How to Stop a Pickpocket

How to Stop a Pickpocket

By Justin Spittler

Los Angeles wants to blow billions of tax dollars…

The Olympics are a spectacle. The athletes are incredible to watch. But hosting the games is a usually a big money-loser for the venue city.

Russia went $39 billion over budget hosting the 2014 Sochi games. Vancouver ended up $1 billion in debt after hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics. Athens spent about $16 billion – roughly 5% of Greece’s GDP – on the 2004 Summer Olympics. Some economists say the huge cost even contributed to Greece’s debt crisis.

Now Los Angeles wants a turn to lose money. On Tuesday, it was named as the U.S. bid to host the 2024 Summer Olympics.

Los Angeles thinks holding the Olympics would cost $4.1 billion in taxpayer money, plus another $1 billion it hopes to get from private partners. The city has already guaranteed it would cover any additional costs.

As Bloomberg Politics explains, there’s zero evidence that the Olympics provide any economic stimulus to the host city.

“They have a lot going for them, but there are risks involved,” said sports economist Andrew Zimbalist, who wrote a book about the costs of the Olympics and the World Cup. “Every city we’ve looked at since 1960 that’s hosted the Olympics has had a cost overrun. There’s not any evidence that this helps the city economically…”

Zimbalist estimates the city, with an annual budget of about $8 billion, should expect cost overruns of as much as $2 billion.

•  State and local governments make bad financial decisions all the time…

On Tuesday we explained how public pensions have promised to pay $4.7 trillion they don’t have. And there’s no way to close the gap. It would require every man, woman, and child in the United States to fork over $15,000.

Our analysis struck a nerve with some readers. So today we’ll dig further into the pension crisis by looking at Illinois…

•  Illinois’ pension system is the worst shape of any state…

Illinois only has 22 cents for every dollar it has promised to pay its public employees, according to think tank State Budget Solutions.

Reuters explains that Illinois got itself into this mess through “years of skipping and skimping on contributions and sweetening benefits for a mainly unionized workforce.”

The Wall Street Journal points out that Illinois’ financial position keeps getting worse.

[Illinois’] pensions are underfunded by $111 billion—a 500% increase from 1995 and up 75% in the past five years. About one in four state tax dollars already finances pensions, which is more than Illinois spends on education.

And failing to set aside enough money is only part of the problem. The Wall Street Journal continues:

Less than 40% of the increase in the state’s unfunded liability since 1995 is due to inadequate payments. The rest is due mainly to benefit growth and faulty actuarial assumptions such as investment rate of return.

“Faulty actuarial assumptions” means Illinois expects to earn an extremely high rate of return on its investments. As we explained yesterday, U.S. public pensions expect to earn 8% per year on average. That’s a wildly optimistic assumption, even in a “normal” investing climate.

And we’re not in a normal investing climate. The Fed’s zero interest rate policy has made it practically impossible to earn a safe, decent return. States have virtually zero chance at earning 8% per year today. The average public pension earned just 3.4% last year.

•  Illinois’ pension system is a slow motion train wreck…

And its government refuses to fix it.

In May, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned a landmark 2013 pension reform law. The law would have lowered payments to some pensioners. It was a small step toward fixing a broken system.

But the Illinois Supreme Court struck the law down because Illinois’ constitution says pension benefits promised to public workers cannot be “diminished or impaired.”

In other words, Illinois public pensions are “untouchable.”

•  To recap…

Illinois doesn’t have anywhere near enough money to keep the promises it has made to public employees.

And…

It is illegal for Illinois to not pay what it has promised to public employees.

We see two possible outcomes here…

One, Illinois will have a full-blown pension crisis. Its pension liability will grow and grow until it eats up all tax revenue and bankrupts the state government.

Two, taxpayers will be on the hook. This is the most likely outcome. As a taxpayer, you’re the backstop for these promises. Governments don’t produce any money. They can only extract money from their citizens as taxes.

•  This isn’t just an Illinois problem…

Barron’s explains how nearly every state pension in the country is “untouchable.”

Benefit protections are as common as underfunded pensions. Only two states—Texas and Indiana—haven’t provided employees with verbiage against changing the terms of government pensions. None of the states have enforced the corresponding obligation to make full advance funding of benefits as they are earned.

No matter what state you live in, don’t be surprised if your government eventually picks your pocket to pay state employees.

Here’s our advice: learn how to legally move some of your money out of your government’s reach. We published a new book that shows you simple strategies for doing this. And until we run out of copies, we’ll send you one for virtually nothing. We just ask that you pay $4.95 to cover our processing costs. Click here to claim your copy.

The article How to Stop a Pickpocket was originally published at caseyresearch.com.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Persnickety
Persnickety
September 23, 2015 1:34 pm

Obviously Chicago needs to host the next summer Olympics, with the money borrowed from the various Illinois government pension funds. That should fix everything.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
September 23, 2015 2:25 pm

Thanks but no thanks! Chicago dodged a bullet by inches when Rio was chosen for the 2016 games instead of Chicago.

I think that Daley and the Obamas making asses of themselves during the selection process helped, but the deciding factor was public opinion in Chicago, which turned against the games when it became clear that the promise they would not cost the taxpayers a dime, was a blatant lie, and that they would instead leave us billions in the hole. I was very active in the movement to prevent the games from coming to Chicago, because of the costs to the public, and the displacement and disruption they would cause.

Dutchman
Dutchman
September 23, 2015 2:27 pm

Dutchman’s Selected Chicago Olympic Events: Pistol, Rapid Fire Pistol, and Rifle Prone would be good starters.

Also the Pentathlon – this requires shooting as well 3,200 meter run. With a slight modification, we could have them run through the hood, with a 50″ flat screen.

Backtable
Backtable
September 23, 2015 2:45 pm

People, particularly property owners, should be aware of their county’s revenue sources. In 2008, when the market correction occurred, property values dropped significantly. This impacted adversely impacted counties heavily reliant on property taxes.

In all likelihood a similar outcome can be expected during the next correction, perhaps for an extended period of time. This would affect not only county services, but county retirees and tax payers as well.

B
B
September 23, 2015 3:03 pm

This is a disguised advertisement. Things must be getting hard up around TBP

Persnickety
Persnickety
September 23, 2015 4:00 pm

“Chicago dodged a bullet by inches when Rio was chosen for the 2016 games instead of Chicago.”

How quickly I forgot. But geez, Chicago vs. Rio? It’s like they wanted to make the games more exciting by giving all the attendees a 10% (or more) risk of violent death while attending. I guess the 2020 competition will be something like ISIS-controlled territory vs. North Korea vs. Somalia vs. Malmo Sweden? (Hey, did anyone notice that 3/4 of those offer a risk of violent death for the same reasons?)

Dutchman
Dutchman
September 23, 2015 4:50 pm

Go team, the ISIS bob sled team!

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
September 23, 2015 7:03 pm

Since the Olympics are such a money loser, why not hold them at a fixed site for each season? That way no new construction would be needed and the host city might even turn a profit. TV broadcast rights could more than pay for the costs.

AC
AC
September 23, 2015 7:14 pm

In an unrelated story, the spouses and major backers of the LA city council have all started up Olympic venue construction companies.

While the cities and countries lose big with the Olympics, the contractors building the Olympic sites win big – and, after all, that is the important thing, just ask them.

CA
CA
September 23, 2015 7:32 pm

Worst part of all is the only people that get to see anything live are all the politicians and their owners.
The little guy gets Jack shit but the bill.
Fucking doosh bags.

starfcker
starfcker
September 23, 2015 9:39 pm

Snick, you’re funny. AC, you nailed it.

David
David
September 24, 2015 10:00 am

Hey Dutchman, of course the ISIS team would use a guy named Robert as the sled.