The US economic numbers this morning sucked out loud.
After the bell Netflix missed its numbers and its stock was being monkey hammered.
Amex and eBay and Las Vegas Sands missed the top lines but hit earnings.
As I noted last week, it is easier to gin up profits with accounting, but topline revenue is a bit more problematic, unless you are a revenue recognizing sandbagger like a few tech companies that we might know.
As the markets melted down this morning, with a reported 179 flash crashes in the first 15 minutes according to Nanex, the talking heads were in fire drill mode, trying to figure out some way to restore confidence on Main Street, short of saying, “buy our stocks. Please!”
One of the themes the spokesmodels struck, believe it or not, was that a fear of ebola is dampening economic activity because they are afraid to go out and spend money.
Blame it on Ebolanomics.
Ebolanomics. Yes I would imagine that is the reason that Netflix missed its numbers from last quarter. People are afraid they can catch a disease by watching crappy movies on television.
Most people are not spending more because they do not have any money, and they are reluctant to borrow and slip more deeply into debt.
They are afraid because they believe, based on what they are seeing, that the financial system is dominated by quasi-criminal cartels, and their political leaders are lying, craven, hand-waving nincompoops.
For the most, their wages are lower since The Recovery™, and wealth hoarding zillionaires do not buy the kinds of things that stimulate the economy through increased aggregate demand.
Yeesh. What is it going to take?
No matter how much money they print and hand over to Wall Street. It has to reach the public to do any good. You can see an existence proof of this phenomenon in about every Third World oligarchy.
Jesse
spinolator
October 15, 2014 5:35 pm
It is FASCINATING to me that we live in an economic system where growth or ever increasing profits is like air. If we had to increased growth or earnings, it wouldn’t mean that people would not work or that we wouldn’t have to produce things or we couldn’t live. Nevertheless, all you ever hear is that it has to be there. I suppose that is true, for a debt based system anyway.
spinolator
October 15, 2014 5:37 pm
If we had no increased growth…that should say above
Brian
October 15, 2014 8:05 pm
I’d plow her farm and enjoy her sugar too!
B
October 15, 2014 9:30 pm
The hottest talking head on TV, hands down.
Smoke Jensen
October 16, 2014 12:10 am
Trophy assets, trophy assets, trophy assets. What else do you need to know?
If we wind up back in the stone age I just want a trophy asset. How much Wampum do I need?
Ebolanomics
The US economic numbers this morning sucked out loud.
After the bell Netflix missed its numbers and its stock was being monkey hammered.
Amex and eBay and Las Vegas Sands missed the top lines but hit earnings.
As I noted last week, it is easier to gin up profits with accounting, but topline revenue is a bit more problematic, unless you are a revenue recognizing sandbagger like a few tech companies that we might know.
As the markets melted down this morning, with a reported 179 flash crashes in the first 15 minutes according to Nanex, the talking heads were in fire drill mode, trying to figure out some way to restore confidence on Main Street, short of saying, “buy our stocks. Please!”
One of the themes the spokesmodels struck, believe it or not, was that a fear of ebola is dampening economic activity because they are afraid to go out and spend money.
Blame it on Ebolanomics.
Ebolanomics. Yes I would imagine that is the reason that Netflix missed its numbers from last quarter. People are afraid they can catch a disease by watching crappy movies on television.
Most people are not spending more because they do not have any money, and they are reluctant to borrow and slip more deeply into debt.
They are afraid because they believe, based on what they are seeing, that the financial system is dominated by quasi-criminal cartels, and their political leaders are lying, craven, hand-waving nincompoops.
For the most, their wages are lower since The Recovery™, and wealth hoarding zillionaires do not buy the kinds of things that stimulate the economy through increased aggregate demand.
Yeesh. What is it going to take?
No matter how much money they print and hand over to Wall Street. It has to reach the public to do any good. You can see an existence proof of this phenomenon in about every Third World oligarchy.
Jesse
It is FASCINATING to me that we live in an economic system where growth or ever increasing profits is like air. If we had to increased growth or earnings, it wouldn’t mean that people would not work or that we wouldn’t have to produce things or we couldn’t live. Nevertheless, all you ever hear is that it has to be there. I suppose that is true, for a debt based system anyway.
If we had no increased growth…that should say above
I’d plow her farm and enjoy her sugar too!
The hottest talking head on TV, hands down.
Trophy assets, trophy assets, trophy assets. What else do you need to know?
If we wind up back in the stone age I just want a trophy asset. How much Wampum do I need?
I’d fuck the shit out of Jim Rogers. Her, too.