BONEHEAD FROM TEXAS

Perry is a Moran

Rick Perry Is Dead Wrong

There are many things I like about Texas Gov. Rick Perry, including his stance on the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. But apparently his new glasses haven’t altered his perception of the world, or allowed him to see it any more clearly.

There are obviously many important events going on in the world right now, but with 60,000 foreign children streaming across the Texas border, I am surprised Governor Perry has apparently still found time to mischaracterize and attack my foreign policy.

Governor Perry writes a fictionalized account of my foreign policy so mischaracterizing my views that I wonder if he’s even really read any of my policy papers.

In fact, some of Perry’s solutions for the current chaos in Iraq aren’t much different from what I’ve proposed, something he fails to mention. His solutions also aren’t much different from President Barack Obama’s, something he also fails to mention. Because interestingly enough, there aren’t that many good choices right now in dealing with this situation in Iraq.

Perry says there are no good options. I’ve said the same thing. President Obama has said the same thing. So what are Perry’s solutions and why does he think they are so bold and different from anyone else’s?

He writes in the Washington Post, “the president can and must do more with our military and intelligence communities to help cripple the Islamic State. Meaningful assistance can include intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance sharing and airstrikes.”

The United States is actually doing all of this now. President Obama has said he might use airstrikes in the future. I have also been open to the same option if it makes sense.

I support continuing our assistance to the government of Iraq, which include armaments and intelligence. I support using advanced technology to prevent ISIS from becoming a threat. I also want to stop sending U.S. aid and arms to Islamic rebels in Syria who are allied with ISIS, something Perry doesn’t even address. I would argue that if anything, my ideas for this crisis are both stronger, and not rooted simply in bluster.

If the governor continues to insist that these proposals mean I’m somehow “ignoring ISIS,” I’ll make it my personal policy to ignore Rick Perry’s opinions.

But the governor and I do have at least one major foreign policy difference, something Perry also conveniently fails to mention.

Said Perry forthrightly during a Republican presidential primary debate in 2012, “I would send troops back into Iraq.” Obviously, this is something he advocated long before the rise of ISIS. At the time, Perry urged the United States to return troops to Iraq to act as a balance against Iran, a country my colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham says we must work with to help beat back the extremists.

Does Perry now believe that we should send U.S. troops back into Iraq to fight the Iranians—or to help Iran fight ISIS? As everyone agrees, governor, there are no easy options.

Unlike Perry, I oppose sending American troops back into Iraq. After a decade of the United States training the Iraq’s military, when confronted by the enemy, the Iraqis dropped their weapons, shed their uniforms and hid. Our soldiers’ hard work and sacrifice should be worth more than that. Our military is too good for that.

I ask Governor Perry: How many Americans should send their sons or daughters to die for a foreign country — a nation the Iraqis won’t defend for themselves? How many Texan mothers and fathers will Governor Perry ask to send their children to fight in Iraq?

I will not hold my breath for an answer. If refusing to send Americans to die for a country that refuses to defend itself makes one an “isolationist,” then perhaps its time we finally retire that pejorative.

Today, the overwhelming majority of Americans don’t want to send U.S. soldiers back into Iraq. Is Perry calling the entire country “isolationist” too?

The let’s-intervene-and-consider-the-consequences-later crowd left us with more than 4,000 Americans dead, over 2 million refugees and over trillions of dollars in debt. Anytime someone advocates sending our sons and daughters to war, questions about precise objectives, effective methods and an exit strategy must be thoughtfully answered. America deserves this. Our military certainly deserves this.

Tough talk like Perry’s might inspire some for the moment, but when bombast becomes policy it can have long and disastrous consequences. It is vitally important that we remember past mistakes so that we learn from them. When Megyn Kelly of Fox News tells Dick Cheney that “history has proven that you got it wrong” on Iraq, it is a very important lesson—we must remember that history so we don’t repeat it.

Perry seems entirely comfortable repeating the history, the rhetoric and presumably, the mistakes.

This is where many in my own party, similar to Perry, get it so wrong regarding Ronald Reagan’s doctrine of “peace through strength.” Strength does not always mean war. Reagan ended the Cold War without going to war with Russia. He achieved a relative peace with the Soviet Union—the greatest existential threat to the United States in our history—through strong diplomacy and moral leadership.

Reagan had no easy options either. But he did the best he could with the hand he was dealt. Some of Reagan’s Republican champions today praise his rhetoric but forget his actions. Reagan was stern, but he wasn’t stupid. Reagan hated war, particularly the specter of nuclear war. Unlike his more hawkish critics—and there were many—Reagan was always thoughtful and cautious.

But above all, he was strong. America must always be strong.

On foreign policy, Perry couldn’t be more stuck in the past, doubling down on formulas that haven’t worked, parroting rhetoric that doesn’t make sense and reinforcing petulant attitudes that have cost our nation a great deal.

If repeating the same mistakes over and over again is what Perry advocates in U.S. foreign policy, or any other policy, he really should run for president. In Washington, he’d fit right in, because leading Republicans and Democrats not only supported the Iraq war in the first place, but leaders of both parties campaigned on it in 2008.

Any future military action by the United States must always be based on an assessment of what has worked and what hasn’t. This basic, common sense precondition is something leaders in both parties have habitually failed to meet.

The governor of Texas insists on proving he’s no different.

Rand Paul represents Kentucky in the U.S. Senate.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Rise Up
Rise Up
July 14, 2014 5:00 pm

Is Rand Paul gearing up for a Republican nomination battle with Rick Perry? Not that it matters, the country is so far down the toilet nobody can rescue it.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
July 14, 2014 5:01 pm

Who the fuck cares….all of those in CONgress are in for themselves DOUCHE BAGS !

Until we have term limits and eliminate K street, we’ll have the same shit year after year !

Stucky
Stucky
July 14, 2014 5:55 pm

Rick Perry makes Oreo look smart.

RPES

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
July 14, 2014 6:34 pm

Senators and former governors do not make good presidents but good presidense.

Eddie
Eddie
July 14, 2014 8:11 pm

Rick Perry is a frat boy opportunist of the lowest kind. No doubt that’s why he’s so beloved by the ignorant-assed voters of this state. In reality, he’s a sock puppet for Big Business, and he’s gotten rich off favors while never holding a real job in his life.

In other words, he’s the perfect candidate.

Susan
Susan
July 14, 2014 8:18 pm

Eddie, so does that make him Obama Lite?

Eddie
Eddie
July 14, 2014 8:38 pm

Perry

He has the social climbing ability of a Clinton.

He has the statesmanship of George W. Bush.

He can stand up to the big banks like Obama.

He has the common touch of Mitt Romney.

AKAnon
AKAnon
July 14, 2014 9:59 pm

Don’t forget that Slick Rick packs heat while jogging and shoots coyotes. That is worth something. OK, maybe it doesn’t make up for being a ‘tard. But better than than O.

flash
flash
July 15, 2014 5:44 am

The invasion of the southern border continues and the loud-mouthed gutless cur Perry wants to go back to Iraq to secure its border..
If the the low-rent shifty bastard had even a shred of respect for the welfare of his fellow Texans or the continued sovereignty of these United States he would call out his national guard and make a damn good show at securing his own border….but for political hacks like Rick Weasel, it’s no longer about doing ones sworn duty, it’s all about gearing up and looking good for the next election cycle by spewing loads of empty bullshit for the purpose of impressing morons..Rick like all the rest is just another useless , big-mouthed ,candy-assed Republipuke..get out the vote they said….sheesh.

Endless wave of illegal immigrants floods Rio Grande valley

“You’re going to be out here a long time,” Fernando, an El Salvadoran child, told FoxNews.com shortly after surrendering to Border Patrol authorities after midnight Saturday. “There are thousands of us.”

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/07/14/night-time-on-border-endless-wave-illegal-immigrants-floods-rio-grande-valley/

overthecliff
overthecliff
July 15, 2014 11:35 am

If Lawrence Odonnell is against Rick Perry I am tempted to be for him. Odonnell is a commie America hater and sucks dicks.