LEFTIES LOSE THEIR SHIT OVER ROBERT E. LEE BEING A GREAT GENERAL

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
31 Comments
MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
April 26, 2019 9:32 pm

Longstreet was a great general; Lee was adequate at best.

mygirlshiding
mygirlshiding
  MarshRabbit
April 26, 2019 9:37 pm

Lefties lose their shit as often as they take a breath.

Ginger
Ginger
  MarshRabbit
April 27, 2019 6:09 am

Longstreet is why Gettysburg was lost.

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  Ginger
April 27, 2019 9:15 am

Gettysburg was a victory

mark
mark
  Ginger
April 27, 2019 1:49 pm

LONGSTREET – SCAPEGOAT OR CULPRIT

Did Lee order Longstreet to attack at dawn on July 2 at Gettysburg? Did Longstreet drag his feet because he disapproved? Was Longstreet’s idea for a defensive battle in Pennsylvania based on good military judgment? Was he justified in arguing for it with Lee? Was a flanking movement to the right feasible? What is Longstreet’s proper rating among Confederate generals?

https://www.historynet.com/longstreet-scapegoat-or-culprit.htm

The Longstreet Defense rests it case.

TC
TC
April 26, 2019 10:03 pm

Amazing to see how quickly and completely Trump abandoned the white people who elected him. Sad.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
April 26, 2019 10:22 pm

Longstreet is credited with “We should have freed the slaves and then fired on Fort Sumter”. Friends, our True Cause was Independence from the Corrupt Northern dominated Congress that was destroying the South economically. Our cause was Just and our cause remains. My vote goes to Gen Nathan Bedford Forrest.

TS
TS
April 26, 2019 10:50 pm

There were many outstanding generals on both sides. As far as Confederate:
For infantry I would have to say A. P. Hill, with a nod to Longstreet.
For cavalry I would say Nathan Bedford Forrest and a nod-tie between J. E. B. Stuart and Mosby. Both were strong in different areas.

mark
mark
April 26, 2019 10:51 pm

Stonewall Jackson’s risky recon at dusk leading to his being wounded by friendly fire at Chancellorsville was the single greatest blow to the Confederate Army of the war. Strategically and tactically Jackson alone was the South’s greatest chance for victory and taking DC.

Following the amputation of his arm, he died eight days later. Lee deeply felt the loss. “He has lost his left arm, but I have lost my right arm”.

Actually, Lee lost the best part of his brain trust.

If Jeb Stuart would have stayed with Lee and not left him blind at Gettysburg and if Lee would have listened to Longstreet and not wasted so many brave lives in Picket’s charge in his ‘hey diddle diddle right up the Yankee waiting dug in cannon surround middle’…it would have been a different war.

If…If…If…

I hang a combined Bonnie Blue Flag / Stars and Bars Flag in my barn, along with every major Revolutionary War Flag.

It wasn’t the first Civil War it was the second Revolutionary War.

Maybe after we have at one another again and break up into regional powers the South will rise again.

If I’m still around…I will be with her.

TS
TS
  mark
April 26, 2019 11:19 pm

Mark –
It’s all a choice between very capable men. I agree that Jackson would be a very strong pick.

mark
mark
  TS
April 27, 2019 12:32 am

TS,

Yep. Can you imagine what would have happened with Jackson at Gettysburg???

TS
TS
  mark
April 27, 2019 2:06 am

Mark
He most likely would have made far more coordinated and supported attacks than the piecemeal crap that went on. As such he probably would’ve carried Little Roundtop early. They almost took it as it was. That would have put serious pressure on the Union and maybe even won the battle.

e.d. ott
e.d. ott
  TS
April 27, 2019 10:25 am

Little Round Top is an engagement of Gettysburg that is part of Army lore and showcases personalities that everyone should study. I agree with the opinion Roundtop should’ve been taken early – but it wasn’t. It was the hinge of the Union flank and a critical defeat that made Joshua Chamberlain one of my big heroes.
You can talk about Jackson and Longstreet, and deservedly so, but it takes a special commitment to order tired, spent men with no ammo into a last-ditch bayonet charge into Rebels who keep coming. It’s do or die.
Some people believe in “luck”. If it’s a combination of timing, initiative, and opportunity then I agree. In war that can be everything.

TS
TS
  e.d. ott
April 27, 2019 10:36 am

Oh, I definitely agree. That was a day – a week – of heroes on both sides. It’s easy to look back and parse, but the real test is when the dust and blood are thick in your nostrils.

e.d ott
e.d ott
  TS
April 27, 2019 11:47 am

God bless them all, Rebels and Yankee alike. I consider them Americans – unlike the liberal Prog rabble and their socialist friends.
Ideology and values matter.

mark
mark
  e.d. ott
April 27, 2019 12:25 pm

I found simple truth in this quote.

“Most firefights go by so fast that acts of bravery or cowardice are more or less spontaneous. Soldiers might live the rest of their lives regretting a decision that they don’t even remember making; they might receive a medal for doing something that was over before they even knew they were doing it.”

― Sebastian Junger, War

mark
mark
  e.d. ott
April 27, 2019 12:41 pm

That was recreated amazingly well in Gods & Generals:

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  mark
April 27, 2019 7:11 pm

or Grant, he would have pursued Lee’s withdraw with everything he had. I expect somewhere between the Pennsylvania line and the Potomac, the Army of Northern Virginia would have been in a full on rout, possibly ending war sooner.

mark
mark
  MarshRabbit
April 27, 2019 10:40 pm

Yep, Grant was a bull dog…but if he had ever faced Jackson on an equal fighting footing with say 25,000 to 50,000 men (I think about as much as they were both leading at the time of Jackson’s death) a brilliant tactical genius like Jackson would have ‘probably’ sliced and diced Grant the slugger up…as he did every single Yankee General he ever faced.

Grant was George Foreman…Jackson was Mohammad Ali. If the Thriller in Gettysburg would have ever been held between the two it would have gone to the STONEWALL.

(However Rocky Marciano would have taken them both out…just saying).

Both were relentless fighters who saw the object of maneuver as closing aggressively on their enemy and destroying him. Both understood the value of time, force, speed (especially Jackson with speed) logistics, and intelligence…but Grant’s advantage was always with massively more men and massively more of everything else. Jackson was almost always the underdog who out maneuvered and outfought everyone he had ever faced, including multiple opponents at the same time.

If Lee’s and Jackson’s roles would have been reversed and Lee would have died before Gettysburg instead of Jackson…the South would ‘probably’ have been spared all these years of Yankee/DC tyranny.

If…
If…
If…

My case:
THE MILITARY GENIUS OF STONEWALL JACKSON
A talk by Bevin Alexander given at the Chambersburg Civil War
Seminars and Tours, Plaza Hotel, Hagerstown, Md., on July 24, 2009

“At the risk of a bit of repetition, let me conclude my remarks by summarizing the immense intellectual concepts that Stonewall Jackson possessed, for they were the only means available to the South to win. In other words, there was precisely one brain in the Confederacy that had figured out a successful strategy and successful tactics, and this brain occupied a subordinate place in the hierarchy of power.”

https://www.bevinalexander.com/commentary/military-genius-stonewall-jackson.htm

mark
mark
  mark
April 27, 2019 11:49 pm

For those interested a worthy read:

SUCH TROOPS AS THESE

The genius and leadership of Stonewall Jackson

https://www.bevinalexander.com/books/general-stonewall-jackson.htm

By Bevin Alexander
Acclaimed military historian Bevin Alexander offers a fresh and cogent analysis of Stonewall Jackson’s military genius and reveals how the Civil War might have ended differently if Jackson’s strategies had been adopted.

The Civil War of 1861–65 pitted the industrial North against the agricultural South, and remains the most catastrophic conflict in terms of loss of life in American history. With triple the population and eleven times the industry, the Union had a decided advantage over the Confederacy in terms of direct conflict and conventional warfare. One general had the vision of an alternative approach that could win the War for the South—his name was Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson.

It was Jackson’s strategy to always strike at the Union’s vulnerabilities, not to challenge its power directly. He won a campaign against the North with a force only a quarter of the size of the Union army, and he was the first commander to recognize the overwhelming defensive power of the new rifles and cannons. With most of its military forces on the offensive in the South, the North was left virtually undefended on its own turf. Jackson believed invading the eastern states along the great industrial corridor from Baltimore to Maine could divide and cripple the Union, forcing surrender. But he failed to convince Confederate president Jefferson Davis or General Robert E. Lee of the viability of his plan.

In Such Troops as These, Bevin Alexander presents a compelling case for Stonewall Jackson as a supreme military strategist and the greatest general in American history. Fiercely dedicated to the cause of Southern independence, Jackson would not live to see the end of the War. But his military legacy lives on and finds fitting tribute in this book.

If…
If…
If…

MarshRabbit
MarshRabbit
  mark
April 28, 2019 11:27 am

Lee vs Grant = boxer vs brawler

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  mark
April 26, 2019 11:44 pm

The South has already risen again- and now they have most of the gun factories that the Northerners ran out of the North over their fool gun control laws.

mark
mark
  Coalclinker
April 27, 2019 12:29 am

Coalclinker,

That’s a good point about the gun factories. When Remington left NY and located to the south I did not own a Remington at the time.

I sent them an e-mail to encourage them for relocating and told them I was buying one of their guns because of it and then bought a Remington 20 gauge for my wife in support.

e.d ott
e.d ott
  Coalclinker
April 27, 2019 11:42 am

Urbanization creates a special kind of stupid. Here’s hoping they figure it out too late or not at all.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
April 26, 2019 11:02 pm

I read somewhere that the ONLY person ever to graduate from West Point with NO demerits, was Robert E. Lee. One way or the other, he was fighting for the most noble of causes – freedom from the tyranny of DC and the American Empire.

Pequiste
Pequiste
April 27, 2019 12:04 am

I bet they, those Lefties and their minions, would lose their shit aplenty should they hear the wunnerful folks from good ole Lawrence Welk doing this little ensemble number:

BB
BB
  Pequiste
April 27, 2019 4:30 am

It’s ashame we are still basically enslaved to the same banking criminals. Got to be a way to break free from these bastards once and for all.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  BB
April 27, 2019 12:56 pm

“The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” – Lord Acton

mark
mark
  MrLiberty
April 27, 2019 1:17 pm

100,000,000,000 +

yahsure
yahsure
April 27, 2019 12:47 pm

Snowflakes crying about the reality of history.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  yahsure
April 27, 2019 5:17 pm

Remember; the people bringing down statues of gallant military leaders are the same ones who want to censor your speech, murder born babies, control your internet capabilities, institute compulsory LBGTQPIBN training for children, ensure any remaining Ten Commandments are torn from courthouses, and make you have an Yzlamik compliant day, among a host of other “progressive” ideology and practices, all in the name of “dieversity” of course.

They are not “snowflakes” and should not be called such names. These are totalitarians of the worst sort and need to be called what they are: evil fucking Trotskyites.

And They want a new Red Terror.