Politicians’ Deceitful Promise

Guest Post by John Stossel

Politicians' Deceitful Promise

Will you be able to retire? Maybe not.

Will your state pay what its politicians promised? Almost certainly not.

Politicians in Connecticut, New Jersey and Illinois are especially irresponsible when it comes to not funding pension plans, but most every municipality has promised more than it will have.

“The money hasn’t been set aside for years and years,” says City Journal editor Daniel DiSalvo in my new internet video. “Nobody was paying attention.”

His colleague Steve Malanga complains that the media rarely report on the coming crisis.

“To a certain extent, I have sympathy with the media, because the media’s looking for what happens next,” says Malanga. “This is not something that’s going to happen next week.”

But the collapse is coming. Current retirees may find their pension check is cut by 10 percent or 50 percent.

“We just don’t have enough money, and the amount of money that we have to put into this is just mountainous,” says Malanga.

Neither party wants to make the tough choices involved. “Both Democrats and Republicans have incentives to short the pension fund,” says DiSalvo. “For Democrats, if we can not put as much in, we can free up more money for greater public spending on public programs that we think are good. If we’re Republicans, we probably want to cut taxes.”

“Ten years from now, they’re gonna have a problem,” says Malanga. “But 10 years from now somebody else is in office!”

Some pension plans are promises that should never have been made, but few politicians will say that. At most, they talk about making small changes to “keep our promises.”

Small changes won’t be enough.

Detroit and several California cities already ran out of money and declared bankruptcy.

“At some point, your debts are so great that you can’t afford to provide basic services to people,” says Malanga.

“Police force, fire protection — all will be on the chopping block,” added DiSalvo.

Instead of making cuts now to avoid crisis later, some politicians increase retirement benefits.

New Jersey passed 13 separate benefit enhancements between 1999 and 2003.

I assume politicians make these unsustainable promises because powerful municipal unions demand them.

“Public employee unions regularly lobby and seek to elect politicians who offer them better compensation packages. They’ve been intimately involved in the whole system from the beginning,” says DiSalvo.

But Steven Kreisberg of AFSCME, the biggest government workers’ union, tells me that unions didn’t create this problem.

“There’s plenty of money to pay our people.”

What about the $5 trillion in unfunded liabilities?

That’s “a figure that’s used by some anti-pension zealots,” replied Kreisberg. “It’s fake news.”

But it’s the number (actually, now $6 trillion) you get if you use accounting standards that the federal government demands from private pension plans.

Unions fight to keep every penny that politicians promised. But Detroit’s bankruptcy changed the rules on that.

“The federal bankruptcy judge created a precedent that said pensions could actually be cut,” says DiSalvo. “That was a shock to the unions. (It) called into question these strong legal protections that public pensions have so long enjoyed. They can’t just sit back and say, well, we’re going to get paid no matter what.”

Some politicians hoped that a rising stock market would fund their promises. Many assumed their investments would grow by more than 7 percent per year. Do you make that much on your savings? I don’t. Seven percent seems like wishful thinking.

Malanga says it was “more than wishful thinking. It borders on criminality, frankly. If after nine years of a bull market we haven’t begun to fix this, when are we gonna fix it?”

Malanga and DiSalvo argue that the only honest way to fix it is to reduce benefit levels and switch to individual retirement accounts like private sector 401(k)s.

That way, instead of a promise backed by nothing more than political hot air, there’s an actual account with money in it, and people can track how well their retirement investments do.

The politicians and union bosses, by contrast, would like to ignore the problem — until one day, no matter what promises they’ve made, they simply won’t be able to keep them.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
bluestem
bluestem
October 24, 2018 1:25 pm

Admin, I see a lot of writers using the term unfunded liabilities. My question is, Over what time span does the unfunded liability cover?? 10 yrs? 20 yrs? 30 yrs? I see all these trillions but no time reference to put it in perspective. Thanks, John

Llpoh
Llpoh
  bluestem
October 24, 2018 7:26 pm

The liability is a projection going forward based on actuarial standards. It efectively has no definite time line – it is an estimate of the promised cost in perpetuity versus the actual principle and projected income on the principle, and ongoing contributions. There is an enormous gap, and the shortfalls can be easily calculated by an actuary.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
  bluestem
October 24, 2018 10:18 pm

The minute you have two kids on a minimum wage, you have unfunded liabilities out the kazoo.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  bluestem
October 26, 2018 11:20 am

There is no time span necessary. An unfunded liability is a future claim on assets

Politicians suck diseased Donkey Balls
Politicians suck diseased Donkey Balls
October 24, 2018 1:26 pm

Greed or envy?

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 24, 2018 1:29 pm

This is another cause for optimism. With the Illonois Supreme Court ruling on their own behalf , that the tax payer will be soaked to pay for their retirement in Florida, the bankruptcy of Illonoise should lead to making Illonois a colony such as Peurto Rico or Washington DC.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Anonymous
October 24, 2018 7:30 pm

The Constitution of Illinois forbids the state going bankrupt. Illinois is on the hook no matter what, unless 1) the Constitution of Illinois is changed, or 2) the Illinois Constitution is deemed to be unConstitutional by the federal courts.

Sucks to be a taxpayer in Illinois.

John
John
  Llpoh
October 24, 2018 8:42 pm

No US state can, or ever has, gone bankrupt. They are sovereign just like Canada or Brazil. Some states have in the past (mine included 3 times) defaulted on their debts just like other sovereigns (i.e. Venezuela). There is no mechanism for a state to go bankrupt. The Federal government, being an agent of the sovereign states, has no authority to oversee a state bankruptcy.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Llpoh
October 26, 2018 11:22 am

A law was passed at the federal level that makes default by the US on the national deficit to the Federal Reserve illegal. Bend over America.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
October 24, 2018 1:32 pm

When some big states/cities/agencies start going bankrupt because they can’t pay their pension costs, that’s when the next Great Depression begins and it ain’t too far away.

unit472
unit472
October 24, 2018 4:47 pm

I receive a ( small) pension for the 10 years I spent working for a city government. Better for me and worse for the taxpayers was the medical insurance I received until I was eligible for medicare. It cost the city more than twice what my pension did.

To be honest I could do without my city pension because I saved and rode the long bull market but I am entitled to it and unless they means test everyone those who saved and didn’t squander their money shouldn’t be singled out to save those who failed to provide for their own retirement.

The left likes to insist tax rates be progressive so I think it only fair that pension cuts be progressive too. No one should get a $100,000 per year pension no matter what their final pay or years of service were. No pension should exceed the median wage in the US which is around $50,000. If you need more than that you better provide it yourself.

DownDaTubes
DownDaTubes
October 24, 2018 6:02 pm

No public pension should provide more than social security. Plus, the pension should not be available until the standard retirement age for social security. I’m tired of the public “servants” in Illinois getting to retire in their early to mid 50’s with a pension that comes with a 3% raise each year. I haven’t had anything over a 3% raise in over 10 years.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  DownDaTubes
October 24, 2018 7:32 pm

Down – you may be tiredd of it, but the Illinois Constitution guarantees that the pension agreements cannot be amended nor reversed. So solly.

Brian Reilly
Brian Reilly
October 24, 2018 7:09 pm

Mr. Malanga is optimistic. It will be less than 10 years when these underfunded chickens come home to roost, maybe a lot less. And here will be some sort of nationalization of municipal and state pensions, likely associated with a bail-in from whatever is left of the private pension and 401/IRA funds, followed soon thereafter by some kind of inflation that will significantly derogate the value of whatever amount is actually disbursed.

FYI, Detroit just put off it’s day of pension reckoning. There was no long term solution, because no politician was willing to face the ethnic/social music.

Llpoh
Llpoh
October 24, 2018 7:24 pm

I think it is unConstitutional (state constitution) in Illinois to cut pensions. It is going to be quite a fight when reality hits the law. The law says you cannot cut the pensions, no matter what. The courts will, and have, ordered the money be paid, no matter what. But there is no money. No there is a quandary.

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Llpoh
October 25, 2018 8:32 am

Llpoh,you cut to the chase like few of us can. How will they pay when there ain’t no money. It will be sad to watch mostly ignorant pensioners get screwed. It will just prove that there is no such thing as free money.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Llpoh
October 26, 2018 11:26 am

Bull pucky. When the rubber meets the road and it ends up in court the final verdict will be cut pensions. You foolishly still think the constitution has power. The only real power that exists is violence to force others to do what you want, those who have power know this, why do you think they use it. Unless you are willing to revolt, violently then nothing will ever change except the change they allow.

Boat Guy
Boat Guy
October 24, 2018 7:38 pm

Private sector workers have been screwed by the unsecured liability that was what their pensions were called in bankruptcy for the last 40 years .
The tax base that funded the government finance plans at all levels local state and federal have been wiped out and now many are looking at citizens who have been taxed heavier directly and indirectly injuring them more as their wages were stagnent . Now the courts run by government employees are issuing edicts that no matter what conditions the citizens are financially the shortages in pension promises must be made whole even if they are taxed out of their homes and escorted into the streets by armed government badge wearing minions .
Looks like a case of “US VERSES THEM” ! But the big “THEY” of government employees need to learn if you were lied to by government it is no different the being lied to by a company contract agreement . You cannot look to other injured parties to fix what you and your employer hid lied or overlooked .
I will say tar and feather for many government reps even those retired and living the good life should be held to account .
In general what I was told about my share of a steelworkers pension too bad water under the bridge . What comes around goes around !

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
October 24, 2018 10:17 pm

Nowadays the insurance companies entertain you so that you feel good about them. They don’t do much for you other than promise to cover you in case of a loss. That’s still better than the politicos who entertain you in exchange for your taxes. As with insurance companies, you hope you never have to use their services. You’re quite happy to see them lounging around the capital, dining in fancy restaurants and cutting big money deals with foreign princes. They will be back like clockwork to accuse one another of cutting bad deals where you the taxpayer got fucked. You are then asked to vote for somebody who will cut profitable deals for himself and the United States of Goldman and hopefully stay out of your pocket for as long as he is able. Like gold digging bitches, they all lie.

SumOfaBitch
SumOfaBitch
October 25, 2018 11:36 pm

Who?…In the real private sector world receives 80-90% of their base pay for retirement with medical?
So many people I know buddy buddy their way up 3 pay grades in the last 2 years of service.
If you want a real wake up , search- ” Transparent California ” and try not to get sick at the 2 LA Fire Chiefs who pull $1.6M a year each …. and literally , they will tax us until they are the last people standing.
Seeing how most Federal & State jobs are the equivalent of servicing fast food….Fuc em.