US and Catholicism in Crisis

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

During the 1950s, the twin pillars of worldwide anti-communism were Dwight Eisenhower’s America and the Roman Catholic Church of Pope Pius XII.

During the 1980s, the last decade of the Cold War, Ronald Reagan and the Polish pope, John Paul II, were the pillars of resistance.

When Pope Francis arrives in Washington on Tuesday afternoon, the country he enters will be a very different one from Eisenhower’s America or Reagan’s America. And Catholics will be welcoming a new kind of pope.

In America 2015, homosexuality, abortion on demand and same-sex marriage — shameful crimes in Ike’s America, mortal sins in the catechism of Pius XII — have become constitutional rights.

These represent the values that define Barack Obama’s America, the values our officials defend at the United Nations, the values we preach to the world.

What Ike’s America saw as decadence, Obama’s America calls progress. And among its noisiest celebrants are our Catholic vice president, Joe Biden, and the Catholic leader of the Democratic Party in the House, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Since Eisenhower’s time, Christianity, the faith that created the West, has been purged from American public life. The Bible, prayer, and all Christian art, books and symbols have been expunged from the public schools as they were in Cuba when Fidel Castro took power.

Our cradle faith cannot be taught in our public schools.

America is a different country today, a secular and post-Christian nation on its way to becoming anti-Christian. Some feel like strangers in their own land. And from the standpoint of traditional Catholicism, American culture is an open sewer. A vast volume of the traffic on the Internet is pornography.

Ironically, as all this unfolds in what was once “God’s country,” Vladimir Putin seeks to re-establish Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the basis of morality and law in Russia. And one reads in The Wall Street Journal on Monday that Xi Jinping is trying to reintroduce his Chinese Communist comrades to the teachings of Confucianism.

The world is turned upside down. Every civilization seems to recognize the necessity of faith except for the West, which has lost its faith and is shrinking and dying for lack of it.

In a New York Times article this month — “Are Western Values Losing Their Sway?” — Steven Erlanger writes:

“In its rejection of Western liberal values of sexual equality and choice, conservative Russia finds common cause with many in Africa and with the religious teachings of Islam, the Vatican, fundamentalist Protestants and Orthodox Jews.”

Yet what Erlanger describes as “conservative Russia” does seem to share values with America, only it is the America of 1955, another country from the America of 2015.

Which raises a question: Does moral truth change?

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.”

But is this true? A decade after his beer hall putsch failed in Munich, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party won the largest number of Germans ever to vote in a democratic election.

He had succeeded in the marketplace of ideas. Did that democratic ratification make Hitler’s ideas true?

Or does truth exist independent of the marketplace?

Secular America, which has purged Christianity, preaches a new gospel to the world: liberal democracy as the salvation of mankind.

Yet did not Winston Churchill, icon of the democracy worshippers, tell us that “the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter”?

The Catholic Church, too, faces a growing crisis of moral consistency and credibility.

The church of Pius XII and John Paul II taught that the truths of the Ten Commandments brought down from Sinai and the truths of the Sermon on the Mount are eternal. Those popes also taught that a valid marriage is indissoluble, that homosexuality is unnatural and immoral, that abortion is the killing of the innocent unborn, an abomination.

Yet one reads regularly of discussions inside the Vatican to alter what is infallible church teaching on these doctrines to make the church more appealing to those who have rejected them.

As the pope arrives in America, some Catholics are calling for an acceptance of contraception, the ordination of women and a new acceptance of homosexuality. Yet the Episcopalians, who have embraced all these “reforms” and more, appear to be going the way of James Fenimore Cooper’s Mohicans.

In Cuba, Pope Francis declined to address the repression of the Castro brothers. Will he also avoid America’s moral crisis to chatter on about income inequality and climate change and find common ground with Obama?

What has come out of the Vatican in the past two years is moral confusion. Yet as Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput reminds us, “confusion is of the devil.” It is also trifling with schism.

Having emerged victorious in the 70-year ideological struggle against one of the greatest enemies that mankind has ever known, Marxism-Leninism, are the United States and the Catholic Church heading for the same desuetude and disintegration?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
September 22, 2015 9:39 am

The prophecies tell us that in the end the Church will fall away from the teachings of Jesus and the word of God and follow unsound doctrine.

The majority of those calling themselves Christian will actually deny Christ and his teachings, failing to confess him in the face of political and social pressure, and enter the Wide gate that leads to destruction (Hell). Only a persecuted remnant will follow sound doctrine and enter through the very difficult narrow gate that leads to salvation and atonement with God in heaven through Jesus the Christ come in the flesh.

This Pope is promoting unsound doctrine to the masses, preparing the way for the one that will follow him and bring the destruction upon them by coercion and outright force.

Choose your gate now, the easy one or the difficult one, no matter whether you’re Catholic, Protestant or independent. It the final choice, the only choice, you will make that has any lasting significance.

bb
bb
September 22, 2015 11:29 am

If we could just skip the coming economic dislocation , the coming antichrist ,the coming totalitarian state , the coming prison planet , the coming wars and tribulations and go right to the second coming of Christ then maybe I would be full of joy.If only.

Persnickety
Persnickety
September 22, 2015 11:56 am

Pb: sounds like the rallying cry of the Cafeteria Catholic.

The Christian God and/or Jesus (are they the same, or not? I’m always so confused) sure seems to bring a lot of pain and destruction for someone who is supposedly all-powerful and all-loving.

bb
bb
September 22, 2015 1:53 pm

Penn head , go pound salt and then read Jeremiah chapter 18.You’will find your answer.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
September 22, 2015 9:34 pm

Penn, also Prov3:12, Heb12:6, Rev3:19. I believe His Angels constantly help Christians but it rains on the good and evil (Matt5:45). I will serve God even if He should seek to kill me (Job13:15).

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
September 25, 2015 1:03 pm

You cannot deny other people their free will, especially the freedom to be wrong. I cannot tell a drug abuser to quit and have that happen; they must sink to the bottom and decide that’s no place for them to live, by themselves, and choose to kick the habit (although medical help may be necessary to make it stick). AA works because the drunkard himself decides that the bottom of a bottle is poor living quarters, and makes a change of their own free will; the religious aspect is not absolutely necessary.

Societies apparently must do the same; sink to the bottom, make a choice and die or reform. The politicians we have elected reflect our lack of interest in public life and reform, perhaps that will change in time to save the country, perhaps not.

The only practice that makes sense to me is to live your own values and morals. Imperfect as I am, the two of us are going on 35 years of marriage; neither of us smoke (my father did, and one juvenile experiment immunized me at the age of six or so), neither of us drink (I can, but rarely do) and as far as I know we both have been faithful. My two children have reached their twenties without police records or bad habits (so far). This is not preaching (although I occasionally lecture my kids, less so now) but teaching by demonstration. This is what works for me, my kids see it and I hope have internalized it.

Tomorrow I may fall; I doubt it (the market for fat, graying ugle men is small) but if I don’t try to succeed, I surely won’t. How do we restore the desire for success in a materialistic, promiscuous society?