Trump Administration Provides New Evidence For A Saudi Connection To 9/11

Authored by Philip Giraldi via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

The debate over what actually occurred on 9/11 and, more to the point, who might have been behind it, continues to preoccupy many observers worldwide.

There is considerable legitimate concern that the commission that reviewed the incident engaged in a cover-up designed either to excuse a catastrophic failure on the part of the United States’ national security apparatus, or even connivance of federal agencies in the attack itself.

And then there is the issue of possible foreign government involvement. The roles of the Saudi Arabian, Israeli and Pakistani governments and security services has never been adequately investigated in spite of the fact that all three countries had clear involvement with the mostly Saudi individuals who have been identified as the attackers. Beyond that, Israel had intelligence operatives that appeared to be celebrating the fall of the twin towers in real time, an involvement in what took place that has never been comprehensively looked at by law enforcement due to unwillingness to offend the Israelis.

It was Saudi Arabia which had the most sustained and personal contact with some of the alleged hijackers. For years, families of victims have been seeking to find out more about the possible Saudi role, admittedly so they can sue the Kingdom in US courts under existing anti-terrorism legislation that dates from 2016 and is referred to as the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. The Act permits lawsuits in the US directed against any country whose government supports international terrorism.

The plaintiffs have won something of a victory recently with the Trump administration decision to declassify a key name of a Saudi official who has been long sought by the relatives of the victims. Under the terms of the information release, the government as well as the victims’ lawyers, who received the name under a “protective order,” have not been allowed to expose the name publicly.

The declassified name, which came from an FBI investigative file, is, however, only a partial victory for the group that goes by the name 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism. The release of other documents relating to the Saudi role is pending, possibly due to the Trump White House’s insistence on maintaining good relations with the Kingdom and more particularly with its Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, but the plaintiffs wonder how it is possible that information on the attack should still be classified more than eighteen years after the fact.

The name of the official is nevertheless important, even a “top priority,” because it is believed that he was a senior intelligence officer who was meeting with two men who may have assisted the alleged hijackers. The FBI even refers to it as “the primary piece of information that the plaintiffs in the 9/11 litigation have been seeking.”

The Saudi Embassy in Washington has not commented on the report and the White House referred inquiries to the Justice Department, which did not comment beyond stating that it had been a top-level decision not to invoke the so-called “state secrets” privilege to keep the information classified.

Previous exposure of a possible Saudi role in 9/11 came with the release of the redacted “28 pages” of the 9/11 report on July 15, 2016. To be sure there were extensive deletions from the text to protect names and sources, but the document produced by the White House was at the time reported to be largely complete. CIA Director John Brennan provided some damage control prior to the release by arguing that much of the information contained in the redacted section consisted of “raw” and untested information, suggesting that it might not be completely reliable, while some who had seen the full document revealed through leaks that there would be no “smoking gun” exposing direct Saudi involvement in 9/11.

The release of the document produced a brief flurry in the media but, perhaps intentionally, the story disappeared amidst the avalanche of political convention reporting that summer. There was a great deal of new information, though most of it served to corroborate or expand on what was already known and reported. One snippet that was particularly interesting recounted how in 1999 two Saudi men on a flight from Phoenix to Washington DC for an alleged visit to the Saudi Embassy to attend a party asked numerous questions about the plane’s security and tried several times to enter the cockpit. They claimed their tickets were paid for by the Saudi Embassy.

There is a direct link between some of the 9/11 hijackers and presumed agents of the Saudi government but the 28 pages do not provide any conclusive evidence demonstrating collusion. In fact, the snippets rather suggest that the Saudis were more likely keeping tabs on some citizens whom they quite rightly might have suspected as threatening to their own national security. There are several hints in the text that the Saudis were quite aggressively running their own operations against their diaspora citizens. It was noted several times that they failed to fully cooperate with US counter-terror investigators prior to 9/11, which would not be surprising if they were simultaneous acting independently.

The key player in the story who directly assisted some hijackers, one Omar al-Bayoumi, has been described as a “non-official cover” intelligence officer, but the way his funding from the Embassy and other official sources fluctuated to pay him sometimes irregularly rather suggests that he might have been a source or informer, not an actual government case officer. Several other Saudis identified in the 28 pages also fit the same profile. Bayoumi was in regular contact with Fahad al-Thumairy, an employee of the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles, who may have been an actual intelligence officer and his controller.

There was also considerable evidence that Saudi government-funded charities, some linked to the Royal Family, did fund the alleged hijackers but the FBI did not find evidence that the government or senior Saudi officials were involved. The US government concluded that the document did not demonstrate any intent by the government in Riyadh to enable its citizens to carry out a terrorist attack on US soil nor knowledge that anything like that might be developing.

It should also be noted for what it’s worth that the Bush Administration clearly regarded Saudi Arabia as a special friend and directed the FBI and CIA to “back off” from aggressively investigating its intelligence operations in the US and globally. Whether that made any difference in terms of what subsequently transpired cannot be determined, just as the surfacing of a new name for the families of victims may not prove to materially affect the viability of a lawsuit directed against Saudi Arabia.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
52 Comments
yahsure
yahsure
October 4, 2019 11:39 am

The powers that be want the oil to keep flowing. If it wasn’t for the oil the Saudis would have no support and be taken out by a revolution. We prop them up.

BL
BL
  yahsure
October 4, 2019 11:57 am

Dude, we only get 15% of our oil from the Saudis, it is not the oil. Back in the 70’s we talked them into becoming wildly wealthy from selling their oil on the provision that they in turn agree to buy bagillions of dollars in US Treasuries and we agreed not to put our oil on the world market to compete with them. That is how it has gone down, they agreed to buy our debt and that is why we really needed them.

Ken31
Ken31
  BL
October 4, 2019 1:09 pm

The only reason we import Saudi oil is to re-export it as refined products.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  BL
October 4, 2019 1:32 pm

Hence the birth of the petrodollar.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 2:31 pm

You mean the “ death of the petrodollar” don’t you

22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
October 4, 2019 11:49 am

Misdirection.

The WTC 7 implosion has gone public.

Fuck Drumpf.

Unless this is fake, this was posted here on TBP on Tuesday:

CNBC Anchor Admits Building 7 Brought Down in ‘Controlled Implosion’
As Americans fought over who hated or who liked Thunberg more, a bombshell revelation on 9/11 was made.

On the 18th anniversary of 9/11 earlier this month, CNBC senior analyst and former anchor Ron Insana went on Bernie and Sid In the Morning on New York’s 77 WABC Radio to share his experience of being at Ground Zero on that horrifying day in American history.

As A&E for 9/11 Truth reports, approximately eight minutes into the interview, Insana made a statement regarding the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — which collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11 — that is truly stunning, especially considering his access to the scene and his job as a prominent news anchor.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
October 4, 2019 11:58 am

Ahh, just “ Pull it” as Lucky Larry proclaimed before filing for double indemnity on his insurance policy

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 4, 2019 11:51 am

The thermite was planted by Jews from Israel

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Anonymous
October 4, 2019 11:57 am

Nobody knows for sure who planted what but it certainly wasn’t the Saudis They would have trouble planting a turnip frankly

22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 12:26 pm

Wasn’t it Jeb Bush and his demolitions firm?

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 3:24 pm

Two downvotes defending the Saudis You two tell me that you actually believe those characters could have gained access to the twin towers and planted that thermite Please try to tell me that fools

Miles Long
Miles Long
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 4:24 pm

You get a downvote for whining about downvotes. 8-D

overthecliff
overthecliff
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 5:34 pm

They don’t seem to be proficient in defeating desert tribesmen with the finest military hardware. ….and they don’t have stupid rules of engagement either.

BL
BL
  Anonymous
October 4, 2019 12:01 pm

Anon- Israeli art students on platforms at the corners of the towers well over a hundred stories in the air with boxes of electrical doo-dad switches on the platform. Begs the question, where was the art?? NYT did a story on it if you want to look it up. If you’ll by that story, you’ll buy anything in this shitshow.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  BL
October 4, 2019 1:59 pm

The “fine art of demolition” Evidently

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 4, 2019 11:59 am

Trump knows what country caused the towers to implode and why they wanted the US to bomb Iraq. Shameful!

mark
mark
October 4, 2019 12:03 pm

US Military False Flag Attack Against Its Own Citizenry Demands A War Crimes Tribunal

9/11 FACT: The Pentagon Was Hit By A Cruise Missile From The US Military Arsenal

New WTC7 Controlled-Demolition Analysis Scientifically Proves 9/11 Terror Attacks Were a US Govt-sponsored, False Flag Operation and Inside Job

New WTC7 Controlled-Demolition Analysis Scientifically Proves 9/11 Terror Attacks Were a US Govt-sponsored, False Flag Operation and Inside Job

9/11 Truth Exploding Worldwide, Perps Desperate to Distract Populace and Disarm Patriots

9/11 Truth Exploding Worldwide, Perps Desperate to Distract Populace and Disarm Patriots

FAKE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT: The Most Absurd Conspiracy Theory of All Time

FAKE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT: The Most Absurd Conspiracy Theory of All Time

I have sent this, and other links to 40 family and friends…shock – many had never, ever, heard any of this in this detail, nodding heads, squirming apathy, crickets, fear, disbelief.

They all know I don’t care what anyone thinks about me – and now they all know what I think about 911.

Maybe one day constant, fearless mass communication will help the 99% reach the tipping point?

M G
M G
  mark
October 4, 2019 1:41 pm

I dunno…it may take more.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  mark
October 4, 2019 2:01 pm

We can hope I suppose butlots of ignorant sheep grazing out in them there fields

CCRider
CCRider
October 4, 2019 12:49 pm

The collapse of building 7, like the Zapruder film is prima facie evidence of a government cover up, at the very least. That’s all the proof one should need. If THEY can get you to not believe your own eyes, you are owned.

Lebowski
Lebowski
  CCRider
October 4, 2019 2:03 pm

And BBC reported bldg 7 had collapsed while it was still very much
Intact Wonder how that happened Oops

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 1:30 pm

Trump said we should have stolen Iraq’s oil after they were falsely accused for 9/11/.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/01/21/trump-iraq-should-have-kept-oil/SwZlr5SwQeG5AkYf4NZelK/story.html

So now with this new revelation, Trump should go to war against Saudi Arabia and steal their oil, right?

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 2:05 pm

Haven’t stolen their oil NICE butwe destroyed their country and killed 600 thousand or so and maimed 100k More motto mention the gruesome effects of the depleted uranium munitions but nobody knows about that right so who cares( sarc)

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 1:37 pm

If Trump want’s to get re-elected he should follow through on his promise to expose the 9/11 coverup. I hope this is the beginning of that promise.

Remember when Trump was campaigning, he said “If I am elected you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center.”? That was what he was and is supposed to do, not show us JFK files. He campaigned to expose the REAL perpetrators of 9/11 and we get JFK instead. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/17/trump_you_will_find_out_who_really_knocked_down_the_world_trade_center_secret_papers_may_blame_saudis.html

Perhaps above all else, we will be expected to brush under the carpet the fact that, twice in a single day, Trump accused Saudi Arabia of being behind the 9/11 attacks. “Who blew up the World Trade Center?” Trump asked his pals at Fox and Friends on the morning of February 17, 2016. “It wasn’t the Iraqis, it was Saudi — take a look at Saudi Arabia, open the documents.”(Then why did you say to steal Iraq’s oil?)
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/02/donald-trump-suggests-the-saudis-did-911.html

At a campaign event in South Carolina later that day, he again cited “secret papers” that could prove it was “the Saudis” who were in fact responsible for the attacks on 9/11. “It wasn’t the Iraqis that knocked down the World Trade Center … because they have papers in there that are very secret, you may find it’s the Saudis, OK?”
http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-says-very-secret-papers-may-show-the-saudis-knocked-down-world-trade-center/

Donald Trump Said Saudi Arabia Was Behind 9/11. Now He’s Going There on His First Foreign Trip.

“If I am elected, I’ll show you who was really behind the 9/11 attacks” ~ Donald Trump, 2-17-16

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 2:06 pm

He’s a reality show president and a huge disappointment

TC
TC
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 3:33 pm

Trump’s “threats” to go public on 9/11 and JFK are/were just bargaining chips, much like letting Hillary and Obama skate for their crimes. What do you think the master negotiator gets in return?

22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
22winmag - Not someone's sockpuppet
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 7:20 pm

Netanyahu is boss. Where he goes, Trump goes.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 1:57 pm

The roles of the Saudi Arabian, Israeli and Pakistani governments and security services has never been adequately investigated in spite of the fact that all three countries had clear involvement with the mostly Saudi individuals who have been identified as the attackers.

Follow the money:
While it was proven that Pakastani’s ISI (The equivalent of our CIA) wired $100,000 to ring leader Mahamad Atta, the 9/11 Commission Report said whoever or wherever the funding for the terrorist attack came from is of no significance or concern at all.

That’s like saying whoever hires a hit man in a murder for hire crime to go kill somebody doesn’t matter.

But listening to and recording all of Americans peoples phone calls and emails does matter. All from a government that doesn’t trust it’s own people, even though it’s own people didn’t commit this terrorist attack. They wrote the Patriot Act to establish that the American people are the terrorists. They have stepped up efforts to assign guilt as a terrorist to any American that has a dissenting view from that of the dictator government.

Foreigners committed 9/11 attack. The government left the border wide open for more foreigners to come in 19 years afterwards. If foreigners did 9/11 wouldn’t the first thing to do would be shut down the border? If foreigners did 9/11, wouldn’t you write the Patriot Act to apply specifically to foreigners, not American citizens who did not commit the crime?

If Trump knows the Saudis did 9/11, then why does he want to permanently restore the NSA program to spy on Americans?? Why not instead permanently spy more on SA? As far as spying and violating your privacy, this would be worse than the combined efforts of Bush and Obama to do the same .

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2019/08/17/trump-administration-applies-to-reauthorize-nsas-controversial-spying-program/#5b41efa749c4

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 2:34 pm

The planes were military planes that crashed into the towers and a cruise missile into the pentagon by the way so there was no Mohammad Atta

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 2:56 pm

I was giving the govs story and showing the contradictions therein. . You’re preaching to the choir

Lebowski
Lebowski
  Vote Harder
October 4, 2019 3:25 pm

Yup and I will keep preaching till people wake the hell up

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  Lebowski
October 4, 2019 3:28 pm

Did you see that new vid?

overthecliff
overthecliff
October 4, 2019 5:31 pm

Passports on the ground was enough evidence for me. God wanted us to know it was the Saudis. Only he could preserve the passports in the fire and guide the finder to their locations in all that rubble and confusion.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 4, 2019 11:40 pm

Give it a rest , we will never know the truth , the whole truth and nothing but the truth .
Saudis living in the US funded the lifestyles of some of the hijackers and the Hillary Clinton assistant hottie Uma married to the Hebrew national dickhead congressman and her family ties to the Saudi funding the hijackers but nothing to see here