was – save today so as to be secure tomorrow.

Ed
Ed
May 20, 2016 6:33 am

Hesh up, BW. PJ would mash you like a tater bug if she could get at your skanky ass. You would not like gettin mashed. You would look funny with a prolapsed cooter.

ZombieDawg
ZombieDawg
May 20, 2016 6:41 am

I do, which is why I’m so well off.
I neither need nor want a McMansion or 6 kids and 4 cars or private schools, 5 credit cards maxed out and mortgages on 50% overvalued property..
I have none of that crap. The people that do have all that are asleep at the wheel of reality.
I woke up early on as to the nature of reality, planned, adapted, cut costs drastically, prepared and now I’m VERY well set for what is coming.
The bottom line is we’re months away from this show going down, so waking up the mindless masses at this stage is just a waste of time. They had every chance to wake up and prepare.
They CHOSE not to.
Tough. Shit happens. To them.

Friday Haiku
Friday Haiku
May 20, 2016 6:51 am

Billah’s fertile wife
Has sixteen dirty children
Sharing a diaper

Rob in Nova Scotia
Rob in Nova Scotia
May 20, 2016 7:44 am

I wish it was just months away but it here it is 2016 and still waiting.

Hard to believe that my household would be considered in top 20%. If you drove by it you wouldn’t know. My wife and I live in a very modest house. I drive a truck that is nine years old. Well maintained I’m told but most importantly paid for. Same for my wife except her car is 6 years old.

Yet I drive thru town past houses chock a block with boats, ATV’s and assorted other toys. I wonder sometimes if it makes sense to forgo when so many are living the good life. I know I am making right choice by saving instead of spending but does seem like a bad choice most days when so many are having so much fun. The sad part is when shan meets fit these same people will be standing at my door.

But I do wonder if the folks like me who are prudent are the ones making a mistake. I look around and it isn’t hard to see that I am one of the few. This country is run by fools elected by foolish and in a democracy the majority rules.

Ed
Ed
May 20, 2016 8:15 am

To all those folks living it up on borrowed money: When the crash comes and you can’t pay anymore, you’ll become slaves to those you owe. Legislation has been added incrementally to make that possible.

KaD
KaD
May 20, 2016 8:31 am

If I made $50K you’re right, I shouldn’t have a problem. If I made $30K I’d be pretty good. Even after going back to school I can’t get near that.

prusmc
prusmc
May 20, 2016 10:03 am

Harry S. the retired electrician o pension and SS could make a good bit off-the- books with his skill. After he was kicked out of the commune for spending all his time talking politics and refusing to do any work, Bernie worked five years under the table as a carpenter so he would not forfeit his low income benefits.

TPC
TPC
May 20, 2016 11:19 am

People don’t attach real world meaning to their money. Somehow they have completely dissociated the value of their work and time from the money they are spending, so pulling out a payday loan at 30% interest is just a thought exercise with no real world impact to them.

Pirate Jo
Pirate Jo
May 20, 2016 11:29 am

“The real question my old friend is whether it’s better ter be poor and exist er ter just not exist. Many poor people prefer the former.”

Not true, fine lady – not true. It isn’t that poor people don’t want to exist – it’s that they don’t want to be poor. When a person who is poor gains wealth and ceases to be poor, there is one less poor person. Not one less person – one person for whom the descriptor “poor” no longer applies.

ASIG
ASIG
May 20, 2016 5:39 pm

It’s a choice that people make to live paycheck to paycheck.

Take a person that is making $3000 a month and living paycheck to paycheck and give that person a raise to $3200 a month. That person could now save $200 a month except that the vast majority won’t do that, typically they will ratchet up their spending and with the $3200 a month will be back to living paycheck to paycheck.