OSAMA WON

Osama bin Laden got a 660,000,000% return on his investment. SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY MILLION PERCENT. He’s dead, but we’ve bankrupted ourselves. He would have died eventually. We didn’t have to bankrupt ourselves. But we did. He won.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/09/08/us/sept-11-reckoning/cost-graphic.html

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
148 Comments
SSS
SSS
September 11, 2011 4:47 pm

Stucky said to Smokey, “The small flaw in your logic is that Bin Laden ALREADY bankrupted the Soviet Union. He had a track record. He didn’t need to be a great thinker to estimate that the same would happen with the USA.”

Contrary to that staement and what a couple of other comments have implied, bin Laden was a BIT PLAYER in the resistence to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Just another small-change Jihadi wannabe from Saudi Arabia. The heart and soul of the resistence were Afghan citizens, some of whom were Islamic extremists (Taliban) and others who just wanted the Soviets out (Massoud, leader of the Northern Resistence Movement).

And the Soviet Union largely bankrupted itself through unsustainable defense spending and a sclerotic, state-controlled economy. I visited the Soviet Union at the apex of its global power in the summer of 1979, BEFORE it invaded Afghanistan that December. It was a 3rd World shithole.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 4:48 pm

Stucky discredited again.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 4:51 pm

“….then what the fuck have you been doing on this site for the past two years?”

Bashing curs like you.

eugend66
eugend66
September 11, 2011 4:54 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 4:58 pm

Please check my prediction.

I do believe I include tomorrow.

Is it tomorrow yet ?

SSS
SSS
September 11, 2011 5:05 pm

Here’s the dweeb who put together that worthless New York Times link Admin posted at the beginning of the article. He states (and I’m not kidding you here), “I enjoy sewing.” He ought to start by sewing his fucking mouth shut.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
September 11, 2011 5:07 pm

Osama Bin-Laden won an extended stay in a rat hole with undoubtedly stinky, unkept wives.

eugend66
eugend66
September 11, 2011 5:15 pm

No, no, this only the start of the first move is:

[imgcomment image[/img]

vs.

worse than my spelling will be:

[imgcomment image[/img]

Stucky
Stucky
September 11, 2011 5:21 pm

OK. Fine. The USSR was already in the shitter pre-Osama. I’ll concede the error of my ways.

It’s time to declare a winner
for I need to go and eat dinner
Ms Freud a wild salmon did bake
I’ll leave Smokey to play with his snake.

.
FIRST PRIZE goes to MUCK
—— “But 9/11 didn’t do shit on its’ own – just hurried it up a bit.”
—— Muck has Wisdom that comes with age.

RUNNER UP IS ADMIN
—— “Guess what? Even if he didn’t think he would bankrupt the US. HE FUCKING DID IT”
—— Jim cuts to the chase with the precision of a laser.
—— Jim gets bonus points for showing pics of Smokey getting kicked in the nuts. Precious!!

.
Smokey looses … for the 854th time.

Jim, I might have declared you the winner but I don’t want to be accused of planting my lips around your cock ever again.

SSS
SSS
September 11, 2011 5:29 pm

Admin pleads for facts after he said, “The extremely low interest rates created the housing bubble led to the collapse of the worldwide financial system.”

Bullshit. The housing bubble was created by a combination of factors and government policies that started long BEFORE 9/11. As for extremely low interest rates, between September 1992 and September 2009, the range on interest rates for a 30 yr mortgage was between 5.25% (September 2003) and 9.25% (March 1995). It was March 2010 when 30 yr mortgage rates headed south below 5%. The housing bubble burst LONG BEFORE THAT.

Now, Mr. Smarty Pants, fact check THAT!!!!

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 5:33 pm

Administrator,

To say that 9/11 and the reaction to it led to the collapse of the worldwide financial system is an extremely narrow, incomplete view.

It is far more accurate to say that pervasive fraud, from both a borrowers and a lenders standpoint, led to the sub-prime crisis which has adversely affected world markets.

NEWSFLASH—JQ

Interest rates have been in a downtrend for THIRTY YEARS. But, according to you, 9/11 caused the decline over the past ten years and therefore doomed the world.

That is bullshit.

Fuck, you might as well say 9/11 CAUSED all the no doc and liar loans. In fact, why not just say that 9/11 CAUSED the entire goddamn unregulated derivatives market?

Muck About
Muck About
September 11, 2011 5:43 pm

Stucky’s @5:21 is absolutely right in the evaluation of who has the most brains on this thread of doom.

I’d give Admin 4th place, not second, but you can never be sure about Jemmeh as he loves to drop in comments just to stir up the shit.

MA

Muck About
Muck About
September 11, 2011 5:45 pm

And I’d have to give Smoky 2nd spot… I’ll never lose track of that word again..

MA

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Administrator,

I nearly posted the SAME fucking chart.

Look at the thirty year trend. It is DOWN.

It makes my case.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 6:00 pm

Administrator,

You keep digging yourself deeper. You’d be better off to concede that you are woefully over matched today, and find solace in the fact that Phillie’s convicted felon once again carried them to a victory.

SSS
SSS
September 11, 2011 6:23 pm

Admin

Did you actually read some of the bullshit thrown out in that link you posted to the New York Times article which came out with that preposterous $3.3 trillion figure as a cost of 9/11? Here’s a couple of examples which went into that article’s math.

—-$100 billion in “costs” due to an average 20-minute additional wait time at the airports for airline passengers, calculated at an average salary of $37/hour. This $100 billion figure was just for Oct 2001 through Dec 2004 and concedes that wait times have decreased since then (well, damn, people are still waiting, just not as long, so why not run the figure all the way to the present).

Talk about pulling shit out of your ass, this one takes the cake. How in hell did they come up with an average salary for airline passengers of $37 per hour? That means the average passenger in the 2001-2004 timeframe made nearly $78,000 a year. And what about kids, retirees, and the unemployed who don’t work? Did they get any monetary credit for waiting?

—-$19 billion from deaths of 2,400 people in car accidents in the Oct 2001-Sep 2003 timeframe because people drove more and flew less because of 9/11. How on God’s green earth does ANYONE know that 2,400 people died in car accidents because of 9/11. Did they interview dead people and ask them why they were driving? Did people automatically decide in Oct 2003 that it was now safe to fly, so they gave up driving to their intended destination? Give me a fucking break.

If you want to bite on this absolutely worthless piece of shit analysis, that’s your call. I’ll pass.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 6:23 pm

Administrator,

What I am saying is that 9/11 is a convenient scapegoat.

Yes it probably is responsible for moving the time table of our destiny up by 6-10 years. But it did not change our ultimate destiny.

This country has a rendezvous with economic collapse ANYWAY.

The country is still run by corrupt assholes, 9/11 or not. Derivatives would have been developed and abused, 9/11 or not. Social Security, Medicare, none of that shit would have been paid regardless of 9/11.

Spending was going to continue out of control, with or without 9/11. Politicians were going to take bribes, steal and fuck over the country with or without 9/11.

Go through the fucking math, spending was NOT going to be cut.

Look at the recent budget ceiling deal. Are you telling me that those irresponsible thieving deluded assholes would have made the system solvent if it wasn’t for 9/11?

To say “If only it weren’t for 9/11 look where we’d be.” I’ll tell you where we’d be. We’d be fucked up the ass anyway, that’s where.

Stucky
Stucky
September 11, 2011 6:37 pm

JIM!!!

Smokey seems to be conceding some points. He’s taking a softer stance. Even being reasonable. Now is the time to motherfuck him!! Pounce on his ass. Kick him in the ballz! Don’t you dare fucking say something nice back. Don’t you concede shit. Fuck him up. Fuck him up bad. Do it Jim.

Stucky
Stucky
September 11, 2011 6:41 pm

On the other hand, while eating dinner we were watching one of the many specials they are running today on 9-11 human interest stories. Dammit it’s still hard to watch folks talk about the people they lost without tears welling up. That’s why I’m back downstairs. Jim, fuck him up!!

Stucky
Stucky
September 11, 2011 7:05 pm

Jim fucks up Smokey with stats, numbers, and facts!
[imgcomment image[/img]

.
Smokey, try looking at your problem a different way.
[imgcomment image[/img]

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 7:08 pm

Administrator,

Hey, if you want to believe it was surpluses as far as the eye could see, be my guest. That shit would have been revised downward the first recession, and last I checked, recessions roll in every few years.

I will concede that because of NEWT GINGRICH’S republican congress, things had briefly turned up economically. But you conveniently forget, Newt was out of Congress in 2001 and a downward slide was inevitable.

Of course, now that you are getting your ass torched unmercifully in front of one and all, we don’t hear a fucking peep from you about the off the books liabilities that you normally drone on about ad nauseum. You are quiet as a cigar store Indian. A mouse in church. A small town church cemetery on a rainy Sunday afternoon. The sound of crickets.

But if you weren’t on the ropes, you’d be screaming “All this debt! We’ll never pay social security! It’s bankrupt. Medicare can never be paid!”

So instead, since you are cornered, you proudly proclaim “surpluses as far as the eye could see.”

But you forget, you are debating a heavyweight here, not a pussy bantam weight like Stuck, or platoplubius or Welshman or Persnickety.

SSS
SSS
September 11, 2011 7:09 pm

Admin

That 2001 Congressional Budget Office projection begins with, “In the absence of significant legislative changes.”

Yes, 9/11 contributed to wiping out your “surpluses for as far as the eye could see,” but did any of the these “significant legislative changes” also contribute?

—-No Child Left Behind

—-Bush tax cuts

—-Medicare Part D

—-Federal budget increases for EVERY program and department EVERY year

—-TARP

—-$840 billion in stimulus

—-Obamacare

ad naseum

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 7:14 pm

What do Peyton and Eli Manning have in common?

(1) They have a father who was an NFL star

(2)They were both college football stars

(3) They both play in the NFL

(4) They both won what?

Damn, I can’t remember. Something about post-season play. It escapes me now. Maybe I can find it if I google SUPER BOWL WINNERS.

Stucky
Stucky
September 11, 2011 7:19 pm

Smokey sneaks in a sucker punch with that “off the books liabilities” bullshit.

Fuck him up Jim! Go all Putin on him!!
[imgcomment image[/img]

Muck About
Muck About
September 11, 2011 7:21 pm

OK, so we all agree with what I said 5 hours ago.. The Federal reaction to 9/11 hastened our economic downfall. Why don’t we stop this shit and just let it lie (or as Smoky would say “lye”).

But we still did it to ourselves.

If anyone had done any thinking, we’d have spent several hundred million, used the CIA (SSS note) and assassinated Osama way back when we were started bombing cave systems in the Afgan mountains. We could have then declared victory (long before Bushes banner) and got on with the budding housing bubble and building up the FSA to an even larger size.

We still would have croaked but it might have been about 2015 instead of as we speak.

MA

Muck About
Muck About
September 11, 2011 7:22 pm

Sorry, Smoke.. Make that “Bushs’ banner”. I loosed it..

MA

Dave Doe
Dave Doe
September 11, 2011 8:46 pm

We have such a huge federal bureacracy now, it seems like it’s self perpetuating.

They keep finding reasons to perpetuate the gargantuan national security apparatus.

Yet, when they catch somebody, it’s a few private citizen collaring the fucker and taking him down
(like the nigerian kid on the airplane two years ago).

It just seems impossible for the feds to cut anybody or anything which means the bloat is going to continue until the whole thing collapses.

LLPOH
LLPOH
September 11, 2011 9:12 pm

Smokey has delivered an monumental bitch slap to the Admin. Admin needs to stop practicing with the amateurs and move up to the pros, or at least to the college kids, because it is truly embarrassing to watch Smokey (and SSS) kick crap out of him.

[imgcomment image[/img]

LLPOH
LLPOH
September 11, 2011 9:27 pm

False bravado? Bah. Late arrival, yes, I will give you that.

LLPOH
LLPOH
September 11, 2011 9:34 pm

Admin – I would have been here sooner but I was typing away at an article for you (in your in tray as we speak) in hopes of enlightening a few naysayers around these parts. So, I get a free pass for coming in late.

You are just lucky I wasn’t around earlier or this would have been likely result for you when the big dogs went into feeding frenzy:

[imgcomment image[/img]

LLPOH
LLPOH
September 11, 2011 9:35 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 9:40 pm

As always, LLPOH delivers an objective, unbiased assessment of the blog action.

LLPOH is a giant on this site, a man of unimpeachable integrity, and extraordinary intelligence.

LLPOH
LLPOH
September 11, 2011 9:51 pm

Damn, Admin. let us exame that statement line by line. First line – the implication is that there is a relationship between OBL and US bankruptcy. Yes there is, but it is not a 100% correlation. Any fool knows that. Line 2 – duh. Line three – yes indeedy. Line 4 again gives the implication that the bankruptcy is 100% related to OBL and his actions. No indeed. It certainly contributed to it, tho.

By the way, what did OBL have to do with Iraq – seems to me the biggie was WMD.

Your statement is full of implication. Each sentence when looked at individually stands up, but together they make the implicatio that OBL is responsible for the US going bankrupt all by his little lonesome. No fucking way.

It is the Admin playing at being a politician – saying one thing, meaning another, and then twisting it around again.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 9:56 pm

LLPOH,

He is squirming now. Panic stricken. Trying to find a way out. He’s sees the writing on the wall. Desperation is setting in.

His biggest fear, because he’s been there before—–Smokey AND LLPOH.

Opinionated Bloviator
Opinionated Bloviator
September 11, 2011 9:58 pm

You better believe it, when America disintegrates into a third world police state racked by poverty, counterinsergencies and corruption that would be right at home in Argentina or Zimbabwe, the wail of despair eminating from your ruin of a country will be music to those who despise you everywhere.

Whats even better is the list of those countries actively working against your interests will include most of europe, great britain, all of asia, middle east, africa and even the paciffic rim countries. After all the shafting the governments and citizens recieved at the hands of Wall Street will be remembered and acted upon when the time is right…

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 10:16 pm

LLPOH,

By Administrator’s warped logic, if Bush had decided to invade Greenland, then that means 9/11 CAUSED it.

Smokey
Smokey
September 11, 2011 10:20 pm

Shit, for that matter, according to the curs, Bush and the neocons were going to invade Iraq whether there had been a 9/11 attack or not.

So the neocons could impose on the world their radical beliefs.