In Spies Battle, Trump Holds the High Ground

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

In Spies Battle, Trump Holds the High Ground

In backing John Brennan’s right to keep his top-secret security clearance, despite his having charged the president with treason, the U.S. intel community has chosen to fight on indefensible terrain.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper seemed to recognize that Sunday when he conceded that ex-CIA Director Brennan had the subtlety of “a freight train” and his rhetoric had become “an issue in and of itself.”

After Donald Trump’s Helsinki summit with Vladimir Putin, Brennan had called the president’s actions “nothing short of treasonous.”

The battle is now engaged. Trump cannot back down. He must defy and defeat the old bulls of the intel community. And he can.

For a security clearance is not a right. It is not an entitlement.

It is a privilege, an honor and a necessity for those serving in the security agencies of the U.S. government — while they serve.

Brennan is not being deprived of his First Amendment rights. He can still make any accusation and call the president any name he wishes.

But to argue that a charge of treason against a president is not a justification for pulling a clearance is a claim both arrogant and absurd.

Again, a security clearance is not a constitutional right.

Said Defense Secretary James Mattis: “I have taken security clearances away from people in my previous time in uniform … a security clearance is something that is granted on an as-needed basis.”

Brennan is now threatening to sue the president. Bring it on, says national security adviser John Bolton.

With 4 million Americans holding top-secret clearances, and this city awash in leaks to the media from present and past intel and security officials, it is time to strip the swamp creatures of their special privileges.

The White House should press upon Congress a policy of automatic cancellation of security clearances, for intelligence and military officers, upon resignation, retirement or severance.

Clearances should be retained only for departing officers who can demonstrate that their “need to know” national secrets remains crucial to our security, not merely advantageous to their pursuit of lucrative jobs in the military-industrial complex.

Officials in the security realm who take clearances with them on leaving office are like House members who retain all the access, perks and privileges of Congress after they step down to earn seven-figure salaries lobbying their former congressional colleagues.

The White House statement of Sarah Huckabee Sanders on John Brennan’s loss of his clearances was spot on:

“Any access granted to our nation’s secrets should be in furtherance of national, not personal, interests.

“Mr. Brennan has recently leveraged his status as a former high-ranking official with access to highly sensitive information to make a series of unfounded and outrageous allegations — wild outbursts on the Internet and television — about this administration. Mr. Brennan’s lying and recent conduct, characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary, is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation’s most closely held secrets, and facilitates the very aim of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos.”

Trump is said to be evaluating pulling the security clearances of Clapper, ex-FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director Michael Hayden, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

This is a good start. Some of these individuals have been fired. Some are under investigation. Some were involved in the FBI’s “get-Trump” cabal to prevent his election and then to abort his presidency.

Some have become talking heads on cable TV, exploiting the credibility of their former titles and offices to undermine an elected president.

Again, they have a First Amendment right to do this. But they should be stripped of their clearances to show the nation that the president is dealing with insiders who have joined the Resistance.

At bottom, the issue is: Who speaks for America?

Is it the mainstream media, the deep state, the permanent government, the city that gave Trump 4 percent of its votes? Or is it that vast slice of Middle America that sent Trump to drain the swamp?

Trump’s enemies, and they are legion, want to see Robert Mueller charge him with collusion with Russia and obstructing the investigation of that collusion. They want to see the Democratic Party take over the House in November, and the Senate, and move on to impeach and remove Trump from office. Then they want to put him where Paul Manafort sits today.

For Trump, a truce or a negotiated peace with these people is never going to happen. But this issue of security clearances is a battlefield where the president cannot lose, if he fights wisely.

Americans sense that these are privileges that should be extended to those who protect us, not perks for former officials to exploit and monetize while they attempt to bring down the commander in chief.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 21, 2018 8:54 am

Trump should yank the security clearances of all of the cads mentioned in this article, but for good measure, he should throw in Obama, too. That’d drive the fuckers crazier.

Blue
Blue
  Iska Waran
August 21, 2018 10:39 am

Don’t forget the Clinton’s too !!

SmallerGovNow
SmallerGovNow
August 21, 2018 9:21 am

I said it before here but bares repeating, I was stripped of my clearances when I retired and had to sign NDA’s. These people should be no different… Chip

TampaRed
TampaRed
  SmallerGovNow
August 21, 2018 10:25 am

but you’re a deplorable chip,our betters should not have to lower themselves to our level–
get off your crazy right wing internet sites that try to make the case that we’re all equal under the law–
btw,go eat some cake–

22winmag - Hug a Nazi, punch a Socialist!
22winmag - Hug a Nazi, punch a Socialist!
August 21, 2018 9:24 am

Slightly off topic, but what’s the over/under that the Manafort trial ends in a hung jury?

TampaRed
TampaRed

from what i’ve heard the feds win 95% of their cases but since the judge apparently is not happy w/the govt & the jury asked for info that was seen as good for the defense,let’s make an uneducated guess & say 60/40 for conviction–
i wouldn’t want to be manafort–

Al
Al

Jordon Peterson a man of the left???

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/08/voxiversity-20.html?m=1
————————————————
Day 8 of my fast and no longer smoking tho I am in mourning of it but to bad needed to quit…

Bought a weights training set so I am lifting weights to also help build muscle and burn off the fat.

My physical appearance has changed considerably already tho I hear your body does pack on some water after the fast is over due to the high salt in our diets,time will tell.

I have lost so far 17.8 lbs as of this morning.

Cheers

splurge
splurge
  Al
August 21, 2018 1:47 pm

Day 8 of my fast and no longer smoking tho I am in mourning of it but to bad needed to quit…
Excellent ,stick with it and continued good luck.

Al
Al
  splurge
August 21, 2018 3:13 pm

Thanks

Mark
Mark
  Al
August 21, 2018 9:24 pm

Al,

With the power of regular fasts and weights/cardio, you can focus and sculpt your physique over time. It not the intensity of either that matters it the consistency.

8 days is strong, outstanding!