THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Kasparov loses chess game to computer – 1996

Via History.com

On this day in 1996, after three hours, world chess champion Garry Kasparov loses the first game of a six-game match against Deep Blue, an IBM computer capable of evaluating 200 million moves per second. Man was ultimately victorious over machine, however, as Kasparov bested Deep Blue in the match with three wins and two ties and took home the $400,000 prize. An estimated 6 million people worldwide followed the action on the Internet.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Kasparov had previously defeated Deep Thought, the prototype for Deep Blue developed by IBM researchers in 1989, but he and other chess grandmasters had, on occasion, lost to computers in games that lasted an hour or less. The February 1996 contest was significant in that it represented the first time a human and a computer had duked it out in a regulation, six-game match, in which each player had two hours to make 40 moves, two hours to finish the next 20 moves and then another 60 minutes to wrap up the game.

Kasparov, who was born in 1963 in Baku, Azerbaijan, became the Soviet Union’s junior chess champion at age 13 and in 1985, at age 22, the youngest world champ ever when he beat legendary Soviet player Anatoly Karpov. Considered by many to be the greatest chess player in the history of the game, Kasparov was known for his swashbuckling style of play and his ability to switch tactics mid-game.

In 1997, a rematch took place between Kasparov and an enhanced Deep Blue. Kasparov won the first game, the computer the second, with the next three games a draw. On May 11, 1997, Deep Blue came out on top with a surprising sixth game win–and the $700,000 match prize.

In 2003, Kasparov battled another computer program, “Deep Junior.” The match ended in a tie. Kasparov retired from professional chess in 2005.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
February 10, 2017 7:44 am

People look at it as losing to a computer, but it is actually losing to the programmer(s) behind the computers actions.

TPC
TPC
February 10, 2017 10:58 am

Ever since Nickel’s thread a day or so ago I’ve been thinking about dusting off the chess board and practicing it. My greatest weakness as a professional is the sort of 400 step thought processes that Chess reinforces. I make great snap decisions, and am pretty good at planning a year or so out, but haven’t had any reason to develop my long term skills until now.

Bob
Bob
February 10, 2017 1:56 pm

The overlooked point of the computer-human chess match was the number of advisors each side brought to bear. It was Deep Blue plus a horde of programmers plus a few advisory grandmasters versus the world champion, playing alone. So what? It is notable that there was no discussion or desire on the part of IBM to even the odds by allowing Kasparov to surround himself with advisors.

I advocate that any device that is purported to have any sort of ‘artificial intelligence’ be required by constitutional amendment to have an off switch accessible to and easily operated by a 10-year-old child.

Hagar
Hagar
  Bob
February 10, 2017 3:01 pm

Nothing is going to stop the continued development and deployment of AI. Scares the hell out of me and the future of mankind.