A deal has been reached with Iran and it’s nuke program. It looks like this;
Ya got yer Evil Joos! (Who are already saying they are not bound by the agreement)
Ya got yer Crazy Fuckin Iranian Mooslims! (Who were still shouting “Death To America!” just before the signing.)
Ya got yer Clueless Neegrow! (“I got this.”)
Ya got “I don’t hate Joos” ZARA with the biggest smile of his life! (Actual photo of Zara.)
Ya got yer Moonbat Christians who will tell you today’s deal was PROPHESIED IN DA BIBLE!! (And it’s a sign that Jeebus will be coming back to earf SOON!)
“One of those fuckers IS Iran!!” (Daniel 84:20)
And ya got this … Oh, yeah, Baby! … eventually, sooner or later … ya got THIS in yer future.
To summarize; ya got Joos, Mooslims, Neegrows, Christians, Nukes, and Zara … all in one thread. In other words, the possibility of an Epic Shit Fest. Don’t be a pussy … pick a side!!
Me? It’s a tossup. There absolutely WILL be a nuke war, sooner or later. The only question is who starts it, and where. I’m going with the Middle East. And, the Joos. Those fuckers are cra-a-a-a-zy and paranoid … a dangerous combination that will blow up. Literally.
STM, commence fire!
I have no doubt that eventually nuclear-armed muslims are likely to kill millions anyway. I don’t relish the deaths of millions, but I’m (I think) a realist. Islam expands by force. It was only forced out of the Iberian peninsula after hundreds of years by people who were unconstrained by the kind of PC attitudes that are in fashion these days. I’m not convinced that they can be deterred by “mutual assured destruction”, therefore I think they should expect a nuclear attack would be met not only by a response but also an attack on one of the pillars of islam – the hajj. I don’t support any preemptive attack, but a disproportionate response would be fine. This is a civilizational battle that’s being going on for 1,500 years and it’s not about to end.
Anyone who thinks that Iran would nuke Israel in any form other than retaliation is a complete fucking moron. Can I make it any clearer?
WTF is all the pro / con news media magic lantern sideshow? come on folks- you are all too intelligent to fall for any of this managed psyop bs. ooo- whose side is whom on today???? oooo- maybe oceania HAS always been at war with whoever…!!! so what- puppets of Satan rule this mortal vale; the Father of Lies continues to conquer man with nothing but temptation: bite more apples, the knowledge of good and evil hasn’t done us much good yet.
Zara,
I tend to agree with you that Iran won’t nuke Israel first. That’s why I’m ok with this deal. And even if Iran were inclined to, Israel’s nuclear arsenal should deter them, especially if Israel were to make clear that its retaliatory strike would include Mecca.
Thanks Stucky. I’m a Libertarian, Pro-Constitution, economist. So while I may disagree with U, admin., etc., I don’t believe in banning speech, copyrights, or anything not in in the Constitution.
I also think Americans are so caught up in racial politricks, they’ve missed the fascist police state shouting to be overthrown, which is a fundamental right of the people. No 1 group can take back the country, patriotic whites will need patriotic blacks, hispanics, & asians also. But, at the rate the country is being sold out by the politicians with the TPP, there may not be much to save.
Lastly, 1 of the reasons the bankers hate Muslims is that their religion frowns upon interest & forbids usury. Can’t have that.
“Lastly, 1 of the reasons the bankers hate Muslims is that their religion frowns upon interest & forbids usury. Can’t have that.” ——— Econman
It’s one of the reasons (amongst many) that I refused to take on mooslims as clients (for mortgages. (Actually, I had a couple mooslim clients, both were medical doctors … but they were SECULAR … and when I asked “Do have a problem paying interest?”, they emphatically replied “No!”.)
However, we had a mooslim loan-officer who worked with mooslim-friendly banks … and they have a way around “interest”. IIRC, it has something to do with calling it “rent” instead of interest. I believe it was a convoluted formula … but, at the end of the day, the “rent”-payment pretty much matched exactly what the interest payments would have been. Hypocritical Bullshit, if you ask me.
That’s interesting info I didn’t know. Thanx