The First Thing We Need To Do Is Kill All The Generals

President Trump, with respect, start ruthlessly purging the U.S. general officer corps

 

President Trump:

Last time we discussed your refusal to abide by the Constitution’s hard-and-fast war-making provision, a decision that merits — as it did for most of your post-1945 predecessors — impeachment proceedings. Waging war in the manner you did in Syria is the work of an absolute monarch or a dictator, not that of a popularly elected president of this republic.

Today, we must discuss a topic that has been covered in this space on multiple occasions; namely, the need for you to immediately purge — via forced retirement — scores of your general officers. The American fetish for treating these officers as god-like wonders is baseless, and must be curtailed to the greatest possible extent. Among the most obvious reasons they merit forced retirement are:

–They and their predecessors have not won a war since 1945. In truth, they have won nothing in the most war-filled 72 years in American history.

–They have regularly betrayed the military men and women entrusted to their care by American parents by taking those troops to fight in wars that neither they nor their political masters intended to win. I do not know of a single case, since 1945, when a general officer resigned and told the citizenry that he did so because he refused to lead their soldier-children into a war no one meant to win, and in which the rules-of-engagement made those soldier-children targets rather than killers.

–They hold their positions for venal self-interest. To understand why no general has resigned and told the foregoing truth to the public, just survey the membership of America’s corporate boards of directors. Those boards are loaded with former generals who are making more mounds of money to add to their already luxurious pensions. The formula-for-success for U.S. general officers obviously is: keep silent, get use to losing, get your troops killed for nothing, and you will be generously rewarded when you retire.

–They are incompetent and, apparently, shoddily educated men and women. One example should suffice. They have been waging war, at various levels of intensity, against Islamists since Osama bin Laden’s declaration of war in 1996, and they have lost on every field of battle on which they have engaged the Islamists. Mr. President, did you know that our Islamist enemies are not professionally trained soldiers; that they are armed almost entirely with small arms, some of Korean War vintage; that they have no air cover or naval support; and that their funding, supply lines, and safe havens are always at risk? Did you know that this is the kind of paramilitary force that has consistently humiliated the United States and its military for two decades, one that has forced your canting generals to obliquely admit to being losers and fantasists with the words like “There is no military solution to this conflict” and “The Islamists have nothing to do with Islam”.

–They are thoroughgoing liars. Again, one example will suffice. Since at least 2003-2004, every Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and every U.S. general officer commanding in Afghanistan, has told the American people that: (1) the remnants of the Taleban, al-Qaeda, and other Islamist groups were being eliminated; (2) that our democracy- and nation-building efforts were bearing durable results; and (3) that the Afghan military was on the verge of being able to defend its country with minimal foreign assistance. Each statement was a transparent lie every time it was spoken, and the general officers who spoke them knew they were lies. Today, the truth is that al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Taleban are thriving in Afghanistan, while the Afghan government and its military are collapsing. No number of additional lies will save either. Are these dishonest men and women the ones you are going to trust to restore America’s greatness? They are much more likely to again cover the republic in infamy.

Now is the moment, Mr. President, to fall back on you instincts, commonsense, and, most important, the non-interventionist demands of the people who elected you. America has no life-and-death national interests in Syria or the rest of the Middle East. Very few citizens want to expend trillions of additional tax dollars and their kids’ lives on a war there that is not necessary; which would be fought for Israeli, Saudi, and U.S. corporate interests; and which your generals would surely lose. So, dump your in-house, Cheney-sounding, Neocon war-monger, General McMaster; immediately ban the self-admitted criminal General Petraeus– who lost wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and then deliberately compromised classified information — from the White House grounds; and then get on with a wide-ranging purge that can do nothing but improve the the quality, commonsense, and nationalism of the U.S. general-officer corps.

With this done, Mr. President, recall how much essential work you have pledged to do at home, and how sick your supporters are of unnecessary, interventionist, and always lost wars. Then, Sir, look around the nation and understand two irrefutable facts: (a) that America is located in North America, 5,000 miles from the Middle East’s idiot wars, wars which cannot come here save through the continued lax enforcement of border and immigration laws, and (b) that the republic’s security, unity, and prosperity would not be damaged if those distant peoples killed one another for however long it takes for their wars to burn out, or until there is not a single living soul from Morocco eastward to India.

America First, Mr. President, always, America First.

 

 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
rhs jr
rhs jr
April 11, 2017 9:22 pm

Comrade Stalin, better be sure you leave some like Zhukov, Vatutin and Konev etc.

Ed
Ed
April 11, 2017 9:28 pm

Hmmm…why do you think president Kushner will listen to you?

mangledman
mangledman
April 11, 2017 9:41 pm

Well said

Fergus, ex SGR
Fergus, ex SGR
April 11, 2017 9:55 pm

Wow, the voice of another armchair mastermind who never served brays, and brays, and brays.

starfcker
starfcker
  Fergus, ex SGR
April 11, 2017 10:29 pm

Good call, Fergus

Shinmen Takezo
Shinmen Takezo
  Fergus, ex SGR
April 11, 2017 11:20 pm

Wow! –the voice of another delusional, mindless flag-waver who thinks that anyone who don’s a US military uniform is actually “defending this country.”

Wake up and smell the coffee please.

AWB
AWB
  Shinmen Takezo
April 12, 2017 12:43 am

If you prefer Russian thugs, Chinese totalitarianism, or EU social democracy, you’re more than welcome to leave.

While I may not agree with US policies, foreign or domestic, beginning with Reagan through Obama, there’s worse alternatives, like if Hillary was POTUS.

I suggest you take your own advice.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
April 11, 2017 10:04 pm

I’m not disagreeing with the idea of purging the political and crony capitalist Generals. I thoroughly agree that the ROE, the mission goals, and the mission creep have been a terrible waste of blood and treasure. I am totally sick of intervention where we have no pressing national interest and even worse, NO will to do what is necessary to destroy the enemy. Worst of all, it breaks faith with the troops, their families, and the American people, that lives and money will not be squandered unnecessarily. That loss of loyalty, both up and down the chain of command, costs the country the “true faith and allegiance” that both enlisted and officers swear to uphold. (Think of Benghazi!)
Furthermore, the problem goes much deeper than a few hundred officers. The problem is with the past 55+ years of civilian control of the military. When the civilians in charge require the officer corps to quit concentrating on being soldiers… to quit being warriors… fire breathing, enemy killing, motherfuckers… then we have a problem. That problem will not be solved by simply retiring some Generals, it will require a change in the way the population views the military and the way we fight wars. It will require the average soccer mom to understand that the military AIN’T A FUCKING PC, GROUP HUG, SOCIAL EXPERIMENT, PICNIC.
Bad shit happens and innocent people die. Don’t like it? Don’t send us to war.
If you do, “Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war…”

“Our Country won’t go on forever, if we stay soft as we are now. There won’t be any AMERICA because some foreign soldier will invade us and take our women and breed a heartier race!”
Gen. Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller (USMC w/5 Navy Crosses)

“No friend ever served me and no enemy ever wronged me whom I have not repaid in full.”
Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Roman General)

“Of course I deprecate war, but if it is brought to my door the bringer will find me at home.”
President James Garfield

“War is an ugly thing. But it is not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling, which thinks that nothing is worth fighting for is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares about more than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”
John Stuart Mill 1862

AC
AC
April 11, 2017 11:09 pm

Funny thing about Afghanistan . . . .

TAPI Pipeline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenistan%E2%80%93Afghanistan%E2%80%93Pakistan%E2%80%93India_Pipeline

I can only conclude that modern wars cause natural gas pipelines.

Walt
Walt
April 12, 2017 2:30 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

Ah, Purge, my favorite four letter word..

Firstly, to say ‘They and their predecessors have not won a war since 1945.’ is completely disingenuous, they were simply on the winning side. (Which happened to be the wrong side, imho.). The (((communists))) won that war, both literally and figuratively.
The proof is in the pudding. (Or for you oldies, the proof of the pudding is in the eating):

[imgcomment image[/img]

Short of gaining a few temporary concessions, it could even be argued that the War of Independence was lost. How does (((globalism))) equate with independence, exactly? Is The (((Fed))) a mark of independence or of subjugation? Paying interest on your own money? Please…

Secondly, I say Dick The Butcher had it right when he suggested: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers” (Henry VI, Part2, Act IV, Scene 2).
If the lawyers go first, then the generals can’t sue.
Saying of the current crop, that ‘They are thoroughgoing liars.’ is an insightful observation, considering (((whose))) orders they follow, although not news:
‘Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.’ John 8:44

[imgcomment image[/img]

[imgcomment image[/img]

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
April 12, 2017 3:22 am

This article is bullshit. We totally won the war in Grenada.

Ed
Ed
  Iska Waran
April 12, 2017 11:51 am

I know it, Iska and we beat the piss out of those Davidians in Texas.

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 12, 2017 8:29 am

Islamism has nothing to do with Islam??? You are a fool or a liar. I think the latter.