THE UNAFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS AN UNQUALIFIED DISASTER

Obama declared that Obamacare would not add one dime to the national debt. Obama declared that every family in America would see their annual premiums go down by $2,500. Obama declared that 30 million uninsured Americans would now be covered.

Does anyone ever get held accountable for their promises in this country?

My annual healthcare costs have risen by an average of 10% per year since Obamacare was implemented, and I work for a large institution. Millions have lost coverage or have seen their costs double or triple.

The assumptions put forth by the government were bogus, so premiums for the actual Obamacare plans are going up 20% to 50% per year.

No liberal ever mentions the fact that deductibles for the cheapest Obamacare plans run from $5,000 to $10,000. How many middle class people can pay those deductibles?

And the coup de grace. Only 10 million people are signed up for Obamacare, and most of them had coverage before it came along.

Obamacare is a disaster and will only get worse as time goes on. The Medicaid system is being swamped and the bankrupt states will become more bankrupt.

Government destroying our lives, a day at a time. So it goes.

 

Guest Post by Michael Tanner

As we await the Supreme Court’s decision on subsidies, an interim report. We haven’t heard much about Obamacare from the media lately (with the exception of Paul Krugman, who slips a paragraph into every other column — regardless of topic — to tell us how well it’s working). It’s as if both supporters and opponents of the health-care law are holding their collective breaths as they wait for the Supreme Court, which is expected to decide any day now whether the law will be able to survive in its current form.

Obamacare’s opponents have mostly been caucusing behind closed doors trying to decide whether and when to offer an alternative — and how much to offer — should the Court require the law to be implemented as written — that is, without subsidies on federally run exchanges.

The law’s advocates, meanwhile, may have been left speechless by the news that Obamacare has tied an all-time low for public support, according to the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll. Just 39 percent of registered voters back the law, tying an all-time low last reached in April 2012. Fifty-four percent oppose it, and while that’s not a record, it represents a six-point increase in opposition over the past year.

Or maybe the law’s supporters simply have little response to the ongoing spate of news suggesting that, Krugman notwithstanding, the law is still not working very well. For example, insurance companies have begun submitting their requests for rate increases for 2016, and those requests suggest that premiums could skyrocket next year.

Already we’ve seen requests for increases for individual plans as high as 64.8 percent in Texas, 61 percent in Pennsylvania, 51.6 percent in New Mexico, 36.3 percent in Tennessee, 30.4 percent in Maryland, 25 percent in Oregon, and 19.9 percent in Washington.

Those increases would come on top of premium increases last year that were 24.4 percent above what they would have been without Obamacare, according to a study from the National Bureau of Economic Research. At the same time, deductibles for the cheapest Obamacare plans now average about $5,180 for individuals and $10,500 for families.

In fairness, those rate-hike requests are just that — requests. State regulators are likely to trim them back, significantly in some cases. And other insurers in those states may be seeking smaller increases. We haven’t seen any data weighting increases by the number of people covered, so we should be careful about overstating the impact. In addition, many people are insulated from the true cost by the law’s subsidies, which is what makes the upcoming Court decision so important. Still, to recall P. J. O’Rourke’s famous dictum, if we thought health insurance was expensive before, look at it now that it is free.

New evidence also suggests that Obamacare is struggling to meet its goals for covering the uninsured. According to a report in Investor’s Business Daily, the Obama administration estimates that roughly 10.2 million people have enrolled in Obamacare plans and paid at least one month’s premium. This meets the White House’s revised sign-up goal announced late last year, though it falls below the Congressional Budget Office’s earlier projections. The CBO had originally projected some 12 million sign-ups through 2015, later lowering that estimate to 11 million. So, while we should recognize that Obamacare has significantly increased coverage, there clearly is a long way to go.

A very long way, in fact. The CBO still hopes for 21 million enrollees next year, which would mean more than doubling current sign-up levels. Anyone see that happening? But failure to meet those numbers would mean that Obamacare would continue to flirt with the possibility of an adverse-selection “death spiral,” which could take down the entire insurance market. Already, insurance companies are warning that exchange enrollment is weighted too heavily toward sicker and older patients. And the Republican Congress is unlikely to renew bailouts designed to protect insurance companies from such adverse selection.

Of course these numbers do not count the nearly 7 million people who signed up for Medicaid because of Obamacare’s expansion of the program. But given the increasing evidence that Medicaid provides dubious value in terms of health outcomes, how this will affect federal and state budgets remains an open question. To cite just one example, getting poor people enrolled in Medicaid was supposed to reduce the strain on overburdened emergency rooms, by steering patients toward primary and preventive care. But the low physician-reimbursement rates under Medicaid mean that few physicians will treat Medicaid patients. As a result, emergency-room visits have actually increased under Obamacare.

Very soon the Supreme Court will rule on Obamacare’s subsidies. But for the law as a whole, the verdict is already in. By almost any measure, Obamacare is a failure.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/419526/report-card-obamacare-michael-tanner

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
28 Comments
nmb
nmb
June 10, 2015 1:59 pm

New Deal vs Obamacare: one reality and one desperate try

http://bit.ly/1eVDcuI

Persnickety
Persnickety
June 10, 2015 2:02 pm

Putative goal: make health care affordable – FAIL

Putative goal: get everyone covered – FAIL

Real goal: transfer money to major insurance companies that donated to campaigns – ?

Real goal: cause failure of private insurance market to set stage for government single-payer system – WIN

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
June 10, 2015 2:16 pm

The reason the U.S. spends 19% of GDP on healthcare while other developed countries pay only 8 to 9% is all the “bend over backwards” laws, written by Kaiser, Blue Cross, Humana, Health Net, etc. to ensure profitability. That’s essentially what Obamacare did, and that’s why it’s failing. It did nothing to reduce costs, it just put it on the backs of the taxpayers. We need to reign in the 1000% markups (see this from Karl Denninger) http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=230225 and go with a single-payer plan like all the other “advanced” countries. Thereafter, if you want the gold-plated coverage, then pay for it.

card802
card802
June 10, 2015 2:23 pm

So far, the gov has provided over $4 Billion in “free money” (federal grants) to states that have set up exchanges to help the states defray the cost of this marvelous failure.

Colorado, Oregon and Rhode Island want to abandon their state run exchange because it costs too damn much.
Illinois left $270 million of “free money” on the table instead of starting a state exchange. The corrupt legislators say they ran out of time before a vote, but we all know they are holding out for more.

Democratic state Rep. Robyn Gabel from the corrupt state of Illinois said:

“My hope is that if the Supreme Court rules that people would have to buy insurance on state-run exchanges to be eligible for tax credits and subsidies, then more funds will become available to set up a state exchange,”

Where do “more funds” come from you stupid ignorant slut?

Dutchman
Dutchman
June 10, 2015 2:24 pm

I hope that the SCOUS rules in favor of the states. Obamacare will go down quicker than Monica.

Then these fuckers who don’t contribute can die.

Dutchman
Dutchman
June 10, 2015 2:27 pm

@Card802: “Democratic state Rep. Robyn Gabel from the corrupt state of Illinois said”

Illinois has the highest, unfunded liability, for public pension plans. The state has a junk bond credit rating, and pays it’s bills 90 days late. What does this moron know about money?

bb
bb
June 10, 2015 2:34 pm

I lost my insurance last year.The insurance company just stop providing the plan.I guess if I get sick I’ll have to go to the nearest emergency room. It sucks but that’s life.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
June 10, 2015 2:52 pm

Forget buying health insurance. Buy burial insurance and term life insurance. With healthcare costs rising we will not be seeing long term treatment like previous generations. We are going to see no life extending measures. I don’t predict this because of “death panels”, but from people realizing a life being extended for hundreds of thousands of dollars is not one worth living.

Constman54
Constman54
June 10, 2015 3:01 pm

Single payer is BS. Get the gov’t 100% out of the “healthcare” business. With the gov’t tit closed to all (including insurance companies) prices will drop like a rock.

Why? Because everyone, including the doctors will have to compete for your business.

Stephanie Shepard
Stephanie Shepard
June 10, 2015 3:01 pm

“The facts are that this year, the penalty for not having coverage will explode from $95 to $325 (or 2% of income) plus half for any children.”

Ha ha ha, ya right. You see there is an exemption for low income earners from the penalty. Where Obamacare crashes and burns is the part where they thought young people were going to sign up and be the sacrificial lambs to the insurance industry. Instead what they got were higher premiums for the middle class who already had coverage.

Persnickety
Persnickety
June 10, 2015 3:06 pm

The outrageous health care costs and structure here are due to a perverse incentive system and protection racket, which Karl Denninger (among others) has detailed many times. Legally speaking it could be fixed overnight – literally. Politically speaking any fix will be extremely difficult to impossible. This is the problem and any minor tweaks of the insurance system will do nothing to help.

Rife
Rife
June 10, 2015 3:18 pm

We used to pay for our own policy. With Ocare we got the really crappy policy that wouldn’t cost us anything (Why should I pay for something that is shoved up my butt?). The yearly cost increase is almost 10K$. The policy is complete crap (deductibles + “out of pocket” + premiums = 30K$). Our 16 year old kid got the vision plan. My 55 year old wife and I (59) did not get any vision plan, but she did get maternity coverage.
Then they have a very spooky “privacy” section that made me decide to avoid doctors at all costs. We couldn’t afford a dental policy but replaced our dentist many years ago with brushing with coconut oil and baking soda, with much better results.
Next year, we’ll pass.

Dutchman
Dutchman
June 10, 2015 3:41 pm

They now have hepatitis C cure – $1000 a pill – $84,000 for a 7 week treatment. And we’re supposed to pay for the habits of intravenous/snort drug users,

Soon we’ll be paying for this fucking shit;

Disabled ‘guinea pig’ for first full HEAD transplant to meet surgeon for first time this week and insists he’ll only go under knife when it is ‘99% possible

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3117029/I-m-not-going-crazy-cut-head-Disabled-man-volunteering-HEAD-transplant-meet-surgeon-time-tomorrow-insists-ll-knife-99-possible.html

I’d rather pay for putting a brain in the heads the liberals out there.

Don Levit
Don Levit
June 10, 2015 3:42 pm

The recent 2015 Milliman Medical Index reports for a family of four group premiums average:
$6,000 in payroll deductions for employees
$4,000 in out of pocket costs for employees
$14,000 in employer payments
With median household income at $53,000 families are spending about 19% of their income for medical expenses.
Why not consider a unique way of pre-funding medical expenses at 8-10% compounding every month – guaranteed.
Many employers are finding small cost increases in year one, and savings which accelerate in year 2 onward,
To learn more, go to nationalprosperity.com
Don Levit

Satori
Satori
June 10, 2015 4:08 pm

I must be an outlier or something

my monthly premium didn’t go up
although I do have to pay an extra $5 per doctor visit
I kept the same doctor I have had for the last 20 years
and
recently I received a notice that my monthly costs are going to
go down by $29 a month starting with the new fiscal year

kokoda
kokoda
June 10, 2015 4:12 pm

Current law: If you elect to not buy Health Ins., you will pay the penalty ONLY if the you have sent money into the IRS during the year. They will just take whatever they can to cover the penalty.

Aquapura
Aquapura
June 10, 2015 4:55 pm

Due to EMTALA everyone had health coverage in this country long before anyone even knew who Barack Hussein Obama even was. No ER can turn you away, regardless of citizenship, net worth, whatever. How is that NOT health coverage? Not saying I agree with that law – nor does every other nation on the planet, but the fact remains that ever since 1986 everyone in this nation, citizen or not, has had health coverage, PERIOD.

Adding a giant new law called the ACA was nothing more than a way to add new federal taxes under the guise of “health care.”

Dutchman
Dutchman
June 10, 2015 5:30 pm

Satori: ” I received a notice that my monthly costs are going to go down by $29 a month starting with the new fiscal year”

Check to make sure you’re not going to a ‘medicine man’ or a vet.

Rick Caird
Rick Caird
June 10, 2015 5:36 pm

The ObamaCare advocates have never understood that health insurance is not health care. with $6k deductibles and high copays, the policy holder is ending up with a catastrophic care policy at costs which are higher than the former low deductible policies were.

You know and I know that is not an advance, the the ObamaCare advocates (Krugman) have not gotten the message.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 10, 2015 6:17 pm

Injuns don’t gots to pay no fucking Obamacare penalty. Weez iz exempt. Bwahahahaha!

bb
bb
June 10, 2015 6:45 pm

Admin , it’s not the syphilis that’s got me down .It’s the broken heart that never goes away.

overthecliff
overthecliff
June 10, 2015 8:50 pm

Prediction: The Supremes will torture the English language and uphold the Obama interpretation of the law. That will make everything just wonderful and we won’t have to worry about it anymore.

Persnickety
Persnickety
June 10, 2015 9:59 pm

“Due to EMTALA everyone had health coverage in this country long before anyone even knew who Barack Hussein Obama even was. No ER can turn you away, regardless of citizenship, net worth, whatever. How is that NOT health coverage?”

Bullshit. All that EMTALA means is that an ER doc will eventually see you and determine if you are or are not “stable.” Once you are stable, without insurance out the door you go. And whenever you go out that door, EMTALA does nothing to keep you from being billed at outrageous rates (up to a dozen times their cost) and hounded by bill collectors forever. Sure, if you’re already dead poor and a deadbeat this won’t matter much, but for anyone with a job and a car or house, it does matter.

If hospitals were forced to bill and accept one single price for everyone, without any discounts or special rate schedules whatsoever, then things might be better.

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
June 10, 2015 10:21 pm

Greetings,

I’m somewhat torn on this one. I’ve been self employed since the turn of the century but until recently it has been pretty much impossible to purchase insurance because I occasionally get migraines. Why migraines would be a disqualifier is beyond me as there isn’t any treatment for it other than imitrex and a nap. Still, it was a preexisting condition that made it impossible for me to purchase insurance in the state where I lived (it could be different in other states).

I was one of the very first people to sign up and I have had no need until last week where I made an appointment for a check up. I have not seen a doctor in, oh, 10 years so I was surprised by the questions that he asked me. He was very interested in things that had no bearing on my being there. I suspect that doctors are now being used by the government to gather very personal info.

I played it cool but this doctor was almost desperate in his desire to give me anti-depressants even though I repeatedly told him that I was not depressed, was an optimist and had no desire or need for any medications (pain included).

Odd huh?

ThePessimisticChemist
ThePessimisticChemist
June 12, 2015 11:28 am

Sorry I’m just now posting:

My wife and I have seen our insurance payments rise by double digit percent annually as well.

Our obamacare deductible would be $13k for the two of us, with $900/month payments.

Yay……

d3cr3yg805
d3cr3yg805
February 3, 2016 6:17 am

http://www.ooobag.com/watch/hublot/classic/d55e2175bd67901d.html
日本超人気のスーパーコピーブランド激安通販専門店!┏━━━━━2016年人気最高品質━━━━━┓ ◎━ 腕時計、バッグ、財布、アクセサリ ━◎最新入荷!主に販売商品:ロレックスコピー、カルティエコピー、エルメスコピー、ブラダコピー、ルイヴィトンコピー、シャネルコピー、グッチコピー等一流のブランドコピー品。商品の数量は多い、品質はよい、高品質のブランドコピーを超激安な価格で販売しています。信用第一、商品は絶対の自信が御座います!驚きと満足を保証致します。ぜひご来店くださいませ!★ 2016年注文割引開催中,全部の商品割引10% ★ 在庫情報随時更新! ★ 実物写真、付属品を完備する。 ★ 100%品質を保証する。 ★ 送料は無料です(日本全国)!★ 経営方針: 品質を重視、納期も厳守、信用第一!税関の没収する商品は再度無料にして発送します!}}}}}}